Is cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) an underestimated issue in oncology clinical practice? Real-world data regarding long term management of CAT

e23150

Background: Cancer is associated with thrombosis due to different pathophysiological processes. CAT is the 2nd cause of death in oncology patients and can occur anytime during the natural history of cancer. CAT is not rare complication, can delay anti-cancer therapy and increase health systems costs. Methods: A prospective observational study (Greek Management of Thrombosis-GMaT) conducted by HeSMO in Greek Oncology units for two years aiming to record clinical practice of CAT management. Patients with active cancer who received CAT treatment or thromboprophylaxis were enrolled after signing informed consent. Results: 546 patients were enrolled from 18 oncology units. Primary cancers were: lung 23.9%, pancreas 13.3%, breast 7.6%, colorectal 8.9%, stomach 8.3%, ovarian 7.6% and other 30.5%. 120 patients received LMWH for Venus Thombo-Embolism (VTE) treatment (Group A) and 426 for thromboprophylaxis (Group B). Group A: 89/120 (74.17%) patients continued in 2nd year and 58.6% received CAT treatment (6.9±4.4 months). Only 2 had VTE recurrence in 2nd year (versus 3 in 1st year). 4/120 (3.33%) had bleeding events (grade 1) in 1st year while no bleeding events occurred in 2nd year. Group B: 345/426 (80.98%) patients continued in 2nd year. 126 (30%) had Khorana score ≥3 and 300 (70%) had Khorana score ≤2. In 2nd year, 123 (35.65%) received thromboprophylaxis (7.3±3.7 months) while 79.4% of them were initially treated with High Thrombotic Treatment Agents (HTTA: e.g. platinum, 5-FU) and 83.1% had metastatic disease. In 2nd year, 52.5% received LMWHs at prophylactic dose and 47.5% at therapeutic dose. Overall, 12 (2.82%) had thrombotic events whereas 4 were recorded in 2nd year. Notably, patients treated with therapeutic doses had lower probability to have a thrombotic event (OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.7 to 20.5, p < .05). Six (1.41%) bleeding events (grade 1) occurred in 1st year and one (0.81%) in 2nd year. Conclusions: LMWHs can be used for long term CAT management. Therapeutic LMWHs doses as thromboprophylaxis are safe and effective. Khorana score is a useful model for CAT risk assessment but some other factors such as disease stage and HTTA might be taken into account. CAT can occur anytime during the natural history of cancer. Oncologists should be aware about CAT and its negative influences in patients’ prognosis and quality of life.

Screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients for lynch syndrome (LS) emphasizes the need for public insurance coverage of genetic testing: Results of a national program by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO)

e13141

Background: Lynch Syndrome is associated with germline mutations in Mismatch Repair (MMR) genes ( MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). CRC patients whose tumors exhibit high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) have an increased probability of LS. Although the diagnosis of LS has important implications for the patient and the family, germline genetic testing is not reimbursed by the Hellenic Public State Healthcare Services. To address this need HeSMO conducted a national program to screen and diagnose CRC patients with LS. Methods: All patients with CRC were eligible. Assessment for LS involved initially screening tumor tissue for the presence of MMR deficiency, either via molecular MSI testing or via immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect the absence of one or more MMR proteins. Patients with an MMR-deficient tumor in the absence of a somatic cause (e.g. BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation) underwent genetic counseling and germline testing to confirm a LS diagnosis. Results: From June 2017 to December 2018, 104 patients diagnosed with CRC were enrolled and tested. Median age of diagnosis was 58,5 years (range 32 - 89) and male-to-female ratio was 1.6:1. Fifty patients (48%) had tumors that exhibited the MSI-H phenotype. From the MSI-H tumors, 41 (82%) did not harbor the BRAF V600E mutation and 33 of them (80.5%) did not harbor an MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. Therefore, 33 patients were invited for genetic counseling and testing. Fifteen patients (45.45%) were diagnosed with LS: 6 ( 40 %) had a mutation in MLH1 (one of which had also a mutation in PMS2 gene), 4 (26.6%) in MSH6, 4 (26.6%) in MSH2 and 1 (6.6%) in PMS2. Conclusions: In our series, 30% of the CRC patients with MSI-H tumors were tested positive for LS. These results confirm the value of a universal screening program of CRC patients for LS. Hopefully, these results will convince the Hellenic Public State Healthcare Services to reimburse screening and germline genetic testing of CRC patients for LS.

Three versus six months adjuvant oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer: The Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) participation to the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant (IDEA) chemotherapy project

730

Background: The IDEA international collaboration aimed to combine data from 6 randomized trials to investigate whether a 3-month (3m) of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month(6m) for 3-year disease free survival (DFS)in stage III colon cancer (CC). Methods: HORG-IDEA randomized patients between 3Mand 6M of CT with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX. DFS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and described using 3 years DFS rate. Results: In total708 patients were randomized between May 2009 and October2015, 354in each arm. Among them the basic characteristics was: median age 63.9 years; mFOLFOX6: 41.8% and CAPOX 58.2%, N1: 74.9%, N2: 25.2%; T1-3: 86.4%, T4: 13.6%. DFS median follow-up was 54.2 months. There were 214 DFS events (109in 3M and 105 in 6M arm) leading to a 3-year DFS rate of 73.2% in the 3M vs. 74.9% in the 6M (HR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.80–1.43, p = 0.622).For patients receiving mFOLFOX6, 3-year DFS rate was 71.8% in the 3M vs.77.7% in the 6M (HR = 1.18; 95%CI 0.74–1.88 p = 0.478). For patients receiving CAPOX 3-year DFS rate was 74.7% in the 3M vs. 74.8% in the 6M (HR = 0.99; 95%CI 0.69–1.45 p = 0.994).94.2% and 78.0% of pts completed 3 and 6 months of CT, respectively. Overall, 96.9% and 89.5% of patients completed 3 months (arm A) and 6 months (arm B) of CT, respectively. Median oxaliplatin doses intensity were 97.3% in 3M and 73.2% in 6M (505.0 and 738.3 mg/m2).Overall maximum neuropathy during treatment grade 2/3-4 was 23.9/5.9%in 3M and38.7/13.7%in 6M; p < 0.0001. In addition, worst grade 2/3-4 diarrhea was 11.1/4/0 in 3M and in 12.3/7.36M; p = 0.03. Conclusions: Since the HORG-IDEA study was designed in order to contribute patients in the IDEA project, the result on the study should be interpreted together with those of the whole IDEA project. Nevertheless, the results of the HORG-IDEA study are in line with those of the whole IDEA project, indicating that the results are depended on the administered adjuvant regimen, and the choice of regimen and duration should be depended on tumor characteristics and patient preference. Clinical trial information: NCT01308086.

Nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

Background

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Thirty-nine pretreated patients [33 with taxane-based regimens (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil)] and 6 with combination of fluoropyrimidines plus cisplatin with locally advanced inoperable and metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m² d1, d8, d15 in cycles of 28 days).

Results

Partial response (PR) was documented in nine patients (23.1%; 95% confidence interval 10.1-37.2%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (28.2%) and disease progression in 18 (46.2%). The disease control rate (SD + PR + complete response) was 51.3%. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 10.2% and 5.1% of patients, respectively; grade 3 anemia in 5.1%; grade 3 neurotoxicity in 5.1%; and grade 2 pain in 5.1%. The median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (range 0.3-13.6) and the median overall survival 6.8 months (range 0.3-22).

Conclusion

Nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in locally advanced inoperable or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma is an active chemotherapy regimen with a manageable toxicity profile and merits further evaluation.

Second-line pazopanib in patients with relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

Background:

Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression is increased in SCLC and is correlated with poor prognosis. The efficacy and tolerance of second-line pazopanib in SCLC was evaluated.

Patients and methods:

Patients with platinum-sensitive (cohort A; n=39) and -resistant/refractory (cohort B; n=19) SCLC were enrolled in a multicentre phase II study. The primary end point was the progression-free survival rate (PFS-R) at week 8 in each cohort. Pazopanib (800 mg per day per os) was administered until progressive disease (PD). Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) were enumerated using the Cellsearch assay.

Results:

All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. In the intention-to-treat analysis, eight (13.8%) patients achieved partial response (PR) (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0–22.7), 20 (34.5%) stable disease (SD) and 30 (51.7%) PD. Accrual in cohort B was halted because the hard-stop rule was met; in cohort A, the PFS-R was 59% (95% CI: 43.5–74.4; PR=7, SD=16). Nine (23.1%) patients received pazopanib for >6 months and 3 of them for >12 months. One pazopanib cycle resulted to a significant decrease to the number of patients with ⩾5 CTCs/7.5 ml of blood (20%) compared with baseline (50%). The median PFS and OS for all patients was 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.9–3.1 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.8–8.2 months), respectively (cohort A: PFS=3.7 months and OS=8.0 months). No unexpected toxicity was observed.

Conclusions:

Second-line treatment with pazopanib in platinum-sensitive SCLC is well tolerated and resulted in promising objective responses and disease control; CTC enumeration might serve as a reliable surrogate biomarker of response.

The Greek participitation to IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) study of 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer: Patients’ characteristics and safety analysis

740

Background: The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant (IDEA) collaboration was established to prospectively analyze data from six randomized trials to assess whether a 3-month course of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines (FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month current standard treatment in stage III colon cancer (CC). The primary endpoint of IDEA was 3-year disease-free survival. The accrual goal for the Greek IDEA study was 1.000 patients. Methods: Greek IDEA randomized patients with stage III colon cancer between 3 months (arm A) and 6 months (arm B) of adjuvant CT with modified (m) FOLFOX6 or XELOX (depending on physician/patient choice). Toxicity was graded during treatment and follow-up using NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Results: From May 2009 to October 2015, 708 patients were randomized in Greek centers either to arm A (n = 354, 50%) or to arm B (n = 354, 50.%). 297 (41.9%) patients received mFOLFOX6 and 411 (58.%) XELOX. The median age was 67 years (20-75) and 579 (81.8%) of them had PS 0. The patients’ population was balanced for the major risk factor between the two arms: N1/N2 disease (68.1/31.9% vs. 68.9/31.1 for ARM A and B, respectively), obstruction (4.5% vs. 2.5 for ARM A and B, respectively) and perforation (5.1% vs. 6.2 for ARM A and B, respectively). Overall, 96.9% and 89.5% of patients completed 3 months (arm A) and 6 months (arm B) of CT, respectively. Median oxaliplatin dose was 505 mg/m2 in arm A and 738 mg/m2 in arm B. Toxicity profiles were comparable between the two arm and the two fluoropyrimidines backbones with a total incidence of Grade 3/4 adverse events 18.9/4.4% and 19.7/5.1% for mFOLFOX6 and XELOX, respectively. Grade 2/3-4 peripheral neuropathy during the study was similar between arm A (33.9/4%) and B (38.7/3.7%). Conclusions: Both mFOLFOX6 and XELOX were safe. More patients completed the scheduled treatment in the 3-arm schedule.