Bendamustin-Rituximab Combination Is a Safe and Effective, Ambulatory Treatment for Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Retrospective Real-world Analysis by Age from a German Registry and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Treatment recommendations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are based upon selected, otherwise healthy study populations mostly under 72 years of age. The Project group Internistic Oncology (PIO) embarked on an analysis of the 'real-world' safety and efficacy of bendamustine with and without rituximab in unselected outpatients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter, open-label, prospectively stratified, retrospective study was conducted to determine routine feasibility, toxicity, and response rates obtained by bendamustine with and without rituximab in a random population of mostly elderly patients with CLL. Records were obtained from 775 patients with CLL from 60 private medical oncology practices. Informed consent was obtained prior to study participation. The median observation time was 28 months. Patients were stratified according to age, and treatment. Response criteria and statistics followed international guidelines adopted by the "German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group".

RESULTS

Overall, 57.5% of patients were over 70 (range=36-95) years old. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and age influenced the total dose given, decreasing by 20% between ECOG 0 and 3, and by 15% above 80 years old. Response rates did not differ between the ages of 60 to 80 years, with an overall remission rate for bendamustine of 83%, and for the combination therapy of 89%, decreasing above the age of 80 years. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 25% of 775 patients, and grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events in 9.55% (n=74), not interfering with the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Bendamustine with and without rituximab was associated with high activity and tolerability, irrespective of age and risk factors. The median overall survival was 64 months with a 3-year survival rate of 72%; progression-free survival was 30.6 months, and the 3 year PFS was 43%. The good tolerability and feasibility of bendamustine with and without rituximab, in particular for the elderly population with CLL argues for it being a safe outpatient treatment.

Adjuvant therapy reduces the benefit of palliative treatment in disseminated breast cancer - own findings and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant treatment concepts have improved the 10-year cure rate of breast and colon cancer, but new treatments for metastatic disease have yielded only incremental benefit. If treatments for disseminated cancer were actually prolonging life rather than only increasing remission rates, this effect should have been documented over the last 30+ years. However, published data concerning advances in treatment for disseminated cancer have been contradictory.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To add data-based information, we analyzed 2 sources: a regional population-based cancer registry (Hamburgisches Krebsregister, HKR), and a research cancer registry (Projektgruppe Internistische Onkologie, PIO). We compared the survival of several thousand patients with metastatic disease who received treatment only after dissemination with that of patients who received initial adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

After adjuvant treatment, survival in patients with disseminated breast cancer is up to a third shorter than that of patients without adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In accordance with published evidence, we conclude that ineffective adjuvant treatment shortens survival after documentation of metastatic disease. This is probably due to the elimination of chemo-sensitive tumor cells or to the induction of resistance in remaining micrometatases. This negative effect on survival after dissemination has been shown clearly for breast cancer and is also probable for cancer of the colon and other sites.

Randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

An increasing proportion of patients are exposed to anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Re-exposure in the metastatic stage is limited by drug resistance, thus evaluation of non-cross-resistant regimens is mandatory.

METHODS

Anthracycline-pretreated patients were randomly assigned to three gemcitabine-based regimens. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1.000 mg m(-2) plus vinorelbin 25 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemVin), or plus cisplatin 30 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemCis), or plus capecitabine 650 mg m(-2) b.i.d. orally days 1-14 (GemCap), q3w. The primary end point was response rate.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were recruited on the trial. The overall response rates were 39.0% (GemVin), 47.7% (GemCis) and 34.7% (GemCap). Median progression-free survival was estimated with 5.7, 6.9 and 8.3 months, respectively. Corresponding median survival times were 17.5 (GemVin), 13.0 (GemCis) and 19.4 months (GemCap). Neutropenia ≥grade 3 occurred in 16.7% (Gem/Vin), 4.4% (GemCis) and 0% (Gem/Cap), whereas non-haematological toxicities were rarely severe except grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 2.0% of the GemCap patients (per patient analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomised phase II trial has revealed comparable results for three gemcitabine-based regimens regarding treatment efficacy and toxicity. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to be a worthwhile treatment option for pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

A new concept for the differential diagnosis and therapy of anaemia in cancer patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to prove the usefulness of the diagnostic plot, using the haemoglobin content of reticulocytes as a measure of functional iron deficiency (FID) and the ferritin index as a measure of iron availability, to customise anaemia treatment in cancer patients.

METHODS

Based on results of this plot, cancer patients fulfilling practice guideline criteria to receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were allocated to treatment with ESAs alone, iron alone or the combination of both. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients identified to require iron in addition or as an alternative to ESA therapy.

RESULTS

Out of 303 patients screened, 286 were allocated to treatment: 204 patients were normochromic and iron replete and treated with ESAs alone, 22 had both FID and anaemia of chronic disease and were treated with ESAs and parenteral iron, and 60 were iron-depleted and treated with iron only. After 8 weeks, a haemoglobin increase >1 g/dL from baseline was shown by 56% of patients treated with ESAs alone, by 100% of patients receiving the combination, by 50% of normochromic and by 73% of hypochromic iron-depleted patients receiving iron only. Acute phase reaction did not diminish the response rate to ESAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic plot was superior to transferrin saturation and ferritin in predicting iron availability in hypochromic patients treated with ESAs and proved useful to select treatment for anaemia in cancer patients.

Bone effects of exemestane vs. tamoxifen within the TEAM trial: results of a prospective randomized bone sub study

Abstract #1143

Background: A prospective open label randomized multicenter trial was performed in the German TEAM Trial Group to compare the effects of the steroidal aromatase inhibitor Exemestane (EXE) and the ER agonist/antagonist Tamoxifen (TAM) on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover during adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
 Methods: 200 postmenopausal estrogen receptor positive breast cancer women
 were included in the bone substudy. Women with a history of osteoporosis or a disease or treatment known to effect bone metabolism were excluded. BMD and markers of bone turnover were assessed at baseline, after 6 and 12 months of treatment. BMD was performed using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumber spine and femoral neck (FN). Marker of bone formation, PINP, bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and osteocalcin (OC) as well as bone resorption marker (ICPM) were analysed using standardised methods. Intent-to-treat analysis was performed based on 200 patients. The primary endpoint was to compare Exemestane and Tamoxifen with regard to changes from baseline to month 12 in BMD (g/cm²) in lumbar spine (integral of L1-L4). Results: 156 patients with a mean age of 61 yr. (+/- 7.3 yr.) were available for final analysis. Both groups were comparable regarding age, height, tumor grade and stage. Compared to women on Tamoxifen, who comprised an BMD increase of +0.9% and +0.9% after 6 and 12 months at the spine, women on EXE showed a decrease of -2.8% and -3.6%. Conversely, BMD at the FN showed a decrease of -2.1% and -2.2% in women on TAM while women on EXE showed a decrease of -3.4% after 6 and an increase of +1.1% after 12 months, respectivly. Bone formation and absorption was modulated in both groups. Details will be presented at the meeting.Conclusion: The results of the 12 months analysis in the TEAM Bone substudy confirm the bone protective effect of TAM at the spine while conversely the results at the FN showed a decrease. Women on EXE showed a decrease at the spine while there was a neutral effect at the FN. Futher evaluation of the 24 months data as well as the fracture rate of the total TEAM trial are nessecary to evaluate the effect of EXE on bone health.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 1143.

[Asymptomatic 32 year old female smoker with persistent polyclonal lymphocytosis]

A 32 year old female smoker (20 pack years) presented with an asymptomatic lymphocytosis of 13,000/nl and splenomegaly. The patient's blood smear showed an absolute lymphocytosis with 65% atypical lymphocytes. A total of 1% of the lymphocytes were bilobulated. Bone marrow histology and immunphenotyping of blood and bone marrow excluded leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. IgH-CDR-3 PCR analysis revealed a polyclonal pattern. In summary, a persistent polyclonal B-cell-lymphocytosis (PPBL) was diagnosed. The exact etiology of PPBL is still unclear, however, it is associated with a polyclonal raise in the lymphocyte count of CD27+IgD+-memory-B-lymphocytes due to a defect in apoptosis signaling and leukocyte homing to secondary lymphoid tissues. An association with cigarette smoking is obvious since all patients are smokers. From all published cases, only two developed a malignancy with an uncertain association with PPBL. We have been monitoring our patient for 6.5 years without any evidence of the development of a lymphoma.

Determining carboplatin/etoposide dosage in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)

In order to define the maximum tolerance level of combined carboplatin/etoposide dosage, patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with a fixed dose of carboplatin (300 mg/m2 iv on day 1) and escalating doses of etoposide starting with 80 mg/m2 iv on days 1-3. Five patients were given this starting and every following dose level. The daily dose of etoposide was increased in increments of 20 mg/m2 iv until severe myelosuppression occurred in 3 of 5 patients. Leuko- or thrombocytopenia WHO grade 3 or 4 occurred in 0/5 of the patients at the dose levels of 80 and 100 mg/m2, in 1/4 of the patients at the level of 120 mg/m2, in 2/5 of the patients at a level of 140 mg/m2, and 3/5 patients at a level of 160 mg/m2. Thus, increase in dosage was stopped at an etoposide dose of 160 mg/m2. Other side effects were mild and consisted predominantly of nausea and vomiting in 14/25 of the patients. The overall response rate was 40% with a 12% complete remission rate, median survival was 9.3 months and median progression-free survival totalled 4.3 months. These results indicate that combined carboplatin/etoposide is a well tolerated regimen in extensive-stage SCLC, with response rates comparable to those of other standard protocols. Using treatment intervals of 4 weeks the recommended dose of etoposide in combination with 300 mg/m2 carboplatin was identified as 140 mg/m2 iv for 3 consecutive days.

Chemotherapy with tauromustine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A trial of the Phase II Study Group of the Association for Medical Oncology of the German Cancer Society

Tauromustine (TCNU) is a newly developed nitrosourea compound. As a result of molecular modification, TCNU is more hydrophilic than BCNU and CCNU. In experimental data there was a high therapeutic index, especially in Walker 256 carcinosarcoma in rats, and in phase I trials antitumor activity was observed in NSCLC (10/33 remissions). There was also activity in melanoma, breast cancer, pleuramesotheliomas and ovarian cancer. To determine the effectiveness, duration of response and toxicity of TCNU the following phase II trial was performed. Patients received 130 mg/m2 TCNU every 35 days orally. Twenty-five patients were treated; 22 were evaluable. The female/male ratio was 18/4, 1 patient was stage III, 21 patients stage IV, the mean age was 62.3 years (range 32-70). Between 1 and 4 courses (mean 1.9) were administered. Histology was as follows: 6 squamous cell, 11 adenocarcinoma, 2 large cell and 3 polymorph cell carcinomas. No objective response (CR + PR) was observed; 6/18 patients had stable disease, 7/18 progression and 5/18 early progression. The median survival time is 4.9 months. The most severe side effect was thrombocytopenia (WHO grade 3 + 4, 4/22 patients). TCNU administered at this dose and schedule does not show substantial antitumor activity in patients with NSCLC. The fact that no objective tumor remission was observed suggests that the true response rate is less than 20% (p less than 0.05). It is improbable that TCNU has a relevant impact on the course of inoperable NSCLC.

[Chemotherapy of non-small cell bronchial cancer with ifosfamide in combination with cisplatin, etoposide or vindesine]

192 untreated patients with a histologically verified non-small cell lung carcinoma were treated within 3 phase-II studies with different chemotherapy regimens: ifosfamide 2 g/m2 day 1-5 and cis-platinum 75 mg/m2 on day 1 (study I); ifosfamide 2 g/m2 days 1-5 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 days 1-3 (study II); ifosfamide 2 g/m2 days 1-5 and vindesine 3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (study III). All chemotherapy combinations were repeated every 4 weeks. One therapy with at least 2 courses was the minimum criterion for evaluating the remission rate. We observed complete remissions in 5 patients, and partial remissions in 54 patients (remission rate 31%). The median duration of remission was 7 months, the time to progression 5 months. The median survival time of all 192 patients was calculated as 8.5 months. The performance status had a significant influence on the remission state and the survival time of the patients. The sex and age of the patients as well as the extension and the histological type of the tumor had no influence. Concerning the remission rate and the survival time, there was no significant difference between the 3 therapy regimens. Due to the lesser toxicity, the combination ifosfamide/etoposide was the best.