Artificial intelligence-adjudicated spatiotemporal dispersion: A patient-unique fingerprint of persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Spatiotemporal dispersion-guided ablation is a tailored approach for patients in persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). The characterization of dispersion extent and distribution and its association with common clinical descriptors of PsAF patients has not been studied.

OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence-adjudicated dispersion extent and distribution (AI-DED) was obtained with a machine/deep learning classifier (VX1 Software, Volta Medical) in PsAF patients undergoing ablation. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that AI-DED is unique to each patient and independent of common procedural and clinical parameters.

METHODS

In a subanalysis of the Ev-AIFib study (NCT03434964), spatiotemporal dispersion maps were built with VX1 software in 78 consecutive persistent and long-standing PsAF patients. AI-DED was quantified using 2 distinct approaches (visual regional characterization or automated global quantification of AI-DED).

RESULTS

AI-DED paired-subregion Euclidean distance measurements between 78 patients (average distance 5.07 ± 0.60; min 2.23; max 9.75) demonstrate that AI-DED is a patient-unique characteristic of PsAF. Importantly, both AF type and AF history do not correlate with AI-DED levels (R2 = 0.006, P = .53; and R2 = 0.03, P = .25, respectively). The most extensive AI-DED levels are not associated with poorer procedural (83%, 81%, and 83% of AF termination in low, medium, and high dispersion groups, respectively; P = .954) and long-term (88%, 75%, and 91% of freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia after multiple procedures; P = .517) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The atrial distribution and extent of multipolar electrogram spatiotemporal dispersion follow a nonrandom, albeit patient-unique, distribution in PsAF patients. AI-DED may represent a procedure-implementable fingerprint of the PsAF substrate.

Artificial intelligence software standardizes electrogram-based ablation outcome for persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Multiple groups have reported on the usefulness of ablating in atrial regions exhibiting abnormal electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF). Still, previous studies have suggested that ablation outcomes are highly operator- and center-dependent. This study sought to evaluate a novel machine learning software algorithm named VX1 (Volta Medical), trained to adjudicate multipolar electrogram dispersion.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, multicentric, nonrandomized study conducted to assess the feasibility of generating VX1 dispersion maps. In 85 patients, 8 centers, and 17 operators, we compared the acute and long-term outcomes after ablation in regions exhibiting dispersion between primary and satellite centers. We also compared outcomes to a control group in which dispersion-guided ablation was performed visually by trained operators.

RESULTS

The study population included 29% of long-standing persistent AF. AF termination occurred in 92% and 83% of the patients in primary and satellite centers, respectively, p = 0.31. The average rate of freedom from documented AF, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), was 86% after a single procedure, and 89% after an average of 1.3 procedures per patient (p = 0.4). The rate of freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia, with or without AADs, was 54% and 73% after a single or an average of 1.3 procedures per patient, respectively (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences between outcomes of the primary versus satellite centers were observed for one (p = 0.8) or multiple procedures (p = 0.4), or between outcomes of the entire study population versus the control group (p > 0.2). Interestingly, intraprocedural AF termination and type of recurrent arrhythmia (i.e., AF vs. AT) appear to be predictors of the subsequent clinical course.

CONCLUSION

VX1, an expertise-based artificial intelligence software solution, allowed for robust center-to-center standardization of acute and long-term ablation outcomes after electrogram-based ablation.