Self-reported Dysphagia and Pharyngeal Volume Following Whiplash Injury

Difficulty swallowing has been reported following whiplash injury; however, the reasons remain poorly understood. A possible factor may be the observed changes in pharyngeal volume. The current exploratory study was designed to examine the prevalence of self-reported dysphagia after whiplash and the relationship with recovery status and change in pharyngeal volume. Data were available from a longitudinal study of adults with whiplash. Data included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine, the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI), and Neck Disability Index (NDI) collected over four timepoints (< 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months post-injury). Initial cross-sectional analysis examined 60 patients with DHI data from at least one timepoint. A second, longitudinal analysis was conducted on 31 participants with MRI, NDI, and DHI data at both early (< 1-2 weeks) and late (3-12 months) timepoints. The pharynx was contoured on axial T2-weighted MRI slices using OsiriX image processing software and pharyngeal volume (mm³) was quantified. In the 60-patient cohort, prevalence of self-reported dysphagia (DHI ≥ 3) was observed in 50% of participants at least once in 12 months (M = 4.9, SD 8.16, range 0-40). In the longitudinal cohort (n = 31), mean total DHI significantly (p = 0.006) increased between early and late stages. There was no relationship (p = 1.0) between dysphagia and recovery status, per the NDI% score. Pharyngeal volume remained stable and there was no relationship between dysphagia and pharyngeal volume change (p = 1.0). This exploratory study supports the need for further work to understand the nature of dysphagia, extent of functional compromise, and the underlying pathophysiology post-whiplash.

Development and validation of the communication and language assessment questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (CLAMS)

BACKGROUND

There is growing recognition that communication and language can be compromised in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) designed to measure communication and language function in MS are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and validate a novel PROM, the Communication and Language Assessment questionnaire for persons with Multiple Sclerosis (CLAMS).

METHODS

One-hundred and ninety-nine participants were recruited internationally through online channels. Participants completed an online questionnaire consisting of 41-items generated from the: (1) La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ), (2) Speech pathology-specific questionnaire for persons with Multiple Sclerosis (SMS), and (3) published research describing communication and language in MS. These items were then submitted to preliminary psychometric evaluation, including principal component analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and analyses of floor and ceiling effects. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the CLAMS with the Communication Participation Item Bank (CPIB).

RESULTS

The final CLAMS contained 11-items. Internal consistency was high (α = 0.944) and test-retest reliability. All items produced an intra-class correlation coefficient ≥ 0.70. No floor or ceiling effects were present. A statistically significant strong correlation between the CLAMS and the CPIB was identified (r = -0.750, p = ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CLAMS is a reliable and valid PROM that assesses self-perceived communication and language function in MS. This tool can be used for research and clinical purposes to measure intervention outcomes, monitor symptom evolution, evaluate service delivery, facilitate patient-centred care, and as an adjunct to clinical assessment.

Whiplash-Associated Dysphagia and Dysphonia: A Scoping Review

Swallowing and voice complaints after a whiplash injury have been observed and reported in several studies; however, variability in study design complicates current understanding of whether dysphagia and dysphonia should be recognised as potential adverse outcomes. A scoping review was conducted across six databases from 1950 to March 2019. A total of 18 studies were included for review. Data regarding study purpose, design, outcome measures, participant characteristics and outcomes reported were extracted. Level of evidence (LOE) was assessed by the American Speech-Language Language Association (ASHA)'s LOE system. All studies were exploratory, with 68% rated as poor (< 3) on quality ratings. Nearly half (n = 6) were single case reports. Only three studies investigated some type of swallow-related outcome specifically within the study aim/s. Incidence of swallow-related problems ranged from 2 to 29%, with unspecified complaints of "swallowing difficulty", "dysphagia" and fatigue and pain whilst chewing reported. Neither swallowing biomechanics nor the underlying pathophysiology of swallow or voice complaints was investigated in any study. Four case studies presented post-whiplash voice complaints; two of which described loss of pitch range. Others described hoarseness, loss of control and weak phonation. Most studies only mentioned swallow- or voice-related deficits when reporting a wider set of post-injury symptomatology and six did not describe the outcome measure used to identify the swallow and voice-related problems reported. The existing literature is limited and of low quality, contributing to an unclear picture of the true incidence and underlying mechanisms of whiplash-related dysphagia and dysphonia.

Responsiveness of the EAT-10 to Clinical Change in Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Dysphagia

Purpose: This retrospective study evaluated the external responsiveness of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) to clinical changes in a single cohort (n = 105) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) for head-and-neck cancer.Method: Patients completed the EAT-10 four times: (I) Within two weeks of commencing (C)RT, (II) in the final week of (C)RT, (III) two weeks post-(C)RT and (IV) following discharge from speech-language pathology services. Data was compared to their oral intake status, using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS).Result: Using Cohen's d, changes in the EAT-10 and FOIS were comparable, however, a difference was observed at data-point IV. At data-points I, II and III, the EAT-10 had a strong negative correlation with the FOIS (Spearman's ρ= -0.81, -0.80 and -0.81 resp.). At data-point IV the correlation strength decreased (Spearman's ρ= -0.69). Fisher's Z transformation found no statistically significant correlation coefficient differences between data-points I, II and III. A significant difference in correlation was found between these data-points and data-point IV (p = 0.027; p = 0.039 and p = 0.022 resp.). A very high internal consistency was found (Cronbach's α > 0.95) for all data-points.Conclusion: This study's results indicate that the EAT-10 has weaknesses in the external responsiveness and has redundancy of its question items.

Whiplash-Associated Dysphagia: Considerations of Potential Incidence and Mechanisms

Non-specific self-reports of dysphagia have been described in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) following motor vehicle collision (MVC); however, incidence and mechanistic drivers remain poorly understood. Alterations in oropharyngeal dimensions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), along with heightened levels of stress, pain, and changes in stress-dependent microRNA expression (e.g., miR-320a) have been also associated with WAD, suggesting multi-factorial issues may underpin any potential swallowing changes. In this exploratory paper, we examine key biopsychosocial parameters in three patients with persistent WAD reporting swallowing change and three nominating full recovery after whiplash with no reported swallowing change. Parameters included (1) oropharyngeal volume with 3D MRI, (2) peritraumatic miR-320a expression, and (3) psychological distress. These factors were explored to highlight the complexity of patient presentation and propose future considerations in relation to a potential deglutition disorder following WAD. The three participants reporting changes in swallowing all had smaller oropharyngeal volumes at < 1 week and at 3 months post injury and lower levels of peritraumatic miR-320a. At 3 months post MVC, oropharyngeal volumes between groups indicated a large effect size (Hedge's g = 0.96). Higher levels of distress were reported at both time points for those with persistent symptomatology, including self-reported dysphagia, however, this was not featured in those nominating recovery. This paper considers current evidence for dysphagia as a potentially under-recognized feature of WAD and highlights the need for future, larger-scaled, multidimensional investigation into the incidence and mechanisms of whiplash-associated dysphagia.

Patients' experiences with HMEs and attachments after total laryngectomy

OBJECTIVES

The short-term and long-term beneficial effects of HME use by laryngectomees are well described in literature. In this study, we document how laryngectomised patients, who previously did not use an HME, get accustomed to the use of HME and attachments.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty patients, who were at least 3 months post-laryngectomy and previously did not use an HME, were followed for 12 weeks and were asked to complete questionnaires about their experiences with the HME and attachments.

RESULTS

Results show that when patients start using an HME, they report some difficulties with breathing resistance during the first 2 weeks of use. However, after 6 weeks, they have become accustomed to the breathing resistance and after 12 weeks over 96% reports that breathing was equal or less strenuous compared with breathing though an open stoma. Only a small proportion of patients experienced problems with increased coughing when starting HME use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight in the way laryngectomised patients are experiencing the use of HMEs in the first weeks. These outcomes can contribute to a better knowledge of HME use by healthcare providers and help them to manage patient expectations and improving support to patients in achieving compliant HME use.