1
|
Kwong A, Shin V, Au CH, Ho C, Slavin T, Weitzel J, Chan TL, Ma E. Abstract P5-09-12: Germline mutation in TP53 gene in a cohort of 2,561 Chinese high-risk breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-09-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal genetic disorder with germline TP53 mutations. Patients with TP53 mutations have a higher risk of developing breast cancer than those harboring BRCA mutations. Although limited studies have shown that TP53 mutation carriers are less responsive to low dose radiation and more susceptible to induce new malignancies from radiotherapy. Moreover screening strategies allows early detection of a spectrum of cancers related to TP53 mutations. From work of BRCA mutations where over 40% novel mutations were detected in Chinese cohort, it is important to evaluate the frequency of TP53 mutation in Chinese to better understand the spectrum to guide appropriate clinical management of these high risk individuals.
Methods: TP53 gene mutation screening was performed on 2,561 high-risk breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing. The patients were accrued by Hong Kong Hereditary and High Risk Breast Cancer Program from March 2007 to May 2018. All detected pathogenic mutations were further validated by bi-directional DNA sequencing and analyzed by our in-house developed bioinformatics pipeline.
Results: Sixteen distinct pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified, and 3 of them were de novo TP53 mutations (18.75%). The mean age of patients who harbored TP53 mutation was 30.44 years (range 18-44), and 50% of the tumors were bilateral breast cancer. Of sixteen different pathogenic mutations, majority of them were missense mutation (87.5%), and 2 were nonsense mutation (12.5%). Four of the sixteen TP53 mutation carriers had family history of breast cancer, while others had a family history of lung cancer (43.75%).
Conclusion: This study revealed that seven patients were found to habor TP53 mutation even when they did not meet the criteria of LFS of LFS-like phenotype, implicated the importance of using multigene panel test for probands and their relatives to offer a comprehensive surveillance programe for TP53 carriers.
Citation Format: Kwong A, Shin V, Au CH, Ho C, Slavin T, Weitzel J, Chan TL, Ma E. Germline mutation in TP53 gene in a cohort of 2,561 Chinese high-risk breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-09-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kwong
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - V Shin
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - CH Au
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - C Ho
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - T Slavin
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - J Weitzel
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - TL Chan
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - E Ma
- The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Somlo G, Frankel P, Luu T, Ma C, Arun B, Garcia A, Cigler T, Fleming G, Harvey H, Sparano J, Nanda R, Chew H, Moynihan T, Vahdat L, Goetz M, Hurria A, Mortimer J, Gandara D, Chen A, Weitzel J. Abstract P2-16-05: Efficacy of ABT-888 (veliparib) in patients with BRCA-associated breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p2-16-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The potential for exploiting BRCA deficiencies with DNA repair inhibitors has both pre-clinical and clinical support. ABT-888 (veliparib), a DNA repair inhibitor initially thought to target Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases (PARP), has demonstrated in vitro inhibition of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficient mouse embryonic stell cells, with a larger effect on BRCA1 cells. We report on the pre-planned interim analysis of the efficacy of single agent veliparib in patients with either BRCA1 or BRCA2-associated stage IV breast cancer. Methods: BRCA 1 or 2 carrier patients with stage IV breast cancer, with measurable disease, without prior exposure to a PARP inhibitor or a platinum compound in the metastatic setting, were eligible. Velapirib was administered orally, at doses of 400 mg twice daily. Dose adjustments based on toxicity were permitted. Patients progressing on velapirib alone received carboplatin at an AUC of 5, IV, given Q 21 days, and velapirib 150 mg twice daily (the maximum tolerated dose [MTD] of the combination from our completed Phase I study: J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 [suppl; abstr 1024]). Patients were to be accrued from 7 NCI NO1- supported consortia. Initially 10 patients were to be accrued to each stratum (BRCA1 and BRCA2) to provide evidence of single agent activity. If there was sufficient activity to warrant consideration of velapirib as single agent therapy (defined as 2 or more confirmed partial [PR] or better responses out of 10 per stratum), an additional 12 patients would be accrued per stratum. Results: 20 evaluable patients (11 BRCA1 and 9 BRCA2 [1 in screening]) have been accrued, the majority with lung or liver as visceral metastatic sites of disease. Median age (range) is 46 (29-68) years. Tumors from 9 patients were hormone receptor positive. BRCA1 cohort: 4 of 11 patients are off treatment at a median of 2 months (1-4); 1 patient stopped velapirib due to toxicity (grade 2 rash/pruritus, grade 2 vomiting), 3 stopped for progressive disease (one with an unconfirmed PR). Seven patients are still on single agent veliparib with 1 unconfirmed PR, and 1 patient with two evaluations showing stable disease. BRCA2 cohort: 2 patients are off treatment at 2 months for progressive disease, 7 are still on treatment with 1 confirmed PR, and 3 unconfirmed PRs. Data on patients receiving combination of velapirib and carboplatin after progression is too early. Treatment-related toxicity is being updated and has so far been reported from 14 patients: 1 patient had grade 3 fatigue, 1 patient with liver metastasis had both grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevation and grade 3 abdominal pain. Grade 2 toxicities occurring in more than 1 patient included nausea/vomiting (6 patients), chills (2 patients), and fatigue (2 patients). Conclusion: Velapirib has single agent activity in both BRCA1 and BRCA2-associated stage IV breast cancer patients, and is well-tolerated. Mature response, treatment, and toxicity data will be presented.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Somlo
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - P Frankel
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - T Luu
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - C Ma
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - B Arun
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - A Garcia
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - T Cigler
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - G Fleming
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - H Harvey
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - J Sparano
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - R Nanda
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - H Chew
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - T Moynihan
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - L Vahdat
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - M Goetz
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - A Hurria
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - J Mortimer
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - D Gandara
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - A Chen
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - J Weitzel
- City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; University of California, Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Klifa C, Sand S, Vora L, Press M, Orisamolu A, Pike M, Spicer D, Daniels A, Blazer K, Weitzel J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging quantification of breast density in BRCA carriers following gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA)-based hormonal chemoprevention. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.1506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1506 Background: Breast tissue density limits the usefulness of mammography as a surveillance tool in young women. Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides high tissue contrast and three-dimensional structural information not impaired by high breast density. We developed a volumetric “MR density” measure of breast structural composition that may be complementary to mammographic breast density. We tested this MR density measure in unaffected women with known high risk of breast cancer due to a BRCA gene mutation (or empiric risk > 30% lifetime), who were recruited in a phase II trial to study the effects of a hormonal chemoprevention regimen. Methods: Nine premenopausal high-risk women age 21 to 48 were treated with intranasal GnRHA (deslorelin), low-dose estradiol, and testosterone daily for 10 months. All patients underwent one contrast-enhanced breast MRI exam before and after treatment. We measured MR density as the ratio of fibroglandular tissue volume to total volume of the breast, at both time points. Our technique involved the semi-automated delineation of the breast and the automated segmentation of fibroglandular from adipose tissue. An “MR index” was also defined to quantify partial voluming effects due to the presence of adipose/fibroglandular edges in the MR data. Results: Eight out of nine patients showed a reduction in MR density (p = 0.026) with treatment. Three patients had less than 5% MR density at baseline, making it difficult to quantitate a change with treatment. All of the remaining six patients had reduced MR density after treatment (mean reduction 35.5%; p = 0.035). Conclusions: We have demonstrated the use of breast MR density as a robust volumetric quantitative measure of breast tissue composition. Our findings suggest that MR could be used to measure hormonal chemoprevention effects in BRCA carriers. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Klifa
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - S. Sand
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - L. Vora
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - M. Press
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - A. Orisamolu
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - M. Pike
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - D. Spicer
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - A. Daniels
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - K. Blazer
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| | - J. Weitzel
- University of California, San Francisco, CA; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, CA
| |
Collapse
|