Supervised versus unsupervised pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of women with urinary incontinence - a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study synthesized the effects of supervised and unsupervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) programs on outcomes relevant to women's urinary incontinence (UI).

METHODS

Five databases were searched from inception to December 2021, and the search was updated until June 28, 2022. Randomized and non-randomized control trials (RCTs and NRCTs) comparing supervised and unsupervised PFMT in women with UI and reported urinary symptoms, quality of life (QoL), pelvic floor muscles (PFM) function/ strength, the severity of UI, and patient satisfaction outcomes were included. Risk of bias assessment of eligible studies was performed by two authors through Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model with the mean difference or standardized mean difference.

RESULTS

Six RCTs and one NRCT study were included. All RCTs were assessed as "high risk of bias", and the NRCT study was rated as "serious risk of bias" for almost all domains. The results showed that supervised PFMT is better than unsupervised for QoL and PFM function of women with UI. There was no difference between supervised and unsupervised PFMT for urinary symptoms and improvement of the severity of UI. Results of patient satisfaction were inconclusive due to the sparse literature. However, supervised and unsupervised PFMT with thorough education and regular reassessment showed better results than those for unsupervised PFMT without educating patients about correct PFM contractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised and unsupervised PFMT programs can both be effective in treating women's UI if training sessions and regular reassessments are provided.

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the pain anxiety symptom scale (PASS-20) in chronic non-specific neck pain patients

OBJECTIVES

Pain-related anxiety has been linked to avoidance behaviour, maintenance of pain and disability. A valid and reliable tool is required to evaluate pain-related anxiety among Persian speaking adults with chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). This study aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Persian pain anxiety symptom scale-20 (PASS-20) according to the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist in Iranian adults with CNSNP.

METHODS

198 individuals with CNSNP completed the PASS-20. The factorial structure (confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA)), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC)), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and construct validity (convergent and known-group validity) were assessed. The correlation between PASS-20 with pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), neck disability index (NDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), visual analog scale (VAS) (Spearman's rank correlation) were examined. Known-group validity of PASS-20 was evaluated by comparing the difference between the PASS-20 scores of the known groups based on level of disability, pain intensity and gender using non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

The CFA showed almost the best fit with the original version. The subscales and total score demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.70-0.92) and high test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.94-0.97). PASS-20 had significant moderate correlations with PCS, TSK, NDI, VAS and a significant low correlation with BDI. Regarding known-group validity, the total score of Persian PASS-20 was higher in CNSNP with higher levels of pain and disability and in the female gender.

CONCLUSIONS

The Persian PASS-20 has acceptable psychometric properties in adults with CNSNP. The results of the factor analysis supported the four-factor structure comparable to the original version.

ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER

921672004.

Effect of Motor Control Training on Trunk Muscle Morphometry, Pain, and Disability in People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the effects of motor control training (MCT) on trunk muscle morphometry measured by ultrasound imaging and pain and disability in individuals with chronic low back pain.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from study inception until January 2021. Randomized control trials evaluating both muscle morphometry and pain or disability in individuals with chronic low back pain were included. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by 2 reviewers independently. Modified Downs and Black tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with mean difference or standardized mean difference (SMD).

RESULTS

Of 3459 studies initially identified, 15 studies were included, and 13 studies were selected for meta-analysis. The results revealed no differences in the resting thickness of the transversus abdominis, internal and external oblique, and lumbar multifidus muscles in studies that compared MCT with other interventions. The transversus abdominis muscles contraction ratio was greater (SMD = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.0 to 1.85) and lower pain (weighted mean difference: -1.07 cm; 95% CI, -1.91 to -0.22 cm; P = .01) and disability (SMD = -0.86; 95% CI, -1.42 to -0. 29; P < .01) scores were found in the groups who underwent MCT compared with other interventions.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that motor control exercise training increased the transverse abdominis contraction ratio (muscle activation) and improved the level of pain and disability compared to other interventions in people with chronic low back pain. However, motor control exercise training was not superior to other interventions in increasing the resting thickness of deep abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscles in intervention times less than 12 weeks.

Physical and mental health complications post-COVID-19: Scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Several long-lasting health complications have been reported in previous coronavirus infections. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review studies that evaluated physical and mental health problems post-COVID-19.

METHODS

Articles for inclusion in this scoping review were identified by searching the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases for items dated from 1 January to 7 November 2020. Observational studies evaluating physical health (musculoskeletal symptoms, functional status) or mental health status with a follow-up period longer than 1 month after discharge or after the onset of symptoms were included.

RESULTS

This scoping review included 34 studies with follow-up periods of up to 3 months post-COVID-19. The most commonly reported physical health problems were fatigue (range 28% to 87%), pain (myalgia 4.5% to 36%), arthralgia (6.0% to 27%), reduced physical capacity (six-minute walking test range 180 to 561 m), and declines in physical role functioning, usual care and daily activities (reduced in 15% to 54% of patients). Common mental health problems were anxiety (range 6.5% to 63%), depression (4% to 31%) and post-traumatic stress disorder (12.1% to 46.9%). Greater fatigue, pain, anxiety and depression were reported in female patients and individuals admitted to intensive care. An overall lower quality of life was seen up to 3 months post-COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the presence of several physical and mental health problems up to 3 months post-COVID-19. The findings point to the need for comprehensive evaluation and rehabilitation post-COVID-19 to promote quality of life.

Comparison of pressure release, phonophoresis and dry needling in treatment of latent myofascial trigger point of upper trapezius muscle

BACKGROUND

Latent myofascial trigger point (LMTP) is a small hypersensitive area in skeletal muscles that becomes painful under compression or stimulation. LMTPs are relevant for various musculoskeletal disorders. Although several treatments have been introduced to treat LMTP, the most efficient one is yet to be found.

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of the present study was to compare pressure release, phonophoresis of betamethasone and dry needling on the upper trapezius latent myofascial trigger point.

METHODS

Sixty participants (mean ± SD age, 23.6 ± 2.1 y), with at least one latent myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle, participated in this study. Subjects were randomly divided into three groups (pressure release, phonophoresis with betamethasone and dry needling groups) for two weeks. Pain intensity, pain pressure threshold and active cervical range of motion were assessed.

RESULTS

Significant pain decrease, active cervical range of motion and pain pressure threshold increase were observed in the three groups (p< 0.001). The dry needling and phonophoresis groups reported more significant improvement compared to the pressure release group (p< 0.001). There was no difference between the dry needling and phonophoresis groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the significant, positive effects of all three methods, dry needling and phonophoresis seem to be more effective than pressure release.

Effects of lumbosacral orthosis on dynamical structure of center of pressure fluctuations in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A few clinical trials have examined the effect of treatment interventions on postural control in patients with chronic low back pain, all of which have exclusively evaluated postural stability using traditional linear measures of postural sway. However, postural control improvement cannot be determined by exclusively relying on linear measurements, because these parameters provide no information on underlying motor control mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effect of using lumbosacral orthoses (LSO) together with routine physical therapy, compared to routine physical therapy alone on postural control, using nonlinear analysis techniques.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with low back pain were randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. Both groups underwent 8 sessions of physical therapy twice weekly for 4 weeks. The intervention group received LSO in addition to routine physical therapy. Before and after the intervention, non-linear dynamical features of center of pressure fluctuations were assessed during quiet standing at 3 difficulty levels of postural tasks, including eyes open while standing on a rigid surface, eyes closed while standing on a rigid surface, and eyes closed while standing on a foam surface.

RESULTS

The results of this study showed that a 4-week intervention consisting of LSO and routine physical therapy modalities did not affect the temporal structure of postural sways in patients with low back pain.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategies, such as routine physical therapy modalities or LSO, which exclusively focus on the correction of peripheral mechanics, fail to affect the behavior of the postural control system.

Immediate Effects of Lumbosacral Orthosis on Postural Stability in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND

Lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is commonly used for the treatment of back pain. The clinical and mechanical effectiveness of this device has been repeatedly investigated in several studies; however, its sensorimotor effectiveness has been rarely considered. Regarding this, the aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of a non-extensible LSO on postural stability (as a construct of sensorimotor function) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

This preliminary study was conducted on 17 patients with nonspecific chronic LBP using a single-group quasi-experimental design. Postural stability was measured while the participants were placed in a quiet standing position, under the combined conditions of base of support (rigid and foam surface), visual input (open eyes and closed eyes), and LSO (with and without orthosis).

RESULTS

The findings demonstrated that wearing orthosis during the most challenging postural task (i.e., blindfolded while standing on a foam surface) significantly reduced postural sway parameters related to the position and displacement of the center of pressure (COP; the sway area and sway amplitude in the anteroposterior direction; P<0.001). However, the use of this device had no significant effect on COP velocity.

CONCLUSION

As the findings of the present study indicated, the use of a non-extensible LSO decreased the COP displacement; however, it did not affect the COP velocity. Therefore, our data could not utterly support the effectiveness of non-extensible LSO on postural stability as a construct of sensorimotor function. Postural control is an appropriate indicator for assessing the global functioning of the sensorimotor system due to its dependence upon the interaction between the neural and musculoskeletal systems. Consequently, further studies are needed to elucidate the positive effects of LSO on the aspects of sensorimotor function.

A RCT comparing lumbosacral orthosis to routine physical therapy on postural stability in patients with chronic low back pain

Background: Poor balance performance and impaired postural control have been frequently reported in patients with low back pain. However, postural control is rarely monitored during the course of treatment even though poor postural control may contribute to chronicity and recurrence of symptoms. Therefore, the present study aimed at investigating the effect of a nonextensible lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) versus routine physical therapy on postural stability of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted between November 2015 and May 2016 at the outpatient physical therapy clinic of the School of Rehabilitation Sciences. Patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain aged 20 to 55 years were randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. Both groups received 8 sessions of physical therapy twice weekly for 4 weeks. The intervention group received nonextensible LSO in addition to routine physical therapy. Pain intensity, functional disability, fear of movement/ (re)injury, and postural stability in 3 levels of postural difficulty were measured before and after 4 weeks of intervention. A 2×2×3 mixed model of analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the main and interactive effects of the 3 factors including group, time, and postural difficulty conditions for each variable of postural stability.

Results: The LSO and control groups displayed significant improvement in postural stability at the most difficult postural task conditions (P-value for 95% area ellipse was 0.003; and for phase plane, the mean total velocity and standard deviation of velocity was <0.001). Both groups exhibited a decrease in pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia after 4 weeks of intervention. A significant difference between groups was found only for functional disability, with greater improvement in the orthosis group (t = 3.60, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Both routine physical therapy and LSO significantly improved clinical and postural stability outcomes immediately after 4 weeks of intervention. The orthosis group did not display superior outcomes, except for functional disability.

Intratester and intertester reliability of the movement system impairment-based classification for patients with knee pain

BACKGROUND

The methods to standardize the test items used for classification of patients with knee pain based on the movement system impairment (MSI) approach have been established. To our knowledge, no study has concentrated on establishing reliability for proposed classification for knee pain problems.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess intra- and intertester reliability of the knee MSI classification in patients with knee pain.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional methodological study.

SETTING

Rasul Akram Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-six subjects with knee pain aged 18-65 years.

METHODS

In order to examine intertester reliability, all three testers assessed the symptoms, signs and the MSI diagnosis of subjects with knee pain simultaneously. In order to assess intratester reliability, the procedure was exactly repeated after a one-week intersession period. Kappa values and percentages of agreement were calculated to analyze the reliability level.

RESULTS

The kappa values for intra- and intertester reliability of the symptom items ranged from 0.83 to 1.00 and 0.00 to 0.83, respectively. For the sign items, the kappa values ranged from 0.18 to 1.00 and 0.00 to 0.82, respectively. Finally, the kappa values of intra- and intertester reliability for patients' classification judgments ranged from 0.66 to 0.71, and 0.48 to 0.58, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study indicate that intertester reliability for the symptoms, signs and classification judgments of patients with knee pain based on the MSI approach seemed generally acceptable. However, for intratester reliability, lower levels of the system were observed, probably due to different pain levels or pain behavior between test and retest sessions.

Validation of the movement system impairment-based classification in patients with knee pain

BACKGROUND

Categorizing patients with knee pain problems based on pathoanatomical sources has not proved to be the most effective method for directing physical therapy interventions. Movement system impairment (MSI) classification system may be an alternative in the assessment, diagnosis, and management of patients with knee pain. No previous study has been conducted to validate the proposed system in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess construct validity of the MSI classification system in patients with knee pain.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional methodological study.

SETTING

Rasul Akram Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eighty subjects with knee pain aged 18-65 years.

METHODS

The MSI classification recognizes seven categories of knee pain problems based on the findings from the symptoms and signs assessment. Three physical therapists examined subjects with knee pain. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to derive proposed categories. Eigenvalues and a scree plot were also used to determine the factor retention.

RESULTS

Four factors related to three proposed categories were extracted from the PCA. Two factors were related to tibiofemoral rotation (TFR) category. The other two factors were related to proposed categories patellar lateral glide (PLG) and tibiofemoral hypomobility (TFHypo).

CONCLUSION

The results provided evidence for the construct validity of three (TFR, PLG, and TFHypo) of the seven categories proposed by MSI classification. In addition TFR was subcategorized into two groups which were named as tibial lateral rotation (TLR) and femoral adduction/medial rotation (FAdd/MR) in the present study.