Iatrogenic Breast Lymphoedema: Incidence, Diagnosis, and Associated Risk Factors

While upper limb lymphoedema following breast and axillary surgery is well established in the literature, breast lymphoedema is rarely documented. Our primary objective was to identify risk factors of breast lymphoedema, and our secondary aim was to assess the possibility of using a breast ultrasound scan to assess breast lymphoedema. This study was a case series analysis, including patients who had wide local excision for primary breast cancer treatment between January 2013 and January 2018. Patients' demographics, including age, weight, body mass index (BMI), breast volume, tumour characteristics, and histological findings, were noted. All patients had a clinical assessment and ultrasound scan 6 months and 12 months after surgery, comparing ipsilateral to the contralateral breast skin, subcutaneous thickness, as well as parenchymal changes. We have included two hundred eighty-six breast cancer; the mean age was 54.7 years SD 17.3, the mean weight was 76.5 kg SD 12.6, the mean BMI was 31.5 SD 5.2, and the mean breast volume was 1223 ml SD 179. This study identified breast lymphoedema in patients with clinically detected skin oedema in the absence of radiotherapy skin changes; skin and subcutaneous 5 mm added thickness more than the contralateral side, and based on that, 22 patients (7.7%) were found to have breast lymphoedema. We have also found that patients with high BMI, larger breast volume, upper outer quadrant tumours, and patients who had axillary lymph node clearance had an increased incidence of breast lymphoedema. The incidence of breast lymphoedema in this cohort was 7.7%. We suggest that breast lymphoedema should be considered if skin and subcutaneous thickness are 5 mm more than the contralateral side in the absence of severe radiotherapy skin changes. Also, we have found that high body mass index (BMI), larger breast volume, upper outer quadrant tumours, and patients who had axillary lymph node clearance are associated with an increased incidence of breast lymphoedema.

Adequate Assessment Can Affect the Management of Breast Cancer in Geriatric Population

Breast cancer (BC) risk increases with age; about a third of patients are diagnosed in age older than 65. Treatment of this age group remains controversial, leading to inferior outcomes with lower survival rates than younger patients. We aimed to evaluate performance status tools as well as the outcome of management of breast cancer in the geriatric population. We have conducted a retrospective database analysis looking into the management of breast cancer patients older than 65 years old presenting to our unit during the period between June 2015 and June 2019. All patients had triple assessment as well as multimodality performance status assessment with their treatment modalities, and outcomes are recorded and assessed. We have included 578 patients, 0.8% male and 99.2% female, and our patients' mean age was 71 years. Most of our patients scored one or two on the WHO/ECOG performance status score and Clinical Frailty Score, as well as ASA-PS score. 3.2% had no treatment, 4.3% had endocrine therapy only, 0.5% had primary endocrine therapy followed by surgery, and 92.3% underwent surgery with 4.1% complication rate. Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery had adjuvant breast radiotherapy, and 23.7% had adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy, 78.8% had adjuvant endocrine treatment, and 4.8% had adjuvant chemotherapy out of which 30.7% had adjuvant chemotherapy and Herceptin. Objective assessment tools should be used for patients older than 65 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer to be able to scarify patients' individualised treatment options to reach the optimum outcome.

86 Adequate Assessment Can Affect the Management of Breast Cancer in The Geriatric Population

Background

Breast cancer (BC) risk increases with age; about a third of patients are diagnosed in age older than 70. Treatment of this age group remains a thorny issue leading to inferior outcome with lower survival rate compared to younger patients.

Aim

We aimed to evaluate performance status tools as well as the outcome of management of breast cancer in the geriatric population.

Method

We have conducted a retrospective database analysis looking into the management of breast cancer patients older than 65 years old presenting to our unit during the period between June 2015 to June 2019. All patients had triple assessment as well as multimodality performance status assessment with their treatment modalities and outcomes recorded and assessed.

Results

We have included 578 patients, 0.8% male and 99.2 % female, and our patients mean age was 71 years. Most of our patients scored one or two on the WHO/ ECOG performance status score, Clinical Frailty Score, as well as ASA-PS score. 3.2% had no treatment, 4.3% had endocrine therapy only, 0.5% had primary endocrine therapy followed by surgery, 92.3 % underwent surgery with 4.1% complication rate. Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery had adjuvant breast radiotherapy, and 23.7% had adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy, 78.8% had adjuvant endocrine treatment and 4.8% had adjuvant chemotherapy out of which 30.7% had adjuvant chemotherapy and Herceptin.

Conclusions

Patients’ age should trigger the use of objective assessment tools while assessing elderly patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis, and treatment modalities offered should be individualised to reach the optimum outcome.

Routine cavity shaves following breast conserving surgery; friend or foe?

BACKGROUND

Radial margin status is considered one of the most important prognostic predictor for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCT), not only related to regional recurrence but also to 5y survival, especially in patients with invasive disease.

AIM

While our primary aim was to evaluate whether doing routine radial cavity shaves following at the time of primary conservative breast surgery will decrease the need for a second operation or not, our secondary aim was to assess time added to the operation to resect and mark the radial shaves, as well as patients' satisfaction with the results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have conducted a case series prospective analysis, including158 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery looking into the histological status of resection margins and radial shaves, added time taken to take and mark the shaves as well as patients' satisfaction.

RESULTS

158 female breast cancer patients have been included in our analysis, the mean age was 56 years; total number of lesions was 160. While 89.3% of lesions were palpable, 10.6% were not requiring wire-guided localisation. Mean tumour size was 24 mm SD 7, final histology revealed that 86.8% lesion was invasive ductal carcinoma, 5.6% invasive lobular carcinoma, 1.2% medullary carcinoma. 12.4% had invasive disease as well as DCIS, and 1.8% had DCIS only with no invasive disease. Mean preoperative breast volume was 723 ml, Mean wide local excision specimen weight was 73 g, and mean shave weight was 1.6 g. Total number of radial margins was 640, 81.8% was clear, 14.6% was close, and 3.4% was involved. Total number of shaves was 640 out of which 98.7% was clear 0.7% was close and 0.4% was involved. Out of the 160 lesions, 3.7% required a second procedure to clear margins, out of which 2.5% had re-excision for close or involved single shaves each while 1.2% had mastectomy due to close or involved two shaves each. Average time utilised in resection of radial shaves and marking was 7 min 0.6% of patients developed a haematoma, 1.8% had a Seroma, and 1.2% had wound infection. Mean hospital stay was 1day SD 1.

CONCLUSION

Routine radial cavity shaves not only ensure microscopic clearance, reduce the need for re-excision with no significant added operating time but also has no impact on patients' satisfaction.