Rhabdomyolysis in Ebola Virus Disease. Results of an Observational Study in a Treatment Center in Guinea

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of Ebola virus disease (EVD) remains unclear. The sporadic nature of Ebola outbreaks and their occurrence in resource-limited settings have precluded the acquisition of extensive clinical and laboratory data. Rhabdomyolysis during EVD has been suggested to occur in previous studies showing increased aspartate aminotransferase-alanine aminotransferase ratios, but, to date, has not been confirmed with creatine kinase (CK) assays.

METHODS

We performed an observational study of 38 patients admitted to an Ebola treatment center from January to April 2015. CK values from patients with confirmed EVD were compared with those in patients without confirmed EVD. A panel of other analyses were also performed. In patients with EVD, characteristics were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors.

RESULTS

High levels of CK were more frequent in patients with EVD than in those without (P = .002), and rhabdomyolysis was more frequent (59% vs 19%, respectively; P = .03). CK levels >5000 U/L were observed in 36% of patients with EVD. Also in patients with EVD, fatal outcome was significantly associated with higher creatinine and bilirubin levels, international normalized ratio, and viral load.

CONCLUSIONS

Rhabdomyolysis is a frequent disorder in EVD and seems to be more common than in other viral infections. It may contribute to the renal failure observed in nonsurviving patients. More studies are needed to determine the impact of rhabdomyolysis on EVD outcome.

[Evaluation of the performance of transfer devices in a closed system using a radioactive solution of [(99m)Tc]]

INTRODUCTION

The exposure of workers to antineoplastic agents is potentially dangerous in the long term because of the teratogenic, carcinogenic and mutagenic hazardous of these products. These risks could be reduced by individual and collective shield measures. It's recommended to use transfer devices in a closed system for preparation of chemotherapy.

METHOD

The aim of the survey is to analyse for five devices (four devices in a closed system transfer and a needle equipped with an air intake), the following criteria: transfer performance of a solution of a vial to another one, no leakage of the device and practicality in the use. A method implementing a radioactive solution of sodium pertechnetate [(99m)Tc] is used.

RESULTS

Teva(®) and Cardinal(®) devices seem to be more efficient according to the ability to transfer one solution from a vial to another one with a low dead volume and low-level contamination in the around of the manipulation area. The Hospira(®) device appears an intermediate solution, while the Phaseal(®) device may be irrelevant for the transfer of a solution.

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

Our study could attest that the methodology is simple to implement and cheap to compare devices on multiple selection criteria. This evaluation method is interesting because it allows a classification according to several criteria weighted according to the type of intended use. In addition to economic issues and protection of the worker, the use of such devices should be extended to other areas as the preparation of chemotherapy such as preparation of radiopharmaceuticals drugs.