1
|
Fountzilas E, Tsimberidou AM, Hiep Vo H, Kurzrock R. Tumor-agnostic baskets to N-of-1 platform trials and real-world data: Transforming precision oncology clinical trial design. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 125:102703. [PMID: 38484408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Choosing the right drug(s) for the right patient via advanced genomic sequencing and multi-omic interrogation is the sine qua non of precision cancer medicine. Traditional cancer clinical trial designs follow well-defined protocols to evaluate the efficacy of new therapies in patient groups, usually identified by their histology/tissue of origin of their malignancy. In contrast, precision medicine seeks to optimize benefit in individual patients, i.e., to define who benefits rather than determine whether the overall group benefits. Since cancer is a disease driven by molecular alterations, innovative trial designs, including biomarker-defined tumor-agnostic basket trials, are driving ground-breaking regulatory approvals and deployment of gene- and immune-targeted drugs. Molecular interrogation further reveals the disruptive reality that advanced cancers are extraordinarily complex and individually distinct. Therefore, optimized treatment often requires drug combinations and N-of-1 customization, addressed by a new generation of N-of-1 trials. Real-world data and structured master registry trials are also providing massive datasets that are further fueling a transformation in oncology. Finally, machine learning is facilitating rapid discovery, and it is plausible that high-throughput computing, in silico modeling, and 3-dimensional printing may be exploitable in the near future to discover and design customized drugs in real time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Luke's Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece; European University Cyprus, German Oncology Center, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- WIN Consortium for Precision Medicine, France; Medical College of Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vo HH, Truong-Thi NN, Ho-Thi HB, Vo HMC, Tran-Thi KT, Nguyen MD. The value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, red cell distribution width, and their combination in predicting acute pancreatitis severity. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27:11464-11471. [PMID: 38095394 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202312_34585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain requiring hospitalization worldwide. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) are novel inflammatory markers that have been investigated in various diseases associated with an inflammatory response, achieving many positive results. Evaluating the NLR, PLR, RDW, and their combination to predict acute pancreatitis severity can help clinicians have an appropriate initial treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective cohort study enrolled 131 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis at Gia Dinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, between December 2021 and August 2022. Patients with the following features were excluded from our study: age < 18 years old, time from symptom onset to admission of > 72 hours; patients with autoimmune disease, decompensated cirrhosis, active tuberculosis, heart failure (New York Heart Association class 4), end-stage renal failure, pregnancy, active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, and chronic pancreatitis. RESULTS There were 21 severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) cases (16%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting SAP was 0.82 for NLR, 0.72 for PLR, and 0.73 for RDW. When the cutoffs of 13.5 for NLR, 202.7 for PLR, and 13.1% for the RDW were used, the negative predictive values in predicting SAP were 93.1%, 91.9%, and 98.8%, respectively. This finding demonstrates the value of inflammatory markers in predicting SAP. The combination of these markers did not show an advantage in predicting SAP compared to the single markers. CONCLUSIONS High NLR, PLR, and RDW are associated with SAP. These indices are good indicators for predicting SAP. In our study, the combination of inflammatory markers did not improve SAP prediction compared to the individual markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H H Vo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Binh Dan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fountzilas E, Hiep Vo H, Mueller P, Kurzrock R, Tsimberidou AM. Dataset of phase I and II immunotherapy clinical trials used for a meta-analysis to assess the role of biomarkers in treatment outcomes in diverse cancers. Data Brief 2023; 51:109698. [PMID: 38020439 PMCID: PMC10630619 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We performed a literature search in PubMed to identify phase I/II clinical trials with immunotherapy drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (labeled, off-label, and/or combined with investigational immune checkpoint inhibitors or other treatment modalities) from 2018 to 2020. We used the following key words: clinical trials, phase 1, Phase 2; and the following filters: cancer, humans; and selected the checkpoint inhibitors that had been approved by the FDA by March 2021, i.e., "pembrolizumab", "nivolumab", "atezolizumab", "durvalumab", "cemiplimab", "avelumab", and "ipilimumab. Clinical trials with their checkpoint inhibitors as in their labeled indications, off-label use or their combinations with investigational immune checkpoint inhibitors or other treatment modalities were included. Studies describing supportive care or locoregional treatments; cellular, viral, or vaccine therapy; studies in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting; and pediatric studies were excluded. Overall, 173 articles reporting on relevant studies were identified. Using these articles, we compiled a data file of study-specific covariates for each study. We recorded the immunotherapeutic agent, tumor type and biomarker, and clinical outcomes (objective response rate and median values [point estimate] and confidence intervals for progression-free survival and overall survival. Using these data, we carried out meta-analyses for the three outcomes and meta-regression on study-specific covariates. The same data could be used for any alternative implementation of meta-analysis and meta-regression, using more structured inference models reflecting different levels of dependence based on the available study-specific covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Luke's Clinic, Panorama 552 36, Thessaloniki, Greece
- European University Cyprus, 6 Diogenous Str., Egkomi, 2404, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Peter Mueller
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The University of Texas at Austin, 105 E 24th St D9800, Austin, TX 78705, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- WIN Consortium for Precision Medicine, Albert Thuret 24, 94550 Chevilly-Larue, France
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsimberidou AM, Kahle M, Vo HH, Baysal MA, Johnson A, Meric-Bernstam F. Molecular tumour boards - current and future considerations for precision oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:843-863. [PMID: 37845306 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00824-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, rapid progress has been made in developmental therapeutics, especially regarding the use of matched targeted therapies against specific oncogenic molecular alterations across cancer types. Molecular tumour boards (MTBs) are panels of expert physicians, scientists, health-care providers and patient advocates who review and interpret molecular-profiling results for individual patients with cancer and match each patient to available therapies, which can include investigational drugs. Interpretation of the molecular alterations found in each patient is a complicated task that requires an understanding of their contextual functional effects and their correlations with sensitivity or resistance to specific treatments. The criteria for determining the actionability of molecular alterations and selecting matched treatments are constantly evolving. Therefore, MTBs have an increasingly necessary role in optimizing the allocation of biomarker-directed therapies and the implementation of precision oncology. Ultimately, increased MTB availability, accessibility and performance are likely to improve patient care. The challenges faced by MTBs are increasing, owing to the plethora of identifiable molecular alterations and immune markers in tumours of individual patients and their evolving clinical significance as more and more data on patient outcomes and results from clinical trials become available. Beyond next-generation sequencing, broader biomarker analyses can provide useful information. However, greater funding, resources and expertise are needed to ensure the sustainability of MTBs and expand their outreach to underserved populations. Harmonization between practice and policy will be required to optimally implement precision oncology. Herein, we discuss the evolving role of MTBs and current and future considerations for their use in precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Kahle
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mehmet A Baysal
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amber Johnson
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fountzilas E, Vo HH, Mueller P, Kurzrock R, Tsimberidou AM. Correlation between biomarkers and treatment outcomes in diverse cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase I and II immunotherapy clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112927. [PMID: 37364526 PMCID: PMC10528229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many immuno-oncology (IO) trials are conducted without biomarker selection. We performed a meta-analysis of phase I/II clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to determine the association between biomarkers and clinical outcomes, if any. METHODS A PubMed search for phase I/II clinical trials with drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (labelled, off-label, combined with investigational ICIs or other treatment modalities) from 2018 to 2020 was performed. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between biomarker-positive and biomarker-negative groups, using studies that explored the correlation of biomarkers with outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 174 clinical studies that included 19,178 patients were identified, and 132 studies investigated>30 correlative biomarkers that included PD-L1 expression (≥1%, 111 studies), tumour mutational burden (20 studies) and microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency (10 studies). Overall, 123, 46 and 30 cohorts (drugs, tumour types or biomarkers) with 11,692, 3065, and 2256 patient outcomes for ORR, PFS and OS, respectively, were analysed in correlation with biomarkers. Meta-analyses demonstrated that ICIs in patients with biomarker-positive tumours were associated with higher ORR (odds ratio 2.15 [95% CI, 1.79-2.58], p < 0.0001); and longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55 [95% CI, 0.45-0.67], p < 0.0001), and OS (HR 0.65 [95% CI, 0.53-0.80], p < 0.0001) compared with those with biomarker-negative tumours. Significance for ORR and PFS was retained in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001) (OS, not included owing to the small number of trials reporting OS). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that IO biomarkers should be used in patient selection for ICIs. Prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Luke's Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece; European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Mueller
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- WIN Consortium for Precision Medicine, Paris, France; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tsimberidou AM, Guenther K, Andersson BS, Mendrzyk R, Alpert A, Wagner C, Nowak A, Aslan K, Satelli A, Richter F, Kuttruff-Coqui S, Schoor O, Fritsche J, Coughlin Z, Mohamed AS, Sieger K, Norris B, Ort R, Beck J, Vo HH, Hoffgaard F, Ruh M, Backert L, Wistuba II, Fuhrmann D, Ibrahim NK, Morris VK, Kee BK, Halperin DM, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Kebriaei P, Shpall EJ, Vining D, Hwu P, Singh H, Reinhardt C, Britten CM, Hilf N, Weinschenk T, Maurer D, Walter S. Feasibility and Safety of Personalized, Multi-Target, Adoptive Cell Therapy (IMA101): First-in-Human Clinical Trial in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2023; 11:925-945. [PMID: 37172100 PMCID: PMC10330623 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-22-0444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
IMA101 is an actively personalized, multi-targeted adoptive cell therapy (ACT), whereby autologous T cells are directed against multiple novel defined peptide-HLA (pHLA) cancer targets. HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors expressing ≥1 of 8 predefined targets underwent leukapheresis. Endogenous T cells specific for up to 4 targets were primed and expanded in vitro. Patients received lymphodepletion (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide), followed by T-cell infusion and low-dose IL2 (Cohort 1). Patients in Cohort 2 received atezolizumab for up to 1 year (NCT02876510). Overall, 214 patients were screened, 15 received lymphodepletion (13 women, 2 men; median age, 44 years), and 14 were treated with T-cell products. IMA101 treatment was feasible and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (Grade 1, n = 6; Grade 2, n = 4) and expected cytopenias. No patient died during the first 100 days after T-cell therapy. No neurotoxicity was observed. No objective responses were noted. Prolonged disease stabilization was noted in three patients lasting for 13.7, 12.9, and 7.3 months. High frequencies of target-specific T cells (up to 78.7% of CD8+ cells) were detected in the blood of treated patients, persisted for >1 year, and were detectable in posttreatment tumor tissue. Individual T-cell receptors (TCR) contained in T-cell products exhibited broad variation in TCR avidity, with the majority being low avidity. High-avidity TCRs were identified in some patients' products. This study demonstrates the feasibility and tolerability of an actively personalized ACT directed to multiple defined pHLA cancer targets. Results warrant further evaluation of multi-target ACT approaches using potent high-avidity TCRs. See related Spotlight by Uslu and June, p. 865.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Anna Nowak
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Aslan
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Becky Norris
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rita Ort
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer Beck
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Manuel Ruh
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Nuhad K Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Van Karlyle Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | - Bryan K Kee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | | | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Vining
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Norbert Hilf
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Song IW, Vo HH, Chen YS, Baysal MA, Kahle M, Johnson A, Tsimberidou AM. Precision Oncology: Evolving Clinical Trials across Tumor Types. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1967. [PMID: 37046628 PMCID: PMC10093499 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular technologies and targeted therapeutics have accelerated the implementation of precision oncology, resulting in improved clinical outcomes in selected patients. The use of next-generation sequencing and assessments of immune and other biomarkers helps optimize patient treatment selection. In this review, selected precision oncology trials including the IMPACT, SHIVA, IMPACT2, NCI-MPACT, TAPUR, DRUP, and NCI-MATCH studies are summarized, and their challenges and opportunities are discussed. Brief summaries of the new ComboMATCH, MyeloMATCH, and iMATCH studies, which follow the example of NCI-MATCH, are also included. Despite the progress made, precision oncology is inaccessible to many patients with cancer. Some patients' tumors may not respond to these treatments, owing to the complexity of carcinogenesis, the use of ineffective therapies, or unknown mechanisms of tumor resistance to treatment. The implementation of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and bioinformatic analyses of complex multi-omic data may improve the accuracy of tumor characterization, and if used strategically with caution, may accelerate the implementation of precision medicine. Clinical trials in precision oncology continue to evolve, improving outcomes and expediting the identification of curative strategies for patients with cancer. Despite the existing challenges, significant progress has been made in the past twenty years, demonstrating the benefit of precision oncology in many patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Wen Song
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet A. Baysal
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael Kahle
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amber Johnson
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Apostolia M. Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsimberidou AM, Vo HH, Beck J, Shia CS, Hsu P, Pearce TE. First-in-Human Study of OBI-999, a Globo H-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200496. [PMID: 36701651 PMCID: PMC9929104 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OBI-999 is a novel antibody-drug conjugate comprising the Globo H-targeting antibody (OBI-888) linked to the cytotoxic payload monomethyl auristatin E. OBI-999 demonstrated excellent dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition in breast, gastric, and pancreatic cancer xenograft models as well as a lung cancer patient-derived xenograft model. We conducted a phase I study of OBI-999 monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04084366). PATIENTS AND METHODS OBI-999 was administered intravenously at doses of 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 mg/kg every 21 days as part of a 3 + 3 trial design. Primary end points were the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events and determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose. RESULTS Fifteen adult patients were treated. OBI-999 was well tolerated up to 1.2 mg/kg, the maximum tolerated dose. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia and anemia. OBI-999 exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics at all doses, with lower clearance at higher doses. The three patients treated at the 1.6 mg/kg dose level developed grade 4 neutropenia during cycles 1 and 2. Five (33.3%) patients had stable disease (SD) including one patient with adenoid cystic carcinoma of the oropharynx with SD for 13 cycles and one patient with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with SD for eight cycles. OBI-999 was well tolerated; however, dose-dependent, noncumulative neutropenia was dose-limiting. CONCLUSION The recommended phase II dose was determined to be 1.2 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. A phase II cohort-expansion study is now enrolling patients with pancreatic, colorectal, and other cancers expressing high levels of Globo H.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Unit 455, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail:
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jennifer Beck
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Pei Hsu
- OBI Pharma Inc, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tsimberidou AM, Skliris A, Valentine A, Shaw J, Hering U, Vo HH, Chan TO, Armen RS, Cottrell JR, Pan JQ, Tsichlis PN. AKT inhibition in the central nervous system induces signaling defects resulting in psychiatric symptomatology. Cell Biosci 2022; 12:56. [PMID: 35525984 PMCID: PMC9080159 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00793-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Changes in the expression and activity of the AKT oncogene play an important role in psychiatric disease. We present translational data assessing the role of AKT in psychiatric symptoms.
Methods
(1) We assessed the protein activity of an AKT3 mutant harboring a PH domain mutation (Q60H) detected in a patient with schizophrenia, the corresponding AKT1 mutant (Q61H), and wild-type AKT1 and AKT3 transduced in AKT-null mouse fibroblasts and modeled the Q61H mutation onto the crystal structure of the Akt1 PH domain. (2) We analyzed the results of earlier genome-wide association studies to determine the distribution of schizophrenia-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the AKT3 gene. (3) We analyzed the psychiatric adverse events (AEs) of patients treated with M2698 (p70S6K/AKT1/AKT3 inhibitor) and with other PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors.
Results
(1) Proteins encoded by AKT3 (AKT3Q60H) and AKT1 (AKT1Q61H) mutants had lower kinase activity than those encoded by wild-type AKT3 and AKT1, respectively. Molecular modeling of the AKT1-Q61H mutant suggested conformational changes that may reduce the binding of D3-phosphorylated phosphoinositides to the PH domain. (2) We identified multiple SNPs in the AKT3 gene that were strongly associated with schizophrenia (p < 0.5 × 10–8). (3) Psychiatric AEs, mostly insomnia, anxiety, and depression, were noted in 29% of patients treated with M2698. In randomized studies, their incidence was higher in PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor arms compared with placebo arms. All psychiatric AEs were reversible.
Conclusions
Our data elucidate the incidence and mechanisms of psychiatric AEs in patients treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors and emphasize the need for careful monitoring.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Recent rapid biotechnological breakthroughs have led to the identification of complex and unique molecular features that drive malignancies. Precision medicine has exploited next-generation sequencing and matched targeted therapy/immunotherapy deployment to successfully transform the outlook for several fatal cancers. Tumor and liquid biopsy genomic profiling and transcriptomic, immunomic, and proteomic interrogation can now all be leveraged to optimize therapy. Multiple new trial designs, including basket and umbrella trials, master platform trials, and N-of-1 patient-centric studies, are beginning to supplant standard phase I, II, and III protocols, allowing for accelerated drug evaluation and approval and molecular-based individualized treatment. Furthermore, real-world data, as well as exploitation of digital apps and structured observational registries, and the utilization of machine learning and/or artificial intelligence, may further accelerate knowledge acquisition. Overall, clinical trials have evolved, shifting from tumor type-centered to gene-directed and histology-agnostic trials, with innovative adaptive designs and personalized combination treatment strategies tailored to individual biomarker profiles. Some, but not all, novel trials now demonstrate that matched therapy correlates with superior outcomes compared to non-matched therapy across tumor types and in specific cancers. To further improve the precision medicine paradigm, the strategy of matching drugs to patients based on molecular features should be implemented earlier in the disease course, and cancers should have comprehensive multi-omic (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, immunomic) tumor profiling. To overcome cancer complexity, moving from drug-centric to patient-centric individualized combination therapy is critical. This review focuses on the design, advantages, limitations, and challenges of a spectrum of clinical trial designs in the era of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Lukes's Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.,European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fountzilas E, Kurzrock R, Vo HH, Tsimberidou AM. Wedding of Molecular Alterations and Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Genomics as a Matchmaker. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1634-1647. [PMID: 33823006 PMCID: PMC9890928 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has transformed the medical oncology armamentarium. But despite its favorable impact on clinical outcomes, immunotherapy benefits only a subset of patients, and a substantial proportion of these individuals eventually manifest resistance. Serious immune-related adverse events and hyperprogression have also been reported. It is therefore essential to understand the molecular mechanisms and identify the drivers of therapeutic response and resistance. In this review, we provide an overview of the current and emerging clinically relevant genomic biomarkers implicated in checkpoint blockade outcome. US Food and Drug Administration-approved molecular biomarkers of immunotherapy response include mismatch repair deficiency and/or microsatelliteinstability and tumor mutational burden of at least 10 mutations/megabase. Investigational genomic-associated biomarkers for immunotherapy response include alterations of the following genes/associated pathways: chromatin remodeling (ARID1A, PBRM1, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, BAP1), major histocompatibility complex, specific (eg, ultraviolet, APOBEC) mutational signatures, T-cell receptor repertoire, PDL1, POLE/POLD1, and neo-antigens produced by the mutanome, those potentially associated with resistance include β2-microglobulin, EGFR, Keap1, JAK1/JAK2/interferon-gamma signaling, MDM2, PTEN, STK11, and Wnt/Beta-catenin pathway alterations. Prospective clinical trials are needed to assess the role of a composite of these biomarkers to optimize the implementation of precision immunotherapy in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Euromedica General Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece
- European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsimberidou AM, Van Morris K, Vo HH, Eck S, Lin YF, Rivas JM, Andersson BS. T-cell receptor-based therapy: an innovative therapeutic approach for solid tumors. J Hematol Oncol 2021; 14:102. [PMID: 34193217 PMCID: PMC8243554 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-021-01115-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
T-cell receptor (TCR)-based adoptive therapy employs genetically modified lymphocytes that are directed against specific tumor markers. This therapeutic modality requires a structured and integrated process that involves patient screening (e.g., for HLA-A*02:01 and specific tumor targets), leukapheresis, generation of transduced TCR product, lymphodepletion, and infusion of the TCR-based adoptive therapy. In this review, we summarize the current technology and early clinical development of TCR-based therapy in patients with solid tumors. The challenges of TCR-based therapy include those associated with TCR product manufacturing, patient selection, and preparation with lymphodepletion. Overcoming these challenges, and those posed by the immunosuppressive microenvironment, as well as developing next-generation strategies is essential to improving the efficacy and safety of TCR-based therapies. Optimization of technology to generate TCR product, treatment administration, and patient monitoring for adverse events is needed. The implementation of novel TCR strategies will require expansion of the TCR approach to patients with HLA haplotypes beyond HLA-A*02:01 and the discovery of novel tumor markers that are expressed in more patients and tumor types. Ongoing clinical trials will determine the ultimate role of TCR-based therapy in patients with solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Unit 455, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Karlyle Van Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Unit 455, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Stephen Eck
- MacroGenics, Inc., 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Yu-Feng Lin
- Immatics US, Inc., 2201 Holcombe Blvd., Suite 205, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | | | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vo HH, Fu S, Hong DS, Karp DD, Piha-Paul SAA, Subbiah V, Janku F, Naing A, Yap TA, Rodon Ahnert J, Ajani JA, Cartwright C, Naqvi MF, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Miller VA, Palmer GA, Vining DJ, Berry DA, Meric-Bernstam F, Tsimberidou AM. Initiative for Molecular Profiling and Advanced Cancer Therapy (IMPACT2): Challenges and Opportunities in Conducting an MD Anderson Randomized Study in Precision Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3140 Background: Precision oncology is associated with favorable outcomes in selected patients with cancer. Our first IMPACT trial (IMPACT1) demonstrated that in sequential patients with advanced cancer who had tumor molecular testing and participated in phase I clinical trials, matched targeted therapy (MTT) was associated with superior rates of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared with those of patients who received non-MTT. Despite the statistical significance for these outcomes, the study was non-randomized. Recognizing that it would be difficult to randomize patients we nonetheless undertook IMPACT2, a phase 2 randomized study to determine whether patients treated on the basis of tumor genomic alterations have longer PFS compared to those whose treatment is not selected on the basis of molecular alteration analysis. Methods: Patients with metastatic cancer undergo a tumor biopsy and genomic profiling. Patients are presented at tumor board and are offered to be randomized between two arms: MTT or non-MTT, when criteria (biomarker present, available clinical trial, eligibility criteria met, insurance approval) are met. In April 2019, we amended the trial to include a “patient-preference” cohort for each arm. Patients who decline randomization are offered choice of arm (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02152254). The primary analysis will use both randomized and patient-preference cohorts based on a Bayesian hierarchical model that “borrows” from the patient-preference cohorts to the extent to which its PFS agrees with that in the randomization cohort. Results: The key barriers randomizing patients with actionable molecular alterations are patient-related (advanced, metastatic setting requiring immediate intervening therapy; decline in performance status, organ function; or death); drug-related (FDA-approved drug available; or unavailable MTT against key driver biomarker) or financial (no insurance coverage of MTT; lack of patient resources to participate in trials). As the study spans over a few years, some investigational agents that were considered non-MTT at the time of treatment assignment were later proven to be MTT (e.g., immunotherapeutic agents targeting high tumor mutational burden); and/or were approved by the FDA. Conclusions: Although randomized trials have been considered the gold standard in drug development, such studies in the advanced metastatic setting are complicated. The benefit of Precision Oncology has been exemplified in individual patients who were treated with biomarker-selected therapy. The adaptive design of IMPACT2 enables patient randomization despite the evolving tumor biomarkers and the plethora of investigational drugs. IMPACT2 provides insights for the development of cancer genome-based medicine. Outcomesfor randomized patients are awaited. Clinical trial information: NCT02152254.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Hiep Vo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX
| | - Siqing Fu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David S. Hong
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel D. Karp
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Vivek Subbiah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Filip Janku
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aung Naing
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy A. Yap
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Jaffer A. Ajani
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mohammad Faraz Naqvi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - David J Vining
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Donald A. Berry
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Naqvi MF, Vo HH, Vining D, Tsimberidou AM. Prolonged response to treatment based on cell-free DNA analysis and molecular profiling in three patients with metastatic cancer: a case series. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211001538. [PMID: 33995588 PMCID: PMC8107674 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211001538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors have limited treatment options. Mutations that serve as biomarkers of carcinogenesis can be found in cell-free DNA of patients’ plasma. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was developed as a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative to tumor biopsy when such biopsy is not technically feasible or it is associated with high risk for complications. The role of ctDNA in precision oncology is promising but its clinical significance across tumor types remains to be validated. We report a case series of three heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors who received matched targeted therapy based on ctDNA analysis and/or tumor molecular profiling. Case presentation: Three patients with advanced, metastatic cancer and the following characteristics are presented: a 71-year-old woman with ovarian cancer and BRCA2 mutation identified in ctDNA and tumor tissue was treated with a PARP inhibitor and achieved partial response by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) for 22.6+ months; a 40-year-old woman with adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland was treated with a MEK/RAF pathway inhibitor on the basis of RAF1 amplification on ctDNA analysis and had stable disease for 20.2 months; and a 56-year-old woman with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation identified by ctDNA analysis was treated with a PARP inhibitor and achieved stable disease for 9.1 months. All three patients are alive at the time of this report. Conclusions: These results suggest that ctDNA analysis can contribute to selection of targeted therapy in patients with advanced, metastatic cancer. Prospective clinical trials to evaluate and optimize ctDNA biomarkers, as well as the integration of novel and/or alternative targeted therapies, are warranted to fully assess the role of ctDNA analysis in cancer therapy. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02152254). Registered May 28, 2014. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02152254. MD Anderson protocol # PA12-1161 (approval ID IRB1 FWA00000121) and # PA11-0377 (approval ID IRB4 FWA00005015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Faraz Naqvi
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Vining
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 455, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsimberidou AM, Vo HH, Subbiah V, Janku F, Piha-Paul S, Yilmaz B, Gong J, Naqvi MF, Tu SM, Campbell M, Meric-Bernstam F, Naing A. Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors. Oncologist 2021; 26:558-e1098. [PMID: 33491277 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
LESSONS LEARNED Advanced germ cell tumors are aggressive and associated with poor prognosis. Pembrolizumab was overall well tolerated in 12 heavily pretreated patients. Three patients had radiographic stable disease that lasted for 10.9 months, 5.5 months, and 4.5 months, respectively. Published data of immunotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced germ cell tumors are confirmed. The limited antitumor activity of immunotherapy in germ cell tumors is, at least partially, attributed to tumor biology (low tumor mutational burden; low PD-1 expression) and other poor-risk features. Tumor profiling to understand the mechanisms of resistance to pembrolizumab and innovative clinical trials that may include immunotherapy are warranted. BACKGROUND Advanced germ cell tumors are associated with poor prognosis. We investigated the role of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced germ cell tumors. METHODS We analyzed a prespecified cohort of an open-label, phase II clinical trial in which patients with advanced germ cell tumors were treated with pembrolizumab (200 mg) intravenously every 21 days. The endpoints of the study were the non-progression rate (NPR) at 27 weeks, safety, and tolerability. An NPR >20% was considered successful and worthy of further pursuit. RESULTS From August 2016 to February 2018, 12 patients (10 men, 2 women) were treated (median age, 35 years [range, 22-63 years]; median number of prior systemic therapies, 3.5 [range, 2-7]; median number of metastatic sites, 3 [range, 2-8]). Overall, pembrolizumab was well tolerated. One patient experienced both grade 1 immune-related skin rash and grade 3 immune-related pneumonitis. No patient died from toxicity. Three patients had radiographic stable disease that lasted for 10.9 months, 5.5 months, and 4.5 months, respectively. No objective response was noted. The median progression-free survival was 2.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-4.5 months), and the median overall survival was 10.6 months (95% CI, 4.6-27.1 months). The 27-week NPR was 9.0% (95% CI, 0.23-41.2%). CONCLUSION Overall, pembrolizumab was safe and had limited antitumor activity in these patients. In the advanced, metastatic setting, tumor profiling to understand the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and innovative clinical trials to identify efficacious combination regimens rather than off-label use of pembrolizumab are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarina Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bulent Yilmaz
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Gong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohammad Faraz Naqvi
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shi-Ming Tu
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fan Q, Yin X, Rababa'h A, Diaz Diaz A, Wijaya CS, Singh S, Suryavanshi SV, Vo HH, Saeed M, Zhang Y, McConnell BK. Absence of gravin-mediated signaling inhibits development of high-fat diet-induced hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2019; 317:H793-H810. [PMID: 31441691 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00215.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Gravin, an A-kinase anchoring protein, is known to play a role in regulating key processes that lead to inflammation and atherosclerosis development, namely, cell migration, proliferation, and apoptosis. We investigated the role of gravin in the development of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced atherosclerosis and hyperlipidemia. Five-week-old male wild-type (WT) and gravin-t/t mice were fed a normal diet or an HFD for 16 wk. Gravin-t/t mice showed significantly lower liver-to-body-weight ratio, cholesterol, triglyceride, and very low-density lipoprotein levels in serum as compared with WT mice on HFD. Furthermore, there was less aortic plaque formation coupled with decreased lipid accumulation and liver damage, as the gravin-t/t mice had lower levels of serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. Additionally, gravin-t/t HFD-fed mice had decreased expression of liver 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase, an essential enzyme for cholesterol synthesis and lower fatty acid synthase expression. Gravin-t/t HFD-fed mice also exhibited inhibition of sterol regulatory element binding protein-2 (SREBP-2) expression, a liver transcription factor associated with the regulation of lipid transportation. In response to platelet-derived growth factor receptor treatment, gravin-t/t vascular smooth muscle cells exhibited lower intracellular calcium transients and decreased protein kinase A- and protein kinase C-dependent substrate phosphorylation, notably involving the Erk1/2 signaling pathway. Collectively, these results suggest the involvement of gravin-dependent regulation of lipid metabolism via the reduction of SREBP-2 expression. The absence of gravin-mediated signaling lowers blood pressure, reduces plaque formation in the aorta, and decreases lipid accumulation and damage in the liver of HFD mice. Through these processes, the absence of gravin-mediated signaling complex delays the HFD-induced hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The gravin scaffolding protein plays a key role in the multiple enzymatic pathways of lipid metabolism. We have shown for the first time the novel role of gravin in regulating the pathways related to the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Specifically, an absence of gravin-mediated signaling decreases the lipid levels (cholesterol, triglyceride, and VLDL) that are associated with sterol regulatory element binding protein-2 downregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiying Fan
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Xing Yin
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Abeer Rababa'h
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Andrea Diaz Diaz
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Cori S Wijaya
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Sonal Singh
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Santosh V Suryavanshi
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Moawiz Saeed
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Bradley K McConnell
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|