1
|
P657Anticoagulation strategies based on warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants compared to major hemorrhagic events: the relevance of patients aged 75 years or older. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate rates of major bleeding (mBleed) associated with anticoagulant treatments in patients (pts) with age ≥75 years (y), referred to hospital in northwest Tuscany.
Methods
We analysed 4-y survey; 302,687 visits; catchment area 197,722 inhabitants, of whom 15,267 on Warfarin (W) and 10,397 on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs were available in the catchment area since 4 y (dabigatran and rivaroxaban), 3 y (apixaban), and 2 y (edoxaban). Overall, 3,373 pts received dabigatran, 4,046 rivaroxaban, 2,141 apixaban, and 839 edoxaban. Pts with hemorrhage were submitted to propensity score matching for mBleed and stratified according to age ≥75 y, and W or DOACs. Primary endpoint was one-month death in pts with age ≥75 y.
Results
Out of 1,919 mBleed enrolled, those of pts aged ≥75 y were 1,127 (59%) versus (vs) 792 (41%) aged <75 y, with 77 (4.0%) one-month death vs 20 (1.0%), respectively; p<0.0001.
Patients on W showed higher rate of mBleed (n=175; 9.1%) compared to DOACs (n=53; 2.8%); p<0.0001. One-month death accounted for 14 (0.7%) vs 1 (0.1%), respectively; p=0.0019. Pts aged ≥75 years were more likely to show female gender and comorbidities including atrial fibrillation; p<0.01. Among DOACs, edoxaban presented the lowest absolute rate of hospital admission for mBleed and dabigatran the highest, although without statistical differences within DOACs (p=0.6454). Interestingly, in the subset of pts aged ≥75 y, within DOACs, we found no statistical difference in one-month mortality, although edoxaban showed one death due to brain mBleed; conversely, we found statistical significance in rate of mBleed. Indeed, edoxaban vs dabigatran showed p=0.0008, edoxaban vs apixaban p=0.0242, edoxaban vs rivaroxaban p=0.0058, apixaban vs rivaroxaban p=0.7093, apixaban vs dabigatran p=0.2279, rivaroxaban vs dabigatran p=0.5087.
Warfarin or DOACs and outcomes Major Bleeding (pts ≥75 y) p value versus pts <75 y p value within group One-month death (pts ≥75 y) p value versus pts <75 y p value within group n=1,127 n=77 Warfarin 175 (9.1%) 0.0001 <0.0001 14 (1.2%) 0.514 0.0019 DOACS 53 (2.8%) 0.0001 1 (0.1%) 0.256 Dabigatran 21 (1.1%) 0.026 0.0088 0 (0%) 0.391 0.8012 Rivaroxaban 16 (0.8%) 0.121 0 (0%) 0.619 Apixaban 13 (0.7%) 0.033 0 (0%) 1 Edoxaban 3 (0.2%) 0.647 1 (0.1%) 0.191 Patients: pts; direct oral anticoagulants: DOACs; p value Yates' correction: p value.
Patients with age >75 years and bleeding
Conclusion
In pts with age ≥75 y, rate of mBleed and short-term mortality were significantly higher than in pts aged <75 y In those pts, DOACs showed significantly lower rate of mBleed, and short-term death. Within DOACs, edoxaban was more likely to show lower rate of mBleed.
Collapse
|