1
|
Walker SP, Keenan E, Bintcliffe O, Stanton AE, Roberts M, Pepperell J, Fairbairn I, McKeown E, Goldring J, Maddekar N, Walters J, West A, Bhatta A, Knight M, Mercer R, Hallifax R, White P, Miller RF, Rahman NM, Maskell NA. Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 2021; 57:13993003.03375-2020. [PMID: 33334938 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03375-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) is traditionally managed with an intercostal chest tube attached to an underwater seal. We investigated whether use of a one-way flutter valve shortened patients' length of stay (LoS).This open-label randomised controlled trial enrolled patients presenting with SSP and randomised to either a chest tube and underwater seal (standard care: SC) or ambulatory care (AC) with a flutter valve. The type of flutter valve used depended on whether at randomisation the patient already had a chest tube in place: in those without a chest tube a pleural vent (PV) was used; in those with a chest tube in situ, an Atrium Pneumostat (AP) valve was attached. The primary end-point was LoS.Between March 2017 and March 2020, 41 patients underwent randomisation: 20 to SC and 21 to AC (13=PV, 8=AP). There was no difference in LoS in the first 30 days following treatment intervention: AC (median=6 days, IQR 14.5) and SC (median=6 days, IQR 13.3). In patients treated with PV there was a high rate of early treatment failure (6/13; 46%), compared to patients receiving SC (3/20; 15%) (p=0.11) Patients treated with AP had no (0/8 0%) early treatment failures and a median LoS of 1.5 days (IQR 23.8).There was no difference in LoS between ambulatory and standard care. Pleural Vents had high rates of treatment failure and should not be used in SSP. Atrium Pneumostats are a safer alternative, with a trend towards lower LoS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma Keenan
- Academic Respiratory Unit Bristol, Westbury on Trym, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alex West
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul White
- Applied Statistics Group, University of West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Robert F Miller
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corcoran JP, Psallidas I, Gerry S, Piccolo F, Koegelenberg CF, Saba T, Daneshvar C, Fairbairn I, Heinink R, West A, Stanton AE, Holme J, Kastelik JA, Steer H, Downer NJ, Haris M, Baker EH, Everett CF, Pepperell J, Bewick T, Yarmus L, Maldonado F, Khan B, Hart-Thomas A, Hands G, Warwick G, De Fonseka D, Hassan M, Munavvar M, Guhan A, Shahidi M, Pogson Z, Dowson L, Popowicz ND, Saba J, Ward NR, Hallifax RJ, Dobson M, Shaw R, Hedley EL, Sabia A, Robinson B, Collins GS, Davies HE, Yu LM, Miller RF, Maskell NA, Rahman NM. Prospective validation of the RAPID clinical risk prediction score in adult patients with pleural infection: the PILOT study. Eur Respir J 2020; 56:2000130. [PMID: 32675200 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00130-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 30% of adult patients with pleural infection either die and/or require surgery. There is no robust means of predicting at baseline presentation which patients will suffer a poor clinical outcome. A validated risk prediction score would allow early identification of high-risk patients, potentially directing more aggressive treatment thereafter. OBJECTIVES To prospectively assess a previously described risk score (the RAPID (Renal (urea), Age, fluid Purulence, Infection source, Dietary (albumin)) score) in adults with pleural infection. METHODS Prospective observational cohort study that recruited patients undergoing treatment for pleural infection. RAPID score and risk category were calculated at baseline presentation. The primary outcome was mortality at 3 months; secondary outcomes were mortality at 12 months, length of hospital stay, need for thoracic surgery, failure of medical treatment and lung function at 3 months. RESULTS Mortality data were available in 542 out of 546 patients recruited (99.3%). Overall mortality was 10% at 3 months (54 out of 542) and 19% at 12 months (102 out of 542). The RAPID risk category predicted mortality at 3 months. Low-risk mortality (RAPID score 0-2): five out of 222 (2.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 5.7%); medium-risk mortality (RAPID score 3-4): 21 out of 228 (9.2%, 95% CI 6.0 to 13.7%); and high-risk mortality (RAPID score 5-7): 27 out of 92 (29.3%, 95% CI 21.0 to 39.2%). C-statistics for the scores at 3 months and 12 months were 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.83) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.82), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The RAPID score stratifies adults with pleural infection according to increasing risk of mortality and should inform future research directed at improving outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Corcoran
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Joint first authors, with equal contribution to study recruitment and manuscript writing
| | - Ioannis Psallidas
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Joint first authors, with equal contribution to study recruitment and manuscript writing
| | - Stephen Gerry
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Francesco Piccolo
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Tarek Saba
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | | | | | | | - Alex West
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jayne Holme
- University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Henry Steer
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Nicola J Downer
- Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Mansfield, UK
| | - Mohammed Haris
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Emma H Baker
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Thomas Bewick
- Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Lonny Yarmus
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fabien Maldonado
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Burhan Khan
- Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, UK
| | - Alan Hart-Thomas
- Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| | | | | | | | - Maged Hassan
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Chest Diseases Dept, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | | | - Anur Guhan
- University Hospital Ayr, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayr, UK
| | | | - Zara Pogson
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK
| | - Lee Dowson
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Natalia D Popowicz
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Judith Saba
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Neil R Ward
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Rob J Hallifax
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melissa Dobson
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rachel Shaw
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma L Hedley
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Assunta Sabia
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Barbara Robinson
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert F Miller
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hallifax RJ, McKeown E, Sivakumar P, Fairbairn I, Peter C, Leitch A, Knight M, Stanton A, Ijaz A, Marciniak S, Cameron J, Bhatta A, Blyth KG, Reddy R, Harris MC, Maddekar N, Walker S, West A, Laskawiec-Szkonter M, Corcoran JP, Gerry S, Roberts C, Harvey JE, Maskell N, Miller RF, Rahman NM. Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396:39-49. [PMID: 32622394 PMCID: PMC7607300 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31043-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary spontaneous pneumothorax occurs in otherwise healthy young patients. Optimal management is not defined and often results in prolonged hospitalisation. Data on efficacy of ambulatory options are poor. We aimed to describe the duration of hospitalisation and safety of ambulatory management compared with standard care. METHODS In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, adults (aged 16-55 years) with symptomatic primary spontaneous pneumothorax were recruited from 24 UK hospitals during a period of 3 years. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with either an ambulatory device or standard guideline-based management (aspiration, standard chest tube insertion, or both). The primary outcome was total length of hospital stay including re-admission up to 30 days after randomisation. Patients with available data were included in the primary analysis and all assigned patients were included in the safety analysis. The trial was prospectively registered with the International Standard Randomised Clinical Trials Number, ISRCTN79151659. FINDINGS Of 776 patients screened between July, 2015, and March, 2019, 236 (30%) were randomly assigned to ambulatory care (n=117) and standard care (n=119). At day 30, the median hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the 114 patients with available data who received ambulatory treatment (0 days [IQR 0-3]) than in the 113 with available data who received standard care (4 days [IQR 0-8]; p<0·0001; median difference 2 days [95% CI 1-3]). 110 (47%) of 236 patients had adverse events, including 64 (55%) of 117 patients in the ambulatory care arm and 46 (39%) of 119 in the standard care arm. All 14 serious adverse events occurred in patients who received ambulatory care, eight (57%) of which were related to the intervention, including an enlarging pneumothorax, asymptomatic pulmonary oedema, and the device malfunctioning, leaking, or dislodging. INTERPRETATION Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax significantly reduced the duration of hospitalisation including re-admissions in the first 30 days, but at the expense of increased adverse events. This data suggests that primary spontaneous pneumothorax can be managed for outpatients, using ambulatory devices in those who require intervention. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob J Hallifax
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Edward McKeown
- Royal Berkshire National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | | | | | - Christy Peter
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Andrew Leitch
- Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Andrew Stanton
- Great Western Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK
| | - Asim Ijaz
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | - Amrithraj Bhatta
- Blackpool Fylde and Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Kevin G Blyth
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Raja Reddy
- Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, UK
| | | | | | - Steven Walker
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alex West
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Stephen Gerry
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Corran Roberts
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Nick Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Robert F Miller
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laroche C, Fairbairn I, Moss H, Pepke-Zaba J, Sharples L, Flower C, Coulden R. Role of computed tomographic scanning of the thorax prior to bronchoscopy in the investigation of suspected lung cancer. Thorax 2000; 55:359-63. [PMID: 10770815 PMCID: PMC1745764 DOI: 10.1136/thorax.55.5.359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibreoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is the usual initial investigation of choice in patients with suspected endobronchial carcinoma, but it is often non-diagnostic. Once a positive diagnosis has been made, many patients undergo staging by computed tomographic (CT) scanning to assess the extent of the disease and its suitability for radical treatment. To determine whether initial CT scanning before FOB is a cost effective way of reducing subsequent unnecessary or unhelpful invasive diagnostic procedures, a study was undertaken in 171 patients with suspected endobronchial carcinoma. METHODS A randomised two group study was performed with all patients undergoing an initial CT staging scan. In group A the CT scans were reviewed before FOB, allowing cancellation or a change to an alternative invasive procedure if considered appropriate. In group B all patients proceeded to FOB with the bronchoscopist blinded to the result of the CT scan until after the procedure. RESULTS In group A six of 90 patients (7%) required no further investigations as the CT scan was either normal, consistent with benign disease, or consistent with widespread metastatic disease. Of the remainder, bronchoscopy was diagnostic in 50 of 68 (73%) in group A compared with 44 of 81 (54%) in group B (p = 0.015). Overall, a positive diagnosis was made after a single invasive investigation in 64 of 84 patients (76%) in group A compared with only 45 of 81 patients (55%) in group B (p = 0.005). Only seven of 90 patients (8%) in group A required more than one invasive investigation compared with 15 of 81 patients (18.5%) in group B. In patients with malignancy, bronchoscopy was more likely to be diagnostic in group A (50 of 56 patients (89%)) than in group B (44 of 62 (71%); p = 0. 012), and the diagnosis was more frequently made on the initial invasive investigation (group A, 63 of 70 (90%); group B, 44 of 62 (71%); p = 0.004). Because of the lower number of invasive procedures performed in group A than in group B, the cost of performing CT scans before FOB in all patients in group A would have equated to a projected cost of performing CT scans in 60% of patients after FOB in group B. CONCLUSIONS Performing initial CT thoracic scans before bronchoscopy in patients with suspected endobronchial malignancy is a cost effective way of improving diagnostic yield from invasive diagnostic procedures and occasionally may obviate the need for any further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Laroche
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Papworth and Addenbrooke's NHS Trusts, Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|