A Multinational Survey Investigating the Unmet Needs and Patient Perspectives Concerning Proton Pump Inhibitors in Systemic Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). However, not all patients adequately respond to the treatment, and there are frequent concerns about the safety of long-term use of PPIs. Our aim was to identify the main problems/complaints of SSc patients on PPIs, as well as understand their unmet needs.

METHODS

SSc patients treated with PPIs were invited through international patient associations and social media to participate in an online survey.

RESULTS

We gathered 301 valid responses from 14 countries (United Kingdom 19.3% and United States 70.4%). Multiple PPIs use (two: 30% and three: 21% in series) was common. The majority (89%) reported improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms from receiving PPIs. Side effects attributed to receiving PPIs were uncommon (19%); however, most (79%) were potentially concerned. Around half (58%) had received lifestyle information, and most (85%) had searched online for information about PPIs. Only in the minority (12%) had a surgical approach been discussed; however, half (46%) indicated that they would be willing to undergo surgery to resolve their GERD symptoms but had important concerns.

CONCLUSION

Despite the frequent use of PPIs in patients with SSc, there is significant heterogeneity in prescription, and combination therapy (PPIs plus other medication for acid reflux) is not uncommon (approximately 40%). Patients have significant concerns about PPIs side effects. Education about PPIs is often neglected, and patients very frequently use online sources to obtain information on drug treatment. A surgical approach is infrequently discussed, and patients fear this potential therapeutic approach.

Patients' unmet needs and treatment preferences concerning digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Digital ulcers (DUs) significantly impact on quality of life and function in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of our survey was to explore patients' perspectives and their unmet needs concerning SSc-DUs.

MATERIALS

SSc patients were invited through international patient associations and social media to participate in an online survey.

RESULTS

358 responses were obtained from 34 countries: US (65.6%), UK (11.5%) and Canada (4.5%). Recurrent DUs are common: >10 DUs (46.1%), 5-10 DUs (21.5%), 1-5 DUs (28.5%), 1 DU (3.9%). Fingertip DUs were most frequent (84.9%), followed by those overlying the interphalangeal joints (50.8%). The impact of DUs in patients is broad, from broad-ranging emotional impacts to impact on activities of daily living, and personal relationships. Half (51.7%) of respondents reported that they received wound/ulcer care, most often provided by non-specialist wound care clinics (63.8%). There was significant variation in local (wound) DU care, in particular the use of debridement and pain management. DU-related education was only provided to one-third of patients. One-quarter (24.6%) were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' that the provided DU treatment(s) relieved their DU symptoms. Pain, limited hand function, and ulcer duration/chronicity were the main reasons for patients to consider changing DU treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that there is a large variation in DU treatment between countries. Patient access to specialist wound-care services is limited and only a small proportion of patients had their DU needs met. Moreover, patient education is often neglected. Evidence-based treatment pathways are urgently needed for DU management.

A multi-national survey to identify clinicians' perspectives concerning Proton Pump inhibitors in patients with systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in SSc for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, there is little evidence to support their empirical use and long-term safety has been questioned. Our objective was to better describe clinicians' attitudes toward PPIs prescription and use in SSc patients.

METHODS

Clinicians involved in the care of SSc patients were invited through international physician networks and social media to participate in an online survey.

RESULTS

Responses from 227 clinicians from 36 countries were evaluable. The majority 'agreed' (41.4 %) or 'strongly agreed' (45.4 %) that GERD is a major cause of morbidity in SSc. Lifestyle modifications are seldom (16 %) considered effective. Only half 'agreed' (43 %) or 'strongly agreed' (11 %) there is solid evidence supporting PPIs efficacy in SSc. The most common reasons for PPIs prescription were symptomatic GERD unresponsive to lifestyle modification (95 %), objective evidence of GERD (82 %), and hoarseness or respiratory symptoms (71 %). There are variable concerns about PPIs long-term safety in SSc. The three highest (mean) reasons (0-10, here 10 is 'very concerned') were: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (5.5), osteoporosis (5.4), and drug interactions (5.2). There are significant differences in attitudes towards surgery for refractory GERD, and concerns about potential complications. PPIs may have a putative role for disease modification (e.g., ILD and calcinosis), and the role of immunosuppression is uncertain for GI (gastrointestinal) disease in SSc.

CONCLUSION

PPIs are frequently prescribed in SSc. Side effects are a recognized concern, especially regarding long-term therapy. There is significant variation in attitudes towards surgical intervention. Future research and practical treatment recommendation for PPIs in SSc are urgently needed.

Long-term outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rare and complex connective tissue diseases: The ERN-ReCONNET VACCINATE study

Background

Vaccination is one of the most important measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for frail patients. VACCINATE is a multicentre prospective observational study promoted by the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ERN ReCONNET) aimed at assessing the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rare and complex connective tissue diseases (rcCTDs) in terms of efficacy and safety.

Methods

Adult rcCTDs patients were eligible for recruitment. Demographic, clinical and vaccination data were collected at enrolment. Follow-up visits were scheduled 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after completion of the first vaccination cycle; data on adverse events, disease exacerbations and the occurrence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections were collected at these time-points.

Findings

365 rcCTDs patients (87 % female, mean age 51.8 ± 14.6 years) were recruited. Overall, 200 patients (54.8 %) experienced at least one adverse event, generally mild and in most cases occurring early after the vaccination. During follow-up, 55 disease exacerbations were recorded in 39 patients (10.7 %), distributed over the entire observation period, although most frequently within 4 weeks after completion of the vaccination cycle. The incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections was 8.9 per 1000 person-months, with no cases within 12 weeks from vaccine administration and an increasing trend of infections moving away from the primary vaccination cycle. Only one case of severe COVID-19 was reported during the study period.

Interpretation

COVID-19 vaccination seems effective and safe in rcCTDs patients. The rate of new infections was rather low and serious infections were uncommon in our cohort. No increased risk of disease flares was observed compared to previous disease history; however, such exacerbations may be potentially severe, emphasising the need for close monitoring of our patients.

Beyond very early systemic sclerosis: deciphering pre‑scleroderma and its trajectories to open new avenues for preventive medicine

The identification of individuals with systemic sclerosis in an oligosymptomatic phase preceding the very early manifestations of the disease represents a challenge in the search for a new window of opportunity in systemic sclerosis. This phase could be identified in a clinical scenario as the pre-scleroderma phase, in which the disease would still be far from systemic sclerosis-related fibrotic or irreversible manifestations in skin or organs. In this Personal View, we discuss parameters and candidate definitions for a conceptual framework of pre-scleroderma, from the identification of populations at risk to autoantibodies and their potential functional activities. We discuss how this new paradigm of pre-scleroderma could represent a game-changing approach in the management of systemic sclerosis, allowing the treatment of patients at high risk of organ involvement or skin fibrosis before such events occur.

Consensus on the assessment of systemic sclerosis-associated primary heart involvement: World Scleroderma Foundation/Heart Failure Association guidance on screening, diagnosis, and follow-up assessment

Introduction

Heart involvement is a common problem in systemic sclerosis. Recently, a definition of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement had been proposed. Our aim was to establish consensus guidance on the screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement patients.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed to investigate the tests used to evaluate heart involvement in systemic sclerosis. The extracted data were categorized into relevant domains (conventional radiology, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory, and others) and presented to experts and one patient research partner, who discussed the data and added their opinion. This led to the formulation of overarching principles and guidance statements, then reviewed and voted on for agreement. Consensus was attained when the mean agreement was ⩾7/10 and of ⩾70% of voters.

Results

Among 2650 publications, 168 met eligibility criteria; the data extracted were discussed over three meetings. Seven overarching principles and 10 guidance points were created, revised and voted on. The consensus highlighted the importance of patient counseling, differential diagnosis and multidisciplinary team management, as well as defining screening and diagnostic approaches. The initial core evaluation should integrate history, physical examination, rest electrocardiography, trans-thoracic echocardiography and standard serum cardiac biomarkers. Further investigations should be individually tailored and decided through a multidisciplinary management. The overall mean agreement was 9.1/10, with mean 93% of experts voting above 7/10.

Conclusion

This consensus-based guidance on screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement provides a foundation for standard of care and future feasibility studies that are ongoing to support its application in clinical practice.

The role of skin ultrasound in systemic sclerosis: looking below the surface to understand disease evolution

Skin ultrasound has shown promising results in the evaluation of skin involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis, as substantiated by a recent systematic literature review from the World Scleroderma Foundation Skin Ultrasound Working Group. In this Viewpoint, we will discuss the role of ultrasound in evaluating skin involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis, particularly the possibility of using this technique to detect an early subclinical skin involvement from the very early phase, suggesting its possible use in both diagnosis and disease follow-up. To detect subclinical skin involvement, it is essential to understand the difference between the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis and that of healthy controls, including defining exactly which structures are affected by the disease and which are spared. The potential of this non-invasive technique might suggest its future role in both clinical practice and clinical trials, possibly replacing invasive and painful procedures such as skin biopsies and promoting patient retention in clinical trials.

ERN ReCONNET points to consider for treating patients living with autoimmune rheumatic diseases with antiviral therapies and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products

Recent studies have shown that people who are immunocompromised may inadvertently play a role in spurring the mutations of the virus that create new variants. This is because some immunocompromised individuals remain at risk of getting COVID-19 despite vaccination, experience more severe disease, are susceptible to being chronically infected and remain contagious for longer if they become infected and considering that immunocompromised individuals represent approximately 2% of the overall population, this aspect should be carefully considered. So far, some autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) patients with COVID-19 have been treated with antiviral therapies or anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products. However, there is no homogeneous approach to these treatment strategies. This issue was addressed within the European Reference Network (ERN) on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET) in a discussion among experts and patient's representatives in the context of the rare and complex connective tissue diseases (rCTDs) covered by the Network. ERN ReCONNET is one of the 24 ERNs launched by the European Commission in 2017 with the aim of tackling low prevalence and rare diseases that require highly specialised treatment and promoting concentration of knowledge and resources through virtual networks involving healthcare providers (HCPs) across the European Union (EU). Considering the urgent need to provide guidance not only to the rCTDs community, but also to the whole ARDs community, a multidisciplinary Task Force, including expert clinicians and European Patient Advocacy Group (ePAG) Advocates, was created in the framework of ERN ReCONNET with the aim of developing overarching principles (OP) and points-to-consider (PtC) on a homogenous approach to treat immunocompromised patients with ARDs (with a particular focus on CTDs) affected by COVID-19 using antiviral therapies and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products. The present work reports the final OP and PtC agreed by the Task Force.

Exploring patient's experience and unmet needs on pregnancy and family planning in rare and complex connective tissue diseases: a narrative medicine approach

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to explore patient' unmet needs of rare and complex rheumatic tissue diseases (rCTDs) patients during pregnancy and its planning by means of the narrative-based medicine (NBM) approach.

METHODS

A panel of nine rCTDs patients' representatives was identified to codesign a survey aimed at collecting the stories of rCTD patients who had one or more pregnancies/miscarriages. The results of the survey and the stories collected were analysed and discussed with a panel of patients' representatives to identify unmet needs, challenges and possible strategies to improve the care of rCTD patients.

RESULTS

129 replies were collected, and 112 stories were analysed. Several unmet needs in the management of pregnancy in rCTDs were identified, such as fragmentation of care among different centres, lack of education and awareness on rCTD pregnancies among midwifes, obstetricians and gynaecologists. The lack of receiving appropriate information and education on rCTDs pregnancy was also highlighted by patients and their families. The need for a holistic approach and the availability specialised pregnancy clinics with a multidisciplinary organisation as well as the provision of psychological support during all the phases around pregnancy was considered also a priority.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of the NBM approach enabled a direct identification of unmet needs, and a list of possible actions was elaborated to improve the care of rCTD patients and their families in future initiatives.

Proton pump inhibitors in systemic sclerosis: a reappraisal to optimise treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with significant morbidity in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although the introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical care have represented a major achievement in the management of oesophago-gastric problems in SSc, PPIs are seldom fully effective in SSc patients, and the utilization of maximum PPI dosages is a very frequent clinical practice. However, currently there is little evidence currently to support the empiric use of PPIs in SSc which is especially relevant in regard to safety concerns of long-term exposure with have been raised in the general population. The purpose of this viewpoint is to highlight the significant beneficial impact of PPIs on GERD in SSc, while considering the potential adverse effects in this patient population. Furthermore, we highlight the unmet needs of SSc patients with GERD, and also propose an agenda for future research to optimise the safe and effective use of PPIs in SSc.

POS1232 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH RARE AND COMPLEX CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES: AN AD-INTERIM ANALYSIS OF ERN-ReCONNET VACCINATE STUDY

Background

Since the COVID-19 vaccination campaign was launched all over Europe, there has been general agreement on how benefits of SARS-CoV2 vaccines outweigh the risks in patients with rare connective tissue diseases (rCTDs). Yet, there is still limited evidence regarding safety and efficacy of such vaccines in these patients, especially in the long-term. For this reason, in the framework of ERN-ReCONNET, an observational long-term study (VACCINATE) was designed in order to explore the long-term outcome of COVID-19 vaccination in rCTDs patients. The consent form was developed thanks to the involvement of the ERN ReCONNET ePAG Advocates (European Patients Advocacy Group).

Objectives

To evaluate the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccination in rCTDs patients and the potential impact on disease activity. Primary endpoints were the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) and of disease exacerbations post-vaccination. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 (adapted from https://brightoncollaboration.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SO2_D2.1.2_V1.2_COVID-19_AESI-update-23Dec2020-review_final.pdf)

Methods

The first ad-interim analysis of the VACCINATE study involved 9 ERN-ReCONNET Network centres. Patients over 18 years of age with a known rCTD and who received vaccine against COVID-19 were eligible for recruitment. Demographic data and diagnoses were collected at the time of enrolment, while the appearance of AEs and potential disease exacerbations were monitored after one week from each vaccination dose, and then after 4, 12 and 24 weeks from the second dose. A disease exacerbation was defined as at least one of the following: new manifestations attributable to disease activity, hospitalization, increase in PGA from previous evaluation, addition of corticosteroids or immunosuppressants.

Results

A cohort of 300 patients (261 females, mean age 52, range 18-85) was recruited. Systemic lupus erythematosus (44%) and systemic sclerosis (16%) were the most frequent diagnoses, followed by Sjogren’s syndrome (SS,12%), idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IMM,10%), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD,8%), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD,4%), Ehlers-Danlos’s syndrome (EDS,4%), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS,2%). AEs appearing 7 days after the first and second doses were reported in 93 (31%) and 96 (32%) patients respectively, mainly represented by fatigue, injection site reaction, headache, fever and myalgia. Otitis, urticaria, Herpes Simplex-related rash, stomatitis, migraine with aura, vertigo, tinnitus and sleepiness were reported with very low frequency. Less than 2% of patients experienced AEs within 24 weeks from the second dose. No SAEs or AEs of special interest were observed in the study period. There were 25 disease exacerbations (8%), 7 of which severe. The highest number of exacerbations was observed after 4 weeks from the second dose (12 within week 4, 6 within week 12 and 7 within week 24). Disease exacerbation was most frequent in patients with EDS (33%) and MCTD (25%).

Conclusion

This preliminary analysis shows that COVID-19 vaccination is safe in rCTDs patients. AEs appear most often early after vaccination and are usually mild. Disease exacerbations are not frequent, but can be potentially severe and tend to occur most frequently within the first month after vaccination. Exacerbations can also occur 3-6 months after vaccination, although a causal relationship with the vaccination remains to be established. Our present data underline the importance of long-term observational studies.

Table 1.

AEs and disease exacerbations per disease

DiagnosisPatients enrolled (%) (n=300)EAs after 1st and 2nd dose (%)Exacerbations (%)APS25714EDS45033IIM10527MCTD44225SS12598SLE44698SSC16492UCTD850-

Acknowledgements

VACCINATE is a study promoted by the European Reference Network on rare and complex connective tissue diseases, ERN ReCONNET. This publication was funded by the European Union’s Health Programme (2014-2020)

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0388 DEVELOPING A SCREENING TOOL FOR THE DETECTION OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: THE ILD-RISC RISK SCORE

Background

High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Although there is agreement in performing HRCT as a screening test at time of SSc diagnosis, some physicians do not regularly perform baseline HRCTs. In addition, it is unclear according to which criteria HRCTs should be repeated during the follow-up of baseline ILD negative patients.

Objectives

To develop a risk score for the presence of SSc-ILD (the ILD-RISC), to guide physicians in ordering both baseline and follow-up HRCTs.

Methods

The steering board included six SSc-ILD experts from referral centers, two fellows and a patient research partner. Items for regression analysis were selected according to face validity, feasibility, scientific background, and personal experience using the nominal group technique (NGT). The prediction model for the presence of ILD was developed from baseline visits of SSc patients from the six centers using multivariable logistic regression with backward selection. Patients were randomly divided into a derivation and validation cohort consisting of 66% and 34% of patients respectively. Patients with missing data in the selected covariates and in the ILD status (outcome) were excluded. After identifying a cut-off favoring sensitivity >85% from the ROC curve analysis, the derived ILD-RISC score was applied first in the validation cohort and then longitudinally in a cohort of SSc patients with negative baseline HRCT.

Results

The steering board selected 13 variables deemed important in the identification of SSc-ILD: sex, age, disease duration from first non-Raynaud’s phenomenon symptom, skin subset (diffuse/limited), presence of esophageal symptoms, digital ulcers (DU) ever, arthritis ever, smoking ever, increased inflammatory markers, NYHA functional class, SSc autoantibody status (SSc_Atb), FVC% and DLCO%. Among 780/3240 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 533 (43% ILD) and 247 (48% ILD) respectively constituted the derivation and the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, a model including FVC%, DLCO%, DU ever, age and SSc_Atb (Table 1A) showed an OR of 133.9 (95% CI 53.4-335.9) and an AUC of 79.1% (95% CI 75.3-83.0%) for the presence of ILD on HRCT (Figure 1). An ILD-RISC score ≥0.3 showed sensitivity of 85.6% and specificity of 53.6%, NPV of 83.2% and PPV of 58.2%, which were replicated in the validation cohort (Table 1B). Among 819 patients with negative baseline HRCT, 170 (20.8%) developed ILD during a 3.8±3.0 years follow up (1988 visits). Longitudinally, the ILD-RISC score showed comparable sensitivity and specificity (Table 1B).

Table 1.A)ILD-RISC MODEL VARIABLESOR95% CIp valueDigital ulcers, ever2.0581.347-3.145<0.001Age1.0261.010-1.0420.001SSc_ATBAnti-centromere0.3340.198-0.563<0.001Anti-topoisomerase I2.3791.326-4.2670.004Anti-RNA-polymerase III1.4070.636-3.1130.399Anti-Pm/Scl2.5560.916-7.1350.073None of the aboveComparatorFVC%0.9900.979-1.0020.091DLCO%0.9710.960-0.982<0.001B)ILD-RISC SCORE PERFORMANCEDerivation cohortValidation cohortLongitudinal cohortAll Patients/ILD patients533/229247/119819/170AUC %, 95% CI79.1 (75.3 – 83.0)76.4 (71.0 – 82.7)72.6 (68.9 – 76.2)Sensitivity %, 95% CI85.6 (80.4 – 89.9)85.7 (78.1 – 91.5)80.4 (73.9 – 86.0)Specificity %, 95% CI53.6 (47.8 – 59.3)49.2 (40.3 – 58.2)50.5 (48.2 – 52.9)Negative Predictive Value %, 95% CI83.2 (77.2 – 88.1)78.8 (68.2 – 87.1)96.3 (94.9 – 97.4)Positive Predictive Value %, 95% CI58.2 (52.7 – 63.5)61.1 (53.2 – 68.5)13.9 (11.8 – 16.1)

Conclusion

We developed and validated the ILD-RISC score to predict the presence of ILD at time of diagnosis and evaluated its performance during follow-up. The ILD-RISC may be useful in routine practice when resources for HRCTs might be limited. In particular, it may also help to decide when to order HRCTs at follow up, thus limiting unnecessary HRCTs and reducing the burden for patients and institutions.

Disclosure of Interests

Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Grant/research support from: New Horizon fellowship, FOREUM, EUSTAR, GILS, Lorenzo Tofani: None declared, Håvard Fretheim: None declared, Sophie Liem: None declared, Arthiha Velauthapillai: None declared, Hilde Jenssen Bjørkekjær: None declared, Imon Barua: None declared, Ilaria Galetti: None declared, Alexandru Garaiman: None declared, Mike O. Becker Speakers bureau: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Consultant of: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Grant/research support from: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Consultant of: Actelion, ARXX therapeutics, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medscape., Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra Speakers bureau: Payment for presentations and educational events by Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen, Consultant of: Janssen and Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Roche, Galapagos and Janssen, ZonMW and ReumaNederland, Madelon Vonk: None declared, Jörg H.W. Distler Shareholder of: J.H.W.D. is stock owner of 4D Science and Scientific head of FibroCure., Grant/research support from: J.H.W.D. has received research funding from Anamar, Active Biotech, Array Biopharma, aTyr, BMS, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, GSK, Inventiva, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, RedX, UCB., Marco Matucci-Cerinic Speakers bureau: Biogen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli-Lilly., Consultant of: Actelion, Biogen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli-Lilly., Grant/research support from: Actelion, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Medscape, Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, 4P Science, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur, Grant/research support from: Kymera, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Boehringer Ingelheim

Exploring patient education unmet needs for rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases: A survey of health care providers' and patients' expectations in Europe

OBJECTIVE

The European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases involves health care providers (HCPs) from 8 European countries and 7 patients' representatives of European Patient Advocacy Groups. The objective was to evaluate current practice and unmet needs for patient education (PE) in Europe.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to HCP members asking about the PE practices and another, to enquire about their needs, was sent to patients' associations in the different countries.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 33 HCPs. Half had no specific staff members dedicated to PE. For HCPs with dedicated staff, 83.3% (n = 11) considered that care providers were insufficient to meet patients' needs. Most of HCPs would like to see the practice of PE standardized. Sixty eight percent (n = 1093) of patients suffering from connective tissue diseases completed the questionnaire had never heard about PE. Most of them were interested in taking part in a PE program.

DISCUSSION

Our survey revealed a strong interest in PE among patients and HCP and heterogeneity of practice. PE appeared important for both HCPs and patients. An online course for medical students in Europe will be developed in partnership with EULAR to respond to these unmet needs.

Primary systemic sclerosis heart involvement: A systematic literature review and preliminary data-driven, consensus-based WSF/HFA definition

Introduction

Primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis may cause morpho-functional and electrical cardiac abnormalities and is a common cause of death. The absence of a clear definition of primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis limits our understanding and ability to focus on clinical research. We aimed to create an expert consensus definition for primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Methods

A systematic literature review of cardiac involvement and manifestations in systemic sclerosis was conducted to inform an international and multi-disciplinary task force. In addition, the nominal group technique was used to derive a definition that was then subject to voting. A total of 16 clinical cases were evaluated to test face validity, feasibility, reliability and criterion validity of the newly created definition.

Results

In total, 171 publications met eligibility criteria. Using the nominal group technique, experts added their opinion, provided statements to consider and ranked them to create the consensus definition, which received 100% agreement on face validity. A median 60(5-300) seconds was taken for the feasibility on a single case. Inter-rater agreement was moderate (mKappa (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46-1.00) for the first round and 0.55 (0.44-1.00) for the second round) and intra-rater agreement was good (mKappa (95% CI) = 0.77 (0.47-1.00)). Criterion validity showed a 78 (73-84)% correctness versus gold standard.

Conclusion

A preliminary primary heart involvement in systemic sclerosis consensus-based definition was created and partially validated, for use in future clinical research.

Expert opinion and patients' in-depth interviews on the impact of pulmonary complications in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively explore the perceptions and opinions of experts dealing with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and patients with SSc on the impact of the disease and pulmonary complications on economic status, psycho-social wellbeing and the diagnostic and therapeutic journey, and to identify which strategies/interventions may be useful to address patients' and their family's needs.

METHODS

An expert meeting was conducted using the NGT to discuss the consequences of pulmonary complications on the Italian SSc community. The direct experience of five patients with SSc and pulmonary complications was described through in-depth interviews conducted by psychologists.

RESULTS

The experts' meeting and patients' in-depth interviews underline the complexity of SSc and the consequences of pulmonary involvement on patients' and caregivers' health-related quality of life, working ability, psychological wellbeing and social interactions. Panellists suggest that improved communication between physicians, associations and institutions could help protect the working status of patients with SSc. Granting patients disability benefits, providing access to part-time jobs and productivity-focused training could also help decrease the economic burden of the disease. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to reduce treatment burden, together with the implementation of standard diagnostic and therapeutic paths and increased use of telemedicine via platforms that ensure secure health data sharing. Both patients and caregivers may benefit from psychological support.

CONCLUSION

SSc and pulmonary fibrosis have profound consequences on patients' and caregivers' health-related quality of life, working ability, psychological wellbeing and social interactions. Some activities may help patients and families deal with these aspects of the disease.

How do systemic sclerosis manifestations influence patients' lives? Results from a survey on patients and caregivers

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the patient- and caregiver-reported impact of systemic sclerosis (SSc) manifestations (hand/feet/joint involvement and pulmonary complications) on the diagnostic and therapeutic journey, working productivity, and social life.

METHODS

Two questionnaires (one for the patients, n = 260 and one for the caregivers, n = 47) were designed in collaboration with the patients' association Gruppo Italiano per la Lotta alla Sclerodermia (GILS). Validated questionnaires were combined with specific questions relevant to the Italian scenario.

RESULTS

Pulmonary fibrosis and hand/feet/joint involvement have a major impact on patient's working status: (85.3% of patients with pulmonary fibrosis and 72.6% with hand/feet/joint involvement report loss of job/job change due to SSc. Productivity was affected as well: 60.6% of the patients (75% of those with fibrosis) reported that working productivity in the previous 4 weeks was restricted by physical limitations. The disease has a significant impact on patients' life, limiting the ability to conduct common activities, especially those related to movement, such as object manipulation (61.1%), doing small manual jobs (44.0%), writing (38.9%), and an increased impact in case of pulmonary fibrosis and hands/feet/joints involvement. Half of the patients also present some difficulties in eating-related activities a Patients also experience poorer social life, personal relationships, and sexual life. Caregivers are also deeply influenced by the manifestations of SSc. Pulmonary fibrosis and hand/feet/joint involvement represent an additional challenge.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary fibrosis and hand/feet/joint involvement are extremely burdensome complications for both SSc patients and caregivers, decreasing work productivity, limiting relationship and social life, and impacting psychological status and everyday activities.

Clinical practice guidelines adherence, knowledge and awareness in rare and complex connective tissue diseases across Europe: results from the first ERN ReCONNET survey

Introduction

The European Reference Network (ERN) ReCONNET is the ERN aimed at improving the management of rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (rCTDs) across the European Union (EU). In the mission of ERN ReCONNET, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play a crucial role, representing a valid tool towards the harmonisation of the management of rCTDs while improving effectiveness and quality of care delivered to patients.

Methods

ERN ReCONNET developed two surveys to map the adherence to rCTDs CPGs among healthcare providers and to assess the knowledge and awareness of CPGs for their diseases among patients, family members and caregivers.

Results

The results of the surveys highlighted that healthcare professionals find it useful to apply CPGs in clinical practice (93%), while 62% of them experience difficulties and barriers in the application in their centres. Healthcare professionals also highlighted the need to develop CPGs for all rCTDs and to implement the use of the existing CPGs in clinical practice. On the other hand, patients, families and caregivers are relatively aware of the purpose of CPGs (51%) and 62% of them were aware of the existence of CPGs for their disease. Patient-friendly versions of CPGs and patients’ lifestyle guidelines should be systematically developed contributing to the empowerment of patients in the disease management.

Conclusion

ERN ReCONNET is addressing the main issues identified in the results of the survey, promoting practical actions for the local adaptation of CPGs across Europe, improving their routine clinical use and increasing the awareness on CPGs among rCTDs patients, family members and caregivers.

POS1497-PARE POST-TRIAL SURVEY OF PARTICIPANTS OF A PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL IN SSC-ILD

Background:

The SENSCIS® trial (2015–18) was a large clinical trial (n=576) investigating the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.1 The clinical research sponsors (CRS) collaborated with the scleroderma patient community advisory board (CAB) regarding the design, implementation and conduct of the trial.2 As part of this collaboration, the CRS and CAB developed a post-trial survey for SENSCIS® participants. The use of the developed patient-centric materials was optional for the sites.

Objectives:

The objectives of the SENSCIS® post-trial survey were to gain experience in collecting real-world information and trial satisfaction data from patients to inform and improve future patient centric clinical research.

Methods:

SENSCIS® trial participants who were involved in the extension trial SENSCIS®-ON completed a post-trial survey covering nine multiple-choice questions about three main topics:

[1]Recruitment – Where do patients usually search for clinical trials and how did they become aware of SENSCIS®?

[2]Motivation & Retention – What motivated patients to start and continue participation in SENSCIS®?

[3]Challenges & Wishes – What were the challenges during trial participation and how can future clinical trials be improved regarding patient centricity?

Results:

A total of 125 participants completed all survey questions. Participants could select more than one option. A total of 51 patients reported that they are usually not actively looking for trials. For those actively searching, the most common sources to learn about trials were specialists/general practitioners (GPs) (46 patients) and internet search engines (20 patients), followed by patient organisations (12 patients). Of note, 78 patients would pay attention to printed materials, such as a card/flyer/poster in a doctor’s office and get in touch with a trial/study site.

Back in 2015–2017, during recruitment for the SENSCIS® trial, the majority of the patients who answered the survey were made aware via their specialist/GP (116 patients), whereas 5 were made aware via patient organisations and 4 via the internet.

The most frequent motivations to join the trial were ‘hope to receive an improved therapy’ (98 patients), to help other patients (64 patients), and on the recommendation of their specialist/GP (81 patients). Similarly, the most liked aspects of the trial were the ‘opportunity to receive an improved therapy’ (92 patients) and ‘to support the development of an improved therapy for my illness’ (90 patients). More than half of patients reported ‘continuous observation of general health’ (72 patients) and ‘advice from GPs/specialists’ (71 patients) as motivation to stay in the trial (Figure 1).

‘Concerns about side effects’ (72 patients) and ‘not knowing whether the trial medication will work for me’ (63 patients) were reported as the least liked aspects of the trial. Travel to the site was reported as a challenge by 21 patients.

To improve clinical trials, patients requested more patient-friendly information (50 patients) and multiple formats of information material (46 patients). Finally, 48 patients expressed the desire to communicate with other trial participants.

Conclusion:

The SENSCIS® post-trial survey is a unique approach to receive real-world feedback from trial participants, and these pilot data will help improve future clinical trials and communication. The results highlight the importance of reaching patients who may not be actively looking for clinical trials.

Figure 1.

Motivation to stay in the SENSCIS® trial1,2

1More than one option could be selected.

2Data collected on 9th January 2021

References:

[1]Distler O et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2518-2528. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903076.

[2]Roennow A et al. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 16;10(12):e039473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039473.

Acknowledgements:

Sue Farrington (Federation of European Scleroderma Associations [FESCA] Belgium), Luke Evnin (Scleroderma Research Foundation, United States), Beatriz Garcia (Asociacion Espanola de Esclerodermia, Spain), Catarina Leite (Associacao Portuguesa de Doentes com Esclerodermia, Portugal), Alison Zheng (Chinese Organisation for Scleroderma), Matea Perković Popović (Hrvatska udruga oboljelih od sklerodermije, Croatia), Tina Ampudia (Asociacion Mexicana de Orientacion Apoyo y Lucha Contra la Esclerodermia, AC, Mexico), Stephanie Munoz (Norsk Revmatikerforbund, Diagnosegruppen for Systemisk Sklerose, Norway), Monica Holmner (Reumatikerförbundet Riksföreningen för systemisk skleros, Sweden).

Disclosure of Interests:

Ilaria Galetti: None declared, EDITH BROWN: None declared, Ann Kennedy Consultant of: I have been a member of the CAB (Community Patient Advisory Board) described in the accompanying abstract under discussion. My patient organisation has been paid for its participation in the CAB., Grant/research support from: It is not myself personally, but FESCA (Federation of European Scleroderma Associations) aisbl., that has received project grants for awareness raising and education. I was President of this Federation., Robert J Riggs: None declared, Annelise Roennow: None declared, Maureen Sauvé: None declared, Joep Welling Speakers bureau: BI MIDI and BI International, Sanofi, Henrik Finnern Employee of: I am employee of Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Annie Gilbert Consultant of: I am a paid consultant for Bohringer Ingelheim since 2016, Martina Gahlemann Employee of: I am employed by Boehringer Ingelheim (Schweiz) GmbH, Basel, Switzerland, Wiebke Sauter Employee of: I am employer of Boehringer-Ingelheim

Collaboration between patient organisations and a clinical research sponsor in a rare disease condition: learnings from a community advisory board and best practice for future collaborations

Introduction Transparent collaborations between patient organisations (POs) and clinical research sponsors (CRS) can identify and address the unmet needs of patients and caregivers. These insights can improve clinical trial participant experience and delivery of medical innovations necessary to advance health outcomes and standards of care. We share our experiences from such a collaboration undertaken surrounding the SENSCIS^® clinical trial (NCT02597933), and discuss its impact during, and legacy beyond, the trial.Summary We describe the establishment of a community advisory board (CAB): a transparent, multiyear collaboration between the scleroderma patient community and a CRS. We present shared learnings from the collaboration, which is split into three main areas: (1) the implementation and conduct of the clinical trial; (2) analysis and dissemination of the results; and (3) aspects of the collaboration not related to the trial.1. The scleroderma CAB reviewed and provided advice on trial conduct and reporting. This led to the improvement and optimisation of trial procedures; meaningful, patient-focused adaptations were made to address challenges relevant to scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease patients.2. To ensure that results of the trial were accessible to lay audiences and patients, written lay summaries were developed by the trial sponsor with valuable input from the CAB to ensure that language and figures were understandable.3. The CAB and the CRS also collaborated to co-develop opening tools for medication blister packs and bottles. In addition, to raise disease awareness among physicians, patients and caregivers, educational materials to improve diagnosis and management of scleroderma were co-created and delivered by the CAB and CRS.Conclusions This collaboration between POs and a CRS, in a rare disease condition, led to meaningful improvements in patient safety, comfort and self-management and addressed information needs. This collaboration may serve as a template of best practice for future collaborations between POs, research sponsors and other healthcare stakeholders.

PARE0009 COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD INPUT CAN MAKE LAY SUMMARIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL RESULTS MORE UNDERSTANDABLE

Background:

Under European Union (EU) Clinical Trial regulations,1clinical research sponsors (CRSs) must ensure all studies performed in the EU are accompanied by a trial summary for laypersons, published within 1 year of study completion. These lay summaries should disseminate clinical trial results in an easy-to-understand way for trial participants, patient and caregiver communities, and the general public. The European Patients Forum (EPF)2and European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI)3encourage CRSs to engage with patient organisations (POs) in the development of lay summaries. This recognises the patients’ contribution to clinical research and supports the development of patient-focused material.

Objectives:

We share learnings from a collaboration between scleroderma POs and a CRS to create the SENSCIS® trial (NCT02597933) written and video lay summaries.

Methods:

A community advisory board (CAB), comprising representatives from 11 scleroderma POs covering a range of countries/regions, was formed based on the EURORDIS charter for collaboration in clinical research.4Through three structured meetings, over a seven-month period, the CAB provided advice on lay summary materials (written and video) drafted by the CRS’ Lay Summary Group (Fig. 1). At each review cycle, the CAB advice was addressed to make content more understandable and more relevant for patients and the general public.

Results:

The CAB advised that the existence of lay summaries is not well known in the patient community and also recommended the development of trial-specific lay summary videos to further improve understandability of the clinical trial results for the general public. Videos are a key channel of communication, enabling access to information for people with specific health needs and lower literacy levels. Following CAB advice, the CRS developed a stand-alone video entitled“What are lay summaries?”and a trial-specific lay summary video. Revisions to lay summary content (written and video) included colour schemes, iconography and language changes to make content more understandable. For videos, adjustments to animation speed, script and voiceover were implemented to improve clarity and flow of information (Fig. 2). Approved final versions of lay summary materials are publicly available on the CRS website. Translation into languages representing trial-site countries is in progress to widen access to non-English speakers and, where possible, local versions are being reviewed by the patient community.

Conclusion:

Structured collection and implementation of CAB advice can make lay summary materials more understandable for the patient community and wider general public.

References:

[1]EU. Summaries of clinical trial results for laypersons. 2018

[2]EPF. EPF position: clinical trial results – communication of the lay summary. 2015

[3]EUPATI. Guidance for patient involvement in ethical review of clinical trials. 2018

[4]EURORDIS. Charter for Collaboration in Clinical Research in Rare Diseases. 2009

Disclosure of Interests:

Joep Welling Speakers bureau: Four times as a patient advocate for employees of BII and BI MIDI with a fixed amount of € 150,00 per occasion., Annelise Roennow: None declared, Maureen Sauvé Grant/research support from: Educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen., EDITH BROWN: None declared, Ilaria Galetti: None declared, Alex Gonzalez Consultant of: Payment made to the patient organisation (Scleroderma Research Foundation) for participation in advisory boards, Alexandra Paula Portales Guiraud: None declared, Ann Kennedy Grant/research support from: AS FESCA aisbl, Catarina Leite: None declared, Robert J. Riggs: None declared, Alison Zheng Grant/research support from: We get grants from Lorem Vascular; BI China,; Jianke Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Kangjing Biological Co., Ltd.; COFCO Coca-Cola to organize national scleroderma meetings, offer patients service, holding academic meetings and other public activities, there is also a small part of the grants used to pay the workers in our organization., Consultant of: I worked as a paid consultant for BI. Pay-per-job., Speakers bureau: I was invited once to be a speaker at BI China’s internal meeting and they paid me., Matea Perkovic Popovic: None declared, Annie Gilbert Consultant of: I have worked as a paid consultant with BI International for over 3 years, since Sept 2016., Lizette Moros Employee of: Lizette Moros is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Kamila Sroka-Saidi Employee of: Paid employee of Boehringer Ingelheim., Thomas Schindler Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Henrik Finnern Employee of: Paid employee of Boehringer Ingelheim.

Undifferentiated connective tissue disease: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines

The term ‘undifferentiated connective tissue disease’ (UCTD) is generally used to describe clinical entities characterised by clinical and serological manifestations of systemic autoimmune diseases but not fulfilling the criteria for defined connective tissue diseases (CTDs). In this narrative review, we summarise the results of a systematic literature research, which was performed as part of the ERN ReCONNET project, aimed at evaluating existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) or recommendations.

No specific CPG on UCTD were found, potential areas of intervention are absence of a consensus definition of UCTD, need for specific monitoring and therapeutic protocols, stratification of UCTD based on the risk of developing a defined CTD and preventive measure for the future development of a more severe condition.

Patients feel uncertainty regarding the name of the disease and feel the need of a better education and understanding of these conditions and its possible changes over time.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines [corrected]

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) encompass a heterogeneous group of rare autoimmune diseases characterised by muscle weakness and inflammation, but in antisynthetase syndrome arthritis and interstitial lung disease are more frequent and often inaugurate the disease. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been proposed for IIMs, but they are sparse and heterogeneous. This work aimed at identifying: i) current available CPGs for IIMs, ii) patients ' and clinicians' unmet needs not covered by CPGs. It has been performed in the framework of the European Reference Network on rare and complex connective tissue and musculoskeletal diseases (ReCONNET), a network of centre of expertise and patients funded by the European Union's Health Programme. Fourteen original CPGs were identified, notably recommending that: i) extra-muscular involvements should be assessed; ii) corticosteroids and methotrexate or azathioprine are first-line therapies of IIMs. ii) IVIG is a treatment of resistant-DM that may be also used in other resistant-IIMs; iii) physical therapy and sun protection (in DM patients) are part of the treatment; v) tumour screening for patients with DM include imaging of chest, abdomen, pelvis and breast (in woman) along with colonoscopy (in patients over 50 years); vi) disease activity and damages should be monitor using standardised and validated tools. Yet, only half of these CPGs were evidence-based. Crucial unmet needs were identified both by patients and clinicians. In particular, there was a lack of large multidisciplinary working group and of patients ' preferences. The following fields were not or inappropriately targeted: diagnosis; management of extra-muscular involvements other than skin; co-morbidities and severe manifestations.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the paradigm of systemic autoimmune diseases characterised by a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations with an unpredictable relapsing-remitting course. The aim of the present work was to identify current available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for SLE, to provide their review and to identify physicians’ and patients’ unmet needs. Twenty-three original guidelines published between 2004 and 2017 were identified. Many aspects of disease management are covered, including global disease management, lupus nephritis and neuropsychiatric involvement, management of pregnancies, vaccinations and comorbidities monitoring. Unmet needs relate with disease management of some clinical manifestations and adherence to treatment. Many patient’s unmet needs have been identified starting with faster diagnosis, need for more therapeutic options, guidelines on lifestyle issues, attention to quality of life and adequate education.

Mixed connective tissue disease: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines

Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is a complex overlap disease with features of different autoimmune connective tissue diseases (CTDs) namely systemic sclerosis, poly/dermatomyositis and systemic lupus erythematous in patients with antibodies targeting the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle. In this narrative review, we summarise the results of a systematic literature research which was performed as part of the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases project, aimed at evaluating existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) or recommendations. Since no specific CPGs on MCTD were found, other CPGs developed for other CTDs were taken into consideration in order to discuss what can be applied to MCTD even if designed for other diseases. Three major objectives were proposed for the future development of CPGs: MCTD diagnosis (diagnostic criteria), MCTD initial and follow-up evaluations, MCTD treatment. Early diagnosis, epidemiological data, assessment of burden of disease and QOL aspects are among the unmet needs identified by patients.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare disease characterised by venous and/or arterial thrombosis, pregnancy complications and the presence of specific autoantibodies called antiphospholipid antibodies. This review aims to identify existing clinical practice guidelines (CPG) as part of the ERN ReCONNET project, aimed at evaluating existing CPGs or recommendations in rare and complex diseases. Seventeen papers providing important data were identified; however, the literature search highlighted the scarceness of reliable clinical data to develop CPGs. With no formal clinical guidelines in place, diagnosis and treatment of APS is largely based on consensus and expert opinion. Patients' unmet need refers to the understanding of the disease and its clinical picture and implications, the need of education for patients, family members and healthcare providers, as well as to the development of monitoring pathways involving multiple healthcare providers.

Systemic sclerosis: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an orphan disease characterised by autoimmunity, fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, and vasculopathy. SSc may be associated with high morbidity and mortality. In this narrative review we summarise the results of a systematic literature research, which was performed as part of the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases project, aimed at evaluating existing clinical practice guidelines or recommendations. Only in the domains ‘Vascular & Ulcers’ (ie, non-pharmacological approach to digital ulcer), ‘PAH’ (ie, screening and treatment), ‘Treatment’ and ‘Juveniles’ (ie, evaluation of juveniles with Raynaud’s phenomenon) evidence-based and consensus-based guidelines could be included. Hence there is a preponderance of unmet needs in SSc referring to the diagnosis and (non-)pharmacological treatment of several SSc-specific complications. Patients with SSc experience significant uncertainty concerning SSc-related taxonomy, management (both pharmacological and non-pharmacological) and education. Day-to-day impact of the disease (loss of self-esteem, fatigue, sexual dysfunction, and occupational, nutritional and relational problems) is underestimated and needs evaluation.