Statin therapy in critically-ill patients with severe sepsis: a review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

While statins are indicated to reduce blood cholesterol levels, they also have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Several observational cohort studies suggested that statins may improve survival and reduce complications in patients with sepsis. Recent randomized controlled studies in critically ill patients have been conducted and published. In this paper we present a meta-analysis of these randomized trials.

METHODS

An electronic article search through PubMed was performed. Only randomized controlled trials including critically ill adult patients with severe sepsis were retained. A meta-analysis was performed as detailed in text below. Overall analysis including 1818 patients total from 4 studies showed that there was no difference in 60-day mortality between statins (223/903) and placebo (233/899) [risk ratio, 0.930; 95% CI, 0.722 to 1.198]. Similarly, no difference in 28-day mortality was observed between groups (statins 191/907, placebo 199/911; risk ratio 0.953; 95% CI, 0.715 to 1.271). The results of this meta-analysis confirm that the use of statin therapy should not be recommended in the management of severe sepsis in critically ill patients. Statins should be continued with caution and only if necessary, as one study reported that the statin group had a higher rate of hepatic and renal failure.

A multicenter pilot study of a bronchial valve for the treatment of severe emphysema

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects millions of people and has limited treatment options. Surgical treatments for severe COPD with emphysema are effective for highly selected patients. A minimally invasive method for treating emphysema could decrease morbidity and increase acceptance by patients.

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety and effectiveness of the IBV(R) Valve for the treatment of severe emphysema.

METHODS

A multicenter study treated 91 patients with severe obstruction, hyperinflation and upper lobe (UL)-predominant emphysema with 609 bronchial valves placed bilaterally into ULs.

RESULTS

Valves were placed in desired airways with 99.7% technical success and no migration or erosion. There were no procedure-related deaths and 30-day morbidity and mortality were 5.5 and 1.1%, respectively. Pneumothorax was the most frequent serious device-related complication and primarily occurred when all segments of a lobe, especially the left UL, were occluded. Highly significant health-related quality of life (HRQL) improvement (-8.2 +/- 16.2, mean +/- SD change at 6 months) was observed. HRQL improvement was associated with a decreased volume (mean -294 +/- 427 ml, p = 0.007) in the treated lobes without visible atelectasis. FEV(1), exercise tests, and total lung volume were not changed but there was a proportional shift, a redirection of inspired volume to the untreated lobes. Combined with perfusion scan changes, this suggests that there is improved ventilation and perfusion matching in non-UL lung parenchyma.

CONCLUSION

Bronchial valve treatment of emphysema has multiple mechanisms of action and acceptable safety, and significantly improves quality of life for the majority of patients.