Intern Experience Reflects Information Gathered During the Virtual Interview Process

OBJECTIVE

The onset of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought many changes to the residency application process including transitioning to a virtual interview platform, which continues today. The transition brought many concerns from general surgery applicants about their ability to obtain adequate information about a program virtually. We sought to characterize how information presented by programs during the first ever virtual interview cycle matched the experience of general surgery interns after training at a program for 1 year.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In May of 2022, a survey was distributed to 243 program directors who were asked to forward it to their general surgery categorical interns who matched during the 2021 virtual match cycle. Demographics, resources used to determine an impression of a program, and correlations between information presented virtually and what was subsequently experienced as an intern were collected.

RESULTS

Forty-six program directors confirmed forwarding the survey to their categorical interns. A total of 102 general surgery interns completed the survey. Most interns (88.2%) agreed that their experience matched expectations based on information received through the virtual interview process and 98% of interns were satisfied with their experience at their training program. Interviews with faculty (40.0%), residents (68.0%) and the program web site (29.0%) were the top 3 resources used to create the most accurate impression of a program. Interns felt they were well informed during the virtual interview experience about support from fellow residents (84.3%), culture (73.0%), surgical volume (72.5%), and intern operative experience (71.6%). In addition, 65.7% of participants thought they were able to obtain a good understanding of the program's culture from the virtual process. However, 16.7% thought that their program unintentionally misrepresented aspects of the training program.

CONCLUSIONS

The faculty and residency interviews were the most important factors in program ranking and most participants agreed that their virtual interview experience matched their expectations during their intern year. Most interns felt they were able to obtain a good understanding of the program's culture from the virtual process. In addition, a majority of interns felt well informed during the interview on aspects ranging from surgical volume, autonomy, and work hours to support from faculty and residents. If virtual interviews are to continue, residents can be satisfied that information gathered virtually will match the reality of their training. Programs should continue to make every effort to present their program realistically.

The Association Between Virtual Interviewing and Geographical Distribution of Matched Residency Programs for General Surgery Applicants

OBJECTIVE

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coalition for Physician Accountability's work group on Medical Students in the class of 2021 made the recommendation in May of 2020 that the upcoming residency recruitment cycle be conducted virtually. This flexibility may have allowed applicants to apply and interview at programs with less regard to geography, knowing that travel costs of interviewing would not be a factor. Alternatively, applicants who interviewed virtually could choose to remain in a close proximity to their home institutions where they likely have a greater comfort level and familiarity with the community both personally and professionally. We examine the distribution of applicants matched at general surgery residency programs in 2021 to those in 2020 to see if there was a change in geographic variability.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of general surgery residents SETTING: United States general surgery residency programs PARTICIPANTS: 2153 PGY1 categorical general surgery residents who were interviewed virtually and PGY2 categorical general surgery residents who interviewed in-person, who also attended residency programs and medical schools located in the continental United States with publicly accessible residency websites containing necessary biographical information.

RESULTS

A total of 2153 residents were included; 1124 in their PGY1 and 1029 in their PGY2. Average distance from attended medical school to matched program (634.2 vs 662.5), percentage of matched programs within 500 miles of attended medical school (57.3 vs 55.7), average price of flight, when available, from attended medical school to matched program (222.8 vs 230.4), and percentage of attended medical schools with non-stop flight to matched program (42.9 vs 42.9) did not significantly differ between PGY1 and PGY2 residents.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to adopt virtual interviewing practices compared to previous in-person interviews did not significantly alter the geographical distribution of students' matched programs. The distance from medical school to the matched program, flight availability, and flight pricing remained comparable between residents interviewed in-person and residents interviewed virtually.

Reduced Narcotic Utilization in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients in an Urban Tertiary Care Center

Background

Opioid use after total joint arthroplasty must be balanced against the risks of opioid dependence and diversion. This study sought to define the baseline patient characteristics and discharge opioid use after the initiation of a preoperative and postoperative institutional opioid prescription protocol in a population with a high prevalence of opioid dependence and substance use.

Methods

Data on 1004 patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics were collected, and data were grouped into high- and low-discharge opioid groups based on 1 standard deviation above or below the mean. Patient characteristics of the high and low groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance and Pearson chi-square test.

Results

The prevalence of preoperative opioid dependence was 21.8%. The mean discharge opioid prescription was 264 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). The cutoffs of high- and low-use groups were above 424 MMEs and below 104.5 MMEs. The high-discharge opioid group was more likely to be male, younger, to have a history of preoperative opioid use, to undergo general anesthesia, and to be uninsured. The lower-discharge opioid group was more likely to be older, female, to have Medicare, and to stay approximately 1 day longer in the hospital. Body mass index, intraoperative opioid requirement, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification score, race, total knee vs total hip arthroplasty, or surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty did not affect discharge opioid prescriptions.

Conclusions

Reduction of opioid prescriptions at discharge in total joint arthroplasty patients may be possible with the use of preoperative and postoperative protocols, optimizing patient risk factors for opioid use and utilizing a patient-specific opioid taper regimen.

Pharyngesophageal Diverticula Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVES

Development of traction pharyngesophageal diverticula following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a rare but morbid cause of dysphagia and the optimal surgical management is unclear.

METHODS

PubMed, GoogleScholar, Embase database reviews of "traction diverticula/um + anterior cervical/ACDF." Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, surgical technique, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Seventeen manuscripts reported 21 cases of pharyngesophageal diverticulum (PED) following ACDF (10 F:11 M, mean age 45 years). Presenting symptoms included dysphagia (n = 18), regurgitation (n = 10), and weight loss (n = 6). The average interval to presentation was 4.5 years after ACDF (range: 6 months-18 years) and ACDF levels most commonly involved were C5-C6 and/or C6-C7 (n = 12). Open diverticulectomy with (n = 12) and without (n = 6) cricopharyngeal myotomy was the most common approach and reinforcement with vascularized tissue was used in 6 patients (29%). Attempted endoscopic diverticula repair was successful in 1 patient, was converted to open repair in 5 patients, and 1 patient did not have surgical repair. ACDF hardware was removed in 11 cases (52%) and was routinely removed when concomitant infection was present. Complications following repair were reported in 6 patients (30%).

CONCLUSION

Traction pharyngesophageal diverticula are a rare cause of dysphagia which occur after a variable interval following ACDF. Open surgical diverticulectomy yields superior outcomes compared to the endoscopic approach. In the setting of infection hardware removal is recommended. Vascularized tissue reinforcement can limit potential esophageal leak; however, the risk of post-operative complications remains high.

Surgical management of obstructing clot at the jejunojejunostomy after gastric bypass: a single center experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a proven treatment for morbid obesity and its sequelae. Gastric bypass has a safe risk profile, but postoperative complications can be seen. We report on 10 cases of postoperative bleeding causing an obstructing clot at the jejunojejunostomy (JJ) occurring over a 9-year period.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to document presenting symptoms of obstructing clots at the JJ and to suggest a treatment approach to minimize complications.

SETTING

University Hospital, United States METHODS: The local Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was queried for all patients undergoing reoperation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, from July 2009 until December 2019. All patients who were found to have postoperative bleeding causing an obstructing clot at the JJ were selected for retrospective medical-record review.

RESULTS

The most common presenting symptoms were Hematocrit drop (10 of 10), nausea (9 of 10), abdominal pain (7 of 10), and hematemesis (4 of 10). There were 12 reoperations in the 10 patients, 10 of which were completed laparoscopically. Infectious complications were the most frequent morbidity in our patients; 4 patients developed abscesses. In all of these, the operative notes described gross spillage into the peritoneal cavity. In later cases, the remnant stomach was decompressed before reoperation, reducing spillage.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the low rate of obstructing clots at the JJ, without rapid recognition and reoperation, there is a risk for serious complications. Typical presenting symptoms include nausea and abdominal pain, which help differentiate it from other causes of decreased hematocrit. Diagnosis is commonly made with computerized tomographic (CT) scan. Decompression of a dilated remnant stomach before addressing the clot can prevent intraperitoneal spillage and subsequent abscess formation. Enterotomy creation and removal of clot is recommended, without fear of continued bleeding.

The intensity of breast cancer patients' relationships with their surgeons after the first meeting: Evidence that relationships are not 'built' but arise from attachment processes

BACKGROUND

Cancer clinicians are exhorted to build clinical relationships with their patients over time using patient-centred communication skills. An alternative view is that patients' sense of relationship is a response to clinicians' expertise and authority and therefore is normally present from the start.

OBJECTIVE

We measured the intensity of breast cancer patients' sense of relationship with their surgeon after their first brief, diagnostically focused meeting in order to compare it with published reports from patients in other types and stages of clinical relationship.

PARTICIPANTS

Women (N = 133) over 18 years old and due to undergo surgery for primary breast cancer were recruited consecutively from pre-operative clinics.

DESIGN

Patients reported the intensity of their relationship with the surgeon on a standardised questionnaire (Working Alliance Inventory). We compared their ratings with published reports over the last 15 years, in which patients in other types of clinical relationship completed the same questionnaire.

RESULTS

Patients' alliance with their surgeons was very high (mean 6.13, 95% CI: 5.99, 6.27, on a 1-7 scale), and at 90(th) percentile when compared with scores from other settings, including those characterized by many hours of talk addressing patients' emotional needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with breast cancer feel an intense sense of relationship with the surgeon from the first meeting, consistent with the view that their sense of relationship arises primarily from their recognition of the surgeon's expertise and authority. The challenge for surgeons is therefore not usually to 'build a relationship' but to support the sense of relationship that patients have from the start.

How patients evaluate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and why their evaluation often differs from that of their clinicians

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation of breast reconstruction after treatment for cancer sometimes differs between the patient who receives it and the surgeon who performs it. Questionnaire studies shed little light on this. We therefore aimed to discover what factors influence how patients evaluate breast reconstruction and thereby to understand sources of disagreement between practitioners and patients in their evaluation.

METHODS

At the study centre, patients who undergo reconstruction following breast cancer rate their subjective evaluation of the procedure, and the surgeon and breast care nurse jointly rate their assessment of cosmesis. We interviewed in depth 27 patients with a range of scores on each rating to elicit the reasons for their evaluations. Interviews were analysed qualitatively with particular attention to patients whose evaluations diverged from those of practitioners.

RESULTS

Influences on patients' subjective evaluations included two aspects of cosmesis (how 'normal' they felt and how normal or attractive they thought they appeared to others), but also how much they trusted and respected their practitioners and felt cared for by them, whether reconstruction had helped to complete their 'cancer journey' and post-operative complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients' subjective evaluation of reconstruction after cancer treatment extends well beyond cosmesis, and experience of cancer influences what they consider important. Evaluations therefore often differ from those of practitioners. Surgeons and specialist nurses need to be aware of the factors that influence patients' evaluations in order to guide patients appropriately in decisions about surgery, and to evaluate outcomes across the domains that matter to patients.