Controversies in orthopaedic oncology

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.

Low complication rate and better results for intramedullary nail - arthrodesis for infected knee joints compared to external fixator-a series of one hundred fifty two patients

PURPOSE

Arthrodesis of the knee joint is still a salvage procedure after recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with substantial bone loss and seems to be a good solution to avoid amputation. Until now, intramedullary arthrodesis has increasingly been performed; no study has yet been published to compare these techniques after septic removal of TKA in terms of functional assessment and quality of daily life.

METHODS

In a single-centre retrospective setting, clinical and radiographic evaluation of consecutive patients after knee arthrodesis using intramedullary and external fixation for infected knee joints was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically, with x-ray and questionnaire including analysis regarding any complications at latest follow-up of a minimum 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

We included 152 patients (75 females, 77 males) in this study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 63.6 years (range 12 to 90 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean 3.1 years, range 12 to 49 months). Arthrodesis with external fixator (83 patients, 52.2%) showed less blood loss and less peri-operative complications (1.6%) but a high rate of post-operative, pin-track infections (35.5%); loose pins (12.7%); and pin fractures (4.8%), and therefore risk factors for instability and nonunion (30.9%). Revision rate was 22.6% for arthrodesis with external fixator, and the primary union rate was 65.6%. Intramedullary arthrodesis (69 patients, 43.4%) showed a similar re-infection rate to external fixation (16.1% and 15.9%, respectively) but a significantly lower revision rate (5.4%, p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with intramedullary arthrodesis showed very good patient-related outcomes regarding pain, function and daily life activities in the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Despite similar results regarding patient satisfaction and everyday competences in questionnaires, intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee is superior to the external fixator, as it results in fewer complications, lower revision rate, and union rates/loosening.

Arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle: risk factors and complications

INTRODUCTION

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis is a good therapeutic option in cases of infection after trauma or orthopedic surgical procedures. Many different procedures have been described, but external fixation seems to be standard. Aim of this study is to identify risk factors for complications in septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who received septic ankle joint arthrodesis between January 2008 and December 2012 were included in this study. Patients were evaluated clinically and with radiographs or CT scans.

RESULTS

Follow-up of 74 of 79 patients with an external AO frame fixator could be evaluated; follow-up was 411 days (105-991). The mean age at surgery was 57.7 years (19-87). At this time, complications occurred in 41 patients (52 %) with wound healing problems (17 patients, 22 %) and non-union (12 patients, 15 %), and some needed surgical revision. In our collective, men had a significant higher non-union rate (p = 0.031), age or BMI showed no difference. Patients with diabetes and alcohol consumption showed a higher risk for complications (p = 0.049 and p = 0.031, respectively). 62 % of primary arthrodesis showed union, whereas in the case of revision, arthrodesis only 39 % showed union.

CONCLUSIONS

Septic ankle joint arthrodesis with the external AO frame fixator is a probable tool to achieve union. This study showed that there is a high complication rate and some risk factors for complications could be identified. A blinded and prospective study is needed to compare intramedullary nailing and external fixation to evaluate the possible advantage of intramedullary devices in septic ankle arthrodesis.