Changes in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate among recovered critically Ill patients: A 12-month follow-up study

Introduction

We surveyed a cohort of patients who recovered from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection to determine the COVID-19 vaccination rate. We also compared the willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccine before and after its availability to assess changes in perception and attitude towards vaccination.

Materials and Methods

Recovered patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in the ICU at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020 were followed up over a 1-year period to assess vaccine acceptability and acceptance rates, and changes in perception towards COVID-19 vaccination before and after vaccine availability.

Results

A total of 98 and 93 patients completed the initial and follow up surveys respectively. During the initial survey, 41% of the patients intended to receive vaccination, 46% responded they would not accept a vaccine against COVID-19 even if it were proven to be ‘safe and effective ‘and 13% undecided. During the follow up survey, 44% of the study cohort had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Major reasons provided by respondents for not accepting COVID-19 vaccine were lack of trust in the effectiveness of the vaccine, pharmaceutical companies, government, vaccine technology, fear of side effects and perceived immunity against COVID-19. Respondents were more likely to be vaccinated if recommended by their physicians (OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.8–8.3), employers (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.9–5.8), and family and friends (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–4.5).

Conclusion

We found a suboptimal COVID-19 vaccination rate in a cohort of patients who recovered from severe infection. COVID-19 vaccine information and recommendation by healthcare providers, employers, and family and friends may improve vaccination uptake.

Intensive care unit hospitalizations and outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 during summer and fall surges in Georgia

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the difference in the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in the summer compared to the fall surge.

AIM

To compare the sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes among mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 infection admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the summer and fall surges in the year 2020.

METHODS

We included patients admitted to the ICU and treated with invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 associated respiratory failure between April 1 and December 31, 2020. Patients were categorized into summer surge for ICU admissions between June 15, 2020, and August 15, 2020, and fall surge between October 15, 2020, and December 31, 2020. We compared patients' characteristics and outcomes using descriptive and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were admitted to the Grady Memorial Hospital ICU and mechanically ventilated for COVID-19 associated hypoxemic respiratory failure during the period considered (125 during the summer surge and 95 during the fall surge). More women were admitted in the fall compared to summer (41.1% vs 36.8%, difference, 4.3%; 95%CI: 1.2, 7.5). Patients admitted in the fall had fewer comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea and body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m²). Overall, patients in the fall had a lower ICU mortality rate (27.4% vs 38.4%, difference, -11.0; 95%CI: -6.4, -18.2), shorter length of stay on the mechanical ventilator (7 d vs 11 d, difference, 4 d; 95%CI: 2.1, 6.6) and shorter ICU length of stay (9 d vs 14 d, difference, 5 d; 95%CI: 2.7, 9.4).

CONCLUSION

Patients admitted with severe COVID-19 infection requiring mechanical ventilation had better outcomes in the fall than summer. This difference observed is likely attributable to a better understanding of the condition and advances in treatment strategies.

Association between race and risk of ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients at a safety net hospital

Purpose

To determine racial differences in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality outcomes among mechanically ventilated patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in a safety net hospital.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients ≥ 18 years old with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 disease associated respiratory failure who were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation and admitted to the ICU from May 1, 2020 – July 30 -2020 at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia – a safety net hospital. We evaluated the association between mortality and demographics, co-morbidities, inpatient laboratory, and radiological parameters.

Results

Among 181 critically ill mechanically ventilated African American patients treated at a safety net hospital, the mortality rate was 33%. On stratified analysis by race (Table 2), mortality rates were significantly higher in African Americans (39%) and Hispanics (26.3%), compared to Whites (18.9%). On multivariate regression, African Americans were 3 times more likely to die in the ICU compared to Whites (OR 3.1 95% CI 1.6 -5.5). Likewise, the likelihood of mortality was higher in Hispanics compared to Whites (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.0 -3.9).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated a high ICU mortality rate in a cohort of mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 infection treated at a safety net hospital. African Americans and Hispanics had significantly higher risks of ICU mortality compared to Whites. These study findings further elucidate the disproportionately higher burden of COVID-19 infection in African Americans and Hispanics.

July Effect on Mortality and Complications in Patients With ARDS in US Teaching Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Each July, teaching hospitals in the United States experience an influx of new resident and fellow physicians. It has been theorized that this occurrence may be associated with increased patient mortality, complication rates, and health care resource use, a phenomenon known as the "July effect."

OBJECTIVE

To assess the existence of a July effect in clinical outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit in US teaching hospitals.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for all adult patients with ARDS who received mechanical ventilation from 2012 to 2014. Using a multivariate difference-in-differences (DID) model, differences in mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia, iatrogenic pneumothorax, central catheter-associated bloodstream infection, and Clostridium difficile infection were compared between teaching and nonteaching hospitals during April-May and July-August.

RESULTS

There were 70 535 and 43 175 hospitalizations meeting study criteria in teaching and nonteaching hospitals, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed no differential effect on the rates of all-cause inpatient mortality (DID, 0.66; 95% CI, -0.42 to 1.75), C difficile infection (DID, 0.29; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.78), central catheter-associated bloodstream infection (DID, 0.14; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.33), iatrogenic pneumothorax (DID, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.24), ventilator-associated pneumonia (DID, 0.22; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.49), and any complication (DID, 0.60; 95% CI, -0.01 to 1.20) for July-August versus April-May in teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals.

CONCLUSION

This study did not show a differential July effect on mortality outcomes and complication rates in ARDS patients receiving mechanical ventilation in teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals.

COPDGene® 2019: Redefining the Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Present-day diagnostic criteria are largely based solely on spirometric criteria. Accumulating evidence has identified a substantial number of individuals without spirometric evidence of COPD who suffer from respiratory symptoms and/or increased morbidity and mortality. There is a clear need for an expanded definition of COPD that is linked to physiologic, structural (computed tomography [CT]) and clinical evidence of disease. Using data from the COPD Genetic Epidemiology study (COPDGene®), we hypothesized that an integrated approach that includes environmental exposure, clinical symptoms, chest CT imaging and spirometry better defines disease and captures the likelihood of progression of respiratory obstruction and mortality.

METHODS

Four key disease characteristics - environmental exposure (cigarette smoking), clinical symptoms (dyspnea and/or chronic bronchitis), chest CT imaging abnormalities (emphysema, gas trapping and/or airway wall thickening), and abnormal spirometry - were evaluated in a group of 8784 current and former smokers who were participants in COPDGene® Phase 1. Using these 4 disease characteristics, 8 categories of participants were identified and evaluated for odds of spirometric disease progression (FEV1 > 350 ml loss over 5 years), and the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was examined.

RESULTS

Using smokers without symptoms, CT imaging abnormalities or airflow obstruction as the reference population, individuals were classified as Possible COPD, Probable COPD and Definite COPD. Current Global initiative for obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria would diagnose 4062 (46%) of the 8784 study participants with COPD. The proposed COPDGene® 2019 diagnostic criteria would add an additional 3144 participants. Under the new criteria, 82% of the 8784 study participants would be diagnosed with Possible, Probable or Definite COPD. These COPD groups showed increased risk of disease progression and mortality. Mortality increased in patients as the number of their COPD characteristics increased, with a maximum hazard ratio for all cause-mortality of 5.18 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.15-6.48) in those with all 4 disease characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial portion of smokers with respiratory symptoms and imaging abnormalities do not manifest spirometric obstruction as defined by population normals. These individuals are at significant risk of death and spirometric disease progression. We propose to redefine the diagnosis of COPD through an integrated approach using environmental exposure, clinical symptoms, CT imaging and spirometric criteria. These expanded criteria offer the potential to stimulate both current and future interventions that could slow or halt disease progression in patients before disability or irreversible lung structural changes develop.

Impact of Comorbidities Among Medicaid Enrollees With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, United States, 2009

INTRODUCTION

Multimorbidity, the presence of 2 or more chronic conditions, frequently affects people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Many have high-cost, highly complex conditions that have a substantial impact on state Medicaid programs. We quantified the cost of Medicaid-insured patients with COPD co-diagnosed with other chronic disorders.

METHODS

We used nationally representative Medicaid claims data to analyze the impact of comorbidities (other chronic conditions) on the disease burden, emergency department (ED) use, hospitalizations, and total health care costs among 291,978 adult COPD patients. We measured the prevalence of common conditions and their influence on COPD-related and non-COPD-related resource use by using the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Elixhauser comorbidity counts were clustered from 0 to 7 or more. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the odds of ED visits by Elixhauser scores adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and residence.

RESULTS

Acute care, hospital bed days, and total Medicaid-reimbursed costs increased as the number of comorbidities increased. ED visits unrelated to COPD were more common than visits for COPD, especially in patients self-identified as black or African American (designated black). Hypertension, diabetes, affective disorders, hyperlipidemia, and asthma were the most prevalent comorbid disorders. Substance abuse, congestive heart failure, and asthma were commonly associated with ED visits for COPD. Female sex was associated with COPD-related and non-COPD-related ED visits.

CONCLUSION

Comorbidities markedly increased health services use among people with COPD insured with Medicaid, although ED visits in this study were predominantly unrelated to COPD. Achieving excellence in clinical practice with optimal clinical and economic outcomes requires a whole-person approach to the patient and a multidisciplinary health care team.

A combined pulmonary-radiology workshop for visual evaluation of COPD: study design, chest CT findings and concordance with quantitative evaluation

The purposes of this study were: to describe chest CT findings in normal non-smoking controls and cigarette smokers with and without COPD; to compare the prevalence of CT abnormalities with severity of COPD; and to evaluate concordance between visual and quantitative chest CT (QCT) scoring.

METHODS

Volumetric inspiratory and expiratory CT scans of 294 subjects, including normal non-smokers, smokers without COPD, and smokers with GOLD Stage I-IV COPD, were scored at a multi-reader workshop using a standardized worksheet. There were 58 observers (33 pulmonologists, 25 radiologists); each scan was scored by 9-11 observers. Interobserver agreement was calculated using kappa statistic. Median score of visual observations was compared with QCT measurements.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was moderate for the presence or absence of emphysema and for the presence of panlobular emphysema; fair for the presence of centrilobular, paraseptal, and bullous emphysema subtypes and for the presence of bronchial wall thickening; and poor for gas trapping, centrilobular nodularity, mosaic attenuation, and bronchial dilation. Agreement was similar for radiologists and pulmonologists. The prevalence on CT readings of most abnormalities (e.g. emphysema, bronchial wall thickening, mosaic attenuation, expiratory gas trapping) increased significantly with greater COPD severity, while the prevalence of centrilobular nodularity decreased. Concordances between visual scoring and quantitative scoring of emphysema, gas trapping and airway wall thickening were 75%, 87% and 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite substantial inter-observer variation, visual assessment of chest CT scans in cigarette smokers provides information regarding lung disease severity; visual scoring may be complementary to quantitative evaluation.

Aprotinin reduces blood loss in lung transplant recipients

After early experience with perioperative bleeding in sequential single-lung transplant recipients, aprotinin was introduced in an attempt to reduce this complication and the attendant morbidity. Records of sequential single-lung transplantations (n = 33) performed between January 1989 and November 1991 were reviewed to assess the impact of aprotinin on perioperative blood loss and blood product requirements. Recipients were divided according to whether or not they required cardiopulmonary bypass. In patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 15), mean estimated postoperative blood loss was 3,000 +/- 500 mL in those who did not receive aprotinin (n = 4) compared with 1,177 +/- 253 mL in those who received aprotinin (n = 11) (p < 0.05). An average of 8.0 +/- 0.7 units of packed red blood cells were administered to patients not receiving aprotinin compared with 3.1 +/- 0.7 units to those who received aprotinin (p < 0.05). Requirements for fresh frozen plasma were similar in each group. There were no differences in blood loss or blood product replacement in the group not undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 18). Therefore, we conclude that aprotinin decreases postoperative blood loss and blood product requirements in patients undergoing sequential single-lung transplantation under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Causes of death in lung transplant recipients

Between November 1983 and September 1992, The Toronto Lung Transplant Program performed 131 lung transplantations in 122 recipients; 53 single lung transplantations and 78 double lung transplantations. Forty-five patients died, 25 (47%) in the single lung transplantation and 20 (25%) in the double lung transplantation groups. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital charts of all deceased recipients and the postmortem reports of the 35 patients (20 single lung transplantations and 15 double lung transplantations) who had autopsies. Preoperative single lung transplantation diagnoses included pulmonary fibrosis, (n = 17) obstructive disease (n = 6) and vascular disease (n = 2). Preoperative diagnosis of double lung transplantation included pulmonary fibrosis (n = 2), obstructive disease (n = 6), septic lung disease (n = 9), and vascular disease (n = 3). The most common cause of death in single lung transplantation was infection. Five patients died of bronchiolitis obliterans, and five more had bronchiolitis obliterans lesions present at autopsy that were not a direct cause of death. Diagnosis of primary disease was made in 23 of 25 single lung transplantations antemortem and 2 of 25 at autopsy. Autopsy diagnoses were disseminated Aspergillus and cytomegalovirus infection. In double lung transplantations, infection was also the primary cause of death; in three other patients, airway dehiscence preceded infection. Bronchiolitis obliterans was the second most common cause of death and was also present in four patients dying of infection. All double lung transplantation diagnoses were made antemortem. We concluded that infection and then bronchiolitis obliterans are the primary causes of death after lung transplantation. Although infection is a major cause both early and late after transplantation, bronchiolitis obliterans is an important factor in transplantation only late after the operation.