[Optimizing the detection of subclinical atrial fibrillation after ESUS]

INTRODUCTION

It has been estimated that approximately 20% of ischemic strokes have a cardioembolic origin and the cause is not detected or there are more than one in 9-25% of ischemic strokes. An adequate diagnostic approach of ESUS would allow an optimization of antithrombotic treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Narrative update about the available evidence on the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach among patients with ESUS and how to optimize the detection of atrial fibrillation as a potential cause is reviewed.

DEVELOPMENT

A search was conducted on PubMed (MEDLINE), using the MeSH terms [ESUS] + [atrial fibrillation] + [diagnosis] + [treatment]. Original data from clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies and reviews were selected.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of atrial fibrillation after ESUS is mandatory to optimize the treatment. However, not all patients have the same risk of developing silent atrial fibrillation. There are some factors that increase this risk (left atrium enlargement, elderly, frequent premature supraventricular complexes). In these patients, a more prolonged monitorization could increase the possibility of detecting atrial fibrillation, and consequently, to benefit more from anticoagulant treatment.

Prospective registry of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in octogenarians: a need for intervention

OBJECTIVE

To study the factors associated with choice of therapy and prognosis in octogenarians with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, observational, multicenter registry. Centralized follow-up included survival status and, if possible, mode of death and Katz index.

SETTING

Transnational registry in Spain.

SUBJECTS

We included 928 patients aged ≥80 years with severe symptomatic AS.

INTERVENTIONS

Aortic-valve replacement (AVR), transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) or conservative therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause death.

RESULTS

Mean age was 84.2 ± 3.5 years, and only 49.0% were independent (Katz index A). The most frequent planned management was conservative therapy in 423 (46%) patients, followed by TAVI in 261 (28%) and AVR in 244 (26%). The main reason against recommending AVR in 684 patients was high surgical risk [322 (47.1%)], other medical motives [193 (28.2%)], patient refusal [134 (19.6%)] and family refusal in the case of incompetent patients [35 (5.1%)]. The mean time from treatment decision to AVR was 4.8 ± 4.6 months and to TAVI 2.1 ± 3.2 months, P < 0.001. During follow-up (11.2-38.9 months), 357 patients (38.5%) died. Survival rates at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 81.8%, 72.6%, 64.1% and 57.3%, respectively. Planned intervention, adjusted for multiple propensity score, was associated with lower mortality when compared with planned conservative treatment: TAVI Hazard ratio (HR) 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.93; P = 0.016) and AVR HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.39-0.8; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians with symptomatic severe AS are frequently managed conservatively. Planned conservative management is associated with a poor prognosis.

Enoxaparin as bridging anticoagulant treatment in cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess enoxaparin as bridging anticoagulant treatment in cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Prospective registry of those patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our centre between December 2003 and June 2004 and required long-term anticoagulation. Subcutaneous enoxaparin was used as bridging anticoagulant treatment according to a pre-established protocol. The global thromboembolic risk was carefully assessed in all patients. All patients were followed up for 3 months.

RESULTS

Of 140 patients who were included (mean (SD) age 66 (11); 49% female), 51 were already receiving long-term acenocumarol treatment before the index intervention. 50% of the patients were at high or very high risk for thromboembolic events in the postoperative period. The mean (SD) number of days between surgery and the first dose of anticoagulant was 2.01 (7) for acenocumarol and 1 (1.01) for enoxaparin. The mean (SD) daily dose of enoxaparin was 1.1 (0.27) mg/kg. Six thromboembolic events (4.3%; 95% CI 1.6 to 9.1) occurred, but only four of them were plausibly related to enoxaparin (2.9%; 95% CI 0.8 to 7.1). Six major haemorrhagic events (4.3%; 95% CI 1.6 to 9.1) occurred, but only three were plausibly related to enoxaparin (2.1%; 95% CI 0.4 to 6.1).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show a reasonable rate of adverse events using enoxaparin as bridging anticoagulant treatment in cardiac surgery. Randomised studies are necessary to evaluate the real efficacy and safety of enoxaparin as bridging anticoagulant treatment in cardiac surgery.