The effect of intravenous haloperidol on QT interval dispersion in critically ill patients: comparison with QT interval prolongation for assessment of risk of Torsades de Pointes

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of intravenous haloperidol on QT interval dispersion in critically ill patients and to compare increases in QT interval dispersion and QTc intervals in patients who developed haloperidol-induced Torsades de Pointes versus those in patients who did not. This was a case-controlled study of 30 critically ill patients who received intravenous haloperidol for delusional agitation. Cases were patients (n = 6) who developed Torsades de Pointes during haloperidol therapy. Controls were patients (n = 24) who did not experience haloperidol-induced Torsades dePointes. QTc intervals were measured and QT interval dispersion was calculated. Haloperidol prolonged QTc interval compared to pretreatment values in Torsades de Pointes patients (606 +/- 61 ms vs. 501 +/- 44 ms, p = 0.007) by a greater magnitude than in patients who did not experience Torsades de Pointes (507 +/- 60 ms vs. 466 +/- 44, p = 0.01). Twelve-lead analysis revealed that QT interval dispersion increased in patients who experienced Torsades de Pointes (from 63 +/- 11 to 95 +/- 22 ms, p = 0.03) but not in those who did not (62 +/- 18 vs. 60 +/- 26 ms, p = 0.66). Analysis of precordial leads only showed no significant haloperidol-associated increases in QTinterval dispersion in eithergroup. The odds of developing haloperidol-induced Torsades de Pointes were highest in patients with QTc interval > 521 ms during haloperidol therapy(odds ratio = 12.1). It was concluded that intravenous haloperidol prolongs QTc intervals in critically ill patients. The degree of prolongation is greater in patients who experience Torsades de Pointes. QT interval dispersion may be increased in patients who develop haloperidol-induced Torsades de Pointes compared with those who do not. However, these effects are dependent on the method of measurement (12 leads vs. precordial leads). In addition, the odds of haloperidol-induced Torsades de Pointes are higherin patients with QTc intervalprolongation compared with increased QT interval dispersion. Therefore, QTc interval determination remains preferable to QT interval dispersion as a means assessment of risk for haloperidol-induced Torsades de Pointes.

Characterization of gentamicin pharmacokinetics in patients hemodialyzed with high-flux polysulfone membranes

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin during and after hemodialysis (using polysulfone Fresenius F-80 membranes (Fresenius USA, Inc, Walnut Creek, CA), surface area 1.6 m(2)), eight patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic hemodialysis receiving the drug for therapeutic indications were enrolled. Intradialytic gentamicin half-life, clearance, and amount of gentamicin recovered during a hemodialysis session were also determined. Serum gentamicin concentrations were analyzed using fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The amount of gentamicin recovered was 64.3 +/- 14.4 mg, whereas the intradialytic gentamicin half-life was 2.24 +/- 0.83 hours, with a clearance of 116 +/- 9 mL/min. Gentamicin concentrations rebounded by 27.86% +/- 16.4% at 1. 5 +/- 0.52 hours after the end of the hemodialysis session. The decrease in gentamicin concentrations comparing maximum rebound to prehemodialysis concentrations was 53.54% +/- 9.97%. A variable yet substantial amount of gentamicin is removed during hemodialysis using F-80 membranes; hence, supplemental doses are necessary to avoid potential treatment failures. The supplemental doses of gentamicin calculated based on gentamicin concentrations obtained immediately postdialysis could be overestimated if the postdialysis rebound concentrations are not considered. A dosing regimen is suggested using the pharmacokinetic parameters defined by the present study and population estimate of volume of distribution.

Atrial fibrillation after bypass surgery: does the arrhythmia or the characteristics of the patients prolong hospital stay?

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine whether prolonged hospital stay associated with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is attributable to the characteristics of patients who develop this arrhythmia or to the rhythm disturbance itself.

DESIGN

An investigation was conducted through a prospective case series.

SETTING

Patients were from a single urban teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery between December 1994 and May 1996 were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were involved.

RESULTS

Of 436 patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery, 101 (23%) developed AF. AF patients were older and more likely to have obstructive lung disease than patients without AF, but both patients with and without AF had similar left ventricular function and extent of coronary disease. ICU and hospital stays were longer in patients with AF. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, gender, and race, demonstrated that postoperative hospital stay was 9.2+/-5.3 days in patients with AF and 6.4+/-5.3 days in patients without AF (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although AF is strongly associated with advanced age, most of the prolonged hospital stay appears to be attributable to the rhythm itself and not to patient characteristics.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous diltiazem and digoxin for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary bypass graft surgery may result in hypotension, heart failure symptoms, embolic complications, and prolongation in length of hospital stay (LOHS). The purpose of this study was to determine whether intravenous diltiazem is more effective than digoxin for ventricular rate control in AF after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A secondary end point was to determine whether ventricular rate control with diltiazem reduces postoperative LOHS compared with digoxin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with AF and ventricular rate > 100 beats/min within 7 days after coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to receive intravenous therapy with diltiazem (n = 20) or digoxin (n = 20). Efficacy was measured with ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter monitoring). Safety was assessed by clinical monitoring and electrocardiographic recording. LOHS was measured from the day of surgery. Data were analyzed with the intention-to-treat principle in all randomly assigned patients. In addition, a separate intention-to-treat analysis was performed excluding patients who spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm. In the analysis of all randomly assigned patients, those who received diltiazem achieved ventricular rate control (> or = 20% decrease in pretreatment ventricular rate) in a mean of 10 +/- 20 (median 2) minutes compared with 352 +/- 312 (median 228) minutes for patients who received digoxin (p < 0.0001). At 2 hours, the proportion of patients who achieved rate control was significantly higher in patients treated with diltiazem (75% vs 35%, p = 0.03). Similarly, at 6 hours, the response rate associated with diltiazem was higher than that in the digoxin group (85% vs 45%, p = 0.02). However, response rates associated with diltiazem and digoxin at 12 and 24 hours were not significantly different. At 24 hours, conversion to sinus rhythm had occurred in 11 of 20 (55%) patients receiving diltiazem and 13 of 20 (65%) patients receiving digoxin (p = 0.75). Results of the analysis of only those patients who remained in AF were similar to those presented above. There was no difference between the diltiazem-treated and digoxin-treated groups in postoperative LOHS (8.6 +/- 2.2 vs 7.7 +/- 2.0 days, respectively, p = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular rate control occurs more rapidly with intravenous diltiazem than digoxin in AF after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, 12- and 24-hour response rates and duration of postoperative hospital stay associated with the two drugs are similar.

Torsades de Pointes associated with intravenous haloperidol in critically ill patients

In this retrospective case-control study, 8 of 223 consecutive patients (3.6%) treated with intravenous haloperidol developed torsades de pointes, and were compared with 41 patients randomly selected as controls. The likelihood of torsades de pointes associated with intravenous haloperidol is significantly greater in patients receiving > or = 35 mg over 24 hours or in those with a QTc interval of >500 ms, or both.

Interaction between tacrolimus and erythromycin

A 40-year-old Asian man, 6 months post renal transplant and receiving tacrolimus therapy, presented to the emergency department with a complaint of sudden-onset left eye pain with blurred vision, headache on the left side, and nausea and vomiting. On being admitted, the patient was intubated for respiratory depression, and erythromycin was initiated for suspected atypical pneumonia. Tacrolimus concentrations (whole blood) drawn on the 3rd day of hospitalization were reported to be > 60.0 ng/ml. Before hospitalization, tacrolimus concentrations were reported to be 9.8 ng/ml on a maintenance dose of 7 mg twice daily. Six days after discontinuation of erythromycin and a decrease in tacrolimus dose, the concentration decreased to 11.5 ng/ml and the original dose of tacrolimus was restarted. It is recommended that concurrent administration of erythromycin and tacrolimus be avoided. However, if concomitant therapy is necessary, tacrolimus concentrations, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and urine output should be monitored.

Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay with liquid chromatography for quantification of procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide in urine

The objective of this study was to compare the precision and accuracy of fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for measurement of procainamide (PA) and N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) concentrations in urine. To determine the correlation between FPIA and HPLC, urine PA and NAPA concentrations were assayed using both techniques in samples obtained from study patients receiving PA and in spiked samples. In samples from patients, FPIA-determined PA and NAPA concentrations were 19 +/- 9% lower and 28 +/- 31% higher, respectively, than those determined by HPLC. The slope of the FPIA-HPLC regression lines for PA and NAPA differed significantly from that of the line of unity (the slope that would result if FPIA and HPLC yielded identical concentrations). In spiked samples, FPIA-determined PA and NAPA concentrations were 15 +/- 2% and 11 +/- 2% lower than HPLC-determined concentrations, respectively, and the slopes of the FPIA-HPLC regression lines differed significantly from the line of unity. Therefore, FPIA cannot be recommended as a urine assay method when quantitative assessment of urine PA or NAPA excretion is needed for pharmacokinetic studies.

Disposition of procainamide in patients with chronic congestive heart failure receiving medical therapy

Dosage reduction of procainamide has been recommended in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, these recommendations are based primarily on studies with unmatched control groups, suboptimal blood sampling, and in patients not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. These agents increase renal blood flow, which theoretically may offset alterations in drug disposition in patients with CHF. The pharmacokinetics of procainamide in patients with chronic CHF and in matched controls were compared. A single intravenous dose of 750 mg of procainamide was administered to 9 patients with chronic New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III CHF (mean +/- SD left ventricular ejection fraction 22 +/- 9%) receiving medical therapy and 7 control subjects matched for age and gender. Blood and urine samples were collected at intervals over a period of 48 and 72 hours, respectively. Patients with CHF and control subjects were demographically similar, with the exception of concomitant medications, including ACE inhibitors (8/9 versus 1/7, respectively). There were no significant differences between patients with CHF and control subjects in mean +/- SD peak serum concentrations (Cmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity), total clearance, renal clearance, half-life (t1/2), or volume of distribution (Vd) of procainamide. Similarly, there were no significant differences between patients with CHF and control subjects in the mean +/- SD Cmax, AUC0-infinity, renal clearance, or t1/2 of N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA). Procainamide dosage reduction may not be necessary in patients with chronic stable CHF who are receiving medical therapy.

Inhibition of N-acetylation of procainamide and renal clearance of N-acetylprocainamide by para-aminobenzoic acid in humans

Procainamide administration often results in excessively high serum N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) concentrations and subtherapeutic serum procainamide concentrations. Inhibition of N-acetylation of procainamide may prevent accumulation of excessive NAPA while maintaining therapeutic serum procainamide concentrations. The purpose of this randomized, two-way crossover study was to determine if para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) inhibits N-acetylation of procainamide in healthy volunteers. Eleven (7 female, 4 male) fast acetylators of caffeine received, in random order, PABA 1.5 g orally every 6 hours for 5 days, with a single intravenous dose of procainamide 750 mg administered over 30 minutes on the third day, or intravenous procainamide alone. Blood samples were collected during a 48-hour period after initiation of the infusion. Urine was collected over a 72-hour period. Serum procainamide and NAPA concentrations were analyzed using fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Urine procainamide and NAPA concentrations were measured with high performance liquid chromatography. PABA did not significantly influence total or renal procainamide clearance, elimination rate constant, AUC0-00, amount of procainamide excreted unchanged in the urine, or volume of distribution. However, concomitant PABA administration with procainamide resulted in increases in NAPA AUC0-00 and t1/2 and reductions in NAPA Ke, procainamide acetylation (NAPA formation) clearance, and NAPA renal clearance. Although PABA inhibits metabolic conversion of procainamide to NAPA, it also impairs the renal clearance of NAPA (but not procainamide) in healthy subjects. Therefore, PABA may not be useful for optimizing the safety of efficacy of procainamide in patients.