Comparison of clinical outcomes of osimertinib and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in TKI-untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are devastating complications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has better penetration into the central nervous system than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, data on the distinct activity of EGFR-TKIs in untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with EGFR-TKIs for TKI-untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM between July 2002 and July 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with osimertinib (Osi group) and those treated with gefitinib or erlotinib [first-generation (1G)-TKI group].

RESULTS

Of the 967 patients, 71 were eligible, including 29 in the Osi group and 42 in the 1G-TKI group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Osi group were better than those in the 1G-TKI group (PFS: 16.9 months versus 8.6 months, P = 0.007, and OS: 26.6 months versus 20.0 months, P = 0.158). The LM-overall response rate (ORR) and LM-PFS were significantly better in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (LM-ORR: 62.5% versus 25.7%, P = 0.007; LM-PFS: 23.4 months versus 12.1 months, P = 0.021). In the subgroup analysis of EGFR mutation status, LM-PFS for patients with exon 19 deletion was significantly longer in the Osi group than in the 1G-TKI group (32.7 months versus 13.4 months, P = 0.013), whereas those with L858R mutation in exon 21 did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, osimertinib and exon 19 deletion were significant factors for better LM-PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib can be more effective for untreated common EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM, especially those with exon 19 deletion, compared to first-generation TKIs.

P295 Impact of Pre-existing Mitral Regurgitation on the Mid-Term Left Ventricular Mass Regression following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Valve Stenosis

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) results in an immediate and greater aortic pressure gradient improvement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), and induces early left ventricular (LV) mass regression, which may be related to favorable effects on the mid to long term outcomes. However, the extent of LV mass regression after unloading of chronic pressure overload is varying, and its determinants are still unknown. Thus, the study aims to identify echocardiographic determinants of LV mass regression following TAVI.

Methods

We retrospectively screened all TAVI procedures in symptomatic AS from 2017 to 2019, and selected 74 successful TAVI cases that had serial echocardiographic studies both at the baseline and at the mid-term follow-up (4 to 6 months after the procedure). Through the digitalized medical records, clinical and echocardiographic data as well as angiographic grading (0-3) of post-procedure paravalvular leakage (PVL) were obtained. LV mass was calculated by using Cube formula. Thus, the extent of LV mass regression was defined as the differences of left ventricular mas index (LVMI) between at the baseline and at the follow-up (ΔLVMI). Quantification of the baseline mitral valve regurgitant volume was performed by stroke volume method with pulmonic site measurement on the assumption of no pre-existing intra/extra cardiac shunt. Cases with prior mitral valve replacement were excluded.

Results

At the post-procedure angiogram, only 3 cases had significant PVL (grade 2≤). At the mid-term follow–up, average LVMI decreased significantly from the baseline (165 ± 38 g/m2vs 140 ± 37 mg/ m2, P < 0.0001) and 57 cases (70%) experienced the reduction of LVMI, although average relative wall thickness (2 × posterior wall thickness/left ventricular diastolic dimension) did not change (0.565 ± 0.135 vs 0.586 ± 0.168, P = 0.314). Among the baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables, the baseline peak A wave velocity, E/A ratio, mitral valve regurgitant volume and LVMI revealed simple correlation with ΔLVMI (γ=-0.298, p = 0.0188;γ=0.251, P = 0.0417;γ=0.354, p = 0.0041;γ=0.375, p < 0.0010; respectively), whereas no correlation was observed in angiographic PVL grade. Stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated baseline mitral valve regurgitant volume and LVMI as the determinants of ΔLVMI (β=0.344, p = 0.032; β=0.335 P < 0.0001; respectively).

Conclusions

Pre-existing mitral regurgitation has an impact on the mid–term left ventricular mass regression following TAVI. In severe AS, mitral regurgitation might be functioning as an afterload adjuster, and thus, produces protective effects on LV structure.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab and standard chemotherapy drug combination in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a four arms phase Ib study

In this phase Ib study, four combination therapies of nivolumab 10 mg/kg and standard chemotherapy (cisplatin/gemcitabine, cisplatin/pemetrexed, carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab, or docetaxel) showed acceptable toxicity profiles in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Furthermore, these combination therapies presented encouraging antitumor activities.

Background

The human IgG4 monoclonal antibody nivolumab targets programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and promotes antitumor response by blocking the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands. This single-center phase Ib study investigated the tolerability, safety, and pharmacokinetics of nivolumab combined with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

Patients who had stage IIIB without indication for definitive radiotherapy, stage IV, or recurrent NSCLC were eligible. Regimens were nivolumab 10 mg/kg + gemcitabine/cisplatin (arm A), pemetrexed/cisplatin (arm B), paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab (arm C), or docetaxel (arm D). Regimens A, B, and D were repeated every 3 weeks for up to four cycles and regimen C was repeated for up to six cycles; nivolumab alone (arm A), with pemetrexed (arm B), bevacizumab (arm C), or docetaxel (arm D) was continued every 3 weeks as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated during the first treatment cycle.

Results

As of March 2014, six patients were enrolled in each arm. The combination of nivolumab 10 mg/kg and chemotherapy was well tolerated. DLT was observed in only one patient in arm A (alanine aminotransferase increased). Select adverse events (those with a potential immunologic cause) of any grade were observed in six, four, six, and five patients in arms A, B, C, and D, respectively. Three, three, six, and one patient achieved partial response while median progression-free survival was 6.28, 9.63 months, not reached, and 3.15 months in arms A, B, C, and D, respectively.

Conclusions

Combination of nivolumab 10 mg/kg and chemotherapy showed an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Clinical trials number

Japanese Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI)-132071.