Outcome of thoracoabdominal aortic operations using deep hypothermia and distal exsanguination

BACKGROUND

Operation of the descending and thoracoabdominal aorta may be affected by a significant perioperative morbidity, mainly because of ischemic damage of the spinal cord and malperfusion of the abdominal organs.

METHODS

A comparative analysis was performed on two consecutive series of patients operated between 1982 and 1998. Group 1 consisted of 90 patients operated with moderate hypothermic left heart bypass. Group 2 included 38 patients operated using deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and a period of circulatory arrest while performing the proximal anastomosis and distal exsanguination during confection of the distal anastomosis.

RESULTS

Main demographic factors and causes of the aortic disease were similar in both groups. Early mortality was significantly higher in the group of patients with aortic cross-clamping (15 of 90, 16%) than in those operated with circulatory arrest (2 of 38, 5.2%), p < 0.001. Paraplegia occurred in 8 patients in the group operated with mild hypothermia (8.8%) but in only 1 patient (2.6%) when deep hypothermia had been used.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, deep hypothermia combined with distal exsanguination significantly improved the early postoperative outcome after operation of the descending and thoracoabdominal aorta. This technique allowed easy confection of proximal and distal anastomoses, and the duration of the operation was not prolonged significantly through this approach.

Intra- and postoperative quality control in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery

The introduction of new techniques allowing direct coronary artery revascularisation without sternotomy and extracorporeal circulation--called Minimally (or less) Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass grafting (MIDCAB)--has opened up interesting perspectives for the treatment of patients with limited coronary artery disease. However, like any newer surgical technique, this approach to myocardial revascularisation requires a critical appreciation of the results which may be obtained; when introducing the MIDCAB technique in our institution we developed a quality control protocol based on intraoperative as well as early and late postoperative parameters. This protocol is designed to detect every significant adverse event, exercise capacity and quality of life of our patients. Moreover, several invasive parameters have to be recorded in the protocol, such as intraoperative flow in the internal mammary artery conduit, the angiographic verification of anastomotic patency at one-year follow-up and determination of coronary flow reserve. The results of the first 5 patients observed up to one year postoperatively are presented: all anastomoses were patent and the flow within the internal mammary artery was 69 +/- 40 ml/min at one-year follow-up angiography; this compares very favourably with the flow measured at the end of the operation, which was 31 +/- 8 ml/min. This demonstrates very clearly that internal mammary artery flow is recruitable and usually significantly increases within the first months postoperatively. Coronary flow reserve was 3.4 +/- 1.1 (normal value > 2.5). The results obtained in this pilot study, which was designed to establish a quality control protocol, are very satisfactory and confirm previous experience that this technique may be offered to selected patients with appropriate coronary anatomy.