Curcumin Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy Is Safe and Tolerable in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Randomized Phase IIa Trial

BACKGROUND

Curcumin is the main active ingredient of the spice turmeric, investigated extensively for putative anticancer properties.

OBJECTIVES

This phase IIa open-labelled randomized controlled trial aimed to assess safety, efficacy, quality of life, neurotoxicity, curcuminoids, and C-X-C-motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) in patients receiving folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin chemotherapy (FOLFOX) compared with FOLFOX + 2 g oral curcumin/d (CUFOX).

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients aged >18 y with a histological diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive either FOLFOX or CUFOX. Safety was assessed by Common Toxicity Criteria-Adverse Event reporting, and efficacy via progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Quality of life and neurotoxicity were assessed using questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity). Plasma curcuminoids were determined with liquid chromatography (LC) electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and CXCL1 by ELISA.

RESULTS

Addition of daily oral curcumin to FOLFOX chemotherapy was safe and tolerable (primary outcome). Similar adverse event profiles were observed for both arms. In the intention-to-treat population, the HR for PFS was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.24, 1.36; P = 0.2) (median of 171 and 291 d for FOLFOX and CUFOX, respectively) and for OS was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.82; P = 0.02) (median of 200 and 502 d for FOLFOX and CUFOX, respectively). There was no significant difference between arms for quality of life (P = 0.248) or neurotoxicity (P = 0.223). Curcumin glucuronide was detectable at concentrations >1.00 pmol/mL in 15 of 18 patients receiving CUFOX. Curcumin did not significantly alter CXCL1 over time (P = 0.712).

CONCLUSION

Curcumin is a safe and tolerable adjunct to FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01490996 and at www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as EudraCT 2011-002289-19.

Prolonged biologically active colonic tissue levels of curcumin achieved after oral administration--a clinical pilot study including assessment of patient acceptability

Curcumin, the main constituent of turmeric, is suspected to possess cancer chemopreventive properties. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters have been reported, but few data exist describing whether methodologies are suitably robust for curcuminoid detection in colonic biopsy specimens. Information on the acceptability of prolonged administration of daily curcumin is not available. This is of vital importance to implement chemoprevention strategies. This study aimed to quantify levels of curcuminoids in colorectal mucosa of patients undergoing colorectal endoscopy or surgical resection and to obtain information on the acceptability and compliance with daily curcumin. Curcumin C3 complex (2.35 g) was administered to patients once daily for 14 days before endoscopic biopsy or colonic resection. Safety and tolerance were monitored. Analysis of curcuminoids in plasma, urine, and colonic mucosa was conducted by ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-UV with characterization by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS). Twenty-four of 26 patients commencing curcumin completed the course. Six patients reported mild gastrointestinal adverse events. Curcuminoids were detectable in nine of 24 plasma samples, 24 of 24 urine samples, and in the colonic mucosa of all 23 biopsied participants. Mean tissue levels were 48.4 μg/g (127.8 nmol/g) of parent curcuminoids. The major conjugate, curcumin glucuronide, was detectable in 29 of 35 biopsies. High levels of topical curcumin persisted in the mucosa for up to 40 hours postadministration. Sixteen participants (67%) stated that they would take curcumin long-term should it be of proven benefit. In summary, pharmacologically active levels of curcumin were recovered from colonic mucosa. The regimen used here seems safe, and patients support its use in long-term trials.

Curcumin: the potential for efficacy in gastrointestinal diseases

Curcumin is a naturally occurring phytochemical and an extract of turmeric. Extensive in vitro and in vivo data have paved the way for curcumin to become the subject of clinical trials. Curcumin modulates key signalling pathways important in cellular processes. Numerous mechanisms of action have been elucidated. The potential for clinical efficacy is apparent from benign and malignant disease models. Curcumin has potent anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplastic properties used alone and in combination with standard therapies. Early-phase trials have ascertained pharmacological properties and consistently demonstrate it to be safe and well tolerated. However, bioavailability is limited and efficacious doses have not yet been determined. Evidence of efficacy has been derived from animal models or small clinical trials. There is only finite data supporting the use of curcumin in phase III trials with specific diseases (e.g. ulcerative colitis). However, for the vast majority of conditions additional early-phase studies are required to justify larger trials determining efficacy.

Curcumin ameliorates oxaliplatin-induced chemoresistance in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

The aims of this study were to determine potency of oxaliplatin in combination with curcumin in oxaliplatin-resistant cell lines in vitro and to evaluate the efficacy of a novel curcumin formulation (Meriva®) alone and in combination with oxaliplatin in colorectal tumor-bearing mice, exploring relevant pharmacodynamic markers in vivo. Oxaliplatin-resistant HCT116 p53wt and p53(-/-) cell lines were generated, and the effects of oxaliplatin in combination with curcumin on resistance- and proliferation-associated proteins investigated. Eighty nude mice were implanted with HCT116 p53wt colorectal cancer cells before randomization into the following treatment groups: control; Meriva only; oxaliplatin only; Meriva + oxaliplatin. Tumor volume was assessed, as was the expression of Ki-67, cleaved caspase-3 and Notch-1. Curcumin in combination with oxaliplatin was able to decrease proliferative capacity of oxaliplatin-resistant p53 wildtype and p53(-/-) cell lines more effectively than oxaliplatin alone. It also decreased markers associated with proliferation. After 21 days of treatment in the xenograft model, the order of efficacy was combination > Meriva > oxaliplatin > control. The decrease in tumor volume when compared to vehicle-treated animals was 53, 35 and 16%, respectively. Ki-67 and Notch-1 immunoreactivity was decreased by the combination when compared to vehicle-treated animals, with cleaved caspase-3 rising by 4.4-fold. Meriva did not adversely affect the DNA-platinating ability of oxaliplatin. Curcumin enhanced the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin in models of oxaliplatin resistance in vitro. In vivo, Meriva greatly enhanced oxaliplatin efficacy, without affecting the mode of action of oxaliplatin. Addition of formulated curcumin to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens has the potential for clinical benefit.

Evaluation of the introduction of a standardised protocol for the staging and follow-up of colorectal cancer on resection rates for liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

In 2004, an audit in our unit demonstrated wide variation in liver resection rates for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases within the cancer network. Subsequently, a network-wide CT-based follow-up and referral policy was introduced for all patients. A second audit was performed to assess the impact of the guidelines on liver resection rates.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Analysis of prospective liver resection database between 1997 and 2004 and after the introduction of standardised guidelines between January 2005 and April 2008.

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients underwent liver resection for CRC metastases between 1997 and 2008, 237 prior to the introduction of the referral guidelines and 125 after. Liver resection rates according to referring hospital varied from 0.92 to 2.32 per 100,000 population before guidelines were introduced. After 2005, resection rates from the four district hospitals standardised (1.68-1.84 per 100,000 population), but the central unit rate (Sheffield) remained significantly higher (2.67 per 100,000 population). No significant difference in 1-year disease-free survival between patients from Sheffield and the out-lying hospitals was found (P = 0.553).

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of a referral protocol standardised resection rates from the four district hospitals, but these remain lower compared to the specialist centre. The wide-spread adoption of a policy to discuss all patients with liver metastases at an advanced disease multidisciplinary team meeting, in the presence of hepatobiliary specialists, may further increase resection rates across the UK.

Percutaneous transhepatic insertion of self-expanding short metal stents for biliary obstruction before resection of pancreatic or duodenal malignancy proves to be safe and effective

BACKGROUND

The British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of malignant obstructive jaundice state: "If a stent is placed prior to surgery, this should be of the plastic type and it should be placed endoscopically. Self-expanding metal stents should not be inserted in patients who are likely to proceed to resection." In 2003, a small series of complications after endoscopic intervention caused a change in the authors' practice. Currently, all patients requiring relief of biliary obstruction before surgical resection undergo attempted insertion of a short metal biliary stent.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the authors' prospective database containing all patients presenting with periampullary and pancreatic tumors between January 2004 and May 2008 was performed.

RESULTS

The authors have attempted percutaneous placement of internal metal stents in 67 patients with resectable malignancies and biliary obstruction. Stenting was successful for 53 patients (79%), and 5 patients (9.4%) experienced complications. These five patients were successfully managed conservatively, and all proceeded to trial dissection. The mean bilirubin level was 253 mg/dl before intervention and 33 mg/dl before surgery for the stented patients compared with 308 mg/dl before intervention and 102 mg/dl before surgery for those who needed external drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous insertion of short metal stents provides a safe and effective alternative to endoscopic stent placement for treating jaundice preoperatively in patients with potentially resectable tumors around the pancreatic head.

Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic resection is associated with a significant morbidity. Efforts to reduce hospital stay and enhance recovery have seen the introduction of minimally invasive surgical techniques. This article reviews the current published literature on the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas.

METHODS

An electronic search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed from 1996 to May 2008 to identify all relevant publications; studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria were retrieved and analyzed using a standardized protocol. Data on the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 565 abstracts reviewed, 39 studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. There were 37 case series and two case control studies. Compared with open pancreatic surgery, minimally invasive pancreatic resection is similar in terms of morbidity and mortality. Blood loss and length of stay are decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and enucleation of insulinoma appear to be safe procedures with reduced hospital stay, though morbidity remains significant. The evidence for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is in its infancy, but the authors feel it is unlikely that many centers will achieve sufficient case load to make the introduction of minimally invasive resection feasible.