Defining Minimum Treatment Parameters of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expert Consensus

PURPOSE

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a highly effective treatment in select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system does not recommend the use of EBRT in HCC due to a lack of sufficient evidence and intends to perform an individual patient level meta-analysis of ablative EBRT in this population. However, there are many types of EBRT described in the literature with no formal definition of what constitutes "ablative." Thus, we convened a group of international experts to provide consensus on the parameters that define ablative EBRT in HCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fundamental parameters related to dose, fractionation, radiobiology, target identification, and delivery technique were identified by a steering committee to generate 7 Key Criteria (KC) that would define ablative EBRT for HCC. Using a modified Delphi (mDelphi) method, experts in the use of EBRT in the treatment of HCC were surveyed. Respondents were given 30 days to respond in round 1 of the mDelphi and 14 days to respond in round 2. A threshold of ≥70% was used to define consensus for answers to each KC.

RESULTS

Of 40 invitations extended, 35 (88%) returned responses. In the first round, 3 of 7 KC reached consensus. In the second round, 100% returned responses and consensus was reached in 3 of the remaining 4 KC. The distribution of answers for one KC, which queried the a/b ratio of HCC, was such that consensus was not achieved. Based on this analysis, ablative EBRT for HCC was defined as a BED10 ≥80 Gy with daily imaging and multiphasic contrast used for target delineation. Treatment breaks (eg, for adaptive EBRT) are allowed, but the total treatment time should be ≤6 weeks. Equivalent dose when treating with protons should use a conversion factor of 1.1, but there is no single conversion factor for carbon ions.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mDelphi method assessing expert opinion, we provide the first consensus definition of ablative EBRT for HCC. Empirical data are required to define the a/b of HCC.

External Beam Radiation Therapy for Primary Liver Cancers: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the indications and technique-dose of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC).

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the indications, techniques, and outcomes of EBRT in HCC and IHC. This guideline is intended to cover the definitive, consolidative, salvage, preoperative (including bridge to transplant), and adjuvant settings as well as palliative EBRT for symptomatic primary lesions. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Strong recommendations are made for using EBRT as a potential first-line treatment in patients with liver-confined HCC who are not candidates for curative therapy, as consolidative therapy after incomplete response to liver-directed therapies, and as a salvage option for local recurrences. The guideline conditionally recommends EBRT for patients with liver-confined multifocal or unresectable HCC or those with macrovascular invasion, sequenced with systemic or catheter-based therapies. Palliative EBRT is conditionally recommended for symptomatic primary HCC and/or macrovascular tumor thrombi. EBRT is conditionally recommended as a bridge to transplant or before surgery in carefully selected patients. For patients with unresectable IHC, consolidative EBRT with or without chemotherapy should be considered, typically after systemic therapy. Adjuvant EBRT is conditionally recommended for resected IHC with high-risk features. Selection of dose-fractionation regimen and technique should be based on disease extent, disease location, underlying liver function, and available technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of EBRT for HCC and IHC with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care. Future studies should focus on further defining the role of EBRT in the context of liver-directed and systemic therapies and refining optimal regimens and techniques.

Gynecologic oncology care during the COVID-19 pandemic at three affiliated New York City hospitals

Background

New York City was among the epicenters during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oncologists must balance plausible risks of COVID-19 infection with the recognized consequences of delaying cancer treatment, keeping in mind the capacity of the health care system. We sought to investigate treatment patterns in gynecologic cancer care during the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic at three affiliated New York City hospitals located in Brooklyn, Manhattan and Queens.

Methods

A prospective registry of patients with active or presumed gynecologic cancers receiving inpatient and/or outpatient care at three affiliated New York City hospitals was maintained between March 1 and April 30, 2020. Clinical and demographic data were abstracted from the electronic medical record with a focus on oncologic treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was explored to evaluate the independent effect of hospital location, race, age, medical comorbidities, cancer status and COVID-19 status on treatment modifications.

Results

Among 302 patients with gynecologic cancer, 117 (38.7%) experienced a COVID-19-related treatment modification (delay, change or cancellation) during the first two months of the pandemic in New York. Sixty-four patients (67.4% of those scheduled for surgery) had a COVID-19-related modification in their surgical plan, 45 (21.5% of those scheduled for systemic treatment) a modification in systemic treatment and 12 (18.8% of those scheduled for radiation) a modification in radiation. Nineteen patients (6.3%) had positive COVID-19 testing. On univariate analysis, hospital location in Queens or Brooklyn, age ≤65 years, treatment for a new cancer diagnosis versus recurrence and COVID-19 positivity were associated with treatment modifications. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, hospital location in Queens and COVID-19 positive testing were independently associated with treatment modifications.

Conclusions

More than one third of patients with gynecologic cancer at three affiliated New York City hospitals experienced a treatment delay, change or cancellation during the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the three New York City boroughs represented in this study, likelihood of gynecologic oncology treatment modifications correlated with the case burden of COVID-19.

SU-E-J-170: Clinical Evaluation of Positioning Accuracy of Two Immobilization Devices for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Cone Beam CT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the patient positioning accuracy and reproducibility of two commercially available immobilization systems for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment.

METHODS

Forty one patients with lung (n=21) or liver (n=20) malignancies were assigned to one of the two immobilization devices: Elekta stereotactic body frame (SBF) with built-in stereotactic coordinate system and Civco modular indexing based frame (MIF) without stereotactic reference. All patients underwent the same simulation and planning procedure followed by cone beam CT (CBCT) guided treatment setup. A total of 151 CBCT images were analyzed. The systematic and random isocenter setup errors of the two systems were calculated and compared based on the daily setup corrections under CBCT guidance.

RESULTS

There was not statistically significant difference between the two systems in terms of systematic setup errors in all three translational directions, for both lung and liver patients. The random errors for the lung patients under SBF setup were 1.8mm, 2.0mm and 2.9mm for the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions, respectively compared to 3.6mm, 4.1mm, and 4.2mm for MIF. A similar trend was also observed for liver patients. The random errors of liver MIF setup reached 3.5mm, 6.1mm and 5.7mm for the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions, respectively, with relatively smaller errors 1.7mm, 3.4mm and 2.6mm with SBF setup. Repeated CBCTs occurred for MIF system in 42.4% and 40.7% of the lung and liver treatment to verify couch corrections based on the institutional tolerance, resulting in prolonged setup time. Only 25% and 13.6% of the lung and liver treatment with SBF required with repeated CBCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Without stereotactic coordinate reference, the body frame system tended to have larger random setup errors and patient positioning accuracy inevitably relies on the volumetric imaging guidance. Patient comfort and reproducibility should be clearly considered for selecting a system.

Phase II and gene expression analysis trial of neoadjuvant capecitabine plus irinotecan followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Hoosier Oncology Group GI03-53

PURPOSE

We designed this study in locally advanced rectal cancer to determine the pathological response, toxicity, and disease-free survival (DFS) with induction capecitabine plus irinotecan followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and analyze the gene expression of enzymes involved in the metabolism of capecitabine and irinotecan for associations with response and toxicity.

METHODS

Patients with T3/T4 or node positive rectal cancer were treated with capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily (BID) days 1-14, and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days for 2 cycles, followed by capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) BID days 1-5 per week with concurrent radiotherapy 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Surgical resection occurred a median of 7.4 weeks after CRT. Gene expression levels or sequencing were used to analyze carboxylesterase-converting enzymes (CES1, CES2), thymidylate synthase (TS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dehydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), topoisomerase I (TOPO I), and uridine-diphosphate (UDP) glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 in pre- and post-treatment tumor and normal tissue samples.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and 18 completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent R0 resection. Two patients with UGT1A1 7/7 had grade 3 and 4 neutropenic fever and sepsis. Pathological complete response (pCR) occurred in 6 of 18 patients (33 %) and 10 (56 %) had tumor and/or nodal downstaging. The 3-year DFS was 75.5 % (95 % CI, 39.7-91.8 %). Locoregional control rate was 100 %. We observed higher TP gene expression in pCR patients, but no correlations with toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This neoadjuvant regimen was safe and demonstrated significant antitumor activity. High TP tumor gene expression was associated with obtaining pCR.

Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the role of radiation therapy with concurrent gemcitabine (GEM) compared with GEM alone in patients with localized unresectable pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were randomly assigned to receive GEM alone (at 1,000 mg/m(2)/wk for weeks 1 to 6, followed by 1 week rest, then for 3 of 4 weeks) or GEM (600 mg/m(2)/wk for weeks 1 to 5, then 4 weeks later 1,000 mg/m(2) for 3 of 4 weeks) plus radiotherapy (starting on day 1, 1.8 Gy/Fx for total of 50.4 Gy). Measurement of quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary questionnaire was also performed.

RESULTS

Of 74 patients entered on trial and randomly assigned to receive GEM alone (arm A; n = 37) or GEM plus radiation (arm B; n = 34), patients in arm B had greater incidence of grades 4 and 5 toxicities (41% v 9%), but grades 3 and 4 toxicities combined were similar (77% in A v 79% in B). No statistical differences were seen in quality of life measurements at 6, 15 to 16, and 36 weeks. The primary end point was survival, which was 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.9 to 11.4 months) and 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 15.5 months) for arms A and B, respectively (one-sided P = .017 by stratified log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

This trial demonstrates improved overall survival with the addition of radiation therapy to GEM in patients with localized unresectable pancreatic cancer, with acceptable toxicity.

Treatment delays using an automated afterloading low-dose-rate brachytherapy system

PURPOSE

Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy is an integral treatment modality in radiation oncology. Clinical efficacy is based on experience with manual source loading and continuous dose delivery. With remote afterloading technology, sources may be loaded and unloaded during the treatment course to prevent radiation exposure to nursing staff members and visitors. The aim of this study was to investigate treatment interruptions in terms of frequency and duration as well as extension of the overall treatment time period. The potential clinical impact of treatment interruptions was also considered.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The treatment records of 20 patients who underwent brachytherapy in the Indiana University Department of Radiation Oncology administered with a Selectron LDR remote afterloader were reviewed. Results were tabulated and analysis performed with respect to 1) the number of interruptions, 2) delay time, 3) delay time (T(d)) as a function of total implant time (T), 4) the time of day that each interruption occurred, and 5) the time in minutes of each individual interruption.

RESULTS

The mean number of interruptions was 44.9 per patient, (range, 24-76), with a mean prescription implantation duration of 45.7 hours and a mean actual treatment time of 51.2 hours resulting in a mean interruption time of 6.4 minutes per treatment hour. The number of interruptions was standardized and divided by the number of prescribed dose in grays, translating to 1.2 to 3.7 interruptions per gray delivered, with a mean of 1.6, resulting in an average T(d) of 11.21% (range, 7.35%-17.12%).

CONCLUSION

Significant interruptions are frequent using remote afterloading LDR techniques, reducing the effective dose rate. Careful monitoring of such interruptions is warranted.

Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of patients with one to three hepatic metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with one to three hepatic lesions and maximum individual tumor diameters less than 6 cm were enrolled and treated on a multi-institutional, phase I/II clinical trial in which they received SBRT delivered in three fractions. During phase I, the total dose was safely escalated from 36 Gy to 60 Gy. The phase II dose was 60 Gy. The primary end point was local control. Lesions with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up were considered assessable for local control. Secondary end points were toxicity and survival.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with 63 lesions were treated with SBRT. Among them, 69% had received at least one prior systemic therapy regimen for metastatic disease (range, 0 to 5 regimens), and 45% had extrahepatic disease at study entry. Only one patient experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity (2%). Forty-nine discrete lesions were assessable for local control. Median follow-up for assessable lesions was 16 months (range, 6 to 54 months). The median maximal tumor diameter was 2.7 cm (range, 0.4 to 5.8 cm). Local progression occurred in only three lesions at a median of 7.5 months (range, 7 to 13 months) after SBRT. Actuarial in-field local control rates at one and two years after SBRT were 95% and 92%, respectively. Among lesions with maximal diameter of 3 cm or less, 2-year local control was 100%. Median survival was 20.5 months.

CONCLUSION

This multi-institutional, phase I/II trial demonstrates that high-dose liver SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with one to three hepatic metastases.

Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of patients with one to three lung metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with one to three lung metastases with cumulative maximum tumor diameter smaller than 7 cm were enrolled and treated on a multi-institutional phase I/II clinical trial in which they received SBRT delivered in 3 fractions. In phase I, the total dose was safely escalated from 48 to 60 Gy. The phase II dose was 60 Gy. The primary end point was local control. Lesions with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up were considered assessable for local control. Secondary end points included toxicity and survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with 63 lesions were enrolled and treated at three participating institutions. Seventy-one percent had received at least one prior systemic regimen for metastatic disease and 34% had received at least two prior regimens (range, zero to five). Two patients had local recurrence after prior surgical resection. There was no grade 4 toxicity. The incidence of any grade 3 toxicity was 8% (three of 38). Symptomatic pneumonitis occurred in one patient (2.6%). Fifty lesions were assessable for local control. Median follow-up for assessable lesions was 15.4 months (range, 6 to 48 months). The median gross tumor volume was 4.2 mL (range, 0.2 to 52.3 mL). Actuarial local control at one and two years after SBRT was 100% and 96%, respectively. Local progression occurred in one patient, 13 months after SBRT. Median survival was 19 months.

CONCLUSION

This multi-institutional phase I/II trial demonstrates that high-dose SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with one to three lung metastases.

Proposed guidelines for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: Report from Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group

PURPOSE

To present issues to be considered in, and make proposals for, image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group, consisting of representatives from the Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG), Radiologic Physics Center (RPC), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), American College of Radiology (ACR), American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), and American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), proposed guidelines for image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. This report was based on their aggregate clinical experience and a review of the literature. It reflects only the personal opinions of the authors and is not meant to be an endorsement from any of the above organizations.

RESULTS

The Group recommended T(2)-weighted MRI using a pelvic surface coil with MRI-compatible brachytherapy applicators in place for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Imaging must be performed with the patient in the treatment position, with all other treatment conditions duplicated as closely as possible. Future use of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/CT may obviate the need for special applicators. The group proposed the following terminology for image-based brachytherapy. The GTV((I)) is defined as the gross tumor volume as defined through imaging, GTV is defined as the GTV((I)) plus any clinically visualized or palpable tumor extensions, and GTV + cx is defined as the GTV plus the entire cervix. The dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the GTV, GTV((I)), GTV + cx should be performed, and the dose to 100%, 95%, or 90% of the GTV (D(100), D(95), and D(90), respectively) and the percentage of the GTV covered by Point A dose (V(100)) should be reported. Similarly, the DVH of the bladder and rectum wall should be performed, and the maximal dose at any point within the bladder and rectal wall should be reported, along with the maximal dose to a contiguous 1, 2, and 5 cm(3) volume of the bladder and rectum, respectively. In addition, the dose at the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements reference point for the bladder and rectum should be reported. The Group thought that the current dose prescription method in use for cervical cancer brachytherapy (i.e., to prescribe to Point A in most institutions) should not be changed as yet, because image-based dosimetry is not ready for routine practice. The Group proposes that for research purposes, individual centers and cooperative groups (e.g., GOG, RTOG, ACRIN) collect image-based dosimetry information and perform DVHs and correlate these data with the clinical outcome to determine which of the above parameters are relevant. The Group encourages external funding for image-based dosimetry and recommends that brachytherapy manufacturers develop image-compatible applicators.

CONCLUSION

Although current institutional brachytherapy prescription for cervical cancer should continue, image-based data collection and analysis are needed to optimize cervical cancer brachytherapy. Proposals are made for research in image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 20-year experience in 516 patients

HYPOTHESIS

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a safe procedure for a variety of periampullary conditions.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 516 consecutive patients who underwent PD.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient outcomes and survival factors.

RESULTS

Pathological examination demonstrated 57% periampullary cancers, 22% chronic pancreatitis, 12% cystic neoplasms, 4% islet cell neoplasms, and 5% other. Fifty-one percent of patients underwent pylorus preservation. Median operating time was 5 hours; blood loss, 1300 mL; and transfusion requirement, 1.5 U. Postoperative complications occurred in 43% of patients, including cardiopulmonary events (15%), fistula (9%), delayed gastric emptying (7%), and sepsis (6%). Additional surgery was required in 3% of patients, most commonly because of bleeding. Perioperative mortality was 3.9% overall but only 1.8% in patients with chronic pancreatitis; 25% of patients who died had preoperative complications associated with their periampullary condition. Three-year survival was 15% after resection for pancreatic cancer, 42% for duodenal cancer, 53% for ampullary cancer, and 62% for bile duct cancer. Univariate predictors of long-term survival in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma included elevated glucose levels, liver function test results, abnormal tumor markers, blood loss, transfusion requirement, type of operation, and pathologic findings (periampullary adenocarcinoma type, differentiation, and margin and node status). Multivariate predictors were serum total bilirubin level, blood loss, operation type, diagnosis, and lymph node status.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to be associated with considerable morbidity. With careful patient selection, PD can be performed safely. Long-term survival in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma can be predicted by preoperative laboratory values, intraoperative factors, and pathologic findings.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for vaginal cancer: Learning from treatment complications

Abstract.

Tyree WC, Cardenes H, Randall M, Papiez L. High-dose-rate brachytherapy for vaginal cancer: learning from treatment complications.

Historically, early stage vaginal cancer has been treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Complication rates have been low and treatment efficacious. Although high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has been used for cervical cancer in many countries for over a decade, only more recently has it been integrated into treatment plans for vaginal cancer. This paper describes three patients treated with HDR brachytherapy who experienced significant late effects. Given the very limited amount of literature regarding the use of HDR brachytherapy in vaginal cancer, this analysis potentially contributes to an understanding of treatment-related risk factors for complications among patients treated with this modality.

A focused review of hospital and departmental treatment records was done on three patients treated with HDR brachytherapy. Abstracted information included clinical data, treatment parameters (technique, doses, volume, combinations with other treatments) and outcomes (local control, survival, early and late effects). A review of the available literature was also undertaken.

All patients had significant complications. Although statistical correlations between treatment parameters and complications are impossible given the limited number of patients, this descriptive analysis suggests that vaginal length treated with HDR brachytherapy is a risk factor for early and late effects, that the distal vagina has a lower radiation tolerance than the upper vagina with HDR as in LDR, and that combining HDR with LDR as done in our experience carries a high risk of late toxicity.

Integration of HDR brachytherapy techniques into treatment plans for early stage vaginal cancers must be done cautiously. The etiology of the significant side effects seen here is likely to be multifactorial. For users of HDR brachytherapy in vaginal cancer, there is a need to further refine and standardize treatment concepts and treatment delivery. Ideally this will be based on continued careful observation and reporting of both favorable and unfavorable outcomes and experiences.

Early-stage endometrial cancer

For half a century, adjuvant radiation therapy has been an important component in the treatment of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer believed to be at significant risk of local or regional recurrence. The widespread adoption of up-front surgical treatment and staging, including nodal assessment, has raised new questions about the need for and extent of postoperative adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, in some institutions, even in the absence of complete surgical staging, the extent of postoperative adjuvant treatment is being reassessed. These developments have increased interest in the use of intravaginal brachytherapy (IVRT) alone in selected patients whose major risk of recurrence is at the vaginal cuff. The potential advantages of this approach include lower cost and decreased acute and late toxicity. The use of IVRT alone in select patients was examined through a review of the available literature. The authors conclude that there is a subset of patients in whom adjuvant treatment with IVRT alone is adequate. A clinical approach involving patient selection criteria is proposed which suggests separate selection criteria based on whether or not complete surgical staging information is available.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for vaginal cancer: learning from treatment complications

Historically, early stage vaginal cancer has been treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Complication rates have been low and treatment efficacious. Although high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has been used for cervical cancer in many countries for over a decade, only more recently has it been integrated into treatment plans for vaginal cancer. This paper describes three patients treated with HDR brachytherapy who experienced significant late effects. Given the very limited amount of literature regarding the use of HDR brachytherapy in vaginal cancer, this analysis potentially contributes to an understanding of treatment-related risk factors for complications among patients treated with this modality.A focused review of hospital and departmental treatment records was done on three patients treated with HDR brachytherapy. Abstracted information included clinical data, treatment parameters (technique, doses, volume, combinations with other treatments) and outcomes (local control, survival, early and late effects). A review of the available literature was also undertaken. All patients had significant complications. Although statistical correlations between treatment parameters and complications are impossible given the limited number of patients, this descriptive analysis suggests that vaginal length treated with HDR brachytherapy is a risk factor for early and late effects, that the distal vagina has a lower radiation tolerance than the upper vagina with HDR as in LDR, and that combining HDR with LDR as done in our experience carries a high risk of late toxicity. Integration of HDR brachytherapy techniques into treatment plans for early stage vaginal cancers must be done cautiously. The etiology of the significant side effects seen here is likely to be multifactorial. For users of HDR brachytherapy in vaginal cancer, there is a need to further refine and standardize treatment concepts and treatment delivery. Ideally this will be based on continued careful observation and reporting of both favorable and unfavorable outcomes and experiences.

Radiotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer: state of the art

Modern advances in surgery, chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) have not, unfortunately, impacted the overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer (OC). Despite its long history in the treatment of OC and its proven curative role in patients with microscopic or minimal residual disease, the proper role of RT in the management of OC is controversial and not clearly established. Similarly, the potential roles of RT in the consolidative treatment and as salvage therapy following CT failure remain controversial. In the present review current issues in the radiotherapeutic management are discussed along with possible future clinical research directions.

Integrating radiation therapy in the curative management of ovarian cancer: current issues and future directions

Although important advances in surgery, chemotherapy (CT), and radiation therapy (RT) have been made, overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) has not changed significantly. Despite its long history in the treatment of OC and its proven curative role in patients with microscopic or minimal residual disease, the proper role of RT in the management of OC is not clearly established. Although the use of primary adjuvant RT (whole abdominal irradiation) has declined in the last 15 years, there has been a resurgence of interest in RT as part of a combined modality approach and as salvage therapy for patients with small-volume persistent disease after primary cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based CT. This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of RT alone or combined with chemotherapy as primary adjuvant therapy or in the salvage setting. Current issues in the radiotherapeutic management are discussed along with ideas for future clinical research directions.

New techniques in the radiotherapeutic treatment of gynecological malignancies

The management of patients with gynecological malignancies serves as a prominent example of the importance of multi-modality oncologic therapy. Optimal treatment of these patients requires the skillful implementation of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The decision to use simple versus combined modality therapy is crucial and best carried out in centers in which an experienced and coordinated multidisciplinary team is available. In this article, we have reviewed the most recent data regarding the role of radiation therapy in gynecological malignancies and have pointed out those areas where additional confirmatory studies are needed.

Chordoma: results of radiation therapy in eighteen patients

Between 1975 and 1990, eighteen patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of chordoma were treated at our institution. All patients initially underwent a surgical procedure and were referred for irradiation due to residual disease or postsurgical relapse. The mean dose administered was 50.1 Gy (range, 29.9-64.8 Gy). Eight patients were treated according to a hyperfractionated schedule. The overall actuarial 5-year survival and 5-year progression-free survival were 38% and 17%, respectively. The progression-free interval was longer for patients receiving doses greater than 48 Gy when compared with doses below 40 Gy (actuarial 5-year progression-free survival of 31 +/- 35% vs. 0%, respectively; p = 0.04). We conclude that in the treatment of chordoma, the administration of high radiation doses may increase the disease-free interval. The objective response and dose-response relationships were analyzed in twelve patients for whom sequential CT scans were available.

Combined hyperthermia and irradiation in the treatment of superficial tumors: results of a prospective randomized trial of hyperthermia fractionation (1/wk vs 2/wk)

From December 1984 to December 1989, 240 superficially located recurrent/metastatic malignant lesions (173 patients) were enrolled in a prospective randomized study of one versus two hyperthermia fractions per week. In the majority of patients, the dose of radiation therapy was less than 4000 cGy over 4 to 5 weeks. Stratification was by tumor size, site, and histology. The goal of the hyperthermia sessions were 42.5 degrees C for 45-60 min minimum intra-tumor measured temperature. Hyperthermia was given after radiation within 30-60 min. External applicators, both microwave (over 90% of treatments) and ultrasound, were used. Overall, complete response rate in 222 evaluable lesions was 56.3% (125/222) with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and a maximum follow-up of 52 months. The complete response rate for once a week versus twice a week hyperthermia group was 54.7% and 57.8%, respectively. The severe complication rate was 18% (41/222). There was no difference between the two treatment arms. Cox regression analyses were performed to study the prognostic significance of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, and treatment parameters. Detailed analysis and results are presented.

Cervical metastases from unknown primaries: radiotherapeutic management and appearance of subsequent primaries

Between 1964 and 1986, 72 patients who presented with squamous or undifferentiated metastatic carcinoma to neck nodes, where the primary tumor could not be found by standard clinical procedures, were treated at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. These cases were managed in the following manner: biopsy and radiotherapy in 46 out of 72 patients, radiotherapy (RT) and a planned neck dissection in 14 out of 72, and neck dissection after failure to achieve a complete response (CR) with RT in 12 out of 72. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. The initial CR rates for stages N1, N2a, N2b, N3a, and N3b were 83%, 93%, 61%, 50%, and 33%, respectively. The long-term neck tumor control for the same stages was 83%, 71%, 67%, 44%, and 50%, respectively. One patient had soft tissue necrosis and two had carotid artery ruptures, one of which left no symptomatic sequelae. Twenty-one out of 72 patients developed subsequent primary tumor. Only one of these patients survived. This incidence was not affected significantly by prophylactic treatment of the mucosal areas except in patients with bilateral neck nodes, undifferentiated or poorly differentiated histologies, and/or posterior cervical node involvement. A multivariate analysis showed that prognosticators of an improved disease-free survival were: a complete clearance of tumor by the end of radiotherapy (p less than 0.0009) and no appearance of a subsequent primary tumor (p = 0.035). The only factor that correlated with an increased loco-regional control was having a complete response by the end of radiotherapy (p less than 0.00009). The recommended management and possible ways of preventing the appearance of subsequent primaries will be discussed.

Individual risk of abdominal disease in patients with stages I and II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease. A rule index based on 341 laparotomized patients

A multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors for clinical Stages I and II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease was carried out with a logistic regression model in 341 patients. The proportion of patients with positive staging laparotomy was greater in males, in individuals with several sites involved, mixed cellularity (MC) or lymphocyte depletion (LD) histologic types, systemic symptoms, or in patients with lower cervical involvement and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum copper, and LDH levels. Histology, presence of systemic symptoms (fever and sweats), and number of involved nodal regions were independent predictors of positive laparotomy. Mediastinal involvement is correlated to a significantly lower risk of positive laparotomy. Based on these observations, the individual risk for each patient of occult abdominal disease has been defined.