1
|
Overbeek JK, Ter Heine R, Verheul HMW, Chatelut E, Rudek MA, Gurney H, Plummer R, Gilbert DC, Buclin T, Burger DM, Bloemendal HJ, van Erp NP. Off-label, but on target: the evidence needed to implement alternative dosing regimens of anticancer drugs. ESMO Open 2023; 8:100749. [PMID: 36603522 PMCID: PMC9813708 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J K Overbeek
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - R Ter Heine
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - H M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - E Chatelut
- Institut Claudius-Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, and CRCT, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, 1, Toulouse, France; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - M A Rudek
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA; Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - H Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - R Plummer
- Newcastle University and Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - D C Gilbert
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, UK; Optimal Cancer Care Alliance, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - T Buclin
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - D M Burger
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - H J Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - N P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Joode K, Dumoulin DW, Engelen V, Bloemendal HJ, Verheij M, van Laarhoven HWM, Dingemans IH, Dingemans AC, van der Veldt AAM. Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on cancer treatment: the patients' perspective. Eur J Cancer 2020; 136:132-139. [PMID: 32683273 PMCID: PMC7334940 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has inevitable consequences for medical care of patients without COVID-19. To assess the impact of this pandemic on oncological care, a nationwide survey was conducted among patients with cancer in the Netherlands. Methods The patients' perspective on oncological care was investigated using an online survey between March 29th 2020 and April 18th 2020. The survey consisted of 20 questions on four topics: patients’ characteristics, contact with the hospital, consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns about COVID-19. Results Five thousand three hundred two patients with cancer completed this nationwide survey. Overall, 30% of patients reported consequences for their oncological treatment or follow-up. In the majority of cases, this resulted in conversion from hospital visit to consultation by phone or video. The most frequently adjusted treatments were chemotherapy (30%) and immunotherapy (32%). Among patients with delay and discontinuation of treatment, 55% and 63% of patients, respectively, were (very) concerned about these consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequences were independent of regional differences in COVID-19 incidence. However, patients in regions with high COVID-19 incidence were significantly more concerned. Conclusion This is the first study investigating perspectives of patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study demonstrates the significant impact of the COVID-19 crisis on oncological care, indicating the need for psycho-oncological support during this pandemic. Impact of COVID-19 on oncological care from cancer patients’ perspective. 5302 patients with cancer completed a nationwide online survey. 30% of the patients reported consequences for oncological treatment or follow-up. The consequences were independent of regional differences in COVID-19 incidence. This study indicates the need for psycho-oncological support during this pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K de Joode
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D W Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V Engelen
- Dutch Federation of Cancer Patient Organizations, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H J Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I H Dingemans
- Dutch Federation of Cancer Patient Organizations, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Diseases (GROW), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, van Rijssen LB, van Kleef JJ, Vink GR, Berbee M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bloemendal HJ, Bruno MJ, Burgmans MC, Busch ORC, Coene PPLO, Coupé VMH, Dekker JWT, van Eijck CHJ, Elferink MAG, Erdkamp FLG, van Grevenstein WMU, de Groot JWB, van Grieken NCT, de Hingh IHJT, Hulshof MCCM, Ijzermans JNM, Kwakkenbos L, Lemmens VEPP, Los M, Meijer GA, Molenaar IQ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, de Noo ME, van de Poll-Franse LV, Punt CJA, Rietbroek RC, Roeloffzen WWH, Rozema T, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, Schiphorst AHW, Schipper H, Siersema PD, Slingerland M, Sommeijer DW, Spaander MCW, Sprangers MAG, Stockmann HBAC, Strijker M, van Tienhoven G, Timmermans LM, Tjin-a-Ton MLR, van der Velden AMT, Verhaar MJ, Verkooijen HM, Vles WJ, de Vos-Geelen JMPGM, Wilmink JW, Zimmerman DDE, van Oijen MGH, Koopman M, Besselink MGH, van Laarhoven HWM. Nationwide comprehensive gastro-intestinal cancer cohorts: the 3P initiative. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:195-202. [PMID: 28723307 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1346381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing sub-classification of cancer patients due to more detailed molecular classification of tumors, and limitations of current trial designs, require innovative research designs. We present the design, governance and current standing of three comprehensive nationwide cohorts including pancreatic, esophageal/gastric, and colorectal cancer patients (NCT02070146). Multidisciplinary collection of clinical data, tumor tissue, blood samples, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with a nationwide coverage, provides the infrastructure for future and novel trial designs and facilitates research to improve outcomes of gastrointestinal cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients aged ≥18 years with pancreatic, esophageal/gastric or colorectal cancer are eligible. Patients provide informed consent for: (1) reuse of clinical data; (2) biobanking of primary tumor tissue; (3) collection of blood samples; (4) to be informed about relevant newly identified genomic aberrations; (5) collection of longitudinal PROs; and (6) to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cohort multiple randomized controlled trials (cmRCT) in the future. RESULTS In 2015, clinical data of 21,758 newly diagnosed patients were collected in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Additional clinical data on the surgical procedures were registered in surgical audits for 13,845 patients. Within the first two years, tumor tissue and blood samples were obtained from 1507 patients; during this period, 1180 patients were included in the PRO registry. Response rate for PROs was 90%. The consent rate to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cmRCTs in the future was >85%. The number of hospitals participating in the cohorts is steadily increasing. CONCLUSION A comprehensive nationwide multidisciplinary gastrointestinal cancer cohort is feasible and surpasses the limitations of classical study designs. With this initiative, novel and innovative studies can be performed in an efficient, safe, and comprehensive setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L. B. van Rijssen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. J. van Kleef
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. R. Vink
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. J. Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - M. J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. C. Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - O. R. C. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P. P. L. O. Coene
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V. M. H. Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. T. Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. G. Elferink
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F. L. G. Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - N. C. T. van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. C. C. M. Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. N. M. Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - M. Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - G. A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I. Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. E. de Noo
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | | | - C. J. A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. C. Rietbroek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | - W. W. H. Roeloffzen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Treant Zorggroep, Hoogeveen, The Netherlands
| | - T. Rozema
- Department of Radiotherapy, Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - J. P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. Schipper
- Stichting voor Patiënten met Kanker aan het Spijsverteringskanaal (SPKS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P. D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M. Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D. W. Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - M. C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. G. Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L. M. Timmermans
- Stichting voor Patiënten met Kanker aan het Spijsverteringskanaal (SPKS), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. L. R. Tjin-a-Ton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. J. Verhaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - H. M. Verkooijen
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W. J. Vles
- Department of Surgery, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J. W. Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D. D. E. Zimmerman
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - M. G. H. van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. G. H. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Janssen A, Verkleij CPM, van der Vlist A, Mathijssen RHJ, Bloemendal HJ, Ter Heine R. Towards better dose individualisation: metabolic phenotyping to predict cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics in men with prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2017; 116:1312-1317. [PMID: 28399110 PMCID: PMC5482735 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cabazitaxel is approved for treatment of castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. The current dosing strategy of cabazitaxel is based on body surface area (BSA). Body surface area is known as a poor predictor for total systemic exposure to drugs, since it does not take into account variability in activity of metabolising enzymes, necessary for clearance of drugs. As exposure to cabazitaxel is related to treatment response, it is essential to develop a better individualised dosing strategy. METHODS Ten patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, who received cabazitaxel dosed on BSA as a part of routine palliative care, were enrolled in this study. Midazolam was administered as phenotyping probe for cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A (CYP3A). The relationship between midazolam and cabazitaxel clearance was investigated using non-linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS The clearance of Midazolam highly correlated with cabazitaxel clearance (R=0.74). Midazolam clearance significantly (P<0.004) explained the majority (∼60%) of the inter-individual variability in cabazitaxel clearance in the studied population. CONCLUSIONS Metabolic phenotyping of CYP3A using midazolam is a promising strategy to individualise cabazitaxel dosing. Before clinical application, a randomised study is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Janssen
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - C P M Verkleij
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein 3435 CM, The Netherlands
| | - A van der Vlist
- Department of Pulmonology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch 5223 GZ, The Netherlands
| | - R H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam 3075 EA, The Netherlands
| | - H J Bloemendal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort 3813 TZ, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - R Ter Heine
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
May AM, Boer JH, Velthuis M, Steins Bisschop CN, Los M, Erdkamp F, ten Bokkel Huinink D, Bloemendal HJ, Rodenhuis C, de Roos MAJ, Verhaar M, van der Wall E, Peeters PHM. Abstract P1-10-09: Are patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant treatment able to follow an exercise program with a moderate to high intensity? Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p1-10-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE: We recently showed in a randomized trial, the Physical Activity during Cancer Treatment (PACT) study, that an 18-week exercise program reduced complaints of fatigue and improved physical fitness in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment. The beneficial effects were probably underestimated due to high levels of physical activity in the control group that received usual care only. Another possibility for dilution of the effect might be limited participation of the intervention group in the supervised exercise program or low compliance, i.e., an adjustment of the prescribed exercise protocol. We set out to study participation and compliance and to find determinants of reduced compliance.
METHODS: 102 patients in the PACT study were randomized into the intervention group that received a supervised exercise program 2 times a week for 18 weeks (36 sessions in total). Each session had a duration of 60 minutes and included a pre-specified period of aerobic interval exercises of specific intensities as well as muscle strength exercises. Sessions were supervised by physiotherapists, intensity was based on individual fitness characteristics and results were kept in a log.
We computed attendance (percentage of total sessions attended) and compliance (adherence to the prescribed duration and intensity of the aerobic part and to the muscle strength part of each attended session). We computed for each woman the percentage of sessions the women complied with the protocol, and report median percentages for compliance with the aerobic exercises, duration and intensity, and with the muscle strength exercises separately. Determinants of low compliance that were included in linear regression models were: age, behavioral, physical and psychosocial factors.
RESULTS: For 92 patients exercise logs were available. Patients were, on average, 50.2±7.8 years of age, all patients received chemotherapy and 70% received radiotherapy. Participation was high: patients participated in 83% (interquartile range 69-91%) of the sessions offered. Overall, also compliance was high: in 88% (63-97%) and 84% (65-94%) of all attended sessions patients were able to complete the aerobic (duration) and muscle strength program, respectively, as prescribed in the protocol. Compliance to the high-intensity part of the aerobic program was lower: in 50% (22-82%) of the sessions the intensity of the aerobic exercises was adjusted. Especially patients who received radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy and patients who were more physically fatigued at baseline had a lower compliance to the high-intensity part of the aerobic exercises (β=-5.3 (confidence interval -9.4;-1.2) and β=-0.6 (-1.0;-0.1), respectively).
CONLUSIONS: Participation in and compliance to an 18-week aerobic and muscle strength exercise program was high. Thus, patients are well capable to exercise during adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. This study shows that preferably high intensity aerobic exercises were adjusted in a significant number of participants rather than the duration or the strength exercises. This has to be taken into account when developing training programs, especially in those patients who receive both, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Citation Format: May AM, Boer JH, Velthuis M, Steins Bisschop CN, Los M, Erdkamp F, ten Bokkel Huinink D, Bloemendal HJ, Rodenhuis C, de Roos MAJ, Verhaar M, van der Wall E, Peeters PHM. Are patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant treatment able to follow an exercise program with a moderate to high intensity?. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AM May
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - JH Boer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - M Velthuis
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - CN Steins Bisschop
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - M Los
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - F Erdkamp
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - D ten Bokkel Huinink
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - HJ Bloemendal
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - C Rodenhuis
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - MAJ de Roos
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - M Verhaar
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - E van der Wall
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| | - PHM Peeters
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Orbis Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, Netherlands; Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lange R, de Klerk JMH, Bloemendal HJ, Ramakers RM, Beekman FJ, van der Westerlaken MML, Hendrikse NH, Ter Heine R. Drug composition matters: the influence of carrier concentration on the radiochemical purity, hydroxyapatite affinity and in-vivo bone accumulation of the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical 188Rhenium-HEDP. Nucl Med Biol 2015; 42:465-469. [PMID: 25662844 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 12/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION (188)Rhenium-HEDP is an effective bone-targeting therapeutic radiopharmaceutical, for treatment of osteoblastic bone metastases. It is known that the presence of carrier (non-radioactive rhenium as ammonium perrhenate) in the reaction mixture during labeling is a prerequisite for adequate bone affinity, but little is known about the optimal carrier concentration. METHODS We investigated the influence of carrier concentration in the formulation on the radiochemical purity, in-vitro hydroxyapatite affinity and the in-vivo bone accumulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP in mice. RESULTS The carrier concentration influenced hydroxyapatite binding in-vitro as well as bone accumulation in-vivo. Variation in hydroxyapatite binding with various carrier concentrations seemed to be mainly driven by variation in radiochemical purity. The in-vivo bone accumulation appeared to be more complex: satisfactory radiochemical purity and hydroxyapatite affinity did not necessarily predict acceptable bio-distribution of (188)Rhenium-HEDP. CONCLUSIONS For development of new bisphosphonate-based radiopharmaceuticals for clinical use, human administration should not be performed without previous animal bio-distribution experiments. Furthermore, our clinical formulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP, containing 10 μmol carrier, showed excellent bone accumulation that was comparable to other bisphosphonate-based radiopharmaceuticals, with no apparent uptake in other organs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Radiochemical purity and in-vitro hydroxyapatite binding are not necessarily predictive of bone accumulation of (188)Rhenium-HEDP in-vivo. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE The formulation for (188)Rhenium-HEDP as developed by us for clinical use exhibits excellent bone uptake and variation in carrier concentration during preparation of this radiopharmaceutical should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lange
- Meander Medical Center, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - J M H de Klerk
- Meander Medical Center, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - H J Bloemendal
- Meander Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - R M Ramakers
- Section Radiation, Detection & Medical Imaging, TU Delft & MILabs B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F J Beekman
- Section Radiation, Detection & Medical Imaging, TU Delft & MILabs B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - N H Hendrikse
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Ter Heine
- Meander Medical Center, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Maatweg 3, 3813TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Geenen JW, Heine Ter R, Frederix GW, Hövels A, Vulpen van M, Kooistra A, Klerk de JMH, Bloemendal HJ. Metastatic Prostate Cancer and Skeletal Related Events, a Cost of Illness Study. Value Health 2014; 17:A626. [PMID: 27202213 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J W Geenen
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Heine Ter
- Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - A Hövels
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Vulpen van
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Kooistra
- Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Polinder-Bos HA, Kok EE, van de Wiel A, Spiering W, Wielders JPM, Bloemendal HJ. Severe hypertriglyceridaemia associated with the use of capecitabine. Neth J Med 2012; 70:104. [PMID: 22418760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
9
|
Kroep JR, Linn SC, Boven E, Bloemendal HJ, Baas J, Mandjes IAM, van den Bosch J, Smit WM, de Graaf H, Schröder CP, Vermeulen GJ, Hop WCJ, Nortier JWR. Lapatinib: clinical benefit in patients with HER 2-positive advanced breast cancer. Neth J Med 2010; 68:371-376. [PMID: 20876920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), has shown activity in combination with capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer progressive on standard treatment regimens. We present results on preapproval drug access for this combination in such patients occurring in the general oncology practice in the Netherlands. METHODS Patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer progressive on schedules containing anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab were eligible. Brain metastases were allowed if stable. Lapatinib 1250 mg÷day was given continuously in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg÷m2 twice daily for two weeks in a three-week cycle. Efficacy was assessed by use of response evaluation criteria in solid tumours version 1.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were enrolled from January 2007 until July 2008. The combination was generally well tolerated and the most common drug-related serious adverse events were nausea and÷or vomiting (5%) and diarrhoea (2%). Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for response. Clinical benefit (response or stable disease for at least 12 weeks) was observed in 50 patients (64%) of whom 15 had a partial response and 35 stable disease. The median PFS and OS were 17 weeks (95% CI: 13 to 21) and 39 weeks (95% CI: 24 to 54), respectively. For OS, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (p=0.016), brain metastases at study entry (p=0.010) and higher number of metastatic sites (p=0.012) were significantly negative predictive factors. CONCLUSION In a patient population with heavily pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer lapatinib plus capecitabine was well tolerated and offered clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brouha MEE, Bloemendal HJ, Kappelle LJ, Winter JB. [Cerebral infarction and myocardial infarction due to cisplatin-containing chemotherapy]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003; 147:457-60. [PMID: 12666519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
A 33-year-old man was treated for a testicular non-seminoma carcinoma with three different chemotherapeutic agents: bleomycin, etoposide en cisplatin (BEP). During the second course of BEP he experienced two cerebral infarctions and a myocardial infarction at almost the same time. A CT-scan of the brain revealed a subcortical infarction in the left hemisphere. Angiography of the head and neck arteries revealed an almost completely thrombotic left carotid artery. ECG recordings showed signs of transmural ischaemia of the heart and an echocardiogram demonstrated irreversible myocardial damage. The time interval between the chemotherapy and the complications suggests a cisplatin-related cause (such adverse effects are unknown with bleomycin or etoposide). Cisplatin toxicity can give rise to serious vascular complications for which several factors appear to be responsible, such as an increased thrombogenicity and vascular spasm due to hypomagnesaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E E Brouha
- Hart-Long-Instituut, afd. Cardiologie, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Postbus 85.500, 3508 GA Utrecht.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Angiogenesis is a critical step in the progression of tumours from dormancy to a clinical relevant cancer. Inhibition of this process is one of the most promising new anti-cancer strategies. To develop new drugs that interfere with the cascade of events required for the formation of new blood vessels, insight into this process is essential. Here, we discuss the molecular basis of angiogenesis and the concepts of vascular targeting. Furthermore new strategies will be discussed to discover surface markers on endothelial cells that confer sufficient specificity for targeted intervention in the tumour vasculature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Bloemendal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
A 71-year-old woman, known to have multiple myeloma, was admitted because of fever, abdominal pain and hyperamylasaemia and hyperamylasuria. She was diagnosed as having acute pancreatitis. Because the diagnosis could not be confirmed, and serum lipase was normal, it appeared that this patient had developed an amylase-producing myeloma lesion in the pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Bloemendal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hilversum Hospital, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|