1
|
Pignata S, Califano D, Lorusso D, Arenare L, Bartoletti M, De Giorgi U, Andreetta C, Pisano C, Scambia G, Lombardi D, Farolfi A, Cinieri S, Passarelli A, Salutari V, De Angelis C, Mignogna C, Priolo D, Capoluongo ED, Tamberi S, Scaglione GL, Arcangeli V, De Cecio R, Scognamiglio G, Greco F, Spina A, Turinetto M, Russo D, Carbone V, Casartelli C, Schettino C, Perrone F. MITO END-3: Efficacy of Avelumab immunotherapy according to molecular profiling in first-line endometrial cancer therapy. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00128-5. [PMID: 38704093 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival compared to first-line chemotherapy alone in advanced endometrial cancer, with a much larger effect size in microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H) cases. New biomarkers might help to select patients that may have benefit among those with a microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumor. METHODS In a pre-planned translational analysis of the MITO END-3 trial, we assessed the significance of genomic abnormalities in patients randomized to standard carboplatin/paclitaxel without or with avelumab. RESULTS Out of 125 randomized patients, 109 had samples eligible for next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, and 102 had MSI tested. According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), there were 29 cases MSI-H, 26 MSS TP53 wild-type (wt), 47 MSS TP53 mutated (mut), and one case with POLE mutation. Four mutated genes were present in more than 30% of cases: TP53, PIK3CA, ARID1A, and PTEN. Eleven patients (10%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation (five in MSI-H and six in MSS). High TMB (≥10 Muts/Mb) was observed in all MSI-H patients, in four out of 47 MSS/TP53 mut, and no case in the MSS/TP53 wt category. The effect of avelumab on progression-free survival significantly varied according to TCGA categories, being favorable in MSI-H and worst in MSS/TP53 mut (P interaction=0.003); a similar non-significant trend was seen in survival analysis. ARID1A and PTEN also showed a statistically significant interaction with treatment effect, which was better in the presence of the mutation (ARID1A P interaction=0.01; PTEN P interaction=0.002). CONCLUSION The MITO END-3 trial results suggest that TP53 mutation is associated with a poor effect of avelumab, while mutations of PTEN and ARID1A are related to a positive effect of the drug in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Pignata
- Uro-Gynecological Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy.
| | - D Califano
- Microenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - D Lorusso
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - L Arenare
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Bartoletti
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Cancer Prevention, Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano 33081 (PN), Italy
| | - U De Giorgi
- Dipartimento Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo studio dei Tumori (IRST Dino Amadori, Meldola (FC)
| | - C Andreetta
- Dipartimento di Oncologia - ASU FC S. Maria della Misericordia -Udine
| | - C Pisano
- Uro-Gynecological Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - D Lombardi
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Cancer Prevention, Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano 33081 (PN), Italy
| | - A Farolfi
- Clinical and Experimental Oncology Unit, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - S Cinieri
- U.O.C. Oncologia Medica - Ospedale Senatore Antonio Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
| | - A Passarelli
- Uro-Gynecological Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - V Salutari
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C De Angelis
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - C Mignogna
- Division of Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology. Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - D Priolo
- Oncology Unit, S Vincenzo Hospital, Taormina, Italy
| | - E D Capoluongo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera per L'Emergenza, Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy
| | - S Tamberi
- Oncology Unit, Santa Maria hospital, Ravenna AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - G L Scaglione
- Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - V Arcangeli
- UO Oncologia - Ospedale degli Infermi Rimini (RN), Italy
| | - R De Cecio
- Division of Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology. Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - G Scognamiglio
- Division of Anatomic Pathology and Cytopathology. Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - F Greco
- Medical Oncology Unit, AULSS 9 Regione Veneto, Scaligera - Ospedale Generale Mater Salutis, Legnago, Italy
| | - A Spina
- Microenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M Turinetto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, Italy
| | - D Russo
- Microenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - V Carbone
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C Casartelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - C Schettino
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - F Perrone
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taliento C, Scutiero G, Arcieri M, Pellecchia G, Tius V, Bogani G, Petrillo M, Pavone M, Bizzarri N, Driul L, Greco P, Scambia G, Restaino S, Vizzielli G. Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108252. [PMID: 38471373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis aims to compare the surgery-related results and oncological outcomes between SH and RH in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHOD We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane to collect studies that compared oncological and surgery-related outcomes between SH and RH groups in patients with stage IA2 and IB1 cervical cancer. A random-effect model calculated the weighted average difference of each primary outcome via Review Manager V.5.4. RESULT Seven studies comprising 6977 patients were included into our study. For oncological outcomes, we found no statistical difference in recurrence rate [OR = 0.88; 95% CI (0.50, 1.57); P = 0.68] and Overall Survival (OS) [OR = 1.23; 95% CI (0.69, 2.19), P = 0.48]. No difference was detected in the prevalence of positive LVSI and lymph nodes metastasis between the two groups. Concerning surgery-related outcomes, the comprehensive effects revealed that the bladder injury [OR = 0.28; 95% CI (0.08, 0.94), P = 0.04] and bladder disfunction [OR = 0.10; 95% CI (0.02, 0.53), P = 0.007] of the RH group were higher compared to the SH group. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggested there are no significant differences in terms of both recurrence rate and overall survival among patients with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer undergoing SH or RH, while the SH group has better surgery-related outcomes. These data confirm the need to narrow the indication for RH in early-stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Taliento
- Department of Medical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Ferrara, Italy; Department of Development and Regeneration - Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Scutiero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - M Arcieri
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - G Pellecchia
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - V Tius
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - G Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - M Petrillo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - M Pavone
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - N Bizzarri
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - L Driul
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - P Greco
- Department of Medical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Restaino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
| | - G Vizzielli
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loverro M, Bizzarri N, Capomacchia FM, Watrowski R, Querleu D, Gioè A, Naldini A, Santullo F, Foschi N, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Fanfani F. Indocyanine green fluorescence applied to gynecologic oncology: beyond sentinel lymph node. Int J Surg 2024:01279778-990000000-01185. [PMID: 38489558 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG), a well-known molecule employed in medicine for over five decades, has emerged as a versatile dye widely embraced across various surgical disciplines. In gynecologic oncology, its prevalent use revolves around the detection of sentinel lymph nodes. However, the true potential of ICG extends beyond this singular application, owing to its pragmatic utility, cost-effectiveness, and safety profile. Furthermore, ICG has been introduced in the theranostic landscape, marking a significant juncture in the evolution of its clinical utility. This narrative review aims to describe the expanding horizons of ICG fluorescence in gynecologic oncology, beyond the sentinel lymph node biopsy. The manifold applications reported within this manuscript include: 1) lymphography; 2) angiography; 3) nerve visualization; 4) ICG-driven resections; and 5) theranostic. The extensive exploration across these numerous applications, some of which are still in the pre-clinical phase, serves as a hypothesis generator, aiming to stimulate the development of clinical studies capable of expanding the use of this drug in our field, enhancing the care of gynecological cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Loverro
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - N Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rafał Watrowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obsterics, Helios Hospital Müllheim, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, 79379 Müllheim, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - D Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Gioè
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Naldini
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Santullo
- Operational Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - N Foschi
- Urology Division, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - F Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Concin N, Davidson B, Fotopoulou C, González-Martin A, Gourley C, Leary A, Lorusso D, Banerjee S, Chiva L, Cibula D, Colombo N, Croce S, Eriksson AG, Falandry C, Fischerova D, Harter P, Joly F, Lazaro C, Lok C, Mahner S, Marmé F, Marth C, McCluggage WG, McNeish IA, Morice P, Nicum S, Oaknin A, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Pignata S, Ramirez PT, Ray-Coquard I, Romero I, Scambia G, Sehouli J, Shapira-Frommer R, Sundar S, Tan DSP, Taskiran C, van Driel WJ, Vergote I, Planchamp F, Sessa C, Fagotti A. ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:248-266. [PMID: 38307807 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- CIBERONC, Madrid; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLLEIDA, University of Lleida, Lleida; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - B Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A González-Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumours-Cima, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Chiva
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - S Croce
- Department of Biopathology, Bergonié Institut, Bordeaux, France
| | - A G Eriksson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Falandry
- Institute of Aging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon; CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U1060/Université Lyon 1/INRAE U1397/Hospices Civils Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany
| | - F Joly
- GINECO Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François-Baclesse, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
| | - C Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL-CIBERONC), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Lok
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Mahner
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - F Marmé
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - W G McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - I A McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Nicum
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario - INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - I Romero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - J Sehouli
- North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin; Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - S Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University of Singapore (NUS) Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Taskiran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - W J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - C Sessa
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moro F, Giudice MT, Bolomini G, Moruzzi MC, Mascilini F, Quagliozzi L, Ciccarone F, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Valentin L, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (27): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of recurrent ovarian stromal cell tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 63:399-407. [PMID: 37774092 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of recurrent granulosa cell and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study performed at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS, Rome (Gemelli center), Italy. Patients with a histological diagnosis of recurrent granulosa cell tumor or Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor were identified from the database of the Department of Gynecological Oncology. Those who had undergone a preoperative ultrasound examination at the Gemelli center between 2012 and 2020 were included, and the data retrieved from the original ultrasound reports. In all of these reports, the recurrent tumors were described using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) terminology. If a patient had more than one episode of relapse, information from all episodes was collected. If there was more than one recurrent tumor at the same ultrasound examination, all tumors were included. One expert sonographer also reviewed all available ultrasound images to identify typical ultrasound patterns using pattern recognition. RESULTS We identified 30 patients with a histological diagnosis of recurrent granulosa cell tumor (25 patients, 55 tumors) or Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (five patients, seven tumors). All 30 had undergone at least one preoperative ultrasound examination at the Gemelli center and were included. These women had a total of 66 episodes of relapse, of which a preoperative ultrasound examination had been performed at the Gemelli center in 34, revealing 62 recurrent lesions: one in 22/34 (64.7%) episodes of relapse, two in 4/34 (11.8%) episodes and three or more in 8/34 (23.5%) episodes. Most recurrent granulosa cell tumors (38/55, 69.1%) and recurrent Sertoli-Leydig tumors (6/7, 85.7%) were classified as solid or multilocular-solid tumors, while 8/55 (14.5%) recurrent granulosa cell tumors and 1/7 (14.3%) recurrent Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors were unilocular cysts and 9/55 (16.4%) recurrent granulosa cell tumors were multilocular cysts. The nine unilocular cysts had contents that were anechoic (n = 2) or had low-level echogenicity (n = 7), had either smooth (n = 4) or irregular (n = 5) internal cyst walls, and ranged in largest diameter from 8 to 38 mm, with three being < 20 mm and five being 20-30 mm. On retrospective review of the images, two typical ultrasound patterns were described: small solid tumor measuring < 2 cm (15/62, 24.2%) and tumor with vascularized echogenic ground-glass-like content (12/62, 19.4%). CONCLUSIONS Some granulosa cell and Sertoli-Leydig cell recurrences manifest one of two typical ultrasound patterns, while some appear as unilocular cysts. These are usually classified as benign, but in patients being followed up for a granulosa cell tumor or Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, a unilocular cyst should be considered suspicious of recurrence. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M T Giudice
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Bolomini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M C Moruzzi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Mascilini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - L Quagliozzi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Ciccarone
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - A Fagotti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - L Valentin
- Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A C Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arcieri M, Restaino S, Rosati A, Granese R, Martinelli C, Caretto AA, Cianci S, Driul L, Gentileschi S, Scambia G, Vizzielli G, Ercoli A. Primary flap closure of perineal defects to avoid empty pelvis syndrome after pelvic exenteration in gynecologic malignancies: An old question to explore a new answer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:107278. [PMID: 38134482 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical oncological surgical procedure proposed in patients with recurrent or persistent gynecological cancers. The radical alteration of pelvic anatomy and of pelvic floor integrity can cause major postoperative complications. Fortunately, PE can be combined with reconstructive procedures to decrease complications and functional and support problems of pelvic floor, reducing morbility and mortality and increasing quality of life. Many options for reconstructive surgery have been described, especially a wide spectrum of surgical flaps. Different selection criteria have been proposed to select patients for primary perineal defect flap closure without achieving any strict indication of the best option. The aim of this review is to focus on technical aspects and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, providing an overview of those most frequently used for the treatment of pelvic floor defects after PE. Flaps based on the deep inferior epigastric artery, especially vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flaps, and gracilis flaps, based on the gracilis muscle, are the most common reconstructive techniques used for pelvic floor and vaginal reconstruction. In our opinion, reconstructive surgery may be considered in case of total PE or type II/III PE and in patients submitted to prior pelvic irradiation. VRAM could be used to close extended defects at the time of PE, while gracilis flaps can be used in case of VRAM complications. Fortunately, numerous choices for reconstructive surgery have been devised. As these techniques continue to evolve, it is advisable to adopt an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach within a tertiary medical center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Arcieri
- Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Science, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; Department of Maternal and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
| | - S Restaino
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - A Rosati
- Department of Woman, Child, and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - R Granese
- Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Science, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - C Martinelli
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Barresi", Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - A A Caretto
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Cianci
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Barresi", Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - L Driul
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - S Gentileschi
- Plastic Surgery, Lymphedema Center Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child, and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - G Vizzielli
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - A Ercoli
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Barresi", Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Pilla A, Nero C, Specchia ML, Ciccarone F, Boldrini L, Lenkowicz J, Alberghetti B, Fagotti A, Testa AC, Valentini V, Sala E, Scambia G. A cost-effectiveness analysis of an integrated clinical-radiogenomic screening program for the identification of BRCA 1/2 carriers (e-PROBE study). Sci Rep 2024; 14:928. [PMID: 38195911 PMCID: PMC10776619 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-51031-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Current approach to identify BRCA 1/2 carriers in the general population is ineffective as most of the carriers remain undiagnosed. Radiomics is an emerging tool for large scale quantitative analysis of features from standard diagnostic imaging and has been applied also to identify gene mutational status. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of integrating a radiogenomics model with clinical and family history data in identifying BRCA mutation carriers in the general population. This cost-effective analysis compares three different approaches to women selection for BRCA testing: established clinical criteria/family history (model 1); established clinical criteria/family history and the currently available radiogenomic model (49% sensitivity and 87% specificity) based on ultrasound images (model 2); same approach used in model 2 but simulating an improvement of the performances of the radiogenomic model (80% sensitivity and 95% specificity) (model 3). All models were trained with literature data. Direct costs were calculated according to the rates currently used in Italy. The analysis was performed simulating different scenarios on the generation of 18-year-old girls in Italy (274,000 people). The main outcome was to identify the most effective model comparing the number of years of BRCA-cancer healthy life expectancy (HLYs). An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was also derived to determine the cost in order to increase BRCA carriers-healthy life span by 1 year. Compared to model 1, model 2 increases the detection rate of BRCA carriers by 41.8%, reduces the rate of BRCA-related cancers by 23.7%, generating over a 62-year observation period a cost increase by 2.51 €/Year/Person. Moreover, model 3 further increases BRCA carriers detection (+ 68.3%) and decrease in BRCA-related cancers (- 38.4%) is observed compared to model 1. Model 3 increases costs by 0.7 €/Year/Person. After one generation, the estimated ICER in the general population amounts to about 3800€ and 653€ in model 2 and model 3 respectively. Model 2 has a massive effect after only one generation in detecting carriers in the general population with only a small cost increment. The clinical impact is limited mainly due to the current low acceptance rate of risk-reducing surgeries. Further multicentric studies are required before implementing the integrated clinical-radiogenomic model in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Di Pilla
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - C Nero
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per le Scienze della salute della donna, del Bambino e di sanità pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - M L Specchia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica - Sezione di Igiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - F Ciccarone
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per le Scienze della salute della donna, del Bambino e di sanità pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - L Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Radiomics Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park, Rome, Italy
| | - J Lenkowicz
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Radiomics Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park, Rome, Italy
| | - B Alberghetti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per le Scienze della salute della donna, del Bambino e di sanità pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per le Scienze della salute della donna, del Bambino e di sanità pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per le Scienze della salute della donna, del Bambino e di sanità pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - V Valentini
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Radiomics Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park, Rome, Italy
| | - E Sala
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radiologia, Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per le Scienze della salute della donna, del Bambino e di sanità pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moro F, Zermano S, Ianieri MM, De Cicco Nardone A, Carfagna P, Ciccarone F, Ercoli A, Querleu D, Scambia G, Testa AC. Dynamic transvaginal ultrasound examination for assessing anatomy of parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62:904-906. [PMID: 37470676 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Moro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - S Zermano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - M M Ianieri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - A De Cicco Nardone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - P Carfagna
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - F Ciccarone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - A Ercoli
- University of Messina, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood 'G. Barresi', Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Messina, Italy
| | - D Querleu
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Morciano A, Scambia G, Tinelli A, Marzo G. Laparoscopic Posterior Vaginal Plication plus Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Posterior Vaginal Prolapse: a Step-by-Step Video- Article. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:363-365. [PMID: 38128096 PMCID: PMC10832653 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.4.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In 2023, our Centre validated a surgical approach for patients with anterior/apical prolapse associated with severe posterior colpocele, using a laparoscopic posterior vaginal plication (LPP) combined with standard sacral colpopexy (LSC), demonstrating significant benefits in terms of anatomical repair. Objectives A step-by-step video demonstration of Laparoscopic Posterior Vaginal Plication (LPP) combined with "two-mesh" Sacral Colpopexy (LSC). Material and Methods Surgical technique of a LSC with 2 separate meshes is described. Results This video-article describes, with a step-by-step approach, a combined prosthetic and fascial laparoscopic technique to treat severe posterior colpocele. Conclusions LPP can be considered a feasible procedure during a standard LSC in patients with concomitant severe posterior prolapse.
Collapse
|
10
|
Monterossi G, Pedone Anchora L, Oliva R, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Costantini B, Naldini A, Giannarelli D, Scambia G. The new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS for total hysterectomy: a pilot study. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:331-337. [PMID: 38128091 PMCID: PMC10832655 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.4.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With the rising popularity of robotic surgery, Hugo™ RAS is one of the newest surgical robotic platforms. Investigating the reliability of this tool is the first step toward validating its use in clinical practice; and presently there arelimited data available regarding this. The literature is constantly enriched with initial experiences, however no study has demonstrated the safety of this platform yet. Objectives This study aimed to investigate its reliability during total hysterectomy. Materials and Methods A series of 20 consecutive patients scheduled for minimally invasive total hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign disease or prophylactic surgery were selected to undergo surgery with Hugo™ RAS. Data regarding any malfunction or breakdown of the robotic system as well as intra- and post-operative complications were prospectively recorded. Results Fifteen of the twenty patients (75.0%) underwent surgery for benign uterine diseases, and five (25.0%) underwent prophylactic surgery. Among the entire series, an instrument fault occurred in one case (5.0%). The problem was solved in 4.8 minutes and without complications for the patient. The median total operative time was 127 min (range, 98-255 min). The median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range:30-125 mL). No intraoperative complications were observed. One patient (5.0%) developed Clavien-Dindo grade 2 post-operative complication. Conclusions In this pilot study, Hugo™ RAS showed high reliability, similar to other robotic devices. What is new? Present findings suggest that Hugo™ RAS is a viable option for major surgical procedures and deserves further investigation in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pavone M, Goglia M, Campolo F, Scambia G, Ianieri MM. En-block butterfly excision of posterior compartment deep endometriosis: The first experience with the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:359-362. [PMID: 38128095 PMCID: PMC10832646 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.14.5.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery is the gold standard treatment for deep endometriosis when medical management fails. In selected cases, such as when bowel or urinary tract are involved, robotic assisted surgery can be useful due to its characteristics of high dexterity and manoeuvrability. This is the first case of robotic en-bloc excision of posterior compartment deep endometriosis performed with the new HugoTM RAS system. Objective The purpose of this video article is to show for the first time the feasibility of bowel surgery for deep endometriosis with this new robotic device. Materials and Methods A 24-years-old woman affected by severe dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia and dyspareunia underwent to deep endometriosis excision using the new robotic platform HugoTM RAS system at the Unit of Gynaecological Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Main outcome measures Intraoperative data, docking set up, post-operative outcomes up to three months follow up were evaluated. Results The surgical procedure was carried out without intra-operative or post-operative complications, operative time (OT) was 200 minutes, while docking time was 8 minutes. No system errors or faults in the robotic arms were registered. Post-operative complete disease-related symptoms relief was reported. Conclusion According to our results, the introduction of this new robotic platform in the surgical management of deep endometriosis seems to be feasible, especially in advanced cases. However, further studies are needed to demonstrate the benefits of this surgical system and the advantages of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopy in this subset of patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pujade-Lauraine E, Selle F, Scambia G, Asselain B, Marmé F, Lindemann K, Colombo N, Mądry R, Glasspool R, Vergote I, Korach J, Lheureux S, Dubot C, Oaknin A, Zamagni C, Heitz F, Gladieff L, Rubio-Pérez MJ, Scollo P, Blakeley C, Shaw B, Ray-Coquard I, Redondo A. Maintenance olaparib rechallenge in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer previously treated with a PARP inhibitor (OReO/ENGOT-ov38): a phase IIIb trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1152-1164. [PMID: 37797734 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is the standard of care for some patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor rechallenge. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (NCT03106987) enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received one prior PARP inhibitor therapy for ≥18 and ≥12 months in the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, respectively, following first-line chemotherapy or for ≥12 and ≥6 months, respectively, following a second or subsequent line of chemotherapy. Patients were in response following their last platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and were randomized 2 : 1 to maintenance olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily or placebo. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. RESULTS Seventy four patients in the BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 38 to placebo, and 72 patients in the non-BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 36 to placebo; >85% of patients in both cohorts had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy. In the BRCA-mutated cohort, the median PFS was 4.3 months with olaparib versus 2.8 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.87; P = 0.022]; 1-year PFS rates were 19% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). In the non-BRCA-mutated cohort, median PFS was 5.3 months for olaparib versus 2.8 months for placebo (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.71; P = 0.0023); 1-year PFS rates were 14% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). No new safety signals were identified with olaparib rechallenge. CONCLUSIONS In ovarian cancer patients previously treated with one prior PARP inhibitor and at least two lines of platinum-based chemotherapy, maintenance olaparib rechallenge provided a statistically significant, albeit modest, PFS improvement over placebo in both the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, with a proportion of patients in the maintenance olaparib rechallenge arm of both cohorts remaining progression free at 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Pujade-Lauraine
- Association de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY)-Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Paris; GINECO, Paris.
| | - F Selle
- GINECO, Paris; Department of Medical Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - G Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica, Rome; Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Milan, Italy
| | - B Asselain
- Association de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY)-Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Paris; GINECO, Paris
| | - F Marmé
- University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Studiengruppe, Essen, Germany
| | - K Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO), Oslo, Norway
| | - N Colombo
- University of Milan-Bicocca and IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan; Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group (MANGO), Italy
| | - R Mądry
- Uniwersytet Medyczny im.K.Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu, Poznań; Polish Gynecologic Oncology Group (PGOG), Poznan, Poland
| | - R Glasspool
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow; National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), London; Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG), Edinburgh, UK
| | - I Vergote
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven; Belgian and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Korach
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan; Israeli Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ISGO), Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - S Lheureux
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Toronto; Princess Margaret Consortium, Toronto, Canada
| | - C Dubot
- GINECO, Paris; Oncologie Médicale, Institut Curie Saint Cloud, Paris, France
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain
| | - C Zamagni
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Milan, Italy; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - F Heitz
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin; AGO Studiengruppe, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - L Gladieff
- GINECO, Paris; Institut Claudius Regaud IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - M J Rubio-Pérez
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain; Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
| | - P Scollo
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Milan, Italy; Kore University Enna, Enna; Dipartimento di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Ospedale Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy
| | | | - B Shaw
- AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- GINECO, Paris; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - A Redondo
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain; La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pozzati F, Sassu CM, Marini G, Mascilini F, Biscione A, Giannarelli D, Garganese G, Fragomeni SM, Scambia G, Testa AC, Moro F. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62:594-602. [PMID: 37204769 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of subjective assessment and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal tumors and between metastatic and primary adnexal tumors in patients with a personal history of breast cancer. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center study including patients with a history of breast cancer who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass between 2013 and 2020. All patients had been examined with transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound using a standardized examination technique and all ultrasound reports had been stored and were retrieved for the purposes of this study. The specific diagnosis suggested by the original ultrasound examiner in the retrieved report was analyzed. For each mass, the ADNEX model risks were calculated prospectively and the highest relative risk was used to categorize each into one of five categories (benign, borderline, primary Stage I, primary Stages II-IV or metastatic ovarian cancer) for analysis of the ADNEX model in predicting the specific tumor type. The performance of subjective assessment and the ADNEX model in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal tumors and between primary and metastatic adnexal tumors was evaluated, using final histology as the reference standard. RESULTS Included in the study were 202 women with a history of breast cancer who underwent surgery for an adnexal mass. At histology, 93/202 (46.0%) masses were benign, 76/202 (37.6%) were primary malignancies (four borderline and 72 invasive tumors) and 33/202 (16.3%) were metastases. The original ultrasound examiner classified correctly 79/93 (84.9%) benign adnexal masses, 72/76 (94.7%) primary adnexal malignancies and 30/33 (90.9%) metastatic tumors. Subjective ultrasound evaluation had a sensitivity of 93.6%, specificity of 84.9% and accuracy of 89.6%, while the ADNEX model had higher sensitivity (98.2%) but lower specificity (78.5%), with similar accuracy (89.1%), in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. Subjective evaluation had a sensitivity of 51.5%, specificity of 88.8% and accuracy of 82.7% in distinguishing metastatic and primary tumors (including benign, borderline and invasive tumors), and the ADNEX model had a sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 84.6% and similar accuracy (81.2%). CONCLUSIONS The performance of subjective assessment and the ADNEX model in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses in this series of patients with history of breast cancer was relatively similar. Both subjective assessment and the ADNEX model demonstrated good accuracy and specificity in discriminating between metastatic and primary tumors, but the sensitivity was low. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Pozzati
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C M Sassu
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Marini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - F Mascilini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Biscione
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Giannarelli
- Facility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, G-STEP Generator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Garganese
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - S M Fragomeni
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bizzarri N, Chiantera V, Loverro M, Ercoli A, Vizzielli G, Scambia G. Minimally invasive pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancies: the challenge of patients' selection. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:193-196. [PMID: 37742196 PMCID: PMC10643015 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.3.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic exenteration is a radical procedure representing a salvage option in patients with recurrent or persistent gynaecological malignancies. It can be performed with an open or minimally invasive approach. Different studies have demonstrated optimal peri-operative outcomes of minimally invasive pelvic exenteration with no survival difference when compared with an open approach. In this article, we discuss the importance and the challenge of patient selection for pelvic exenteration and more specifically for minimally invasive pelvic exenteration.
Collapse
|
15
|
Campagna G, Panico G, Vacca L, Caramazza D, Mastrovito S, Lombisani A, Ercoli A, Scambia G. Robotic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse using the new Hugo RAS system. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:499-500. [PMID: 36786846 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02768-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Campagna
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Panico
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - L Vacca
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Caramazza
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S Mastrovito
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Lombisani
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Ercoli
- Ginecologia Oncologica e Chirurgia Ginecologica Miniinvasiva, Università degli studi di Messina, Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pozzati F, Mirandola M, Topozouva G, Parodi L, Carla Testa A, Scambia G, Catena U. Complete uterine septum, double cervix, and longitudinal vaginal septum: an integrated approach for one-stop diagnosis and ultrasound-guided endoscopic treatment. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:167-170. [PMID: 37436055 PMCID: PMC10410656 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.2.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A complete uterine septum, double cervix and vaginal septum is a complex and rare congenital genital tract anomaly. The diagnosis is often challenging and based on the combination of different diagnostic techniques and multiple treatment steps. OBJECTIVE To propose a combined one-stop diagnosis and an ultrasound-guided endoscopic treatment of complete uterine septum, double cervix, and longitudinal vaginal septum anomaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage of an integrated approach management of a complete uterine septum, double cervix and vaginal longitudinal septum treated by expert operators combining minimally invasive hysteroscopy and ultrasound. The patient was 30 years old and was referred to our clinic because of dyspareunia, infertility and the suspicion of a genital malformation. RESULTS A one-stop complete evaluation of uterine cavity, external profile, cervix, and vagina was made through 2D, and 3D ultrasound combined with hysteroscopic assessment and a U2bC2V1 malformation (according to ESHRE/ESGE classification) was diagnosed. The procedure consisted in a totally endoscopic removal of the vaginal longitudinal septum and the complete uterine septum, starting the uterine septum incision from the isthmic level, and sparing the two cervices, under transabdominal ultrasound guidance. The ambulatory procedure was performed in the Digital Hysteroscopic Clinic (DHC) CLASS Hysteroscopy in Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS of Rome - Italy, under general anaesthesia (laryngeal mask). MAIN OUTCOMES Surgical time of procedure was 37 minutes; no complications occurred; patient was discharged three hours after the procedure; the hysteroscopic office control after 40 days showed a normal vagina and a normal uterine cavity with two normal cervices. CONCLUSION An integrated ultrasound and hysteroscopic approach allows an accurate one-stop diagnosis and a totally endoscopic treatment option for complex congenital malformations using an ambulatory model of care with optimal surgical results.
Collapse
|
17
|
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Ciccarone F, Muzii L, Scambia G, Vignali M. Use of oral GnRH antagonists combined therapy in the management of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:29-33. [PMID: 37010332 PMCID: PMC10392112 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.1.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterine fibroids have an impact on women’s lives due to their high prevalence, physical symptoms, their consequences on patients’ emotional and psychological well-being and loss of work productivity.
The choice of therapeutical approaches varies depending on several factors, and therefore should be applied individually. Currently, there is an unmet need for good, reliable, uterine-sparing options.
The oral GnRH antagonists (Elagolix, Relugolix, Linzagolix) represent a new alternative for the medical management of hormone-dependent gynaecological diseases such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. They rapidly bind to the GnRH receptor, block endogenous GnRH activity and directly suppress LH and FSH production, avoiding unwanted flare-up effects.
Some GnRH antagonists are marketed in combination with hormone replacement therapy add-back to counteract hypo-oestrogenic side effects. According to the registration trials, once-daily GhRH antagonist combination therapy results in a significant reduction in menstrual bleeding, as compared with placebo, and preserves bone mineral density, for up to 104 weeks. Further studies in the long term are needed to evaluate the whole impact of medical treatment of uterine fibroids on the management of this common women’s disease.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ghirardi V, Fagotti A, Scambia G. Laparoscopic selection for surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer. A short review. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:25-28. [PMID: 37010331 PMCID: PMC10392116 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.1.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of laparoscopy as a treatment selection method in ovarian cancer patients is receiving growing attention in surgical practice in both early and advanced-stage disease. When the disease is confined to the ovary, intraoperative laparoscopic assessment of the tumour features is needed to select the best surgical approach in order to prevent intraoperative spillage of cancer cells which would negatively impact patient prognosis. The role of laparoscopy as a disease distribution assessment tool in cases of advanced-stage disease is now accepted by current guidelines as an effective treatment strategy selection. Indeed, a published and validated laparoscopic scoring system, based on laparoscopic assessed intra-abdominal disease dissemination features have been demonstrated to be a reliable predictor of optimal cytoreduction achievement. This subsequently reduces the exploratory laparotomy rate in both primary and interval debulking surgery setting.
Furthermore, in cases of recurrent disease, the use of laparoscopy to predict whether complete tumour resection can be achieved is accepted by available guidelines. In this setting, the combination of laparoscopy and imaging techniques to manage platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer cases showed a high accuracy in appropriately selected patients for secondary cytoreductive surgery.
In this article we describe the role of laparoscopy in the treatment selection-process in ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Romiti A, Moro F, Ricci L, Codeca C, Pozzati F, Viggiano M, Vicario R, Fabietti I, Scambia G, Bagolan P, Testa AC, Caforio L. Using IOTA terminology to evaluate fetal ovarian cysts: analysis of 51 cysts over 10-year period. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61:408-414. [PMID: 36123819 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe ultrasound features of fetal ovarian cysts as reported by the original ultrasound examiner, to apply International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) terminology after retrospective analysis of the images and to describe patient management and evolution of fetal cysts during pregnancy and after delivery. METHODS This retrospective observational study included pregnant women diagnosed on ultrasound examination with a fetal ovarian cyst at the Prenatal Diagnosis Division of the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, in Rome, between March 2011 and May 2020. Cysts were classified by the original ultrasound examiner as 'simple' (unilocular anechoic cyst) or 'complex' (cyst with other morphology). In addition, three ultrasound examiners, experienced in gynecologic ultrasound, classified retrospectively the fetal ovarian cysts according to IOTA terminology, by reviewing stored ultrasound images. The evolution of these fetal ovarian cysts during pregnancy and after birth was recorded. RESULTS Included were 51 ovarian cysts in 48 fetuses. Of the 51 cysts, 29 (56.9%) had been classified by the original ultrasound examiner as 'simple', and 22 (43.1%) as 'complex'. Of the simple cysts, the majority (20/29 (69.0%)) resolved spontaneously after delivery, 2/29 (6.9%) resolved following intrauterine aspiration, 2/29 (6.9%) resolved after postnatal aspiration and 5/29 (17.2%) underwent surgery due to persistence after delivery; in all five, normal ovarian parenchyma without signs of necrosis was observed at histology. Of the complex cysts, 7/22 (31.8%) resolved spontaneously. The other 15/22 (68.2%) were removed surgically and, at histology, necrosis was observed in most (12/15 (80.0%)), while a benign epithelial cyst with normal ovarian parenchyma was observed in 3/15 (20%). After reviewing the ultrasound images and applying IOTA terminology, all 51 (100%) fetal cysts were described as unilocular; 29/51 (56.9%) cysts showed anechoic content (described as simple cysts by the original ultrasound examiner), and 10/51 (19.6%) had low-level, 1/51 (2.0%) had ground-glass, 9/51 (17.6%) had hemorrhagic, 1/51 (2.0%) had mixed and 1/51 (2.0%) had undefined content (all described as complex by the original ultrasound examiner). Among the 29 anechoic ovarian cysts, resolution was observed in most (24/29, 82.8%) cases. Similarly, resolution was observed in 7/10 (70.0%) cysts with low-level content. Resolution was not observed in any of the other 12 cysts and all of these cases underwent surgery, with evidence of necrosis being observed in 11 (91.7%). CONCLUSIONS Applying IOTA terminology provided a more detailed and accurate description of fetal ovarian cysts compared with the original classification into 'simple' and 'complex' categories. Anechoic cysts (described as simple cysts by the original ultrasound examiner) and cysts with low-level content (described as complex by the original ultrasound examiner) frequently resolved spontaneously. Cysts with ground-glass, hemorrhagic, mixed or undefined content were frequently associated with necrosis at histology following surgery. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Romiti
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Medical and Surgical Department of Foetus-Newborn-Infant, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - L Ricci
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Medical and Surgical Department of Foetus-Newborn-Infant, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C Codeca
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - F Pozzati
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - M Viggiano
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Medical and Surgical Department of Foetus-Newborn-Infant, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - R Vicario
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Medical and Surgical Department of Foetus-Newborn-Infant, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - I Fabietti
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Medical and Surgical Department of Foetus-Newborn-Infant, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - P Bagolan
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Medical and Surgical Department of Foetus-Newborn-Infant, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - L Caforio
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Medical and Surgical Department of Foetus-Newborn-Infant, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Panico G, Campagna G, Caramazza D, Vacca L, Mastrovito S, Ercoli A, Scambia G. HUGO(TM) RAS System in urogynaecology: the first nerve sparing Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:83-87. [PMID: 37010339 PMCID: PMC10392111 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.1.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive sacral colpopexy is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), combining high success rates with low recurrence risk in comparison to other techniques. This is the first case of robotic sacral colpopexy (RSCP) performed with the innovative Hugo™ RAS robotic system.
Objectives: The aim of this article is to show the surgical steps of a nerve sparing RSCP performed with the new Hugo™ RAS robotic system (Medtronic), by also evaluating the feasibility of this technique using this novel Robotic System.
Materials and methods: A 50-year-old Caucasian woman with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q): Aa: +2, Ba: +3, C: +4, D: +4, Bp: -2, Ap: -2 , TVL:10 GH: 3,5 BP:3 underwent RSCP as well as a subtotal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, using the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS in the Division of Urogynaecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Main outcome measures: Intraoperative data, docking specifics, objective and subjective outcomes at three months follow up.
Results: Surgical procedure was carried out without intra-operative complications, operative time (OT) was 150 minutes, docking time was 9 minutes. No system errors or faults in the robotic arms were registered. Urogynaecological examination at three months follow up showed a complete resolution of the prolapse.
Conclusion: RSCP using the Hugo™ RAS system seems to be a feasible and effective approach according to results in terms of operative time, cosmetic results, postoperative pain and length of hospitalisation. Large number of case reports as well as longer follow up are mandatory to better define its benefits, advantages, and costs.
Collapse
|
21
|
Catena U, Mirandola M, Capomacchia F, Fanfani F, Scambia G. A new surgical approach for fertility-sparing management of diffuse endometrial G2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a step-by-step technique. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:79-81. [PMID: 37010338 PMCID: PMC10392118 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.1.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: 4% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed in young women and 70% are nulliparous. Preserve fertility in these patients is of major interest. It is demonstrated that hysteroscopic resection of focal well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma, followed by progestins achieve a complete response rate of 95.3%. Recently, fertility-sparing treatment was proposed also in case of moderately differentiated endometrioid tumors, with a relatively high remission rate.
Objective: To show a new hysteroscopic approach, in case of fertility-sparing treatment of diffuse endometrial G2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
Materials and Methods: Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage for the fertility-sparing management of diffuse endometrial G2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, combining the use of a 15 Fr bipolar miniresectoscope and ‘three-steps’ resection technique (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) with a Tissue Removal Device (TRD) (Truclear Elite Mini, Medtronic).
Main outcome measures: negative hysteroscopic assessment and endometrial biopsies at three and six months.
Results: Normal endometrial cavity and negative biopsies
Conclusion: Combined hysteroscopic technique, in case of diffuse endometrial G2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, followed by double progestin therapy (Levonorgestrel releasing Intrauterine Device + Megestrole Acetate 160 mg/daily), may be associated with higher complete response rate; the use of TRD to complete the resection near tubal ostia may reduce risk of post-operative intrauterine adhesions and improve reproductive outcomes.
What is new? A novel, fertility-sparing surgical approach for diffuse endometrial G2 endometroid adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
22
|
Moro F, Scavello I, Maseroli E, Rastrelli G, Baima Poma C, Bonin C, Dassie F, Federici S, Fiengo S, Guccione L, Villani M, Gambineri A, Mioni R, Moghetti P, Moretti C, Persani L, Scambia G, Giorgino F, Vignozzi L. The physiological sonographic features of the ovary in healthy subjects: a joint systematic review and meta-analysis by the Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SIGO) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE). J Endocrinol Invest 2023; 46:439-456. [PMID: 36422829 PMCID: PMC9938076 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01939-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a lack of uniformity in the definition of normal ovary ultrasound parameters. Our aim was to summarize and meta-analyze the evidence on the topic. Full-text English articles published through December 31, 2020 were retrieved via MEDLINE and Embase. Data available for meta-analysis included: ovarian follicular count, ovarian volume, and ovarian Pulsatility Index (PI) assessed by Doppler ultrasound. METHODS Cohort, cross-sectional, prospective studies with a single or double arm were considered eligible. Interventional studies were included when providing baseline data. Both studies on pre- and post-menopausal women were screened; however, data on menopausal women were not sufficient to perform a meta-analysis. Studies on pre-pubertal girls were considered separately. Eighty-one papers were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS The mean ovarian volume was 6.11 [5.81-6.42] ml in healthy women in reproductive age (5.81-6.42) and 1.67 ml [1.02-2.32] in pre-pubertal girls. In reproductive age, the mean follicular count was 8.04 [7.26-8.82] when calculated in the whole ovary and 5.88 [5.20-6.56] in an ovarian section, and the mean ovarian PI was 1.86 [1.35-2.37]. Age and the frequency of the transducers partly modulated these values. In particular, the 25-30-year group showed the higher mean follicular count (9.27 [7.71-10.82]), followed by a progressive age-related reduction (5.67 [2.23-9.12] in fertile women > 35 years). A significant difference in follicular count was also found according to the transducer's upper MHz limit. CONCLUSION Our findings provide a significant input to improve the interpretation and diagnostic accuracy of ovarian ultrasound parameters in different physiological and pathological settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - I Scavello
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - E Maseroli
- Andrology, Women's Endocrinology and Gender Incongruence Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - G Rastrelli
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Andrology, Women's Endocrinology and Gender Incongruence Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - C Baima Poma
- Consultorio Familiare ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - C Bonin
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology B, Department of Women and Children's Health, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - F Dassie
- Department of Medicine, Clinica Medica 3-Azienda Ospedaliera, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - S Federici
- Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - S Fiengo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Guccione
- Department of Systems' Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - M Villani
- Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - A Gambineri
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes Prevention and Care, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Mioni
- Department of Medicine, Clinica Medica 3-Azienda Ospedaliera, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - P Moghetti
- Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - C Moretti
- Department of Systems' Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - L Persani
- Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, 20121, Milan, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Istituto Di Clinica Ostetrica E Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - F Giorgino
- Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - L Vignozzi
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50134, Florence, Italy.
- Andrology, Women's Endocrinology and Gender Incongruence Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rodolakis A, Scambia G, Planchamp F, Acien M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Farrugia M, Grynberg M, Pakiž M, Pavlakis K, Vermeulen N, Zannoni G, Zapardiel I, Tryde Macklon K. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:3-23. [PMID: 37010330 PMCID: PMC10392114 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.1.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment.
Objectives: To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Materials and Methods: ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.
Results: The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.
Conclusions: These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario.
What is new? A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
|
24
|
Restaino S, Scutiero G, Taliento C, Poli A, Bernardi G, Arcieri M, Santi E, Fanfani F, Chiantera V, Driul L, Scambia G, Greco P, Vizzielli G. Three-dimensional vision versus two-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance of trainee surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2023; 75:455-470. [PMID: 36811183 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01465-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery underwent great improvements during the last few years. This review aims to compare the performance of Trainee Surgeons using 2D versus 3D/4 K laparoscopy. A systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane's Library and Scopus. The following words and key phrases have been searched: "Two-dimensional vision", "Three-dimensional vision", "2D and 3D laparoscopy", "Trainee surgeons". This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA statement 2020. PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022328045. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two observational studies were included in the systematic review. Two trials were carried out in a clinical setting, and twenty-two trials were performed in a simulated setting. In studies involving the use of a box trainer, the number of errors in the 2D laparoscopic group was significantly higher than in the 3D laparoscopic group during the performance of FLS skill tasks: peg transfer (MD: -0.82; 95% CI - 1.17 to - 0.47; p < 0.00001), cutting (MD: - 1.09; 95% CI - 1.50 to - 0.69 p < 0.00001), suturing (MD: - 0.48; 95% CI - 0.83 to - 0.13 p = 0.007), However, in clinical studies, there was no significant difference in the time taken for laparoscopic total hysterectomy (MD: 8.71; 95% CI - 13.55 to 30.98; p = 0.44) and vaginal cuff closure (MD: 2.00; 95% CI - 0.72 to - 4.72; p = 0.15) between 2D group and 3D group. 3D laparoscopy facilitates learning for novice surgeons and shows improvements in their laparoscopic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Restaino
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - G Scutiero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato Di Mortara 64/B, 44124, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Cristina Taliento
- Department of Medical Sciences, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato Di Mortara 64/B, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
| | - A Poli
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - G Bernardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato Di Mortara 64/B, 44124, Ferrara, Italy
| | - M Arcieri
- Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Science, University of Messina, 98122, Messina, Italy
| | - E Santi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato Di Mortara 64/B, 44124, Ferrara, Italy
| | - F Fanfani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - V Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Driul
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - P Greco
- Department of Medical Sciences, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato Di Mortara 64/B, 44124, Ferrara, Italy
| | - G Vizzielli
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosati A, Vargiu V, Certelli C, Arcieri M, Vizza E, Legge F, Cosentino F, Ferrandina G, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Corrado G. Is the sarcomatous component (homologous vs heterologous) the prognostic "driving force" in early-stage uterine carcinosarcomas? A retrospective multicenter study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04594-5. [PMID: 36773091 PMCID: PMC10356890 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04594-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCSs) are aggressive biphasic malignancies, with a carcinomatous/epithelial component and a sarcomatous/mesenchymal counterpart. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the sarcomatous component (homologous vs heterologous) on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS This is a multicenter observational retrospective study conducted in patients with stage I and II UCSs. RESULTS Ninety-five women with histological diagnosis of early-stage UCSs were retrieved: 60 (63.2%) had tumors with homologous sarcomatous components, and 35 (36.8%) with heterologous. At univariate analysis, a stromal invasion ≥ 50%, the presence of clear cell, serous or undifferentiated carcinomatous component, the heterologous sarcomatous component and FIGO stage IB and II were shown to be variables with a statistically significant negative impact on PFS. Similarly, a depth of invasion ≥ 50%, the heterologous sarcomatous component and FIGO stage IB and II were statistically negative prognostic factors also concerning OS. At multivariate analysis, only the heterologous sarcomatous component was confirmed to be a statistically significant negative prognostic factor both on PFS (HR 2.362, 95% CI 1.207-4.623, p value = 0.012) and on OS (HR 1.950, 95% CI 1.032-3.684, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION Carcinomatous and sarcomatous components both played a role in tumor progression and patients' survival. However, only the sarcomatous component retained a statistical significance at the multivariable model suggesting its preeminent prognostic role in early-stage UCSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rosati
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - V Vargiu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - C Certelli
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - M Arcieri
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - E Vizza
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - F Legge
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Dept. Obstetrics/Gynecology "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - F Cosentino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute "Vincenzo Tiberio" Università degli studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - G Ferrandina
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italia
| | - F Fanfani
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italia
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italia
| | - G Corrado
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rodolakis A, Scambia G, Planchamp F, Acien M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Farrugia M, Grynberg M, Pakiž M, Pavlakis K, Vermeulen N, Zannoni G, Zapardiel I, Tryde Macklon KL. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15. [PMID: 36739613 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.14.4.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment. Objectives To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. Results The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues. Conclusions These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario. What is new? A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
|
27
|
Marchetti C, Fagotti A, Cassani C, Incorvaia L, Perri M, Sassu C, Camnasio C, Giudice E, Minucci A, Arbustini E, Vertechy L, Salutari V, Distefano M, Boccia S, Musacchio L, Ferrandina G, Russo A, Scambia G, Lorusso D. 42P Efficacy of maintenance with PARPi in advanced ovarian cancer according to the location of BRCA mutation. ESMO Open 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
|
28
|
Ergasti R, Lim M, Giannone G, Ennis D, Dye I, Mirza H, Fagotti A, Scambia G, McNeish I. 5P Physiologically relevant treatment models to investigate epigenetic mechanisms driving platinum resistance in ovarian high grade serous carcinoma. ESMO Open 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
|
29
|
Musacchio L, Palluzzi E, Lauria R, Di Napoli M, Corrado G, Bergamini A, Salutari V, Marchetti C, Angioli R, Cassani C, Gori S, Palaia I, Savarese A, Raspagliesi F, Mosconi A, Zafarana E, De Angelis C, Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Lorusso D. 52P Real-world data of niraparib in platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: A multicenter experience of the MITO group. ESMO Open 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
|
30
|
Landolfo C, Bourne T, Froyman W, Van Calster B, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kudla MJ, Chiappa V, Alcazar JL, Leone FPG, Buonomo F, Coccia ME, Guerriero S, Deo N, Jokubkiene L, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Czekierdowski A, Kaijser J, Coosemans A, Scambia G, Vergote I, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61:231-242. [PMID: 36178788 PMCID: PMC10107772 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous work has suggested that the ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors (BDs) can reliably exclude malignancy in a large proportion of women presenting with an adnexal mass. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the BDs and to validate a two-step strategy to estimate the risk of malignancy, in which the modified BDs are followed by the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model if modified BDs do not apply. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis using data from the 2-year interim analysis of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase-5 study, in which consecutive patients with at least one adnexal mass were recruited irrespective of subsequent management (conservative or surgery). The main outcome was classification of tumors as benign or malignant, based on histology or on clinical and ultrasound information during 1 year of follow-up. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain according to predefined criteria. RESULTS A total of 8519 patients were recruited at 36 centers between 2012 and 2015. We excluded patients who were already in follow-up at recruitment and all patients from 19 centers that did not fulfil our criteria for good-quality surgical and follow-up data, leaving 4905 patients across 17 centers for statistical analysis. Overall, 3441 (70%) tumors were benign, 978 (20%) malignant and 486 (10%) uncertain. The modified BDs were applicable in 1798/4905 (37%) tumors, of which 1786 (99.3%) were benign. The two-step strategy based on ADNEX without CA125 had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The risk of malignancy was slightly underestimated, but calibration varied between centers. A sensitivity analysis in which we expanded the definition of uncertain outcome resulted in 1419 (29%) tumors with uncertain outcome and an AUC of the two-step strategy without CA125 of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). CONCLUSION A large proportion of adnexal masses can be classified as benign by the modified BDs. For the remaining masses, the ADNEX model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy. This two-step strategy is convenient for clinical use. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Landolfo
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
| | - T. Bourne
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - W. Froyman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - B. Van Calster
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Biomedical Data SciencesLeiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)LeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J. Ceusters
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. C. Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - L. Wynants
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of EpidemiologyCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - P. Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - C. Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyZiekenhuis Oost‐LimburgGenkBelgium
| | - E. Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAlexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - R. Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Milano‐Bicocca, San Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly
| | - E. Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and EducationKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - D. Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of GynecologyEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - M. J. Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological GynecologyFaculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland
| | - V. Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyNational Cancer Institute of MilanMilanItaly
| | - J. L. Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyClinica Universidad de Navarra, School of MedicinePamplonaSpain
| | - F. P. G. Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBiomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of MilanMilanItaly
| | - F. Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child HealthIRCCS ‘Burlo Garofolo’TriesteItaly
| | - M. E. Coccia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - S. Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio CasulaCagliariItaly
| | - N. Deo
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWhipps Cross HospitalLondonUK
| | - L. Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - L. Savelli
- Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction UnitSant'Orsola‐Malpighi Hospital of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - D. Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University and General University Hospital in PraguePragueCzech Republic
| | - A. Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecological Oncology and GynecologyMedical University of LublinLublinPoland
| | - J. Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIkazia HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - G. Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - I. Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - D. Timmerman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - L. Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Del Mastro L, Poggio F, Blondeaux E, De Placido S, Giuliano M, Forestieri V, De Laurentiis M, Gravina A, Bisagni G, Rimanti A, Turletti A, Nisticò C, Vaccaro A, Cognetti F, Fabi A, Gasparro S, Garrone O, Alicicco MG, Urracci Y, Mansutti M, Poletti P, Correale P, Bighin C, Puglisi F, Montemurro F, Colantuoni G, Lambertini M, Boni L, Venturini M, Abate A, Pastorino S, Canavese G, Vecchio C, Guenzi M, Lambertini M, Levaggi A, Giraudi S, Accortanzo V, Floris C, Aitini E, Fornari G, Miraglia S, Buonfanti G, Cherchi M, Petrelli F, Vaccaro A, Magnolfi E, Contu A, Labianca R, Parisi A, Basurto C, Cappuzzo F, Merlano M, Russo S, Mansutti M, Poletto E, Nardi M, Grasso D, Fontana A, Isa L, Comandè M, Cavanna L, Iacobelli S, Milani S, Mustacchi G, Venturini S, Scinto A, Sarobba M, Pugliese P, Bernardo A, Pavese I, Coccaro M, Massidda B, Ionta M, Nuzzo A, Laudadio L, Chiantera V, Dottori R, Barduagni M, Castiglione F, Ciardiello F, Tinessa V, Ficorella A, Moscetti L, Vallini I, Giardina G, Silva R, Montedoro M, Seles E, Morano F, Cruciani G, Adamo V, Pancotti A, Palmisani V, Ruggeri A, Cammilluzzi E, Carrozza F, D'Aprile M, Brunetti M, Gallotti P, Chiesa E, Testore F, D'Arco A, Ferro A, Jirillo A, Pezzoli M, Scambia G, Iacono C, Masullo P, Tomasello G, Gandini G, Zoboli A, Bottero C, Cazzaniga M, Genua G, Palazzo S, D'Amico M, Perrone D. Fluorouracil and dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer (GIM2): end-of-study results from a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1571-1582. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00632-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
32
|
Specchia ML, Arcuri G, Di Pilla A, La Gatta E, Osti T, Limongelli P, Scambia G, Bellantone RDA. The value of uterine oncological surgery in a University Hospital. Results of a break-even analysis. Eur J Public Health 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Robotic surgery has many clinical advantages but high costs, raising the issue of healthcare sustainability. This study aims to a comparative analysis of the value, in terms of costs and outcomes, of robotic, laparoscopic, and laparotomy surgery for uterine cancer in a University Hospital.
Methods
An observational retrospective study was carried out on hospitalizations between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Oct 2021 for uterine cancer surgery. DRG amount, costs, economic margins and 30-days readmissions percentage (mean values and 95% CIs) were calculated for robotic, laparoscopic and laparotomy surgery. Student’s t and Chi-square tests were used to assess differences and the break-even point was calculated.
Results
1336 hospitalizations were analyzed, 366 with robotic, 591 with laparoscopic, and 379 with laparotomy surgery. Robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and laparotomy ones showed a significant difference (p < 0,001) for economic margin, which was largely negative (-1069.18 €; 95%CI: -1240.44 - -897.92 €) mainly due to devices cost (3549.37 €; 95%CI: 3459.32 € - 3639.43 €), and a lower 30-days readmissions percentage (1.4%; 95%CI: 0.2% - 2.6%) with a significant difference only versus laparotomy (p = 0.029). Laparoscopic compared to laparotomy surgery showed a significantly (p < 0,001) more profitable economic margin (1692.21 €; 95%CI: 1531.75 € - 1852.66 €) without a significant difference for 30-days readmissions. The break-even analysis showed that, on average, for every uterine cancer laparoscopic elective surgery, 1.58 elective robotic surgeries are sustainable for the hospital (95% CI: 1.23 - 2.06).
Conclusions
The systematic application of the break-even analysis will allow defining over time the right distribution of robotic, laparoscopic and laparotomy surgeries’ volumes to perform in order to ensure both quality and economic-financial balance and therefore value of uterine oncological surgery in the University Hospital.
Key messages
• The value-based healthcare approach, defined as the measured improvement in a patient’s health outcomes in relation to its cost, finds effective application in uterine cancer surgery.
• The use of the break-even approach allows to promote the value-based view by identifying a useful criterion for the planning and governance of interventions for uterine malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ML Specchia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
| | - G Arcuri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome, Italy
| | - A Di Pilla
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
| | - E La Gatta
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
| | - T Osti
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
| | - P Limongelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
| | - RDA Bellantone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Falcone R, Filetti M, Lombardi P, Altamura V, Scambia G, Daniele G. 133P ARID1A-mutated cancers: New prospectives for treatment of a subgroup of gynecological cancer. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
34
|
Giudice E, Ghizzoni V, Carbone M, Salutari V, Cappuccio S, Nero C, Musacchio L, Ricci C, Ciccarone F, Camarda F, Perri M, Giannarelli D, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Lorusso D. 27P Clinical relevance of NGS analysis in endometrial cancer (EC) management. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
35
|
Capoluongo ED, Pellegrino B, Arenare L, Califano D, Scambia G, Beltrame L, Serra V, Scaglione GL, Spina A, Cecere SC, De Cecio R, Normanno N, Colombo N, Lorusso D, Russo D, Nardelli C, D'Incalci M, Llop-Guevara A, Pisano C, Baldassarre G, Mezzanzanica D, Artioli G, Setaro M, Tasca G, Roma C, Campanini N, Cinieri S, Sergi A, Musolino A, Perrone F, Chiodini P, Marchini S, Pignata S. Alternative academic approaches for testing homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer in the MITO16A/MaNGO-OV2 trial. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100585. [PMID: 36156447 PMCID: PMC9512829 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The detection of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can identify patients who are more responsive to platinum and poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). MyChoice CDx (Myriad) is the most used HRD test in ovarian cancer (OC). However, some limitations of commercial tests exist, because of the high rate of inconclusive results, costs, and the impossibility of evaluating functional resistance mechanisms. Patients and methods Two academic genomic tests and a functional assay, the RAD51 foci, were evaluated to detect HRD. One hundred patients with high-grade OC enrolled in the MITO16A/MaNGO-OV2 trial and treated with first-line therapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab were analyzed. Results The failure rate of the two genomic assays was 2%. The sensitivity in detecting HRD when compared with Myriad was 98.1% and 90.6%, respectively. The agreement rate with Myriad was 0.92 and 0.87, with a Cohen’s κ coefficient corresponding to 0.84 and 0.74, respectively. For the RAD51 foci assay, the failure rate was 30%. When the test was successful, discordant results for deficient and proficient tumors were observed, and additional HRD patients were identified compared to Myriad; sensitivity was 82.9%, agreement rate was 0.65, and Cohen’s κ coefficient was 0.18. The HRD detected by genomic assays and residual tumor at primary surgery and stage was correlated with progression-free survival at multivariate analysis. Conclusions Results suggest the feasibility of academic tests for assessing HRD status that show robust concordance with Myriad and correlation with clinical outcome. The contribution of the functional information related to the RAD51 foci test to the genomic data needs further investigation. Deficiency in homologous recombination repair of DNA generates genomic instability and permanent genomic changes. HRD status is fundamental for identifying OC patients suitable for platinum and PARPi treatment. HRD testing is considered a topic with urgent need for improvement, going beyond those available commercially. Within this study, two academic genomic tests and a functional assay, the RAD51 foci, were evaluated to detect HRD. Our tests compare favorably with the reference Myriad assay and correlate with the outcome of high-grade OC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E D Capoluongo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples; Azienda Ospedaliera per L'Emergenza, Cannizzaro, Catania
| | - B Pellegrino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma; Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma; Gruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca Clinica (GOIRC), Parma
| | - L Arenare
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - D Califano
- Microenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - G Scambia
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome
| | - L Beltrame
- Molecular Pharmacology laboratory., Group of Cancer Pharmacology IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - V Serra
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G L Scaglione
- Advanced Biotechnology, Università Federico II-CEINGE, Naples; IDI-IRCSS, Rome
| | - A Spina
- Microenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - S C Cecere
- Uro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - R De Cecio
- Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale', IRCCS, Napoli
| | - N Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale', IRCCS, Napoli
| | - N Colombo
- University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan
| | - D Lorusso
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome
| | - D Russo
- Microenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - C Nardelli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples; Advanced Biotechnology, Università Federico II-CEINGE, Naples
| | - M D'Incalci
- Molecular Pharmacology laboratory., Group of Cancer Pharmacology IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
| | | | - C Pisano
- Uro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - G Baldassarre
- Molecular Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Aviano
| | - D Mezzanzanica
- Molecular Therapies Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan
| | - G Artioli
- Oncologia Medica, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso
| | - M Setaro
- Advanced Biotechnology, Università Federico II-CEINGE, Naples
| | - G Tasca
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova
| | - C Roma
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale', IRCCS, Napoli
| | - N Campanini
- Unit of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma
| | - S Cinieri
- Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Senatore Antonio Perrino, Brindisi
| | - A Sergi
- Molecular Pharmacology laboratory., Group of Cancer Pharmacology IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan
| | - A Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma; Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma; Gruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca Clinica (GOIRC), Parma
| | - F Perrone
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - P Chiodini
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Statistics, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Italy
| | - S Marchini
- Molecular Pharmacology laboratory., Group of Cancer Pharmacology IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - S Pignata
- Uro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Moore K, Oza A, Colombo N, Oaknin A, Scambia G, Lorusso D, Banerjee S, Murphy C, Konner J, Lim P, Prasad-Hayes M, Monk B, Wang J, Birrer M, Vergote I. 532P Analyses of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) versus standard chemotherapy in the randomized phase III FORWARD I study in ovarian cancer (GOG 3011). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
37
|
DiSilvestro P, Banerjee S, Colombo N, Scambia G, Kim BG, Oaknin A, Friedlander M, Lisyanskaya A, Floquet A, Leary A, Sonke G, Gourley C, Oza A, Gonzalez Martin A, Aghajanian C, Bradley W, Mathews C, McNamara J, Lowe E, Moore K. 517O Overall survival (OS) at 7-year (y) follow-up (f/u) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC) and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm) who received maintenance olaparib in the SOLO1/GOG-3004 trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
38
|
Moro F, Boldrini L, Lenkowicz J, Scambia G, Testa AC, Fanfani F. Reply. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:299-300. [PMID: 35913380 DOI: 10.1002/uog.24963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Moro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - L Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - J Lenkowicz
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| | - F Fanfani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Musacchio L, Cicala CM, Camarda F, Ghizzoni V, Giudice E, Carbone MV, Ricci C, Perri MT, Tronconi F, Gentile M, Salutari V, Scambia G, Lorusso D. Combining PARP inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade in ovarian cancer patients: a new perspective on the horizon? ESMO Open 2022; 7:100536. [PMID: 35849879 PMCID: PMC9294238 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have completely reshaped the treatment of many malignancies, with remarkable improvements in survival outcomes. In ovarian cancer (OC), however, this emerging class of drugs has not yet found a favorable use due to results from phase I and II studies, which have not suggested a substantial antitumoral activity of these agents when administered as monotherapy. Robust preclinical data seem to suggest that the combination ICIs with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) may result in a synergistic activity; furthermore, data from phase II clinical studies, evaluating this combination, have shown encouraging outcomes especially for those OC patients not suitable for platinum retreatment. While waiting for ongoing phase III clinical trial results, which will clarify the role of ICIs in combination with PARPis in the newly diagnosed OC, this review aims to summarize the preclinical data and clinical evidence available to date. Preclinical data indicate that PARPis exhibit immune modulating properties. The combination of PARPi with ICIs displays significant synergistic activity in preclinical models. Phase I and II clinical trials showed encouraging results for this combination, especially in platinum-resistant OC. Four ongoing phase III trials exploring the combination in first-line setting will delineate the role of immunotherapy in OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Musacchio
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. https://twitter.com/lucia_musacchio
| | - C M Cicala
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. https://twitter.com/carlomcicala
| | - F Camarda
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. https://twitter.com/florianacamarda
| | - V Ghizzoni
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - E Giudice
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M V Carbone
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C Ricci
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M T Perri
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Tronconi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - M Gentile
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - V Salutari
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - D Lorusso
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Catena U, D’Ippolito S, Campolo F, Dinoi G, Lanzone A, Scambia G. Hysteroembryoscopy and hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss: A feasible procedure in selected cases. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2022; 14:193-197. [DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.14.2.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Hysteroscopic uterine evacuation of early pregnancy loss using tissue removal devices seems to be a safe and feasible procedure in selected cases. The hysteroscopic approach allows the precise localisation of the gestational sac inside the uterine cavity. The endoscopic approach allows one to perform hysteroembryoscopy before uterine evacuation and this technique appears to be more accurate than dilatation & curettage for fetal chromosome karyotyping, with lower maternal cell contamination. This “under vision” procedure may reduce retained products of conception rates and risk of intrauterine adhesions formation.
Collapse
|
41
|
Rosati A, Pavone M, Campolo F, De Cicco Nardone A, Raimondo D, Serracchioli R, Scambia G, Ianieri M. Surgical and functional impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for parametrial deep endometriosis: a single centre experience. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2022; 14:121-127. [DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.14.2.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Deep endometriosis (DE) usually creates a distortion of the retroperitoneal anatomy and may infiltrate the parametria with an oncomimetic pathway similar to cervical cancer. The condition represents a severe manifestation of endometriosis that may result in a functional impairment of the inferior hypogastric plexus.
An extensive surgical resection may be required with an associated risk of increased neurogenic postoperative pelvic organ dysfunction.
Objectives: To evaluate the post-operative function and complications following hysterectomy with posterolateral parametrial resection for DE.
Materials and Methods: In total, 23 patients underwent radical hysterectomy for DE with the parametria involved. The severity of pain was assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. The KESS, GQLI, BFLUTS and FSFI were used to examine the gastrointestinal, urinary and sexual functions respectively. Intra and post-operative complications were recorded.
Main outcome measures: The main outcomes were gastrointestinal, urinary and sexual function and intra and post-operative complications.
Results: Dyschezia, dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain were significantly reduced following hysterectomy. Furthermore, an improvement of gastrointestinal function was observed, while sexual functions, examined by FSFI and urinary symptoms, examined by BFLUTS, was not shown to be significant.
Conclusion: The modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for DE results in an improvement of symptoms. Nevertheless, despite the nerve-sparing approach, this procedure may be associated with a not-negligible risk of post-operative bladder voiding deficit.
What is new? This is the first study that focuses on parametrial endometriosis using validated questionnaires to assess functional outcomes following radical hysterectomy for DE.
Collapse
|
42
|
Scutiero G, Vizzielli G, Taliento C, Bernardi G, Martinello R, Cianci S, Riemma G, Scambia G, Greco P. Influence of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in minimally invasive surgery of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2112-2118. [PMID: 35725683 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM The endoscopic approach for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treatment is considered gold standard. Some authors expressed their concern regarding uterine manipulator (UM) as a risk factor for tumor spillage and dissemination allowing peritoneal or lympho-vascular spaces invasion (LVSI). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of UM on the presence of LVSI, recurrence rate and presence of atypical or malignant peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS We searched electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The pooled results were used to evaluate the association between the use of UM and oncological outcomes. This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA statement 2020. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. RESULTS This systematic review included 18 studies (3 prospective studies, 13 retrospective studies, and 2 RCT). The pooled results showed no significant difference (RR: 0.86, 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.08) in the incidence of LVSI between manipulated hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and between UM group and non-UM group in minimally invasive surgery (RR: 1.18, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.85), no significant difference in the rate of recurrence (RR: 1.11, 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.74), in the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology between manipulated and non-manipulated hysterectomies in minimally invasive surgery (RR: 1.89, 95% CI, 0.74 to 4.83) and before and after the use of uterine manipulator (RR: 1.21, 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.16). We found a positive association between malignant cytology and hysterectomies in which a uterine manipulator had been used in a sub-group analysis where LH/LAVH were compared to TAH. (RR = 2.26, 95% CI, 1.08-4.71. P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis supports that the use of uterine manipulator for minimally invasive treatment of endometrial cancer does not increase the rate of recurrence and LVSI. Therefore, the opportunity of any other studies on its use in endometrial cancer women should be questioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Scutiero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - G Vizzielli
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
| | - C Taliento
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - G Bernardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - R Martinello
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - S Cianci
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood "G. Barresi", Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Messina, Italy
| | - G Riemma
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - P Greco
- Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Musacchio L, Marchetti C, Boccia S, Cassani C, Ventriglia J, Salutari V, Camarda F, Ghizzoni V, Giudice E, Carbone M, Pignata S, Scambia G, Lorusso D. 31P Survival outcomes in BRCA pathogenetic mutated, variant of unknown significance, and wild type ovarian cancer patients treated with PARP inhibitors. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
44
|
Marturano M, Campagna G, Gaetani E, Natale F, Mastrovito S, Vacca L, Panico G, Caramazza D, Troisi P, Lombisani A, Scambia G, Ercoli A. 500 EFFECTS OF COVID-19 PANDEMICS ON SYMPTOMS AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFFECTED BY INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS/PAINFUL BLADDER SYNDROME (IC/PBS) AND IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME (IBS). Continence (Amst) 2022; 2:1-2. [PMID: 35822129 PMCID: PMC9263121 DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2022.100451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Marturano
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - G Campagna
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - E Gaetani
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - F Natale
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Mastrovito
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - L Vacca
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - G Panico
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - D Caramazza
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - P Troisi
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - A Lombisani
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - A Ercoli
- University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Scambia G, Salutari V, Musacchio L, Siena S, Pignata S, Zavallone L, Valabrega G, Cormio G, Mosconi A, Ricci C, Ghizzoni V, Carbone M, Giudice E, Camarda F, Nero C, Tronconi F, Lorusso D. 45TiP A randomized, molecular driven phase II trial of carboplatin-paclitaxel-bev vs carboplatin-paclitaxel-bev-rucaparib vs carboplatin-paclitaxel-rucaparib, selected according to HRD status, in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
46
|
Di Donato V, Scambia G, Benedetti Panici P, Raspagliesi F, Bogani G. 25P The impact of COVID-19 on delaying diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of endometrial cancer patients: The Italian real-world scenario. Ann Oncol 2022. [PMCID: PMC9212769 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
47
|
Federico A, Anchora LP, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. ASO Author Reflections: Role of Adjuvant Surgery in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: An Unresolved Issue. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:4815-4816. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11620-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
48
|
Vergote I, Fidalgo AP, Hamilton E, Valabrega G, Van Gorp T, Sehouli J, Cibula D, Levy T, Welch S, Richardson D, Alía EG, Scambia G, Henry S, Wimberger P, Miller D, Martínez J, Monk B, Shacham S, Mirza M, Makker V. VP2-2022: Prospective double-blind, randomized phase III ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study of oral selinexor/placebo as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
49
|
Monterossi G, Pedone Anchora L, Gueli Alletti S, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Scambia G. The first European gynaecological procedure with the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS. A total hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in a woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2022; 14:91-94. [PMID: 35373554 PMCID: PMC9612853 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.14.1.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The benefits of minimally invasive surgery are well known in gynaecology. Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance within the surgical community and seems to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive surgery. Objectives This video shows the salient steps of total hysterectomy with new robotic technology, Hugo™ RAS. The objectives were to introduce and demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this new advanced device. Materials and Methods A sixty-two years-old woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation underwent the first European gynaecological surgical procedure using the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS in the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Main outcome measures Docking and operative times. Results The docking time was 6 minutes and the total operative time was 58 minutes. There were no system errors and faults in the robotic arms. The surgeon found no friction or rasping in the arms. The estimated blood loss was 30 mL. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion Gynaecological surgery with Hugo™ RAS seems feasible, safe and effective as shown by initial experiences in urological surgery. A larger case series would confirm the current experience and determine whether this technology could offer any additional benefit.
Collapse
|
50
|
Ciccarone F, Biscione A, Moro F, Fischerova D, Savelli L, Munaretto M, Jokubkiene L, Sladkevicius P, Chiappa V, Fruscio R, Franchi D, Epstein E, Timmerman D, Froyman W, Valentin L, Scambia G, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (23): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian carcinosarcoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 59:241-247. [PMID: 34225386 DOI: 10.1002/uog.23733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian carcinosarcoma. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study. Patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian carcinosarcoma, who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination between 2010 and 2019, were identified from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database. Additional patients who were examined outside of the IOTA study were identified from the databases of the participating centers. The masses were described using the terms and definitions of the IOTA group. Additionally, two experienced ultrasound examiners reviewed all available images to identify typical ultrasound features using pattern recognition. RESULTS Ninety-one patients with ovarian carcinosarcoma who had undergone ultrasound examination were identified, of whom 24 were examined within the IOTA studies and 67 were examined outside of the IOTA studies. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (range, 33-91) years and 84/91 (92.3%) patients were postmenopausal. Most patients (67/91, 73.6%) were symptomatic, with the most common complaint being pain (51/91, 56.0%). Most tumors (67/91, 73.6%) were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III or IV. Bilateral lesions were observed on ultrasound in 46/91 (50.5%) patients. Ascites was present in 38/91 (41.8%) patients. The median largest tumor diameter was 100 (range, 18-260) mm. All ovarian carcinosarcomas contained solid components, and most were described as solid (66/91, 72.5%) or multilocular-solid (22/91, 24.2%). The median diameter of the largest solid component was 77.5 (range, 11-238) mm. Moderate or rich vascularization was found in 78/91 (85.7%) cases. Retrospective analysis of ultrasound images and videoclips using pattern recognition in 73 cases revealed that all tumors had irregular margins and inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid components. Forty-seven of 73 (64.4%) masses appeared as a solid tumor with cystic areas. Cooked appearance of the solid tissue was identified in 28/73 (38.4%) tumors. No pathognomonic ultrasound sign of ovarian carcinosarcoma was found. CONCLUSIONS Ovarian carcinosarcomas are usually diagnosed in postmenopausal women and at an advanced stage. The most common ultrasound appearance is a large solid tumor with irregular margins, inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid tissue and cystic areas. The second most common pattern is a large multilocular-solid mass with inhomogeneous echogenicity of the solid tissue. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ciccarone
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Biscione
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Savelli
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Women's and Children's Department, Forlì Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - M Munaretto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - V Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - D Franchi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Division of Gynecology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - E Epstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - G Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - A C Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|