Reflux nephropathy and the risk of preeclampsia and of other adverse pregnancy-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and reports in the new millennium

BACKGROUND

Reflux nephropathy is a common urinary tract malformation, and a substantial cause of morbidity in women of childbearing age. While recent studies provide further new information on pregnancy-related outcomes, their results are heterogeneous and a systematic meta-analysis may help the interpretation. The aim of this review was to analyze pregnancy-related outcomes in the recent literature on reflux nephropathy (2000-2016), to perfect the estimation of risks, and to identify specific research needs.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane review databases for the period 2000-2016 (PROSPERO registration no. 42016042713).

SELECTION CRITERIA

all case series and case reports dealing with reflux nephropathy and reporting on at least one pregnancy outcome. Data were extracted from eligible case series (≥ 6 cases). For the outcomes preeclampsia (PE), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), preterm birth, and newborns small for gestational age, we employed as a control group the low-risk pregnancies from a multicenter database including 1418 live-born singletons. Case reports were analyzed narratively.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 2507 papers, of which 7 case series and 4 case reports were retained. The series report on 434 women with 879 pregnancies; no study reported controls. Compared to the low-risk controls, the meta-analysis showed an increased risk of PIH (odds ratio, OR 5.55; confidence interval, CI 3.56-8.66), PE (OR 6.04; CI 2.41-15.13), and all hypertensive disorders combined (OR 10.43; CI 6.90-15.75). No difference was observed in preterm delivery and caesarean sections. A higher incidence of stillbirth was reported in one paper. Conversely, the 4 case reports (on 10 pregnancies) alert us to a potentially severe complication, hydro(uretero)nephrosis with or without infection.

CONCLUSION

Reflux nephropathy is associated with an increased risk of PIH and PE, but not of preterm delivery, suggesting the occurrence of late 'maternal' PE. The finding of a higher incidence of stillbirths in one series requires further analysis. Strict follow-up of these women is needed, in particular in late pregnancy stages, to avoid and manage in particular hypertensive pregnancy complications.

Full normalization of severe hypertension after parathryoidectomy - a case report and systematic review

Background

Although the relationship between hyperparathyroidism and hypertension has been described for decades, the role of hyperparathyroidism in hypertension in dialysis is still unclear. Following the case of a severely hypertensive dialysis patient, in which parathyroidectomy (PTX) corrected the metabolic imbalance and normalized blood pressure (BP), we tried to contextualize our observation with a systematic review of the recent literature on the effect of PTX on BP.

Case presentation

A dialysis patient, aged 19 years at the time of this report, with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from childhood; he was an early-preterm baby with very low birth weight (910 g), and is affected by a so-far unidentified familial nephropathy. He started dialysis in emergency at the age of 17. Except for low-dose Bisoprolol, he refused all chronic medication; hypertension (165–200/90–130 mmHg) did not respond to attainment of dry weight (Kt/V > 1.7; BNP 70–200 pg/ml pre-dialysis). He underwent subtotal PTX 1 year after dialysis start; after PTX, his blood pressure stabilized in the 100–140/50–80 range, and is normal without treatment 5 months later.

Conclusion

Our patient has some peculiar features: he is young, has a non-immunologic disease, poor compliance to drug therapy, excellent dialysis efficiency. His lack of compliance allows observing the effect of PTX on BP without pharmacologic interference.

The prompt, complete and long-lasting BP normalization led us to systematic review the current literature (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration 2000–2016) retrieving 8 case series (194 cases), and one case report (3 patients).

The meta-analysis showed a significant, albeit moderate, improvement in BP after PTX (difference: systolic BP -8.49 (CI 2.21–14.58) mmHg; diastolic BP -4.14 (CI 1.45–6.84) mmHg); analysis is not fully conclusive due to lack of information on anti-hypertensive agents. The 3 cases reported displayed a sharp reduction in BP after PTX.

In summary, PTX may have a positive influence on BP control, and may result in complete correction or even hypotension in some patients. The potential clinical relevance of this relationship warrants prospective large-scale studies.