Outcomes of "Anterior Versus Posterior Divisional Branches of the Hypogastric Artery as Distal Landing Zone for Iliac Branch Devices": The International Multicentric R3OYAL Registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicentric registry was to assess the outcomes of "anteRior versus posteRior divisional bRanches Of the hYpogastric artery as distAl landing zone for iLiac branch devices (R3OYAL)."

METHODS

The main exposure of interest for the purpose of this study was the internal iliac artery (IIA) divisional branch (anterior vs posterior) that was used as distal landing zone. Early endpoints included technical success and adverse events. Late endpoints included survival, primary/secondary IIA patency, and IIA branch instability.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included in the study, of which 50 received bilateral implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs). This resulted in a total of 221 incorporated IIAs included in the final analysis, of which 40 were anterior divisional branches and 181 were posterior divisional branches. Technical success was high in both groups (anterior division: 98% vs posterior division: 100%, P = .18). Occurrence of any adverse event was noted in 14% of patients in both groups (P = 1.0). The overall rate of freedom from the composite IBD branch instability did not show significant differences between patients receiving distal landing in the anterior or posterior division of the IIA at 3 years (79% vs 87%, log-rank test = .215). The 3-year estimates of IBD patency were significantly lower in patients who received distal landing in the anterior divisional branch than those who received distal landing in the posterior divisional branch (primary patency: 81% vs 96%, log-rank test = .009; secondary patency: 81% vs 97%, log-rank test < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the IIA as distal landing zone for IBD implantation shows comparable profiles in terms of immediate technical success, perioperative safety, and side-branch instability up to 3 years. However, IBD patency at 3 years was higher when the distal landing zone was achieved within the posterior divisional branch of the IIA.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The results from this large multicentric registry confirm that use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the internal iliac artery (IIA) as distal landing zone for implantation of iliac branch devices (IBD) shows comparable profiles of safety and feasibility, thereby allowing to extend the indications for endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms to cases with unsuitable anatomy within the IIA main trunk. Although mid-term rates of device durability and branch instability seem to be similar, the rates of primary and secondary IBD patency at three years was favored when the distal landing zone was achieved in the posterior divisional branch of the IIA.

Long-term results of iliac aneurysm repair with iliac branched endograft: a 5-year experience on 100 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Iliac branch device (IBD) technique has been introduced as an appealing and effective solution to avoid complications occurring during repair of aorto-iliac aneurysm with extensive iliac involvement. Nevertheless, no large series with long-term follow-up of IBD are available. The aim of this study was to analyse safety and long-term efficacy of IBD in a consecutive series of patients.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2011, 100 consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective database on IBD. Indications included unilateral or bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms combined or not with abdominal aneurysms. Patients were routinely followed up with computed tomography. Data were reported according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

There were 96 males, mean age 74.1 years. Preoperative median common iliac aneurysm diameter was 40 mm (interquartile range (IQR): 35-44 mm). Sixty-seven patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm >35 mm (IQR: 40-57 mm) associated with iliac aneurysm. Eleven patients presented hypogastric aneurysm. Twelve patients underwent isolated iliac repair with IBD and 88 patients received associated endovascular aortic repair. Periprocedural technical success rate was 95%, with no mortality. Two patients experienced external iliac occlusion in the first month. At a median follow-up of 21 months (range 1-60) aneurysm growth >3 mm was detected in four iliac (4%) arteries. Iliac endoleak (one type III and two distal type I) developed in three patients and buttock claudication in four patients. Estimated patency rate of internal iliac branch was 91.4% at 1 and 5 years. Freedom from any reintervention rate was 90% at 1 year and 81.4% at 5 years. No late ruptures occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results show that IBD use can ensure persistent iliac aneurysm exclusion at 5 years, with low risk of reintervention. This technique can be considered as a first endovascular option in patients with extensive iliac aneurysm disease and favourable anatomy.

Quality of life in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm: the effect of early endovascular repair versus surveillance in the CAESAR trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare changes over time in health-related quality of life reported by patients with small (4.1-5.4 cm) abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or surveillance.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive either early EVAR or surveillance within a multicentre, randomised clinical trial on small AAA (Comparison of surveillance vs. Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair, CAESAR). Patient-reported health-related quality of life was assessed before randomisation, at 6 months and yearly thereafter using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2008, 360 patients (345 males, mean age 68.9 years) were randomised, 182 to early EVAR and 178 to surveillance. There was one perioperative death. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months. No significant difference in survival was found. At baseline, comparable quality of life scores were recorded in both treatment groups: Total SF-36: 73.0 versus 75.5 (p = 0.18), Physical domain: 71.4 versus 73.3 (p = 0.33); Mental health domain: 70.9 versus 72.7 (p = 0.33), in the EVAR arm versus the surveillance arm, respectively. Six months after randomisation, Total SF-36 and Physical and Mental domain scores were all significantly higher with respect to baseline in the EVAR group, while patients of the surveillance group scored lower. The differences between EVAR and surveillance arms in score changes at 6 months were significant and in favour of EVAR: Total score: difference 5.4; p = 0.0017; Physical: difference 3.8; p = 0.02; and Mental: difference 6.0; p = 0.0005. Differences between EVAR and surveillance diminished over time. At the last assessment, patients in both groups had decreased scores with a significant drop with respect to the baseline (-3.9 in EVAR, -6.3 in surveillance). There were no significant differences between the EVAR and surveillance arms: Total score: p = 0.25; Physical: p = 0.47; and Mental: p = 0.38.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with small AAA under surveillance compared with early EVAR had significant impaired functional health at 6 months after assignment. After a mean of 31.8 months, SF-36 health-related quality of life in patients allocated to early EVAR and surveillance was similar.

Endoleak after endovascular aortic repair: classification, diagnosis and management following endovascular thoracic and abdominal aortic repair

Endoleak is a common and unique complication of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and its persistence represents a failure of the endovascular treatment. Accurate detection and classification is essential for the proper management since the method of endoleak treatment is determined by the different source. In general, high-pressure leaks (type I and type III) require urgent management because of the relatively high short-term risk of sac rupture. Although precise differentiation between type I and type III endoleaks may not be possible at cross- sectional imaging, differentiation is often unnecessary because both lesions are considered high-risk and require angiographic evaluation and subsequent treatment. Low-pressure lesions (types II and V or endotension) are considered less urgent but may warrant continued endovascular evaluation if there is impending growth of the aneurysm sac or if the patient presents with symptoms. Once detected, endoleaks warranting correction (all type I and III; persistent endotension and type II associated with aneurysm enlargement) are usually treated by endovascular route. A variety of techniques including extension endografts or cuff, balloon angioplasty, bare stents and a combination of transvascular and direct sac puncture embolization techniques has allowed to treat the vast majority of these endoleaks without conversion to open surgical repair. Type II endoleak continues to be the most common but also the most controversial in terms of evaluation, the need of treatment, and methods of treatment. Careful and rigorous postoperative lifelong follow-up with computed tomography (CT) and high quality imaging continue to be essential for all patients after EVAR.

Different types of thoracic endografts

The emerging role of stent-graft strategies for the management of thoracic aortic diseases has attracted growing acceptance, especially in considering the sobering results of open repair in thoracic high-risk settings (e.g., acute dissection, trauma, rupture). Aortic endograft technology for thoracic diseases has rapidly improved after the early use of first generation devices, and the new models show very promising early and mid-term success rates. To date there is no evidence of the superiority of any single device model over the others. Indeed, each device has some peculiarities that makes it more useful in specific settings. Current limitations in thoracic stent-grafts will hopefully be addressed with new designs of highly-individualized low-profile devices in order to extend the applicability of stent-graft technology in the thoracic aorta. Despite progress in configuration and flexibility and the greater availability of different devices compared to a decade ago, shortcomings of specific endovascular grafts including collapse, migration, or dislodgment have not been fully resolved. Nowadays the selection of patients on the basis of favourable anatomy and pathology is the key for the success of the procedure. Not all patients have lesions amenable to stent-graft repair (contraindications for endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta are still not marginal and mainly defined by anatomical constraints) and thoracic endografting is technically challenging, requiring dedicated facilities and experienced specialists. This paper discusses the different configurations and models of stent-graft for thoracic aortic disease as well as the still existing shortcomings.

Outcome after endografting in small and large abdominal aortic aneurysms: a metanalysis

AIM

To compare the results of endovascular repair (EVAR) in large and small (diameter < 5.5cm) abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies comparing the outcomes after EVAR of large and small aneurysms. Outcomes considered were: risk of death (perioperative, all cause, aneurysm-related), ruptures, and complications (conversion, reintervention). Weighted pooled estimates of outcomes in patients with small versus large aneurysms were calculated. The inverse variance method was used (random-effect model). Subgroup analyses by a follow-up longer or shorter than 24 months were performed.

RESULTS

Five studies, with published and unpublished data, totallying 7,735 patients, were included. Overall, the weighted pooled estimates were: OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.90 for operative mortality, OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.86 for all cause mortality, OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.87 for aneurysm-related mortality and OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.79 for rupture in favour of small AAA group. Pooled estimates were not influenced by follow-up length. Conversion and reintervention rates were not significantly lower for small AAA.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR in small versus large AAA might be associated with lower operative mortality, aneurysm-related mortality and aneurysm rupture. Better evidence is needed to support these suggestions.

Timing of complications during carotid artery stenting. How can they be predicted?

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is becoming increasingly common for the treatment of carotid stenosis. Accumulating data, but not randomised data, suggest that CAS has promising efficacy in preventing stroke with an acceptable rate of procedure-related complications when compared to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, CAS procedures can carry a risk of non-negligible complications such as cerebral embolization, cerebral hemorrhage, severe hypotension and bradycardia. These may occur after the first 24 hours. Lessons may be learned from the timing of occurrence of CAS adverse events. The most severe neurological complications are generally due to embolism and occur intraprocedurally especially during catheter, wire or sheath manipulation in the aortic arch and common carotid. These strokes, obviously, cannot be prevented by using cerebral protection devices and enhance the importance of an appropriate learning curve that includes proper material choice, patient selection, good technique and the skill of "know when to quit".

Conversion to Open Repair After Endografting for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Causes, Incidence and Results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate frequency, causes and results of conversion to Open repair (OR) after endovascular repair (EVAR) in a single centre during an 8-year period.

DESIGN

Six hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients undergoing EVAR were followed up prospectively for endograft-related complications.

OUTCOMES

Early conversion was any OR during or within 30 days from the primary EVAR. Late conversion was any OR with removal of the endograft after 30 days since a completed EVAR procedure.

RESULTS

Median patient follow-up was 38 months (1-93 months). Conversion to OR was performed in 38 patients; nine early and 29 late. Most (7/9) early conversions were due to extensive vessel calcification. Peri-operative mortality was 22% (2/9). Late conversions occurred at a median of 33 months after primary EVAR: 29 were elective and 4 urgent. During the same interval, 79 secondary endovascular interventions were performed, 7 of which failed. The risk of conversion to OR was 9% at 6 years. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, no single factor (short, large or angulated neck, suprarenal fixation, large pre-operative diameter, iliac aneurysms, ASA score risk) was associated with the risk of late failure requiring conversion to OR.

CONCLUSION

The risk of death after early conversion should be recognized, to avoid forcing morphological indications for primary EVAR. Occurrence of late conversion after EVAR is not negligible, affecting almost 1 out of 10 patients after 6 years. In the presence of an expanding aneurysm after EVAR, especially after a failed secondary endovascular correction, an aggressive attitude in fit patients allows outcomes at similar to those of primary OR.

Does gender influence outcome of AAA endoluminal repair?

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that female patients have a less favourable outcome of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Yet, data on stratified per gender are lacking.

METHODS

We reviewed our prospective database of 402 endografts over a 4-year period and the peri- and postoperative course in the 25 (6%) female patients was compared with the 377 (94%) male patients. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 1-56 months). Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the effect of five confounding variables (gender, age, ASA grade IV, EUROSTAR class D or E, AAA diameter) on failure of AAA exclusion.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative deaths in the female group and 5 (1.3%) in the male group (p = 0.8). Major perioperative morbidity occurred in 17% versus 6% (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.2-10.6; p = 0.026). There were 1 (4%) and 5 (1%) conversions to open repair in the female and male groups, respectively (p = 0.3). Late failure of AAA exclusion occurred in 5 (21%) and 26 (7%) patients, respectively (p = 0.03). Of the five variables examined for their influence on failure of AAA exclusion, female gender (hazard ratio 4.42; 95% CI 1.4-13.4; p = 0.009) and AAA diameter (hazard ratio 1.05; 95% CI 1.009-1.09; p = 0.017), were positive independent predictors of late failure of AAA exclusion on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal AAA repair in female patients appear associated with a less favorable outcome when compared to their male counterparts. These data may be taken into consideration when endoluminal AAA repair is suggested to a female patient.

Does the presence of an iliac aneurysm affect outcome of endoluminal AAA repair? An analysis of 336 cases

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the presence of an iliac aneurysm compromises outcome of endovascular exclusion of AAA and to ascertain the fate of the iliac aneurysmal sac.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1997 and March 2001, data on 336 consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair for AAA were entered in a prospective database. Suitability for endovascular repair was assessed by preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A maximum common iliac artery (CIA) diameter > or = 20 mm was defined as iliac aneurysm. Patients with and without iliac aneurysms were compared to early (immediate conversion or perioperative death) and late failure (increase in aneurysm diameter or persisting graft-related endoleak, or late AAA rupture or conversion).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (18%) had iliac aneurysms, 19 were bilateral, for a total of 78 aneurysmal iliac arteries (median diameter 23 mm; range 20-50 mm). A distal seal was achieved by landing in 33 external iliac arteries, in 20 ectatic CIAs, and in 25 normal CIAs. Operating time differed significantly between patients with and without CIA aneurysms (153 +/- 71 vs 123 +/- 55 min, p = 0.0001), whereas no statistically significant differences were found with respect to early and late failure (2% vs 3%, p = 0.5 and 14% vs 8%, p = 0.11, respectively). There were no cases of buttock or colon necrosis. At a median follow-up of 14 months (range 0-46; i.q.r. 7-27 months) common iliac diameter decreased > or = 2 mm in 49 cases, remained stable in 25, and increased > or = 2 mm in 3.

CONCLUSION

The presence of iliac aneurysm rendered endoluminal AAA repair more complex but did not affect feasibility and long-term outcome of the procedure. In our experience internal iliac exclusion was never associated with significant morbidity. These data may be useful when considering endovascular repair in high-risk patients with challenging anatomy.

Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in High-risk Patients: a Single Centre Experience

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the role of endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in American Society for Anaesthesiology [ASA] class IV patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

between April 1997 and March 2000, 266 consecutive patients underwent ER for AAA. There were 26 patients (10%) with ASA grade IV. The remaining 240 patients, ASA grade between I and III (ASA<IV group), were compared with the ASA IV group. Mean follow-up was 11.6 months (range 1-32 months). Increase in AAA diameter after ER or persisting graft-related endoleak were defined as failure of AAA exclusion. Regression analysis was performed to test the effect of five confounding variables on failure of AAA exclusion and perioperative mortality.

RESULTS

patients in the ASA IV group were significantly older than patients in ASA <IV group (mean age: 74 years vs 70 years p=0.005). AAA were larger (mean diameter: 56 mm vs 50 mm p =0.002) and more extensive (class E of EUROSTAR classification: 27% vs 5.8% p =0.002). There were two perioperative deaths in the ASA IV group and one in the ASA<IV group (8% vs 0.4%; RR 19; 95% CI 1.8-202 p=0.01). Major perioperative morbidity occurred in 8% of patients in the ASA IV group and in 3.3% in the ASA<IV group (n.s.). There were no conversions to open repair in the ASA IV group while six were performed in the ASA<IV group (n.s.). Length of hospitalisation was significantly longer for patients in the ASA IV group: 7.8 days vs 3.2 days (p =0.001). Operative times and blood loss were similar. Failure of AAA exclusion occurred in two patients (8%) in the ASA IV group and in four patients (1.6%) in the ASA<IV group (n.s.). On life table analysis, survival rates at 26 months were 76% in the ASA IV group and 89% in the ASA<IV group (p =0.004). Five variables were examined by regression analysis and no independent predictors of failure of AAA exclusion and operative mortality were found.

CONCLUSIONS

ER in ASA IV patients is feasible and effective with acceptable actuarial survival rates. However, the endovascular procedure in these patients is associated with higher major systemic morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospitalisation rates.

Role of duplex scan in endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

to validate the role of duplex scan in endoleak detection in postoperative surveillance of endoluminal abdominal aneurysm repair (EAAR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

between April 1997 and March 1999, 103 patients were eligible for duplex and computed tomography (CT) scan after EAAR. Mean follow-up was 8 months (range 1-24 months). The study protocol comprised concurrent examination with colour-duplex and CT scan at 1, 6, and 12 months after EAAR, for a total of 198 concurrent examinations. All duplex scan examinations were performed by two vascular surgeons with the same machine (ATL HDI 3000). Interobserver agreement in endoleak detection (kappa=1) and in type of endoleak (kappa=0.7) was evaluated in 50 random duplex examinations. Endoleak detection was examined comparatively in duplex and CT scan, the latter being the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity tests together with negative- and positive-predictive values (NPV and PPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

duplex scan was not feasible in one patient. On CT scan the endoleak rate was 4% at one month, 3% at 6 months, and 4% at one year. Overall, CT scan detected 12 endoleaks. With respect to endoleak detection, duplex scan revealed a great ability in ruling out false-negative results (sensitivity 91.7%, NPV 99.4%), but overestimated the presence of endoleak (specificity 98.4%, PPV 78. 6%). Regarding type of endoleak, the ability of duplex scan to identify the source of endoleak was low (sensitivity 66.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

duplex scan, if validated, appears to be a reliable means for excluding the presence of endoleak after EAAR.

Epidural anesthesia reduces length of hospitalization after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

The low invasiveness of endoluminal abdominal aneurysm repair (EAAR) appears optimal for the use of epidural anesthesia (EA). However, reported series on EAAR show that general anesthesia (GA) is generally preferred. To evaluate the feasibility and problems encountered with EA for EAAR, patients undergoing EAAR with EA and patients undergoing EAAR with GA were examined.

METHODS

From April 1997 through October 1998, EAAR was performed on 119 patients at the Unit of Vascular Surgery at Policlinico Monteluce in Perugia, Italy. Four patients (3%) required conversion to open repair and were excluded from the analysis because they were not suitable candidates for evaluating the feasibility of EA. The study cohort thus comprised 115 patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with the AneuRx Medtronic stent graft. The incidence of risk factors and anatomical features of the aneurysm were compared in patients selected for EA or GA on the basis of intention-to-treat analysis. Intraoperative and perioperative data were compared and analyzed on the basis of intention-to-treat and on-treatment analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (54%) underwent the surgical procedure with EA (group A), and 54 (46%) underwent the surgical procedure with GA (group B). Conversion from EA to GA was required in four patients (3 of 61 patients, 5%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two study groups in demographics, clinical characteristics, and American Society of Anesthesiology classification (ASA). There was no perioperative mortality. Major morbidity occurred in 3% of patients (group B). According to intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in mean operating time, fluoro time, blood loss, amount of contrast media used, mean units of transfused blood, need of intensive care unit, mean postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative endoleak. Conversely, significant differences were found by means of on-treatment analysis in the need of intensive care unit (0 vs 5 patients; P =.02), and length of hospitalization (2.5 vs 3.2 days; P =.04). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that GA and ASA 4 were positive independent predictors of prolonged (more than 2 days) postoperative hospitalization (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.8; P =.03, and hazard ratio, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 17.9; P =.007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

EA for EAAR is feasible in a high percentage of patients in whom it is attempted, and it ensures a technical outcome comparable with that of patients undergoing EAAR with GA. Successful completion of EAAR with EA is associated with a short period of hospitalization.

Intraoperative assessment of technical perfection in carotid endarterectomy: a prospective analysis of 1305 completion procedures. Collaborators of the EVEREST study group. Eversion versus standard carotid endartectomy

OBJECTIVE

to define the incidence of technical defects and the impact of technical errors on ipsilateral carotid occlusion, ipsilateral stroke, and early restenosis rates, we analysed 1305 patients undergoing carotid completion procedures.

DESIGN

prospective multicentre study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

adequacy of CEA was assessed intraoperatively by angiography in 1004 (77%), by angioscopy in 299 (22%), and by duplex scan in two patients (1%). Arteriograms and angioscopic findings were interpreted at the time of the procedure by the operating surgeon, who also established the need for immediate surgical revision.

RESULTS

perioperatively, 13 major strokes (0.9%, all ipsilateral) and six deaths (0.4%) were recorded. Overall, 112 defects (9%) were identified intraoperatively: 81 (72%) were located in the common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA), and 31 (28%) in the external carotid artery. In 48 patients (4%) the defects were revised. Logistic regression analysis revealed that carotid plaque extension >2 cm on the ICA was a positive independent predictor of CEA defects (odds ratio (OR) 1.5p=0.03). A significant association was found between the incidence of revised defects of the CCA and ICA and perioperative ipsilateral stroke (OR 11.5p=0.0002). In contrast, patients with minor non-revised defects had an ipsilateral stroke rate comparable to that of patients with no defects (p=0.4). No significant association was found between revised or non-revised defects and occurrence of restenosis/occlusion at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

the incidence of major technical defects during CEA is low, yet the perioperative neurological prognosis of patients with major defects warranting revision is poor. Completion angiography or angioscopy and possible correction of defects did not protect per se from an unfavourable early outcome after CEA. Therefore, surgical excellence is mandatory to achieve satisfactory results after CEA.

Cerebral tomographic findings in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: short-term and long-term implications

PURPOSE

Preoperative cerebral imaging has been considered not to be cost-effective in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Yet, silent brain infarction (SBI) has been associated with the embolization potential of a severe carotid stenosis. Thus the presence of SBI may represent an additional indication for CEA in asymptomatic patients. We examined the predictive value of preoperatively detected silent cerebral lesions on early and late outcomes in patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Preoperative cerebral tomographic (CT) scans performed on 301 asymptomatic patients undergoing 346 CEAs from 1986 to 1995 were reviewed by a single neuroradiologist blinded to patients' records. Mean follow-up was 67. 3 months (range, 24-130 months). The degree of internal carotid lumen reduction was measured bilaterally in all patients (602 carotid arteries); carotid stenosis of 60% or more was found in 399 carotid arteries.

RESULTS

Of the 103 (34%) CT scans positive for cerebral lesions, 58% were lacunar. No significant association was observed between the side of the cerebral lesion on CT scan and the severity of the corresponding carotid stenosis; 38 silent lesions were detected in the 203 hemispheres ipsilateral to carotid stenoses that were less than 60% versus 95 SBIs in the 399 hemispheres ipsilateral to carotid stenoses that were 60% or more (19% vs 24%; P =.2). There were no significant differences in the perioperative stroke/death rate in patients with or without cerebral CT lesions (2% vs 1%; odds ratio, 1.94; P =.6). Mortality rate during follow-up was 22% in patients with preoperative SBI and 15% in patients without SBI (P =.1). However, actuarial survival at 10 years was shorter (P =.02) in patients with SBI. Late stroke occurred in 11% of patients with preoperative SBI and in 3% of patients without preoperative SBI (P =.006). Cox regression analysis showed that both preoperative lacunar and nonlacunar infarctions were independent predictors of late stroke (hazard ratio, 3.6; P =.04; and hazard ratio, 7.1; P =.001; respectively).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, preoperative SBI did not occur more frequently in the hemisphere ipsilateral to asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Although our study lacks a medically treated control group, our data show that SBI is predictive of poor neurologic outcome in asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA. We conclude that CT before CEA, selectively applied, provides information on long-term neurologic prognosis and that a less aggressive attitude towards CEA in asymptomatic patients with SBI may be justified.