Association between resting-state connectivity patterns in the defensive system network and treatment response in spider phobia-a replication approach

Although highly effective on average, exposure-based treatments do not work equally well for all patients with anxiety disorders. The identification of pre-treatment response-predicting patient characteristics may enable patient stratification. Preliminary research highlights the relevance of inhibitory fronto-limbic networks as such. We aimed to identify pre-treatment neural signatures differing between exposure treatment responders and non-responders in spider phobia and to validate results through rigorous replication. Data of a bi-centric intervention study comprised clinical phenotyping and pre-treatment resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) data of n = 79 patients with spider phobia (discovery sample) and n = 69 patients (replication sample). RsFC data analyses were accomplished using the Matlab-based CONN-toolbox with harmonized analyses protocols at both sites. Treatment response was defined by a reduction of >30% symptom severity from pre- to post-treatment (Spider Phobia Questionnaire Score, primary outcome). Secondary outcome was defined by a reduction of >50% in a Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT). Mean within-session fear reduction functioned as a process measure for exposure. Compared to non-responders and pre-treatment, results in the discovery sample seemed to indicate that responders exhibited stronger negative connectivity between frontal and limbic structures and were characterized by heightened connectivity between the amygdala and ventral visual pathway regions. Patients exhibiting high within-session fear reduction showed stronger excitatory connectivity within the prefrontal cortex than patients with low within-session fear reduction. Whereas these results could be replicated by another team using the same data (cross-team replication), cross-site replication of the discovery sample findings in the independent replication sample was unsuccessful. Results seem to support negative fronto-limbic connectivity as promising ingredient to enhance response rates in specific phobia but lack sufficient replication. Further research is needed to obtain a valid basis for clinical decision-making and the development of individually tailored treatment options. Notably, future studies should regularly include replication approaches in their protocols.

Mechanisms of action underlying virtual reality exposure treatment in spider phobia: Pivotal role of within-session fear reduction

Although virtual-reality exposure treatment (VRET) for anxiety disorders is an efficient treatment option for specific phobia, mechanisms of action for immediate and sustained treatment response need to be elucidated. Towards this aim, core therapy process variables were assessed as predictors for short- and long-term VR treatment outcomes. In a bi-centric study, n = 186 patients with spider phobia completed a baseline-assessment, a one-session VRET, a post-therapy assessment, and a 6-month-follow-up assessment (ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03208400). Short- and long-term outcomes regarding self-reported symptoms in the spider phobia questionnaire (SPQ) and final patient-spider distance in the behavioral avoidance test (BAT) were predicted via logistic regression models with the corresponding baseline score, age, initial fear activation, within-session fear reduction and fear expectancy violation as predictors. To predict long-term remission status at 6-month-follow-up, dimensional short-term changes in the SPQ and BAT were additionally included. Higher within-session fear reductions predicted better treatment outcomes (long-term SPQ; short- and long-term BAT). Lower initial fear activation tended to be associated with better long-term outcomes (SPQ), while fear expectancy violation was not associated with any outcome measure. Short-term change in the SPQ predicted remission status. Findings highlight that in VRET for spider phobia, the experience of fear reduction is central for short- and long-term treatment success and should be focused by therapists.

Neural correlates of fear conditioning are associated with treatment-outcomes to behavioral exposure in spider phobia - Evidence from magnetoencephalography

•

Magnetoencephalographic effects of fear conditioning predict exposure outcomes.

•

No associations between fear ratings of conditioned stimuli and exposure outcomes.

•

Prefrontal correlates of safety processing and/or fear inhibition are treatment-relevant.

•

Individual neural differences might be a promising predictor of exposure success.

Background

Models of anxiety disorders and the rationale of exposure therapy (ET) are grounded on classical fear conditioning. Yet, it is unclear whether lower fear ratings of conditioned safety versus threat cues and corresponding neural markers of safety-learning and/or fear inhibition assessed before treatment would predict better outcomes of behavioral exposure.

Methods

Sixty-six patients with spider phobia completed pre-treatment clinical and experimental fear conditioning assessments, one session of virtual reality ET, a post-treatment clinical assessment, and a 6-month follow-up assessment. Tilted Gabor gratings served as conditioned stimuli (CS) that were either paired (CS+) or remained unpaired (CS-) with an aversive phobia-related and phobia-unrelated unconditioned stimulus (UCS). CS+/CS- differences in fear ratings and magnetoencephalographic event-related fields (ERFs) were related to percentual symptom reductions from pre- to post-treatment, as assessed via spider phobia questionnaire (SPQ), behavioral avoidance test (BAT), and remission status at 6-month follow-up.

Results

We observed no associations between pre-treatment CS+/CS- differences in fear ratings and any treatment outcome. CS+/CS- differences in source estimations of ERFs revealed that higher CS- activity in bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) was related with SPQ- and BAT-reductions. Associations between CS+/CS- differences and treatment outcomes were also observed in left ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) regions, which additionally revealed associations with the follow-up remission status.

Conclusions

Results provide initial evidence that neural pre-treatment CS+/CS- differences may hold predictive information regarding outcomes of behavioral exposure. Our findings highlight a key role of neural responses to safety cues with potentially inhibitory effects on affect-generating structures during fear conditioning.

ENIGMA-anxiety working group: Rationale for and organization of large-scale neuroimaging studies of anxiety disorders

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and disabling but seem particularly tractable to investigation with translational neuroscience methodologies. Neuroimaging has informed our understanding of the neurobiology of anxiety disorders, but research has been limited by small sample sizes and low statistical power, as well as heterogenous imaging methodology. The ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group has brought together researchers from around the world, in a harmonized and coordinated effort to address these challenges and generate more robust and reproducible findings. This paper elaborates on the concepts and methods informing the work of the working group to date, and describes the initial approach of the four subgroups studying generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. At present, the ENIGMA-Anxiety database contains information about more than 100 unique samples, from 16 countries and 59 institutes. Future directions include examining additional imaging modalities, integrating imaging and genetic data, and collaborating with other ENIGMA working groups. The ENIGMA consortium creates synergy at the intersection of global mental health and clinical neuroscience, and the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group extends the promise of this approach to neuroimaging research on anxiety disorders.

Centromedial amygdala is more relevant for phobic confrontation relative to the bed nucleus of stria terminalis in patients with spider phobia

Recent studies indicate differential involvement of the centromedial amygdala (CM) and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) during processing (anticipation and confrontation) of threat stimuli. Here, temporal predictability was shown to be a relevant factor. In this study, we want to investigate the relevance of these effects, which were found in healthy subjects, for anxiety disorders. Therefore, we investigated the differential involvement of CM and BNST in the anticipation and confrontation of phobic stimuli under variation of temporal predictability in spider phobia. 21 patients with spider phobia and 21 healthy controls underwent a temporally predictable/unpredictable phobic and neutral anticipation and confrontation paradigm using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and ROI analyses. During the anticipation phase, healthy controls showed higher CM and BNST activity during the predictable compared with the unpredictable condition compared with the anxiety patients. During a confrontation phase that followed the anticipation phase, CM was more activated than BNST during the phobic compared with the neutral confrontation. While this effect was independent of threat predictability in patients, healthy controls showed higher activation in the CM compared with the BNST only during the predictable spider confrontation compared with the predictable bird confrontation. The results contribute to a better understanding of the separate roles of the CM and BNST during phobic processes. The CM was found to be more relevant to phobic confrontation in patients with spider phobia compared with the BNST.

Behavioral and Magnetoencephalographic Correlates of Fear Generalization are Associated with Responses to Later Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Spider Phobia

BACKGROUND

As overgeneralization of fear is a pathogenic marker of anxiety disorders, we investigated whether pre-treatment levels of fear generalization in spider-phobic patients are related to their response to exposure-based treatment, in order to identify pre-treatment moderators of treatment success.

METHODS

Ninety patients with spider phobia completed pre-treatment clinical and magnetoencephalography (MEG) assessments, one session of virtual reality exposure therapy, and a post-treatment clinical assessment. Based on the primary outcome (30% symptom reduction in self-reported symptoms) they were categorized as responders or non-responders. In a pre-treatment MEG fear generalization paradigm involving fear conditioning with two unconditioned stimuli (UCS), we obtained fear ratings, UCS-expectancy ratings, and event-related fields to conditioned stimuli (CS-, CS+) and 7 different generalization stimuli (GS) on a perceptual continuum from CS- to CS+.

RESULTS

Prior to treatment, non-responders showed behavioral overgeneralization indicated by more linear generalization gradients in fear ratings. Analyses of MEG source estimations revealed that non-responders showed a decline of their (inhibitory) frontal activations to safety-signaling CS- and GS compared to CS+ over time, while responders maintained these activations at early (<300ms) and late processing stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Results provide initial evidence that pre-treatment differences of behavioral and neural markers of fear generalization may act as moderators of later responses to behavioral exposure. Stimulating further research on fear generalization as a potential predictive marker, our findings are an important first step in the attempt to identify patients who may not profit from ET, and to personalize and optimize treatment strategies for this vulnerable patient group.

Theranostic markers for personalized therapy of spider phobia: Methods of a bicentric external cross-validation machine learning approach

OBJECTIVES

Embedded in the Collaborative Research Center "Fear, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders" (CRC-TRR58), this bicentric clinical study aims at identifying biobehavioral markers of treatment (non-)response by applying machine learning methodology with an external cross-validation protocol. We hypothesize that a priori prediction of treatment (non-)response is possible in a second, independent sample based on multimodal markers.

METHODS

One-session virtual reality exposure treatment (VRET) with patients with spider phobia was conducted on two sites. Clinical, neuroimaging, and genetic data were assessed at baseline, post-treatment and after 6 months. The primary and secondary outcomes defining treatment response are as follows: 30% reduction regarding the individual score in the Spider Phobia Questionnaire and 50% reduction regarding the individual distance in the behavioral avoidance test.

RESULTS

N = 204 patients have been included (n = 100 in Würzburg, n = 104 in Münster). Sample characteristics for both sites are comparable.

DISCUSSION

This study will offer cross-validated theranostic markers for predicting the individual success of exposure-based therapy. Findings will support clinical decision-making on personalized therapy, bridge the gap between basic and clinical research, and bring stratified therapy into reach. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03208400).

Characterizing the nature of emotional-associative learning deficits in panic disorder: An fMRI study on fear conditioning, extinction training and recall

Emotional-associative learning represents a translational model for the development, maintenance and treatment of anxiety disorders such as panic disorder (PD). The exact nature of the underlying fear learning and extinction deficits however, remains under debate. Using a three-day paradigm to separate the distinct learning and consolidation processes, we aimed to gain insights into the neurofunctional substrates of altered fear conditioning, extinction training and recall in PD. In contrast to studies employing one-session fear conditioning paradigms, a differential fear conditioning and delayed extinction task was conducted for the purpose of disentangling neural networks involved in fear acquisition, extinction training and recall of extinction memories. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), quality-controlled datasets from 10 patients with PD and 10 healthy controls were available from three consecutive days (day 1: acquisition; day 2: extinction training; day 3: extinction recall) with neutral faces serving as CSs and an aversive auditory stimulus (panic scream) as US. PD patients showed heightened fear circuitry (e.g. right amygdala and left insula) activation during early acquisition and prolonged activation in the right insula, left inferior frontal operculum and left inferior frontal gyrus during extinction recall compared to healthy controls. Stronger neural activation in structures conferring defensive reactivity during early acquisition and extinction recall may indicate the accelerated acquisition of conditioned responses, while extinction recall may be attenuated as a function of PD pathophysiology. Future studies should investigate the predictive value of experimental measures of extinction recall for clinical relapse.