Research Note: Perspectives on the Hierarchy of HIV and Hepatitis C Disease: Consequences for Drug Treatment Program Patients

Injection drug users (IDUs) face an increased risk of acquiring blood borne viral infections, including HIV and the hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, the discrepancy in funding for services to address these two diseases has implications. Although drug treatment programs have played an important role in fighting HIV/AIDS, the HCV-related services offered at these programs remain limited. Research from other countries suggests that drug users view HCV as less important than HIV, yet little is known about the extent to which our society's focus on HIV has been adopted within the drug treatment program culture. This qualitative study examines the perceptions of both staff (n = 165) and clients (n = 215) at these programs with regard to HIV and HCV and presents data on how staffs' attitudes toward HCV changed after participating in an HCV training. Clients described a services landscape at drug treatment programs that favors HIV services over those targeting HCV.

Correlates of drug treatment program staff's self efficacy to support their clients' hepatitis C virus (HCV) related needs

Drug treatment staff are uniquely situated to support their clients' HCV related needs, and those with greater self efficacy to do so are more likely to provide this support. Using data collected from staff (N = 140) in 6 drug treatment programs in New York City, we determined the correlates of this self efficacy. Results indicate that medically credentialed staff and staff with more hepatitis C knowledge have greater self efficacy to support their clients' HCV related needs. There was no relationship between this self efficacy and the staff member's own HCV infection or that of a close relative. Efforts should focus on increasing staff's HCV knowledge in order to increase their confidence in providing HCV related support to their clients.

Using latent class analysis to identify patterns of hepatitis C service provision in drug-free treatment programs in the U.S

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a global health problem, and in many countries (including the U.S.), illicit drug users constitute the group at greatest risk for contracting and transmitting HCV. Drug treatment programs are therefore unique sites of opportunity for providing medical care and support for many HCV infected individuals. This paper determines subtypes of a large sample of U.S. drug-free treatment programs (N=333) according to services they provide to patients with HCV infection, and examines the organizational and aggregate patient characteristics of programs in these subtypes. A latent class analysis identified four subtypes of HCV service provision: a "Most Comprehensive Services" class (13% of the sample), a "Comprehensive Off-Site Medical Services" class (54%), a "Medical Monitoring Services" class (8%) and a "Minimal Services" class (25%). "Comprehensive" services class programs were less likely to be outpatient and private for profit than those in the other two classes. It is of concern that so many programs belong to the "Minimal Services" class, especially because some of these programs serve many injection drug users. "Minimal Services" class programs in the U.S. need to innovate services so that their HCV infected patients can get the medical and support care they need. Similar analyses in other countries can inform their policy makers about the capacity of their drug treatment programs to provide support to their HCV infected patients.

Hepatitis C knowledge among staff in U.S. drug treatment programs

Staff in drug treatment programs are in an optimal position to support the hepatitis C related needs of their patients. To do so effectively, however, staff need to have accurate information about the hepatitis C virus (HCV). This article examines the HCV knowledge of staff (N= 104) in two drug-free and two methadone maintenance treatment programs (MMTPs) in the New York metropolitan area. Five of 20 items on an HCV Knowledge Assessment were not answered correctly by the majority of the participating staff, and total scores on the Assessment averaged 70%, 71%, and 45% among the medically credentialed staff, non-medically credentialed staff in the MMTPs, and non-medically credentialed staff in the drug-free programs, respectively. The majority of those in the latter group had never participated in a training specifically devoted to HCV. Results suggest the need for effective HCV-related training for all staff in drug treatment programs.