The effects of biofeedback training for efficient activation of infraspinatus on proprioception and EMG activity during shoulder external rotation

The purpose of this study investigated which biofeedback (BF) training enables efficient activation of the infraspinatus muscle that affect joint position sense (JPS) and force sense (FS) of the shoulder joint. Twenty healthy males participated and performed three external rotation (ER) exercises under three randomly assigned training conditions: 1) non-biofeedback (NBF), 2) BF and 3) force biofeedback (FBF). Each exercise was performed at intervals of one week between training conditions. After performed the ER exercise under each training condition, the relative error (RE) was calculated at shoulder ER 45° and 80°, and then shoulder ER force were measured to determine the JPS error and FS error, respectively. Muscle activity of infraspinatus and posterior deltoid were measured and compared between training conditions. The RE of shoulder ER 45° and 80° were significantly lower under the FBF conditions than other training conditions (P < 0.05). The RE of shoulder ER force were also significantly lower under the FBF conditions compared to those under the other training conditions (P < 0.05). The activity of the infraspinatus muscle was significantly higher under the FBF conditions during all three ER exercises than other training conditions (p < 0.05). We suggest that BF trainings can be useful to improve the proprioception of shoulder joint as well as activation of infraspinatus muscle while performing the ER exercises.

Influence of scapular motion cues on trapezius muscle activity during Y exercise

BACKGROUND

The Y exercise is a therapeutic exercise facilitating lower trapezius muscle activity.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the effects of scapular movement cues (posterior tilt vs. posterior tilt with adduction/depression) on trapezius muscle activity during Y exercise.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy men without current shoulder pain performed general Y exercise; Y exercise with cues for scapular posterior tilt; and Y exercise with cues for scapular posterior tilt, adduction, and depression. Electromyography (EMG) data for the trapezius muscles were collected during Y exercise. The posterior tilt angle of the scapula was measured in the prone position with and without cues for scapular posterior tilt using an inclinometer application.

RESULTS

The greatest lower trapezius muscle activity was observed during Y exercise with cues for scapular posterior tilt, while the greatest EMG activity of the upper trapezius was observed during Y exercise with cues for scapular posterior tilt, adduction, and depression (p< 0.05). Middle trapezius muscle activity did not significantly differ among the three Y exercise conditions (p= 0.175). Cues for scapular posterior tilt significantly increased the scapular posterior tilt angle in the prone shoulder abduction position (p= 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Cues for scapular posterior tilt were most effective in facilitating lower trapezius muscle activity during Y exercise.

The effects of pressure biofeedback on hip and trunk muscle activity and lumbopelvic alignment during one-leg standing

BACKGROUND: During one-leg standing (OLS), optimum activity of the gluteus medius (Gmed), multifidus (MF), and quadratus lumborum (QL) muscles relies upon maintaining neutral lumbopelvic alignment. However, no studies have examined how using pressure biofeedback during OLS affects the activity of these muscles and the concomitant alignment of the pelvis and trunk. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of pressure biofeedback on the activity of the Gmed, MF, and QL and the femoropelvic and trunk lean angles during OLS. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy males performed OLS with (PB+) and without (PB-) pressure biofeedback. For all OLS conditions, a pressure sensor was placed between the lateral surface of the humerus on the non-supporting side and the wall. Under the PB- condition, participants performed preferred OLS while the examiner measured the maximum pressure caused by trunk lean. Under the PB+ condition, participants were asked to perform at a threshold of 50% of the maximal pressure (PB+ 1 condition) and with minimal change in pressure (PB+ 2 condition). Muscle activities of MF, QL, and Gmed as well as the femoropelvic and trunk lean angles were measured under various OLS conditions. RESULTS: The activity of the Gmed, MF, and QL was greater under both PB+ conditions than under the PB- condition (p< 0.05). Also, both PB+ conditions resulted in a greater femoropelvic angle and reduced trunk lean angle. There were no significant differences in muscle activity, femoropelvic angle, or trunk lean angle between PB+ 1 and PB+ 2 (p> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that pressure biofeedback is a useful modality for increasing the activity of the Gmed and trunk muscles, especially the MF muscle on the non-supporting leg side, and for preventing compensatory movements such as trunk deviation and pelvic lateral deviation during OLS.

Strategies for controlling axial shoulder rotation change shoulder muscle activity during external rotation exercises

BACKGROUND

The infraspinatus muscle has a crucial role in shoulder stability. Although axial shoulder rotation is useful for selective activation of the infraspinatus, no study has examined the influence of exercise position on axial shoulder rotation during shoulder external rotation (ER) exercises. Thus, this study investigated the muscle activity in the infraspinatus, posterior deltoid, and middle trapezius during shoulder ER exercises performed with and without controlled axial shoulder rotation in 2 different positions.

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects performed prone external rotation (PER) exercises with and without pressure biofeedback and seated external rotation (SITER) exercises with and without posterior humeral head gliding. Muscle activity during each ER exercise was measured using surface electromyography.

RESULTS

Exercise strategy (P < .001) and position (P < .001) had a significant main effect on muscle activity in the infraspinatus and posterior deltoid. However, no significant interaction between strategy and position was observed. For muscle activity in the middle trapezius, strategy and position had a significant interaction effect (P = .014). Muscle activity in the infraspinatus increased significantly with the use of strategies to control axial shoulder rotation, whereas muscle activity in the posterior deltoid and middle trapezius decreased significantly. For all 3 muscles, greater activity was observed in the prone position than the seated position.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that PER with pressure biofeedback can be useful to improve selective activation of the infraspinatus muscle while further eliciting infraspinatus muscle activity.

Appropriate Resistance Intensity and Effective Exercise for Activation of Infraspinatus

We investigated the muscle activities of the infraspinatus and posterior deltoid, as well as the ratio of the infraspinatus to posterior deltoid muscle activities, in response to 3 resistance intensities during prone external rotation (PER) and sitting external rotation (SITER) exercises. Fifteen healthy males participated; the subjects performed two exercises randomly at three resistance intensity levels: 1) low intensity (10-20%); 2) medium intensity (45-55%); 3) high intensity (60-70%). Surface electromyography was used to measure the activities of the infraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles. The activities of the infraspinatus and posterior deltoid increased significantly as the resistance intensity increased during both PER and SITER exercises (p<0.001). The infraspinatus-to-posterior deltoid activity ratio increased as the resistance intensity decreased. Whereas the muscle activity ratio was highest under low and medium intensity during PER and SITER, respectively, and the muscle activity ratio was significantly increased at medium intensity compared with high intensity during both PER (p=0.023) and SITER (p=0.001). Our results suggest that low to medium intensity is the appropriate resistance intensity for selective activation of the infraspinatus. In addition, our results suggest that PER and SITER are effective for strengthening the infraspinatus.

Immediate effects of an end-range mobilization technique on shoulder range of motion and skin temperature in individuals with posterior shoulder tightness

[Purpose] This study investigated the effects of an end-range mobilization technique on the range of motion of the glenohumeral internal rotation and the skin temperature of the shoulder in individuals with posterior shoulder tightness. [Subjects] Thirteen subjects with posterior shoulder tightness who had glenohumeral internal rotation deficit ≥ 15° participated. [Methods] All subjects underwent glenohumeral joint end-range mobilization intervention. The internal rotation range of motion of the glenohumeral joint was measured by a goniometer and the shoulder skin temperature was measured by a digital infrared thermographic imaging device before and immediately after the intervention. Paired t-tests were used to analyze the differences in these parameter pre and post-intervention. [Results] The glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion and skin temperature of the posterolateral shoulder in increased significantly post-intervention. [Conclusion] The end-range mobilization technique is effective for increasing the glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion and skin temperature of the shoulder in individuals with posterior shoulder tightness.

Reliability of ankle dorsiflexion passive range of motion measurements obtained using a hand-held goniometer and Biodex dynamometer in stroke patients

[Purpose] This study investigated the reliability of ankle dorsiflexion passive range of motion (DF-PROM) measurements obtained using a goniometer and Biodex dynamometer in stroke patients. [Subjects] Fifteen stroke patients participated in this study. [Methods] Ankle DF-PROM was assessed using a goniometer and Biodex dynamometer. Ankle DF-PROM was measured during two sessions with 7 days between tests. Intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change values were used to assess the reliability of measurements obtained using both instruments. [Results] The intra-rater reliability for ankle DF-PROM using the goniometer was moderate and good for the two raters, while using the Biodex dynamometer, it was good for both raters. Inter-rater reliability using the goniometer was moderate; using the Biodex, it was good. [Conclusion] Both intra- and inter-reliability measurements of ankle DF-PROM were higher using a Biodex dynamometer than with a goniometer.

Effects of lifting the non-paretic foot on muscle activity during the semi-squat exercise in hemiplegic patients

[Purpose] This study compared the electromyographic activity of the quadriceps in hemiplegic patients during the downward, maintenance, and upward phases of squat exercises performed with the feet parallel and with the non-paretic foot lifted. [Subjects] A total of 17 hemiplegic patients (9 males and 8 females) volunteered for this study. [Methods] All subjects performed squat exercises with the knees flexed to 30° and with the feet parallel (shoulder-width apart) or with lifting of the non-paretic foot (normalized to 25% of the knee height). [Results] The activity of the rectus femoris, vastus medialis oblique, and vastus lateralis muscles was significantly higher during squat exercises performed with the non-paretic foot lifted than with the feet parallel to each other. The activity of all muscles during the maintenance phase of the exercises was greater than that during the downward and upward phases. [Conclusion] Lifting the non-paretic foot during squats may represent an effective exercise for motor function rehabilitation in hemiplegic patients.