Targeted therapy for advanced salivary gland carcinoma based on molecular profiling: results from MyPathway, a phase IIa multiple basket study

BACKGROUND

Systemic therapy options for salivary cancers are limited. MyPathway (NCT02091141), a phase IIa study, evaluates targeted therapies in non-indicated tumor types with actionable molecular alterations. Here, we present the efficacy and safety results for a subgroup of MyPathway patients with advanced salivary gland cancer (SGC) matched to targeted therapies based on tumor molecular characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MyPathway is an ongoing, multiple basket, open-label, non-randomized, multi-center study. Patients with advanced SGC received pertuzumab + trastuzumab (HER2 alteration), vismodegib (PTCH-1/SMO mutation), vemurafenib (BRAF V600 mutation), or atezolizumab [high tumor mutational burden (TMB)]. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

As of January 15, 2018, 19 patients with SGC were enrolled and treated in MyPathway (15 with HER2 amplification and/or overexpression and one each with a HER2 mutation without amplification or overexpression, PTCH-1 mutation, BRAF mutation, and high TMB). In the 15 patients with HER2 amplification/overexpression (with or without mutations) who were treated with pertuzumab + trastuzumab, 9 had an objective response (1 complete response, 8 partial responses) for an ORR of 60% (9.2 months median response duration). The clinical benefit rate (defined by patients with objective responses or stable disease >4 months) was 67% (10/15), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months, and median overall survival was 20.4 months. Stable disease was observed in the patient with a HER2 mutation (pertuzumab + trastuzumab, n = 1/1, PFS 11.0 months), and partial responses in patients with the PTCH-1 mutation (vismodegib, n = 1/1, PFS 14.3 months), BRAF mutation (vemurafenib, n = 1/1, PFS 18.5 months), and high TMB (atezolizumab, n = 1/1, PFS 5.5+ months). No unexpected toxicity occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 12 of 19 patients (63%) with advanced SGC, treated with chemotherapy-free regimens matched to specific molecular alterations, experienced an objective response. Data from MyPathway suggest that matched targeted therapy for SGC has promising efficacy, supporting molecular profiling in treatment determination.

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors

We present the main findings of the 5th National Audit Project on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia. Incidences were estimated using reports of accidental awareness as the numerator, and a parallel national anaesthetic activity survey to provide denominator data. The incidence of certain/probable and possible accidental awareness cases was ~1:19 600 anaesthetics (95% CI 1:16 700-23 450). However, there was considerable variation across subtypes of techniques or subspecialties. The incidence with neuromuscular blockade was ~1:8200 (1:7030-9700), and without it was ~1:135 900 (1:78 600-299 000). The cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia reported to 5th National Audit Project were overwhelmingly cases of unintended awareness during neuromuscular blockade. The incidence of accidental awareness during caesarean section was ~1:670 (1:380-1300). Two thirds (82, 66%) of cases of accidental awareness experiences arose in the dynamic phases of anaesthesia, namely induction of and emergence from anaesthesia. During induction of anaesthesia, contributory factors included: use of thiopental; rapid sequence induction; obesity; difficult airway management; neuromuscular blockade; and interruptions of anaesthetic delivery during movement from anaesthetic room to theatre. During emergence from anaesthesia, residual paralysis was perceived by patients as accidental awareness, and commonly related to a failure to ensure full return of motor capacity. One third (43, 33%) of accidental awareness events arose during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia, most due to problems at induction or towards the end of anaesthesia. Factors increasing the risk of accidental awareness included: female sex; age (younger adults, but not children); obesity; anaesthetist seniority (junior trainees); previous awareness; out-of-hours operating; emergencies; type of surgery (obstetric, cardiac, thoracic); and use of neuromuscular blockade. The following factors were not risk factors for accidental awareness: ASA physical status; race; and use or omission of nitrous oxide. We recommend that an anaesthetic checklist, to be an integral part of the World Health Organization Safer Surgery checklist, is introduced as an aid to preventing accidental awareness. This paper is a shortened version describing the main findings from 5th National Audit Project - the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home#pt.

5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors

We present the main findings of the 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA). Incidences were estimated using reports of accidental awareness as the numerator, and a parallel national anaesthetic activity survey to provide denominator data. The incidence of certain/probable and possible accidental awareness cases was ~1:19,600 anaesthetics (95% confidence interval 1:16,700-23,450). However, there was considerable variation across subtypes of techniques or subspecialities. The incidence with neuromuscular block (NMB) was ~1:8200 (1:7030-9700), and without, it was ~1:135,900 (1:78,600-299,000). The cases of AAGA reported to NAP5 were overwhelmingly cases of unintended awareness during NMB. The incidence of accidental awareness during Caesarean section was ~1:670 (1:380-1300). Two-thirds (82, 66%) of cases of accidental awareness experiences arose in the dynamic phases of anaesthesia, namely induction of and emergence from anaesthesia. During induction of anaesthesia, contributory factors included: use of thiopental, rapid sequence induction, obesity, difficult airway management, NMB, and interruptions of anaesthetic delivery during movement from anaesthetic room to theatre. During emergence from anaesthesia, residual paralysis was perceived by patients as accidental awareness, and commonly related to a failure to ensure full return of motor capacity. One-third (43, 33%) of accidental awareness events arose during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia, mostly due to problems at induction or towards the end of anaesthesia. Factors increasing the risk of accidental awareness included: female sex, age (younger adults, but not children), obesity, anaesthetist seniority (junior trainees), previous awareness, out-of-hours operating, emergencies, type of surgery (obstetric, cardiac, thoracic), and use of NMB. The following factors were not risk factors for accidental awareness: ASA physical status, race, and use or omission of nitrous oxide. We recommend that an anaesthetic checklist, to be an integral part of the World Health Organization Safer Surgery checklist, is introduced as an aid to preventing accidental awareness. This paper is a shortened version describing the main findings from NAP5--the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home.

5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: patient experiences, human factors, sedation, consent, and medicolegal issues

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland into accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA) yielded data related to psychological aspects from the patient, and the anaesthetist, perspectives; patients' experiences ranged from isolated auditory or tactile sensations to complete awareness. A striking finding was that 75% of experiences were for <5 min, yet 51% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-60%] experienced distress and 41% (95% CI 33-50%) suffered longer term adverse effect. Distress and longer term harm occurred across the full range of experiences but were particularly likely when the patient experienced paralysis (with or without pain). The patient's interpretation of what is happening at the time of the awareness seemed central to later impact; explanation and reassurance during suspected AAGA or at the time of report seemed beneficial. Quality of care before the event was judged good in 26%, poor in 39%, and mixed in 31%. Three-quarters of cases of AAGA (75%) were judged preventable. In 12%, AAGA care was judged good and the episode not preventable. The contributory and human factors in the genesis of the majority of cases of AAGA included medication, patient, and education/training. The findings have implications for national guidance, institutional organization, and individual practice. The incidence of 'accidental awareness' during sedation (~1:15,000) was similar to that during general anaesthesia (~1:19,000). The project raises significant issues about information giving and consent for both sedation and anaesthesia. We propose a novel approach to describing sedation from the patient's perspective which could be used in communication and consent. Eight (6%) of the patients had resorted to legal action (12, 11%, to formal complaint) at the time of reporting. NAP5 methodology provides a standardized template that might usefully inform the investigation of claims or serious incidents related to AAGA.

A phase I/II trial of the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor SB-743921 dosed q14d without and with prophylactic G-CSF in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)

8578

Background: KSP is a mitotic kinesin essential for cell cycle progression. SB-743921 (SB-921), a selective KSP inhibitor, blocks mitotic spindle assembly with cell cycle arrest in mitosis and cell death. In the first-in-humans (FIH) trial, the MTD was 4 mg/m2 q21d. Since neutropenia was the major DLT, with recovery by ∼d15, a q14d schedule without (-GCSF) and with prophylactic G-CSF (+GCSF) is being explored. Methods: In phase I of this phase I/II trial, DLT and MTD of SB-921 given on d1 and d15 q28d (-GCSF) and (+GCSF) will be determined. Eligible patients (pts) have relapsed or refractory HL or NHL, aggressive (a) or indolent (i), have had at least 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen, and have relapsed after or were not candidates for stem cell transplant. This is a standard 3+3 dose escalation trial design, starting at 2 mg/m2 and escalating by 1 mg/m2. Once DLT (-GCSF) is identified, (+GCSF) dosing starts at the (-GCSF) MTD, escalating until (+GCSF) DLT is identified. Results: 39 pts were treated (-GCSF) at 6 dose levels (2–7 mg/m2). 5 pts had DLT: 1/3 at 4 (grade 3 hepatic enzymes; found retrospectively); 2/10 at 6 (both sepsis with neutropenia), and 2/7 at 7 (both grade 4 neutropenia lasting >5d) mg/m2. MTD (-GCSF) was 6 mg/m2. 12 pts were treated with SB-921 (+GCSF) at 6 (n=4), 7 (n=3), 8 (n=3) and 9 (n=2) mg/m2, with 1 DLT of neutropenia at 9 mg/m2. Expansion of the 9 mg/m2 (+GCSF) cohort to n=6 is ongoing. For all 51 pts treated to date, mean age was 52 yr; 53% were male; 39% HL, 33% aNHL, and 28% iNHL; 76% had ≥3 prior CT regimens. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia: 58% at ≥MTD (-GCSF) and 42% (+GCSF). Other grade 3/4 events were uncommon. There was no neuropathy or alopecia >grade 1. There were 2 partial responses (PR), both in elderly pts with HL with ≥2 prior CT regimens, 1 at 6 (-GCSF) and 1 at 8 (+GCSF) mg/m2, ongoing at Cycle 4+. Conclusions: The MTD of SB-921 (-GCSF) on a q14d schedule was 6 mg/m2. This dose density (0.43 mg/m2/d) is >2-fold higher than in the FIH trial with a q21d schedule (0.19 mg/m2/d). Dose escalation (+GCSF) is continuing. SB-921 is well tolerated with minimal toxicity other than hematologic. Activity has been observed in HL, with 2 PRs at doses ≥6 mg/m2.

[Table: see text]

Preliminary results of a randomized phase II study of paclitaxel and bevacizumab ± gemcitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

1089

Background: The addition of bevacizumab (B) to paclitaxel (P) results in a significant improvement in PFS in pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (Miller K, et al. New Engl J Med 2007). A randomized Phase II trial examining the efficacy and safety of adding gemcitabine (G) to the PB doublet has completed enrollment. Reported here are preliminary efficacy and safety results. Methods: This is a US, multicenter, randomized, superiority trial. Eligible pts have locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, ECOG PS 0 or 1, and no prior cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease. Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment with a taxane or endocrine therapy is allowed. Pts are randomized to receive P 90 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by B 10 mg/kg on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, or the same regimen plus G 1,500 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 15. Primary endpoint is response rate according to RECIST criteria. Results: Between May 2006 and February 2008, 189 women were randomized to treatment. The table below summarizes currently available results. Grades 1–2 alopecia occurred in 28% of pts in the PB arm and in 38% of pts in the PB+G arm. One pt (2%) in the PB arm experienced a Grade 3 nosebleed. Grades 3 and 4 thrombotic events occurred respectively in 0% and 2% of pts in the PB arm, and in 3% and 2% of pts in the PB+G arm. Four pts (7%) in the PB arm and 3 pts (5%) in the PB+G arm discontinued due to treatment-related AEs. Three on-study deaths have occurred, none deemed related to study treatment. Conclusions: Study follow-up is ongoing. Full results will be available at the time of the meeting. Therapy with PB ± G is feasible and does not appear to be associated with significant bleeding or thrombotic events. As expected, the addition of G to the PB doublet appears to increase the incidence of neutropenia in pts with MBC.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

A phase II study of single agent OSI-7904L in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

e17005

Background: Given the limited efficacy and relative toxicity of chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, further research is needed to both increase the efficacy and decrease the toxicity of treatment. OSI-7904L is a novel liposomal formulation of a non-competitive thymidylate synthase inhibitor. In a phase I study, 12 mg/m2 dosing given every 21 days was both feasible and well tolerated. Methods: This multi-center, two-stage, phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of OSI-7904L in patients with advanced, refractory SCCHN. A total of 41 patients were to be enrolled by completion of stage II. Enrollment was limited to patients with histologically proven squamous histology, locally recurrent and/or metastatic disease, with no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients were required to have a performance status of ≤ 2, predicted life expectancy of at least three months and adequate hematopoietic, hepatic and renal function. Efficacy was assessed according to RECIST guidelines, and toxicity was evaluated per CTC AE 3.0. Results: Ten patients enrolled in stage 1. Median age was 60 (range 42–66). Nine were evaluable for response assessment with one withdrawn after one cycle due to a grade 4 papular rash. There were no objective responses while 4 of the 10 patients had stable disease during their first restaging. Median time to progression was 2.5 months for the 9 evaluable patients. Besides the one grade 4 dermatologic reaction, other toxicities were grade 3 fatigue and dehydration, and grade 2 anorexia. Assuming an expected 20% response rate required to initiate enrollment in stage II, the probability of the tenth patient being a responder was less than 3%, thus the study was closed due to lack of response in this population. Conclusions: OSI-7904L was well tolerated similar to the phase I data, but did not demonstrate efficacy in metastatic or recurrent HNSCC patients. Further study of this drug as a single-agent with the current dosing regimen is not recommended.

[Table: see text]

The Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (ARCCS) expanded access trial in North America: Safety and efficacy

5011

Background: A prior phase III trial (TARGETs) demonstrated that sorafenib (SOR) doubled median progression-free survival versus placebo in previously treated clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC) patients (pts). The ARCCS trial made SOR available to a broader range of RCC pts through an expanded access program. Methods: This open-label, nonrandomized trial enrolled pts with advanced RCC not eligible for, or without access to, other SOR clinical trials; ECOG PS 0–2 with waivers granted for pts with ECOG PS 3–4; age =15 yrs; and adequate prior treatment of brain metastases. Major exclusion criteria included treatment <4 wks prior, life expectancy <2 mos, uncontrolled hypertension, and severe renal impairment requiring dialysis. Objectives were to analyze the safety and efficacy (response by RECIST) of 400 mg bid SOR in a community-based setting. Enrollment ceased on 12/20/05 when SOR became commercially available in the US, and those with no prior therapy or non-clear cell RCC continued in an extension protocol. Enrollment completed in Canada in 8/06. Results: A total of 2488 pts were valid for safety: 69% male with median age 63 yrs and most (83%) had prior nephrectomy; histologies included 78% clear-cell, 7% papillary, 1% chromophobe, and <1% collecting duct and oncocytoma. Median time from diagnosis for all pts was 1.4 yrs (range <1–34). Of those pts receiving prior therapy (n=1249), treatments included interferon alfa (54%), interleukin 2 (43%), bevacizumab (23%), thalidomide (12%), and sunitinib (2%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurring in > 2% pts were hand- foot skin reaction 7.2%, fatigue 5.3%, hypertension 4.4%, rash/desquamation 4%, dehydration and dyspnea 2.7%, and diarrhea 2.5%. Efficacy assessment, mainly PFS, was limited by the short median time (14 wks) on study due to many pts enrolling during the last 2 months of the study. Of 1,850 pts evaluable for response, 17.5% had unconfirmed PR. One (0.1%), 67 (3.6%), 1479 (79.9%) and 303 (16.4%) had CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively. Conclusions: ARCCS pts were representative of the broader range of RCC pts in the community including those excluded from previous SOR trials. Toxicity and response rates were similar to those reported previously, supporting the generalizability of the phase III trial data.

[Table: see text]

A multicenter phase II study of erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma

8539

Background: Erlotinib and bevacizumab have demonstrated activity in a number of malignancies by virtue of interrupting interdependent signaling pathways thought important in tumorigenesis. Melanoma may be an appropriate target based on its expression of EGFR and VEGF. We conducted a phase II multi-institutional trial evaluating erlotinib and bevacizumab in advanced melanoma patients. Methods: Eligibility included measurable disease, ECOG PS = 0–1, adequate organ function, no more than one prior therapy for metastatic disease, and CNS metastases were allowed if limited and controlled. Patients received oral erlotinib 150 mg/day and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV Q 2 weeks with tumor evaluation every 8 weeks. The primary outcomes were response rate (RR), response duration, and frequency of PFS >6 months. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, safety, and tolerability. A two-stage accrual design was employed ensuring that = 3/21 patients had PFS >6 months before additional patients were accrued. Results: As of Nov 2006, 29 patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled. A total of 23 patients were evaluable for response. The majority was male 19/29 (65%) and had a median age = 62 yrs (range 35–78 years). Fifteen of the 29 had stage M1c disease (51.7%) and 18/29 (62.1%) had a PS = 1. Ten patients (34%) had prior adjuvant therapy and 6 patients (21%) prior therapy for metastatic disease. There were 2/23 (9%) partial responses lasting < 6 months and 5/23 (22%) had stable disease lasting > 6 months. The median progression free survival of evaluable patients was 96 days (95% CI: 50 - 142 days). A total of 25 grade III toxicities were observed with the most common being rash/pruritis (n=4), pain (n=4), fatigue (n=3), hypertension (n=2) and diarrhea (n=2). Two grade IV toxicities were observed (myocardial infarction and bowel perforation) both thought to be due to bevacizumab. Conclusion: The combination of erlotinib (150 mg/day) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) appears potentially active in patients with metastatic melanoma with largely tolerable toxicities. Accrual of a total of 41 patients will be completed shortly.

[Table: see text]

A phase I-II study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and potential efficacy of intravenous SB-743921 on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

18516

Background: Kinesin spindle protein (KSP) is required for mitotic spindle bipolarity and cell cycle progression. SB-743921 (SB- 921), a selective KSP inhibitor, blocks mitotic spindle assembly, causing cell cycle arrest in mitosis and subsequent cell death. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first-in-humans study of SB-921 given Q21 days. Methods: Cohort 1 of the Phase I portion of a study determining the safety, pharmacokinetics and MTD of SB-921 without prophylactic GCSF in patients (pts) with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin’s Disease is reported. Pts with relapsed or refractory disease were eligible if they had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen, had failed high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), or were not candidates for ASCT. SB-921 is given to dose-escalating cohorts of 3 pts as a 1 hr IV infusion, Q14 days. Dosing began at 2 mg/m2 and escalated in 1 mg/m2 increments after 3 pts tolerated 1 cycle. Pts without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) not completing Cycle 1 are replaced. Cohort expansion to 6 pts occurs if 1/3 pts experiences DLT, defined as any drug-related toxicity = grade 3 or drug-related grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Results: Cohort 1 (2 mg/m2) enrolled 6 NHL pts (5 indolent, 1 aggressive). 4 were female; median age = 59 (52–73); 5 Caucasian, 1 African-American; median no. of cycles = 2 (1–6). 5/6 pts were evaluable; 1 dropped out before dosing. The most common Grade 1–2 AEs, in decreasing order, were fatigue, dysgeusia, paresthesia, leukopenia, and diarrhea. Grade 3 AEs of note were 1 each of hemolytic anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and dyspnea; 1 Grade 4 anemia was reported. Conclusions: SB-921 was well tolerated without prophylactic GCSF in Cohort 1 of the Phase I portion of this study, which continues to dose-escalate. If neutropenia is the DLT, dose escalation will continue with prophylactic GCSF.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II trial of irofulven (IROF)/prednisone (P), IROF/capecitabine (C)/P or mitoxantrone (M)/P in docetaxel-pretreated hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients (pts)

14513

Background: IROF, a semisynthetic derivative of the natural product illudin S, is a novel DNA binding agent. IROF alone or in combination has shown activity in phase I-II trials in HRPC, notably with IROF/C (Cvitkovic et al, ASCO 2004). Methods: Pts with histologically-proven metastatic HRPC who progressed (RECIST or PSA) during prior docetaxel or within 3 months of discontinuing treatment, with adequate hematologic and organ functions and KPS ≥70% were stratified by pain and randomized to one of three treatments: Arm A: IROF (0.45 mg/kg, day 1 and 8 q3weeks [w]) and P (10 mg po daily); Arm B: IROF (0.4 mg/kg day 1 and 15), C(2000 mg/m2 day 1–15 q4w) and P; or Arm C: M (12 mg/m2 q3w) and P. Primary endpoint was TTP (RECIST, PSA or clinical progression); secondary endpoints included PSA response (≥50% decrease for ≥4 w), pain response, and toxicity; 135 pts are planned in a 2:2:1 ratio. The study was powered to detect a difference in TTP of 1.5 vs 3 months. Results: As of Dec 2005, 78 pts were randomized and treated with ≥ 5 months follow-up (A/B/C: 31/31/16). Median age (A/B/C) 69/70/61, KPS ≥80% 24/28/9, median baseline PSA ng/mL 90/147/235, disease related pain at baseline 61%/58%/63%; other characteristics, including metastatic site distribution, were similar between arms. Safety: 65 pts were evaluated for safety. Median cycles/Pt (A, B, C) 3/2/2; grade 3/4 toxicities (% pts A, B, C): asthenia (4%, 16%, 0%), vomiting (0%, 12%, 0%) and diarrhea (4%, 8%, 0%). The most common grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were neutropenia (10%, 6%, 31%) and thrombocytopenia (15%, 12%, 0%). Conclusion: IROF in combination with P and, in particular, C/P shows improved activity and acceptable tolerance compared to M/P in docetaxel-resistant HRPC. Patient accrual is complete as of Jan 2006, and final results will be presented. [Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Initial therapeutic strategy in follicular lymphoma (FL): An analysis from the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS)

7527

Background: Initial treatment strategies in FL include observation (obs), rituximab (R), chemotherapy ± R, and XRT. A recent study suggests initial therapy may impact FL survival (JCO 23:8447). NLCS is the first prospective observational study in the US designed to assess FL presentation, prognosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes. We describe initial therapeutic strategy in NLCS FL pts. Methods: FL pts diagnosed within 6 months with no prior lymphomas were recruited in this ongoing study. Data collected includes histology, stage, therapy, response, relapse and death. There is no specified treatment regimen. Results: From 3/04 to 11/05 1493 pts enrolled at 237 sites in the United States. Demographics have been initially reported at ASH 2005 (Blood 106:293a) and are comparable to SEER. Initial therapeutic strategy was: obs, 19%; R-monotherapy, 13%; chemo+R, 51%; XRT, 5%; chemo only, 4%. Chemo+R regimens were: R-CHOP, 59%; R-CVP, 19%; R-fludarabine based,11%; other, 11%. Choice to initiate therapy was associated with FLIPI, stage, and grade (p < 0.0001). Significant regional differences (p < 0.0001) were noted: obs was used in 13% of pts in Southeast and 31% in Northeast (NE); fludarabine-based R-chemo was used in 18% of pts in Southwest and only 3% in NE. Academic sites were more likely than community sites to treat pts on clinical trials (12% vs 4%). In pts treated with R or chemo+R, a higher FLIPI was not associated with decision to utilize chemotherapy. 26% of initially observed pts have switched to active therapy after a median of 2.8 months on obs since diagnosis; this was associated with baseline grade (III>II>I), but not stage or FLIPI. Conclusions: Diverse regimens are used for initial management of FL in the United States. Few pts are treated on clinical trials. Significant differences among regions and between center types suggest physician preference may drive initial therapy. Studies such as NLCS are needed to better understand the impact of initial therapy on short- and long-term outcomes.

[Table: see text]

Safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results from a large observational registry in the US (BRiTE)

3536

Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when added to standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of patients with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line chemotherapy. Safety and efficacy information in unselected patients with mCRC are collected. Chemotherapy regimen choice is at the physician’s discretion. Methods: To facilitate and evaluate enrollment of a typical community-based mCRC population, eligibility criteria were minimized. Cohort demographics were consistent with the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mCRC. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, and safety data including targeted BV-associated serious adverse events (SAEs) are updated every 3 months (mo). Results are based on descriptive analyses and are not adjusted for propensity of treatment, baseline characteristics, and treatment effects. Results: 1968 patients were enrolled between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Median study follow-up was 10 mo by Nov 4, 2005. SAEs were reported in 12.0% of patients including gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) (1.7%), postoperative bleeding/wound healing complications (1.2%), arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) (2.1%), and grade 3–4 bleeding (1.9%). 3.2% of patients discontinued BV due to a BV-related toxicity, most commonly bleeding. For patients with the respective event(s), median time to first event was 2.1 mo for GIP, 3.5 mo for ATE and 4.0 mo for grade 3–4 bleeding. 8.9% of patients with no history of hypertension (HTN) developed HTN requiring medication and 6.2% of patients who had HTN requiring medication at baseline experienced worsening of their HTN while on study treatment. Conclusions: In this unselected population of patients with mCRC, the safety profile of BV plus various chemotherapy regimens appears consistent with that observed in the pivotal BV trial. Overall discontinuation of BV due to a BV-related toxicity was uncommon. In this large community-based observational registry, no new BV associated safety issues have been identified.

[Table: see text]

Final survival and safety results from a multicenter, open-label, phase IIIb trial of erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

7169

Background: Erlotinib is an orally available, reversible inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase with a proven survival advantage for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have failed one prior chemotherapy regimen. Preliminary data suggest that never smokers respond particularly well, as assessed by both response and survival. Method: This is a phase IIIb, multicenter, open-label trial of erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC who have progressed following standard chemotherapy treatment. The trial allowed patients access to erlotinib therapy prior to FDA approval; patients could remain on study up to 9 months following approval. The co-primary objectives were best ORR (as assessed by investigator) and OS associated with erlotinib therapy in this group, and in patient subsets defined by tobacco history. Secondary objectives include evaluating safety; characterization of OS and RR in sub-populations, including histology, sex, ethnicity; duration of time on treatment. Patients and Treatment: Between August and November 2004, 229 patients were enrolled and treated. Erlotinib was given at the standard dose of 150mg once daily. Demographics are as follows: M/F% 60/40; median age 68 (27–90); ECOG PS% 0/1/2/3 25/44/23/7; squamous histology 34%, adenocarcinoma 45%; >1 prior regimen 47%; prior platinum 83%; never smoked 9%. Results: At the time of the final analysis (August 2005), 60% of subjects had died; data are therefore mature. Among the 229 treated subjects, the best ORR was 8.3% (CI: 5.2% - 12.4%). The ORR in never-smokers, previous smokers and current smokers was 28.6% (CI: 13.2% - 50.6%), 6.0% (CI: 3.0% - 10.4%) and 7.3% (CI: 2.0% - 19.0%), respectively. Median overall survival for all patients was 6.3 months (CI: 4.7 - 8.0). Median survival was 5.2 (CI: 4.2 - 7.3) and 6.3 months (CI: 3.6 - 9.2) in previous smokers and current smokers, respectively; and was not reached in never-smokers. Median duration of treatment was 10.6 weeks. One ILD-like event was reported (0.4%). Conclusions: No unexpected safety signals were seen. The observed ORR and survival data are consistent with the findings from the pivotal phase III randomized trial.

[Table: see text]

Risk factors for gastrointestinal perforations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy

3535

Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival when added to standard chemotherapy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of pts with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line chemotherapy (CT). Incidence rate, temporal pattern, and potential risk factors associated with gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) were explored. Methods: Baseline patient characteristics (BC), including prospectively identified potential risk factors for GIP, were collected at study entry. Safety data were collected every 3 months (mo). Logistic regression models, adjusted and unadjusted for treatment assignment, were used to identify BC potentially associated with GIP. Results: 1968 pts were enrolled between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Median study follow-up was 10 mo as of Nov 4, 2005. GIPs were observed in 34 pts (1.7%). For pts with GIP, median time to first event was 2.1 mo; the majority of events were non-fatal and occurred within the first 3 mo after starting BV. BC including GI medical history (chronic aspirin or NSAID use, peptic ulcer disease, diverticulosis) were similar in pts with or without GIP and with earlier or later GIP onset (≤ or >3 mo from start of BV). Although adjusted models did not show any significant BC, GIP rates were numerically higher in pts with primary tumor intact (2.6%) vs. resected (1.6%). Furthermore, univariate analyses revealed a significant difference between intact (2.3%) and resected (0.8%) primary tumor for earlier GIP (≤3 mo from start of BV). The majority of pts with GIP had at least one of the following: acute diverticulitis, intra-abdominal abscess, gastrointestinal obstruction, tumor at GIP site, abdominal carcinomatosis, prior abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy. Conclusions: Preliminary analyses indicate the incidence of GIP in this large, community-based observational registry is similar to that previously reported in phase III mCRC trials with BV. No associations between specific BCs and an increased risk of GIP were identified. Patients with primary tumor intact were more likely to incur a GIP within the first 3 mo of starting BV and CT.

[Table: see text]

Efficacy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results from a large observational registry in the US (BRiTE)

3537

Background: Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) when added to standard chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). BRiTE is a large, community-based observational registry of patients with mCRC receiving BV plus first-line CT. Safety and efficacy information in unselected patients with mCRC are collected. Chemotherapy regimen choice is at the physician’s discretion. Methods: 1968 patients receiving BV plus first-line CT were enrolled at 248 sites in 49 states between Feb 2004 and Jun 2005. Patients are followed for up to 3 years, with data reporting every 3 months (mo) including disease status as assessed by investigator using his/her method of choice. Patients were grouped twice by CT. Cox regression models, adjusted and unadjusted for treatment assignment, were used to identify baseline characteristics (BC) and differential chemotherapy effects on PFS. Results: Cohort demographics were consistent with the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mCRC. Median study follow-up was 10 months by Nov 4, 2005. CT regimens included FOLFOX (55.8%), FOLFIRI (14.1%), and IFL (9.7%). Based on observed progression events (n=800) or deaths (n=123), projected median PFS is 11.3 mo (95% CI: 10.4–11.7). Median PFS was comparable in patients treated with CT regimen based on irinotecan (11.3 mo), oxaliplatin (11.4 mo), or neither (10.2 mo) (CT Grouping 1); or 5FU infusion (11.5 mo), 5-FU bolus (9.7 mo), or capecitabine (11.6 mo) (CT Grouping 2). Significant BC in adjusted and unadjusted models are ECOG performance status (PS), primary disease site, and albumin, with no significant difference among CT regimens. Conclusions: This large, community-based registry included a patient population with demographics consistent with the SEER database for mCRC. Preliminary median PFS of 11.3 mo compares favorably to that reported in the pivotal trial. Median PFS appears to be comparable for all CTs when combined with BV. Higher baseline albumin, PS of 0, and primary disease site of rectum were associated with improved outcome.

[Table: see text]

Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary

Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary Site (CUP) accounts for approximately 3% of all malignant neoplasms and is therefore one of the 10 most frequent cancer diagnoses in man. Patients with CUP present with metastatic disease for which the site of origin cannot be identified at the time of diagnosis. It is now accepted that CUP represents a heterogeneous group of malignancies that share a unique clinical behaviour and, presumably, unique biology. The following clinicopathological entities have been recognised: (i) metastatic CUP primarily to the liver or to multiple sites, (ii) metastatic CUP to lymph nodes including the sub-sets involving primarily the mediastinal-retroperitoneal, the axillary, the cervical or the inguinal nodes, (iii) metastatic CUP of peritoneal cavity including the peritoneal papillary serous carcinomatosis in females and the peritoneal non-papillary carcinomatosis in males or females, (iv) metastatic CUP to the lungs with parenchymal metastases or isolated malignant pleural effusion, (v) metastatic CUP to the bones, (vi) metastatic CUP to the brain, (vii) metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas and (viii) metastatic melanoma of an unknown primary. Extensive work-up with specific pathology investigations (immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular diagnosis) and modern imaging technology (computed tomography (CT), mammography, Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan) have resulted in some improvements in diagnosis; however, the primary site remains unknown in most patients, even on autopsy. The most frequently detected primaries are carcinomas hidden in the lung or pancreas. Several favourable sub-sets of CUP have been identified, which are responsive to systemic chemotherapy and/or locoregional treatment. Identification and treatment of these patients is of paramount importance. The considered responsive sub-sets to platinum-based chemotherapy are the poorly differentiated carcinomas involving the mediastinal-retroperitoneal nodes, the peritoneal papillary serous adenocarcinomatosis in females and the poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Other tumours successfully managed by locoregional treatment with surgery and/or irradiation are the metastatic adenocarcinoma of isolated axillary nodes, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of cervical nodes, or any other single metastatic site. Empirical chemotherapy benefits some of the patients who do not fit into any favourable sub-set, and should be considered in patients with a good performance status.

Volunteers' experiences of becoming arthritis self-management lay leaders: "It's almost as if I've stopped aging and started to get younger!"

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether undergoing training to become a lay leader and conducting an arthritis self-management course is associated with improvements in physical and psychological health status, arthritis self-efficacy, use of self-management techniques, and visits to the general practitioner. In addition, we aimed to describe the experiences of training and course delivery from the older volunteers' perspective.

METHODS

21 participants completed all assessments and had a median age of 58, median disease duration of 10 years, and either osteoarthritis (n = 13) or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 8). The study was a pretest-posttest design with qualitative data collected at 3 points in time: before training, 6 weeks after training, and 6 months after training. Quantitative data were collected through self-administered postal questionnaires at baseline and 6-month followup.

RESULT

Six months after training, participants reported small, significant increases in arthritis self-efficacy for pain (P = 0.002), cognitive symptom management (P = 0.004), and communication with their physician (P = 0.024) and a small, significant decrease in depressed mood (P = 0.04). Qualitative data supported these findings, with participants reporting more confidence, happiness, and a changed outlook on life in general. Volunteerism was associated with altruistic behavior and with filling the vocational void caused by retirement.

CONCLUSION

Findings support the value of volunteerism and training to become lay leaders in arthritis self-management programs. Volunteers reported positive changes both in themselves and in course participants. They enjoyed helping similar others and being involved in a worthwhile activity, and they valued their newly acquired status as lay leaders. Many had begun to apply their newfound knowledge about self-management to their own situation, reporting less pain and more willingness "to get on with life."

Modification of eating attitudes and behavior in adolescent girls: A controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based eating disorder prevention program designed to reduce dietary restraint and concern about shape and weight among adolescent girls.

METHOD

A total of 474 girls aged 13-14 years received the program as part of their normal school curriculum. An assessment-only control group included 386 pupils. Measures of eating disorder features, self-esteem, and knowledge were administered before and after the intervention and at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Immediately following the intervention, there was a small reduction in dietary restraint and attitudes to shape and weight in the index group, whereas there was no change in the control group. This reduction was not maintained at 6-month follow-up although the dietary restraint scores of the index group remained lower than those of the control group.

DISCUSSION

This prevention program achieved change in eating attitudes and behavior, although the change was modest in size and not sustained. Focusing on a high-risk subgroup of dieters might be a more fruitful primary prevention strategy.

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

Stealth liposomal doxorubicin (Alzal Corp, Palo Alto, CA) has a slower clearance rate than free doxorubicin, resulting in sustained serum levels. Liposomal encapsulation also leads to increased concentration of drug in tumor tissue. Meta-analysis of previous studies has shown that doxorubicin has activity in epithelial ovarian cancer. The current study was developed to examine the activity of Stealth liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had epithelial ovarian cancer that either progressed on or recurred within 6 months of completion of platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy. All patients had measurable disease. Stealth liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks as a 1-hour infusion.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were treated and included in an intent-to-treat analysis. There were 82 patients who were platinum and paclitaxel refractory and met all study criteria. There was one complete response and 14 partial responses, for a total response rate of 16.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1% to 24.6%). For platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory patients, the response rate was 18.3% (95% CI, 9.9% to 26.7%). Median time to progression was 19. 3 weeks for the entire population. Ten patients (11.2%) withdrew because of adverse events related to the drug (palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia [PPE], n = 3; asthenia, n = 2; cardiac, n = 2; neutropenia, n = 1; stomatitis, n = 1; and edema, n = 1). There were no drug-related fatal events. There were only eight grade 4 adverse events attributable to the drug. Stomatitis, PPE, and skin lesions were managed with dose reductions and delays in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Stealth liposomal doxorubicin has activity in refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. PPE and stomatitis can usually be managed by dose adjustment. The ease of administration makes this an attractive agent.

Adjuvant dose-intense chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in stage II-III breast cancer with five to nine involved axillary lymph nodes

The purpose of this study is to determine outcomes for patients with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Forty-three patients with stage II-III disease, five to nine positive axillary lymph nodes, and a median age of 44 years (range, 27-60 years) were enrolled in a study that included: 1) standard dose doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate adjuvant therapy; 2) cyclophosphamide, etoposide, filgrastim, and peripheral blood stem cell harvest; and 3) high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) followed by peripheral blood stem cell infusion. All 43 patients received doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate, 42 (98%) received etoposide, and 41 (95%) received CTCb. Thirty-two patients (74%) are alive, 28 (65%) without relapse at a median of 55 months (range, 41-87 months). Two died (5%) of treatment-related causes, (subclavian catheter complication after etoposide and late radiation pneumonitis), and nine other deaths (21%) were associated with recurrent breast cancer. The probabilities of overall and event-free survival at 4 years were 0.77 and 0.67, respectively, compared with 0.82 and 0.69, respectively, for 72 similar patients with 10 or more positive axillary nodes receiving the same sequence of therapy. Thus, patients with five to nine positive axillary lymph nodes have a similar risk of failure after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell support as patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes.

Sequential treatment including high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer: outpatient administration in community cancer centers

The authors determined outcomes for patients with localized high-risk breast cancer undergoing sequential outpatient treatment with conventional-dose adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy, and growth factor mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with PBSC support in community cancer centers. Ninety-six patients with stage II-IIIB noninflammatory breast cancer with 10 or more positive lymph nodes and a median age of 46 years (range, 22-60 years) were treated with: 1) doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM), four courses at 2-week intervals; 2) cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and etoposide (600 mg/m2) (CE), followed by filgrastim (6 microg/kg per day) and PBSC harvest; and 3) cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb), followed by PBSC infusion. All 96 patients received AFM, 95 (99%) received CE, and 95 (99%) received CTCb with a median hospital stay of 12 days (5-34 days) for all phases of treatment. Sixty-nine patients (72%) are alive, 55 (57%) without relapse at a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 37-77 months). One patient (1%) died of acute myeloid leukemia and all other deaths were associated with recurrent breast cancer. The probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) at 4 years for patients with or without locally advanced disease were 0.37 and 0.69, respectively (p = 0.004), and 0.71 and 0.48 for patients who were estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive or ER/PR negative, respectively (p = 0.016). In multivariate analyses, locally advanced disease (relative risk, 2.3; p = 0.021) and ER/PR-negative hormone receptor status (relative risk, 2.2; p = 0.014) were the only adverse risk factors for EFS identified. Patients with zero, one, or two of these adverse risk factors had 4-year EFS of 0.80, 0.56, and 0.33, respectively. The sequential administration of AFM, CE, and CTCb followed by PBSC in an outpatient community setting was well tolerated in patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer. More intensive or more novel treatment strategies will be required to decrease relapses in patients who have ER/PR-negative tumors and/or have locally advanced disease.

A randomized trial of two doses of cyclophosphamide with etoposide and G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in 318 patients with stage II-III breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to develop a less toxic outpatient chemotherapy regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Three hundred eighteen patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III breast cancer who had received conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 6 micrograms/kg/day (ID-Cy, n = 162) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and the same doses of etoposide and G-CSF (HD-Cy, n = 156) followed by collection of PBSC. Three hundred seventeen of 318 patients had apheresis performed, and 315 received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by PBSC support. The median numbers of CD34+ cells collected in a median of two apheresis following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 19.9 and 22.2 x 10(6)/kg, respectively (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients achieving CD34+ cell doses > or = 2.5 or > or = 5.0 x 10(6)/kg were not different between the two regimens. More patients receiving HD-Cy had grade 3-4 nausea (p = 0.001), vomiting (p = 0.03), and mucositis (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients having a neutrophil nadir < 0.5 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.83 and 0.95, respectively (p = < 0.001). The fractions of patients having a platelet nadir < 25 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.13 and 0.51, respectively (p = < 0.001). More patients in the HD-Cy group received platelet (p < 0.001) and red blood cell (p < 0.001) transfusions and were admitted to the hospital more frequently (p = 0.03) than patients receiving ID-Cy. Three hundred fifteen patients received HDC followed by infusion of PBSC. There were no significant differences in the incidence of transplant-related death or early survival between patients receiving ID-Cy or HD-Cy followed by HDC. It was concluded that a regimen of Cy 2 g/m2 with etoposide and G-CSF was effective for mobilization of PBSC with low morbidity and resource utilization in patients with limited prior chemotherapy exposure.

Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study

PURPOSE

The antiemetic effectiveness and safety of single-dose oral granisetron were compared with intravenous (I.V.) ondansetron in chemotherapy-naive patients who received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this double-blind, parallel-group study, patients naive to emetogenic chemotherapy (N = 1,085) who were scheduled to receive cyclophosphamide- (500 to 1,200 mg/m2) or carboplatin (> or = 300 mg/m2) based chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either oral granisetron (n = 542) or I.V. ondansetron (n = 543). Efficacy assessments included the proportion of patients in each treatment group with total control over the 24 and 48 hours following chemotherapy initiation, as well as incidence and severity of nausea and emesis and use of antiemetic rescue medication. Prophylactic corticosteroids were allowed. Safety assessment was based on patients' reports of adverse experiences.

RESULTS

Approximately 80% of patients received prophylactic corticosteroids. Single-dose oral granisetron (2 mg) and I.V. ondansetron (32 mg) resulted in equivalent levels of total emetic control during the first 48 hours after chemotherapy. The proportion of nausea- and emesis-free patients at 24 and 48 hours were also approximately equivalent. The most commonly reported adverse experiences were headache, asthenia, and constipation. More patients who received ondonsetron than granisetron reported dizziness (9.6% v 5.4%, respectively; P = .011) and abnormal vision (4.2% v 0.6%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A single oral dose of granisetron (2 mg) resulted in equivalent levels of antiemetic protection as I.V. ondansetron (32 mg). Both agents were well tolerated, although more dizziness and abnormal vision were reported with ondansetron. Because the two antiemetic regimens exhibited equivalent efficacies, additional factors such as convenience and cost of therapy should be considered.

High-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell infusion in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of outpatient treatment in community cancer centers

The outcomes for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion by practicing oncologists in community cancer centers in the United States were determined. Eighty-three patients with NHL, who had failed conventional chemotherapy, underwent mobilization of PBSC with chemotherapy and a recombinant growth factor in an outpatient facility. At a median of 40 days (range 26-119) after mobilization chemotherapy all received carmustine (300 mg/m2 x 1), etoposide (150 mg/m2 twice a day x 4 days), cytarabine (100 mg/m2 twice a day x 4 days) and cyclophosphamide (35 mg/kg x 4 days) (BEAC) followed by infusion of unmanipulated PBSC in an outpatient facility. The probabilities of treatment-related mortality, relapse/progression, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years for all 83 patients were 0.07, 0.57, 0.49 and 0.38, respectively. The probabilities of relapse/progression, OS and EFS at 3 years for 28 patients who had failed primary induction chemotherapy were 0.55, 0.42 and 0.38, respectively. The probabilities of OS and EFS for 27 patients in untreated first relapse were 0.52 and 0.44, respectively, as compared to 0.56 and 0.32, respectively, for 18 patients who had reinduction attempts prior to receiving mobilization chemotherapy (P = 0.81 for OS and 0.99 for EFS). No significant risk factors for the outcomes of TRM, relapse/progression, OS or EFS could be identified. These data demonstrate that approximately 40% of patients with NHL who have failed conventional chemotherapy become long-term disease-free survivors after mobilization chemotherapy, high-dose BEAC and PBSC infusion administered in an outpatient setting in community cancer centers, with the major cause of failure being relapse. Results obtained in this study are comparable to published data in similar patient populations receiving therapy as inpatients, suggesting that clinical trials involving well-tested HDC regimens can be carried out safely in this setting.

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells after the administration of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of 497 patients

BACKGROUND

There is great interpatient variability in the number of peripheral blood stem cells collected, as measured by CD34+ cell content, after the administration of chemotherapy and a growth factor. The ability to predict patients who fail to yield adequate quantities of CD34+ cells would be of value. However, very few reports include large numbers of patients treated in an identical fashion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Between 1991 and 1995, 497 consecutive patients with a variety of malignant diseases received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (6 micrograms/kg/day) for mobilization and collection of a target dose > or = 2.5 x 10(8) CD34+ cells per kg. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with failure to achieve this target harvest.

RESULTS

A median of 14.71 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 0.08-137.55) was harvested with a median of 2 (range, 1-11) apheresis procedures. Ninety-one percent of patients yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(5) CD34+ cells per kg. Patients with Stage II-III breast cancer, who had pretreatment platelet counts > or = 150 x 10(9) per L and patients who underwent < or = 1 prior chemotherapy regimen had improved CD34+ cell yields. However, most patients with adverse risk factors yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg.

CONCLUSION

A regimen of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor led to the successful collection of adequate numbers of CD34+ cells in most patients without excessive toxicity. These observations confirm previous reports that intense prior therapy adversely affects the quantity of CD34+ cells harvested. Pretreatment and posttreatment variables did not predict with any certainty the small fraction of patients who fail to yield > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg via multiple apheresis procedures.

Phase III double-blind comparison of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron and an evaluation of the additive role of dexamethasone in the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of dolasetron and ondansetron in controlling nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours; to evaluate the efficacy when dexamethasone is added to either drug in the first 24 hours; and to extend these comparisons over 7 days in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study with six parallel arms that used a 2 x 2 factorial design in chemotherapy-naive patients. In arm 1, dolasetron (2.4 mg/kg) was given intravenously (I.V.) prechemotherapy, followed 24 hours later by oral dolasetron (200 mg once daily) for 6 days. Arms 2 and 3 consisted of dolasetron and dexamethasone 8 mg I.V., followed 24 hours later by oral dexamethasone (8 mg once daily) in one arm, and oral dexamethasone and dolasetron in the other, also for 6 days. In arms 4, 5, and 6, ondansetron (32 mg I.V. or 8 mg orally twice daily) was administered in a similar manner to arms 1, 2, and 3 before and 24 hours after chemotherapy. Mean nausea severity (MNS) was assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) in a daily diary.

RESULTS

Of 703 patients enrolled, 696 were eligible. There were 343 dolasetron- and 353 ondansetron-treated patients; 57% of dolasetron-treated patients had complete protection in the first 24 hours versus 67% of patients who received ondansetron (P = .013). MNS was also more pronounced on the dolasetron arm (P = .051). Sixty-seven percent of patients who received added dexamethasone in the first 24 hours had complete protection, compared with 55% without dexamethasone (P < .001). MNS was significantly reduced with the addition of dexamethasone (P < .001). At 7 days, dolasetron and ondansetron had equivalent complete protection rates (36% and 39%, respectively). With the addition of dexamethasone, 48% of patients compared with 28% had complete protection (P < .001). MNS was significantly improved with added dexamethasone (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

At the doses used, dolasetron was significantly less effective than ondansetron at controlling nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, but there was no demonstrable difference between both drugs over 7 days. The addition of dexamethasone significantly improved the efficacy of both drugs in the first 24 hours and over 7 days.

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells following administration of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and filgrastim in patients with breast and ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the toxicities and efficacy of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide (Cy), and recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) administered for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-one patients with breast (n = 115) or ovarian cancer (n = 26) received paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 and Cy 2 gm/m2 (n = 42) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, Cy 3 gm/m2 (n = 99), and filgrastim (6 micrograms/kg/day) followed by collection of PBSC by apheresis.

RESULTS

The 2 dose levels of paclitaxel and Cy tested were well tolerated. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients was 6.53 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.11-51.76) collected with a median of 2 aphereses (range, 1-8). The target dose of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved in 85% of patients. The mean daily collection of CD34+ cells was 5.46 x 10(6)/kg for patients receiving 200 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and 3 gm/m2 of Cy as compared to 2.77 for patients receiving the lower doses (p = 0.0005). Increasing the dose of paclitaxel and Cy did not significantly increase the fraction of patients achieving a target dose of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (87% vs 81%, p = 0.367) but did increase the fraction achieving a target of 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (73% vs 45%, p = 0.002). The mean daily collection of CD34+ cells for patients who had received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen was 6.59 x 10(6)/kg as compared to 3.47 for patients who had received more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen (p < 0.0001). Prior radiation therapy (p = 0.003) and patient performance status (p = 0.047) were adverse risk factors for achieving a target dose of > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of paclitaxel, Cy, and filgrastim can be administered with acceptable toxicity, allowing collection of adequate quantities of PBSC from the majority of patients with breast and ovarian cancer. Increasing the doses of paclitaxel and Cy increased the number of CD34+ cells collected and decreased the number of apheresis procedures necessary to collect target cell doses. However, increasing drug doses did not increase the fraction of patients yielding the minimum CD34+ target dose of 2.5 x 10(6)/kg. Collection of PBSC early in the disease course is the best strategy to assure optimal CD34+ cell doses in all patients.

Treatment-related mortality in 1000 consecutive patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in community cancer centers

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) is being increasingly utilized as a therapeutic modality for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive disease. Several published HDC regimens have become relatively widely used. The purpose of this analysis was to determine treatment-related mortality (TRM) following administration of five different HDC regimens in community cancer centers. A retrospective evaluation of 1000 consecutive patients with leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, sarcoma, ovarian cancer, or breast cancer who received one of five published HDC regimens followed by PBPC infusion over a 5-year period in community cancer centers was performed to determine TRM. Fifty-nine patients (5.9%) died within 100 days of PBPC infusion. Twenty-five patients (2.5%) died predominantly of causes related to disease progression. Thirty-four patients (3.4%) died of TRM, 15 patients (1.5%) died from infection and 19 (1.9%) died from regimen-related toxicities (RRT). In a logistic model, increasing age (P = 0.001) and lower numbers of CD34+ cells/kg (P = 0.003) were associated with an increased risk of 100-day TRM. High-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin was associated with a lower risk of mortality than other regimens (P = 0.0001). High-dose chemotherapy and autologous PBPC support can be performed in community cancer centers with relative safety. Patient age, the type of preparative regimen and the number of CD34+ cells infused were important determinates of mortality.

Induction, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), high-dose chemotherapy and PBSC infusion in patients with untreated stage IV breast cancer: outcomes by intent to treat analyses

We investigated the outcomes of patients with breast cancer undergoing induction chemotherapy, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with PBSC infusion. One hundred and fourteen patients with untreated stage IV breast cancer, with a median age of 46 years (range 24-62), were entered on a phase II trial consisting of; (1) doxorubicin, 5-flurouracil, methotrexate (AFM) x 4 courses at 2 week intervals; (2) cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), cisplatin (105 mg/m2) (CEP), filgrastim (6 micrograms/kg/day) and PBSC collection; (3) cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), carboplatin (800 mg/m2), (CTCb) followed by PBSC infusion. All patients received AFM, 107 (94%) received CEP, 93 (82%) received CTCb and PBSC as per protocol and 99 (87%) ultimately received HDC and PBSC. There was one infectious death after AFM and all other deaths were associated with progressive disease. Fifty-two patients (46%) are alive, 21 (18%) without progression, at a median 31 months (range 22-47). The probabilities of survival and progression-free survival at 3.5 years were 0.40 and 0.17, respectively. All 62 patients with visceral disease and/or a prior history of doxorubicin adjuvant therapy have relapsed or progressed. We conclude that the sequential administration of AFM, CEP and CTCb followed by PBSC resulted in long-term PFS only in patients who were NED, had bone-only disease or had lymph node or soft tissue disease with or without bone disease. Other strategies, aimed at improving responses to initial therapy, improving HDC regimens and/or developing immunomodulatory therapies, will be necessary to improve PFS for patients who fail doxorubicin adjuvant or who have visceral disease.

The role of the 5-HT3 antagonists ondansetron and dolasetron in the control of delayed onset nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

5-HT3 antagonists are effective in reducing the acute nausea and vomiting caused by cancer chemotherapy. However, it is not clear whether continuing these agents beyond twenty four hours is useful in controlling emesis on days two to seven after chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred seven patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who had been given dexamethasone 8 mg i.v. and either ondansetron 32 mg i.v. or dolasetron 2.4 mg/kg i.v. were randomized to continue either an oral form of their 5-HT3 antagonist (ondansetron 8 mg b.i.d. or dolasetron 200 mg daily) plus dexamethasone 8 mg p.o. daily or dexamethasone alone for days two to seven. Endpoints assessed by self-report were: 1) complete control (no vomiting, no rescue medications, no missing data) of emesis; 2) nausea severity; and 3) quality-of-life as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30.

RESULTS

Continuation of 5-HT3 antagonists improved slightly, but not significantly, the complete control rate (47% vs. 41%: P = 0.24 one-sided) after chemotherapy. However, mean nausea severity was significantly (P = 0.015 one sided) reduced (by 3 mm on a 10 cm scale) on the combined arm. Minimal differences in quality of life were observed.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of continuing 5-HT3 antagonists beyond 24 hours is modest and the merits of routine use in these circumstances debatable.