Uncovering the armpit of SBRT: An institutional experience with stereotactic radiation of axillary metastases

Purpose/objectives

The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to its use in varying anatomic locations. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes and process.

Materials/methods

Patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014 to 2022 were reviewed. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate regression analysis examined predictors of LF.

Results

We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60 %) and elderly (median age: 72). Median follow-up was 14.6 months. Common primary cancers included breast (43 %), skin (19 %), and lung (14 %). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (46 %), oligometastases (35 %) and symptomatic progression (19 %). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (18 %) or surgery (11 %). Most had prior systemic therapy (70 %).Significant heterogeneity in planning technique was identified; a minority of patient received 4-D CT scans (46 %), MR-simulation (21 %), or contrast (10 %). Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy). Seventeen cases (44 %) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla.At first assessment, 87 % had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57 % had complete resolution and 21 % had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 16 % and 20 %, respectively. Univariable analysis showed increasing BED reduced risk of LF. Median OS was 21.0 months (95 % [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95 % [CI] 4.3-11.3). Two grade 3 events were identified, and no grade 4/5.

Conclusion

Using SBRT for AM demonstrated low rates of toxicity and LF, and respectable symptom improvement. Variation in treatment delivery has prompted development of an institutional protocol to standardize technique and increase efficiency. Limited followup may limit detection of local failure and late toxicity.

Uncovering the Armpit of Axillary SBRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to applications in new and unique anatomic locations, highlighting the importance of effective, safe, reproducible treatment delivery. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes, safety and process.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this ethics approved single-institution retrospective review, patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014-2022 had tumor, treatment planning, and dosimetric variables abstracted. Toxicity was assessed per Common Terminology for Adverse Events V5.0. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (62%), and elderly (median age: 72), with a median follow-up of 14.6 months. Common primary sites included breast (n = 16, 43%), skin (n = 7, 19%), and lung (n = 5, 14%). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (n = 18, 46%), oligometastases (n = 14, 36%) and symptomatic progression (n = 7, 18%). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (n = 7, 18%) or regional surgery (n = 4, 11%), while most had prior systemic therapy (n = 26, 70%). Significant heterogeneity in simulation, planning and treatment was identified. Immobilization included 5-point thermoplastic mask (n = 12, 32%), Vacloc (n = 12, 32%) arms-up thorax bag (n = 11, 30%). 4-D CT scans were obtained in 46%, MR simulation in 21%, and intravenous contrast in 10%. Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy), over a median of 12 days (IQR: 9-14). Seventeen cases (44%) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla; 14% used a high dose clinical target volume. Median planning target volume margin was 5mm (range: 3-10mm), and plans were generated with 5 different dose constraint protocols. At first radiographic assessment, 87% had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57% had complete symptom resolution and 21% had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 19% and 31%, respectively. Median OS was 21.0 months (95% [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95% [CI] 4.3-11.3). Acute and late toxicities were uncommon, with two grade 3 events (1 plexopathy in a case with tumor involving brachial plexus, 1 skin ulceration) identified, and no grade 4/5.

CONCLUSION

In this series of AM SBRT, low rates of toxicity, and good rates of LF and symptom improvement were observed. As treatment was delivered with a variety of individual treatment differences, an institutional protocol is under development to standardize technique, optimize efficiency and improve evaluability.

Heatmaps to Assess Tumor Motion Probability with MRcine in Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Intrafraction motion affects tumor position during radiation for head and neck cancers (HNC) and can be assessed using magnetic resonance cine (MR-cine). Heatmaps - visual representation of patient specific temporal tumor location akin to internal target volume (ITV) - were analyzed to demonstrate the variation of population-based motion margins in primary oropharyngeal (OP) and laryngeal/hypopharyngeal (LH) sites with the goal to provide insights towards personalized margins.

MATERIALS/METHODS

MR-cine were performed for LH and OP HNC patients as part of simulation protocol. Images (900-1500 slices) were acquired across 3-5 minutes per patient. Gross target volumes were propagated on T1 contrast sagittal sequence using deformable image registration then adjusted manually. Tumor locations were integrated across all frames and displayed as heatmaps representing location probability. To determine individualized motion, a baseline contour representing average tumor rest position was expanded both isotropically and directionally in 1 mm increments in a novel analysis to define the contribution of each increment on target coverage. To assess directional dependence, displacements from rest position were evaluated in 4 planes from centroid: (A) 12 o'clock (OC) to 6OC (capturing volumetric shift in a portion of superior, posterior and inferior directions), B) 3OC-9OC, C) 6OC-12OC, D) 9OC-3OC. Histograms demonstrating the proportion of scan time the tumor was within expansions were generated, with expansion margins for 25%-95% coverage analyzed by patient. Wilcoxon-rank-sum test was performed to compare motion by site.

RESULTS

Motion was evaluated in 66 patients (LH n = 27, OP n = 39). In LH, a median (med) isometric expansion of 8.5mm to achieve 95% target was required, with large variations observed for minimum (min): 2.8mm and maximum (max):23.5mm. Smaller differences were observed for OP with med of 5.3mm, (min:1.9mm, max:14.6mm). At 75%, 50% and 25% coverage, expansions for LH (med: 4.8 min: 1.9 max: 17.3; med: 3.8 min: 1.2 max: 12.9; med: 3.3, min: 0.6, max: 9.3) were not significantly different than OP (med: 3.8, min: 1.7, max: 10.9; med: 3.1 min: 1.3, max: 9.4; med: 2.1, min: 0.7, max: 8.4), suggesting larger but infrequent shifts in LH. Directional tumor displacement varied widely (Table 1), and by site and points describing the need for personalized margins.

CONCLUSION

Current literature as well as the analysis in this study indicate a wide range of motion - both in magnitude and duty cycle - between and within HN sub-sites not captured on CT simulation. Moving forward, motion based heatmaps based on MR-cine may serve as visualization tool for ITV contouring or to generate personalized motion margins.

A Novel Strategy to Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy: Results from the Prospective Phase I Clinical Trial of MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubbles (MRgFUS+MB) Treatment for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that tumor cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy (RT) is combined with focused-ultrasound (FUS)-stimulated microbubbles (MB) treatment. MBs are gas microspheres used as intravascular contrast agents. The acoustic exposure of MBs within the target volume causes bubbles cavitation that induces perturbation of tumor vasculature. This activates apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy, which would otherwise require high-dose radiotherapy (>8-10 Gy/fraction) to be activated. Subsequent irradiation of an MB-sensitized tumor causes increased anoxic tumor killing, which occurs in addition to canonical RT-induced DNA damage. Given the compelling results of preclinical data, we conducted a phase I clinical trial of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-stimulated MBs (MRgFUS+MB) treatment for breast cancer patients (pts). We report the safety and efficacy results of this new radio enhancement treatment.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This is a single-center, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04431674). We included pts with stage I-IV breast cancer with tumor in situ for whom breast or chest wall RT was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team. Pts were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or MB administration. Pts underwent 2-3 MRgFUS+MB treatments throughout the RT course. We used an MR-coupled FUS-device operating at 500 KHz and 540 kPa peak negative pressure to deliver the treatment. The FUS sonicated intravenously administrated MB within the MR-guided target volume. Pts were monitored for 30-min post-procedure and subsequently treated with RT. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology for Adverse Events V5.0. Secondary outcomes were radiological response at 3 months and local control (LC) at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control. All pts signed a written consent form before study participation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 18 females with 20 primary breast cancer treated with MRgFUS+MB therapy. The median age was 60 years (range, 44-90). The molecular subtypes consisted of basal-like (n = 3/20), luminal (n = 11/20), and HER2-enriched (n = 6/20). The prescribed dose was 20 Gy/5 fractions (n = 8/20), 30-35 Gy/5 fractions (n = 7/20), 30-40 Gy/10 fractions (n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3-29). All pts completed the planned MRgFUS+MB treatments. The only MRgFUS+MB treatment-related toxicity consisted of Grade 1 allergic reaction (mild cough) 30 minutes after the last MB injection. All worst acute toxicities were radiation dermatitis (Grade 3 = 2/20, Grade 2 = 2/20, Grade 1 = 14/20). At 3 months, 75% had partial (n = 6/20) or complete (n = 9/20) response, with a single progression. The LC rate at 1 year was 86%.

CONCLUSION

MRgFUS+MB was a safe and efficient treatment that provided durable responses.

An Update of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Palliation of Unirradiated Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC)

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

We report the treatment outcomes of palliative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in patients with primary mucosal head and neck cancer (HNC) who were not eligible to receive conventional radiation therapy (RT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

This is a retrospective study that reviewed the medical records of patients with primary SCC mucosal HNC who were treated with SBRT between 2011 and 2022. Patients with other histologies, skin cancer, parotid tumors, or recurrent previously irradiated tumors were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients and 77 tumors were treated with SBRT in this cohort. The median age in the study was 81 (52-97) years and the median follow-up was 7.2 months. The most common site of HNC was the oral cavity (62%), followed by the oropharynx (18%), hypopharynx (8%), larynx (5%), nasal cavity/sinonasal cancer (3%), and unknown primary (1%). T3-4 lesions were found in most patients (76%). SBRT doses ranged from 35-50 Gy in 5 fractions, and the most common prescription dose was ≥45 Gy in 5 fractions (60%) for the GTV prescription. An elective nodal volume of 25 Gy in 5 fractions was infrequently (17%) used. Most patients (81%) who were treated twice a week completed in ≤14 days. The predominant symptoms at presentation were: pain (41%), mass effect (39%), dysphagia/odynophagia (14%), headache/nasal obstruction (1.4%), bleeding (1.4%), stridor (1.4%), asymptomatic (1.4%), and unknown (1.4%). 84% of patients had symptomatic response to treatment with 24% of them having complete symptom response. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was 6.7% and at 6 months and 17.9% at 12 months, respectively. Cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 7.3% and 10.5% at 6 and 12 months. Cancer was the most common cause of death in 29 patients (51%). The median overall survival (OS) was 8 months with 6 and 12-month OS rates of 67% and 36%, respectively. 39% of patients developed acute G3 toxicity, including 30% with G3 mucositis, 5% with G3 dysphagia, and 4% with G3 dermatitis. A crude rate of late G ≥3 toxicity was observed in 11% of patients including (5%, n = 4) with osteoradionecrosis, and a single case of dysphagia, soft tissue necrosis, supraglottic ulceration, and mucosal necrosis.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the feasibility of SBRT as a treatment option for primary mucosal head and neck cancer patients who are not eligible for conventional radiation therapy. The results indicate that SBRT was effective in achieving local control and symptom relief, but larger prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings. The Canadian Cancer Trials Group has endorsed HN-13, a randomized control trial comparing HN SBRT to palliative RT.

Comparison of survival between radiation therapy and trans-oral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer patients; a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The literature reports various treatment methodologies, such as trans-oral laser microsurgery, radiation therapy, total/partial laryngectomies, and concurrent radiation chemotherapy for patients with early larynx cancer. However, at the forefront of early glottis treatment is trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy, likely due to better functional and survival outcomes. Here we conduct the largest Canadian head-to-head comparison of consecutive patients treated with either radiation therapy or trans-oral laser microsurgery. Additionally, we compare these two treatments and their 5-year survival rates post treatment to add to the existing literature.

METHODS

Charts of patients who were diagnosed with early glottic cancer between 2006 and 2013 were reviewed. Seventy-five patients were identified, and split into 2 groups based on their primary treatment, trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, life-tables, and the log-rank statistic were reported to determine if there was a difference between the two treatment groups and their disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and total laryngectomy-free survival. Additionally, each different survival analysis was stratified by potential confounding variables, to help conclude which treatment is more efficacious in this population.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival rate is 93.3 % σ = 0.063 and 90.8 % σ = 0.056 for patients treated with trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy, respectively (χ (2) < 0.001, p = 0.983). The disease free survival rate is 60.0 % (σ =0.121) for patients treated with trans-oral laser microsurgery, and 67.2 % (σ = 0.074) for those who received RT (χ (2) = 0.19, p = 0.663). Additionally, the total laryngectomy-free survival rate is 84.1 % (σ = 0.1) and 79.1 % (σ = 0.072) for patients' early glottic cancer treated by trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy, respectively (χ (2) = 0.235, p = 0.628). Chi-square analysis of age-group versus treatment group (χ (2) = 6.455, p = 0.04) and T-stage versus treatment group (χ (2) = 11.3, p = 0.001) revealed a statistically significant relationship, suggesting survival analysis should be stratified by these variables. However, after stratification, there was no statistically significant difference between the trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy groups in any of the survival analyses.

CONCLUSION

No difference was demonstrated in the 5-year disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and total laryngectomy-free survival, between the RT and TLM treatment groups. Additionally, both groups showed similar 5-year survival after stratifying by confounding variables.

Response to second-line erlotinib in an EGFR mutation-negative patient with non-small-cell lung cancer: make no assumptions

Erlotinib-an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr)-has commonly been used as a therapeutic option in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) patients in the second- or third-line treatment setting. A mutation in the EGFR gene (EGFR M+) confers an increased response to this class of drugs. In the first-line setting, use of tkis is restricted to patients having a mutation. The importance of this biomarker has been questioned in subsequent treatment lines.Here, we report a case showing a positive response to erlotinib treatment in the second-line setting. The patient, an elderly male smoker with stage iv nsclc, had a tumour that was EGFR mutation-negative (wild-type EGFR). Based on this clinical case, we discuss the controversy concerning the need for, and impact of, testing for EGFR mutation after first-line treatment.

Abstract P4-11-06: Population Based Outcomes after Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the Pre and Post Trastuzumab Eras

Background: In the Pre-trastuzumab (Pre-T) era, survival rates after brain radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer patients were 4 to 8 months. Trastuzumab (T) was approved and funded in British Columbia in the metastatic setting in 1999. We examined the survival of Her2-positive and negative metastatic breast cancer at a provincial level in the Pre-T and T eras after brain RT.

Material and Methods: All women with a diagnosis of breast cancer between 2000 and 2007 (T era) who were treated with brain RT in British Columbia were identified. A series of cases with brain metastasis from breast cancer treated with brain irradiation diagnosed between 1986 and 1992 with banked tissue on which Her-2 testing had been performed were also identified (Pre-T era). Date of death was determined from the tumour registry. Baseline prognostic factors were compared using Chi Square for categorical data, and t-test for continuous data. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between eras and between her-2 groups were done with a log-rank test. Variables significant for survival on log-rank test were entered into a Cox regression for multivariate analysis for each era separately.

Results: A total of 455 women with brain metastases from breast cancer were identified from the T era, and 131 were identified from the Pre-T era. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years in both eras. The percentage of cases with ER-positive (43% and 41% p=0.2) and Grade 3 tumours (74% and 67%, p=0.2) were not statistically different. The percentage of cases with Her2-positive disease were statistically different the two eras (29% in Pre-T and 46% in the T eras, p=&lt;0.001). Of the T era Her2-positive patients, 85% received T. The median time from diagnosis to brain RT was longer in the pre-T era (3.3 years versus 2.3 years, p&lt; 0.001). The most common prescription used for whole brain RT was 20 Gy in 5 fractions in both eras, however it was more common in the pre-T era (87%) compared to the T era (68%) (p=&lt;0.001). Although stereotactic radiotherapy, which first became available in our region in 1997, was occasionally used as a boost in BC, all but 15 (11%) of the pre-T era patients had died prior to its availability. Survival was longer after whole brain RT in the T era (1 year survival 27% versus 14%, log rank p=0.07). In the T era, one year survival was better for those with Her2 positive disease in the T era (39%) compared to those with Her2 negative disease (19%) in the T era (p-value &lt; 0.0001), and to those with Her 2 positive disease in the pre-T era (3%, P&lt;0.001). In the pre-T era, although 1 year survival was better (18%) for Her2 negative disease compared to Her2 positive disease (3%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1). In a Cox model, RT dose and ER status were significant variables in both eras, but Her2 status and age were only significant variables in the T era (p all &lt; 0.001).

Discussion: For patients with Her2 negative disease, there was no difference in survival after RT for brain metastases between the Pre-T and T eras. However, for patients with Her2 positive disease, survival after RT for brain metastases has increased significantly in the trastuzumab era.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-06.

The structure and innervation of the male urethra: histological and immunohistochemical studies with three-dimensional reconstruction

The structure of the striated urethral sphincter, the so-called rhabdosphincter, remains the subject of controversy. There are two main concepts regarding its structure: either it is a part of the urogenital diaphragm, or it extends from the base of the bladder up to the urogenital diaphragm and is an integral part of the urethra. It is also uncertain whether it possesses a somatic innervation or a mixed innervation (i.e. autonomic and somatic). The purpose of this study was to show the precise location of the nerves running to the urethra, and to try to determine their exact nature. Histology and immunohistochemistry were performed in the external urethral sphincter of ten male fetuses (114-342 mm crown-rump length, or between 14 and 40 weeks of gestation). A three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the urethral structure and its innervation was made from serial sections. The 3D reconstruction of the same section levels with different strains allowed us to identify the precise structure of the muscle layers (smooth and striated muscle fibres) and the nature of the nerve elements (myelinated and unmyelinated), their distributions and their relationship to the urethral wall, the prostate and the seminal vesicles. Histological and immunohistochemical 3D reconstruction of the anatomical elements of the urethral sphincter helps us to understand the 3D arrangement of the sphincter muscle layers. It also provides a better understanding of the origin and nature of the nerve elements that play a role in urinary continence.