[Interim results for the Patients' Rights Act and Infection Protection Act].
Chirurg 2014;
85:1103-8. [PMID:
25488115 DOI:
10.1007/s00104-014-2790-2]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The Patient Rights Act has converted court rulings into legal paragraphs. Two new aspects have been introduced: the duty to hand over a copy of the signed written consent form to the patient (in which detailed recommendations are offered) and the obligation of a thorough documentation of findings and treatments within patient files. In addition the legislators, through the Joint Federal Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, GBA) have made the introduction of clinical risk management mandatory. The Infection Protection Act and its regulations have elevated the prerequisites of hygiene within hospitals and private practices with a parallel increase in liability.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Both laws and regulations offer no reference as to who (and to what extent) is financially responsible for the excessive increase in personnel costs, which are as yet not included in the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) system. Despite all additional measures within the area of risk management, mistakes (avoidable or unavoidable) will nevertheless occur. In order to avoid longstanding legal battles the authors recommend an open and rapid communication with the patient and family. The wall of silence should be a thing of the past.
Collapse