The phenotype of Graves' orbitopathy is associated with thyrotropin receptor antibody levels

PURPOSE

Graves' orbitopathy (GO) is a specific inflammatory disorder of the orbit characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical phenotype. The role of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSH-R-Ab) has been widely researched, however there is still no evidence that these antibodies have a direct pathogenic role in this pathology. The aim of this study was to examine their relation to the individual clinical features of GO.

METHODS

Ninety-one consecutive patients with GO were recruited. Total antibody concentration (TSH-R binding inhibitory immunoglobulins, TBII) and their functional activity (stimulating TSH-R-Ab, TSAb) were measured using binding immunoassay and cell-based bioassay, respectively.

RESULTS

Both TSAb and TBII levels were significantly associated to the clinical parameters of GO activity. TSAb was a more sensitive serological marker compared to TBII pertaining to eyelid retraction and edema, proptosis, extra-orbital muscle disorders, diplopia, irritable eye symptoms, and photophobia. TSAb, but not TBII, was a significant predictive marker of conjunctival redness, chemosis, caruncle/plica inflammation, eye irritation, and orbital pain, (odds ratio: 3.096, p = 0.016; 5.833, p = 0.009; 6.443, p = 0.020; 3.167, p = 0.045; 2.893, p = 0.032; versus 2.187, p = 0.093; 2.775, p = 0.081; 3.824, p = 0.055; 0.952, p = 0.930; 2.226, p = 0.099, respectively). Neither TSAb nor TBII correlated with the level of proptosis (ρ = 0.259, p = 0.090, and ρ = 0.254, p = 0.104, respectively), however rising TSAb levels were strongly associated to the level of proptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

TSH-R-Ab were significantly associated with GO's phenotype. Especially TSAb, as a sensitive and predictive serological biomarker, can improve diagnosis and management of GO.

Health care access of thyroid disease patients in Serbia during the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of repurposing health care facilities in response to COVID-19 on the access of patients with thyroid disease to health care.

METHODS

This study consisted of a web-based survey. The survey was anonymous and consisted of forty questions.

RESULTS

This survey included 206 respondents. 91.3% of the respondents had health insurance through the Republic Fund of Health Insurance, 9.7% had private or both health insurances, and 3.4% did not have any health insurance. A significant proportion of respondents (60.4%) had to switch from public to private health care to reach a physician and 73.8% had to switch from public to private laboratories. For the 91.9%, this was perceived as a financial burden. Before the pandemic, 83.1% of respondents reported regular follow-up by physicians, which decreased to 44.9% during the pandemic (p < 0.01). 76.3% of the respondents regarded that their thyroid disease was managed optimally before the pandemic, while this figure declined to only 48% during the pandemic (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the medical care of thyroid patients in Serbia. For the patients treated in the public health care system, access to general practice was hindered, while access to specialist care was disrupted. It led to a switch from public to private health care, which was perceived as a financial burden for almost all the respondents. However, private health care proved to be an important safety net when the public system was overwhelmed.

Clinical value of functional thyrotropin receptor antibodies in Serbian patients with Graves' orbitopathy

PURPOSE

Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSH-R-Ab) are heterogeneous in their biological function and play a significant role in the pathophysiology of both Graves' disease and Graves' orbitopathy (GO). The clinical significance and utility of determining functional TSH-R-Ab in a Serbian collective were evaluated.

METHODS

91 consecutive patients with GO were included in this study. Total TSH-R-Ab concentration, referred to as TSH-R binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBII) was detected using a competitive-binding immunoassay. Stimulating and blocking TSH-R-Ab (TSAb and TBAb) were measured with cell-based bioassays.

RESULTS

Stimulating TSAb activity and TBII positivity were detected in 85 of 91 (93.4%) and 65 of 91 (71.4%) patients with GO (P < 0.001). Blocking TBAb activity was observed in only one patient who expressed dual stimulating and blocking TSH-R-Ab activity. The sensitivity rates for differentiating between clinically active versus inactive and mild versus moderate-to-severe GO were 100% and 100% for TSAb, respectively. In contrast, these were 82% and 87% only for TBII. Seven of eight (87.5%) and one of eight (12.5%) euthyroid patients with GO were TSAb and TBII positive, respectively (P < 0.031). TSAb serum levels significantly predicted GO activity compared to TBII (odds ratio, OR, 95%CI: 3.908, 95%CI 1.615-9.457, P = 0.003; versus 2.133, 0.904-5.032, P = 0.084, univariate analysis; and OR 4.341, 95%CI 1.609-11.707, P = 0.004; versus 2.337, 0.889-6.145, P = 0.085 multivariate analysis).

CONCLUSION

Stimulating TSAb are highly prevalent in patients with GO and show superior clinical characteristics and predictive potential compared to the traditionally used TBII.

Antithyroid drugs in Graves' hyperthyroidism: differences between "block and replace" and "titration" regimes in frequency of euthyroidism and Graves' orbitopathy during treatment

PURPOSE

Whereas antithyroid drugs (ATD) are the preferred treatment modality for Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH), there is still controversy about the optimal regimen for delivering ATD. To evaluate whether 'Block and Replace' (B + R) and 'Titration' (T) regimes are equivalent in terms of frequency of euthyroidism and Graves' Orbitopathy (GO) during ATD therapy.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre observational cohort study of 344 patients with GH but no GO at baseline. Patients were treated with ATD for 18 months according to B + R or T regimen in line with their institution's policy.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. In the treatment period between 6 and 18 months thyrotropin (TSH) slightly increased in both groups, but TSH was on average 0.59 mU/L (95% CI 0.27-0.85) lower in the B + R group at all time points (p = 0.026). Serum free thyroxine (FT4) remained stable during the same interval, with a tendency to higher values in the B + R group. The point-prevalence of euthyroidism (TSH and FT4 within their reference ranges) increased with longer duration of ATD in both groups; it was always higher in the T group than in the B + R group: 48 and 24%, respectively, at 6 months, 81 and 58% at 12 months, and 87 and 63% at 18 months (p < 0.002). There were no significant differences between the B + R and T regimens with respect to the fall in thyrotropin binding inhibiting immunoglobulins (TBII) or thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab). GO developed in 15.9% of all patients: 9.1 and 17.8% in B + R group and T group, respectively, (p = 0.096). GO was mild in 13% and moderate-to-severe in 2%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of biochemical euthyroidism during treatment with antithyroid drugs is higher during T compared to B + R regimen. De novo development of GO did not differ significantly between the two regimens, although it tended to be higher in the T group. Whether one regimen is clinically more advantageous than the other remains unclear.