Global survival trends for brain tumors, by histology: analysis of individual records for 556,237 adults diagnosed in 59 countries during 2000-2014 (CONCORD-3)

BACKGROUND

Survival is a key metric of the effectiveness of a health system in managing cancer. We set out to provide a comprehensive examination of worldwide variation and trends in survival from brain tumors in adults, by histology.

METHODS

We analyzed individual data for adults (15-99 years) diagnosed with a brain tumor (ICD-O-3 topography code C71) during 2000-2014, regardless of tumor behavior. Data underwent a 3-phase quality control as part of CONCORD-3. We estimated net survival for 11 histology groups, using the unbiased nonparametric Pohar Perme estimator.

RESULTS

The study included 556,237 adults. In 2010-2014, the global range in age-standardized 5-year net survival for the most common sub-types was broad: in the range 20%-38% for diffuse and anaplastic astrocytoma, from 4% to 17% for glioblastoma, and between 32% and 69% for oligodendroglioma. For patients with glioblastoma, the largest gains in survival occurred between 2000-2004 and 2005-2009. These improvements were more noticeable among adults diagnosed aged 40-70 years than among younger adults.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the largest account to date of global trends in population-based survival for brain tumors by histology in adults. We have highlighted remarkable gains in 5-year survival from glioblastoma since 2005, providing large-scale empirical evidence on the uptake of chemoradiation at population level. Worldwide, survival improvements have been extensive, but some countries still lag behind. Our findings may help clinicians involved in national and international tumor pathway boards to promote initiatives aimed at more extensive implementation of clinical guidelines.

P-732 Definitions and diagnostic criteria for unexplained infertility (UI) – a systematic review

Study question

What are the various inclusion criteria for the definition of unexplained infertility used for recruitment to clinical trials, and is there homogeneity of these definitions?

Summary answer

There is a need to standardise the definition of unexplained infertility when recruiting for clinical trials to optimise interpretation of results and allow appropriate meta-analysis.

What is known already

Unexplained infertility (UI) is a diagnosis of exclusion. The pathology underlying this diagnosis is likely to include different subtle contributing factors.

Unfortunately there is no universally accepted definition of unexplained infertility. NICE in the UK, and ACOG/ASRM both have lists of recommended investigations but no specific minimum standards to define UI. Even the ICMART definition is ambiguous, describing ‘apparently normal’ ovarian function and ejaculate. This may lead to heterogeneity between inclusion criteria in relevant research studies. This introduces selection bias and renders meta-analysis of trial results less meaningful.

A single definition would improve the quality of research for this important diagnosis.

Study design, size, duration

A systematic review of primary research investigating definitions of unexplained infertility in humans. A thorough search of online databases Medline and Embase was performed from inception to November 2021. A bespoke Excel spreadsheet was used to collect data for baseline study characteristics and outcome data. Results are reported as percentages.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

The search strategy included all primary research on heterosexual couple unexplained infertility in human participants. Papers with specified inclusion criteria were included and no date or language restrictions were applied.

From 663 results, title and abstract screening identified 83 duplicates and 6 studies unsuitable for the review. A further 275 papers were excluded after full-text screening. 241 papers remained and their inclusion criteria recorded and analysed.

Main results and the role of chance

Only 35.7% of papers specified duration of infertility. Timescales varied from 1 year (46.5%), 2 years (39.5%) or 3 years (14%).

85% papers specified that semen analysis should be ‘normal’. Of these, 40% used the most recent WHO criteria. No other national or international criteria for grading semen analysis was identified.

90% studies required fallopian tube patency as an inclusion criteria. Of these, 65.4% specified bilateral patency. Methods for demonstrating patency included hysterosalpingogram (HSG) (15.7%), laparoscopy (18.4%), a combination of either (29.5%) or both (24.4%) of these or hystero-contrast-salpingography (0.9%). 11.5% papers did not specify an imaging modality.

48.5% included studies mentioned uterine cavity assessment, 65% of these using HSG to assess the cavity, other methods mentioned include ultrasound (26.5%) or hysteroscopy (15.4%).

Only 5.4% papers required either exclusion of or evidence of only minimal endometriosis

80.5% of included papers required evidence of regular ovulation. 58.7% used luteal serum progesterone levels, 41.2% required regular cycles (patient-reported) and 17.5% used basal body temperature pattern assessment. Other methods mentioned by a minority of papers include endometrial biopsy, ultrasound follicular tracking, serum and urinary luteinising hormone levels. 44% studies required normal endocrine profiles of which 66% measured prolactin and FSH and 50% measured thyroid function.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The strength of this study is that we included all primary research papers studying unexplained infertility with no time limitations. Included studies originated from across the world. This is a thorough representation of criteria used across all clinical trials for unexplained infertility.

Wider implications of the findings

Only 63/241 (26%) studies included duration of infertility, tubal patency, proof of ovulation and semen analysis in their inclusion criteria. This demonstrates the need for standardisation of the definition of unexplained infertility. If future research can apply the same inclusion criteria this will reduce selection bias and allow appropriate meta-analysis.

Trial registration number

NA

Quality of life with encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib treatment in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes from BEACON CRC

Background

In the BEACON CRC study (NCT02928224), encorafenib plus cetuximab with binimetinib {9.3 versus 5.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.60 [0.47-0.75]} or without binimetinib [9.3 versus 5.9 months; HR (95% CI): 0.61 (0.48-0.77)] significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with the previous standard of care (control) in patients with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Quality of life (QoL) was a secondary endpoint, assessed using validated instruments.

Patients and methods

BEACON CRC was a randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib and the investigator’s choice of irinotecan plus cetuximab or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (chemotherapy control) in patients with previously treated BRAF V600E mCRC. Patient-reported QoL assessments included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Colorectal (FACT-C). The primary outcome for these tools was time to definitive 10% deterioration.

Results

Encorafenib plus cetuximab, both with and without binimetinib, was associated with longer median times to definitive 10% deterioration versus the control group in the EORTC Global Health Status scale [HR (95% CI): 0.65 (0.52-0.80) versus 0.61 (0.49-0.75), respectively] and the FACT-C functional well-being subscale [HR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.50-0.76) versus 0.58 (0.47-0.72), respectively]. Consistent results were observed across all subscales of the EORTC and FACT-C instruments. QoL was generally maintained during treatment for the global EORTC and FACT-C scales.

Conclusions

In addition to improving OS, encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib delays QoL decline in previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC.

•

BEACON CRC compares encorafenib + cetuximab ± binimetinib to chemotherapy in previously treated BRAF V600E mCRC.

•

Encorafenib + cetuximab had longer time to 10% deterioration versus control in QoL and functional well-being scales.

•

Encorafenib + cetuximab ± binimetinib delays QoL decline in previously treated patients with BRAF V600E mCRC.

Management of adverse events from the treatment of encorafenib plus cetuximab for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: insights from the BEACON CRC study

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year relative survival of 14% in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients with BRAF V600E mutations, which occur in ∼10%-15% of patients with mCRC, have a poorer prognosis compared with those with wild-type BRAF tumours. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab currently represents the only chemotherapy-free targeted therapy approved in the USA and Europe for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. As a class, BRAF inhibitors are associated with dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and renal events, as well as pyrexia and secondary skin malignancies. Adverse event (AE) profiles of specific BRAF inhibitors vary, however, and are affected by the specific agents given in combination. In patients with mCRC, commonly reported AEs of cetuximab monotherapy include infusion reactions and dermatologic toxicities. Data from the phase III BEACON CRC study indicate that the combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has a distinct safety profile. Here we review the most frequently reported AEs that occurred with this combination in BEACON CRC and best practices for managing and mitigating AEs that require more than standard supportive care.

Diagnosis and management of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion sarcomas: expert recommendations from the World Sarcoma Network

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with mesenchymal lineage differentiation. The discovery of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions as tissue-agnostic oncogenic drivers has led to new personalized therapies for a subset of patients with sarcoma in the form of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors. NTRK gene rearrangements and fusion transcripts can be detected with different molecular pathology techniques, while TRK protein expression can be demonstrated with immunohistochemistry. The rarity and diagnostic complexity of NTRK gene fusions raise a number of questions and challenges for clinicians. To address these challenges, the World Sarcoma Network convened two meetings of expert adult oncologists and pathologists and subsequently developed this article to provide practical guidance on the management of patients with sarcoma harboring NTRK gene fusions. We propose a diagnostic strategy that considers disease stage and histologic and molecular subtypes to facilitate routine testing for TRK expression and subsequent testing for NTRK gene fusions.

Phase Ib study of atezolizumab combined with cobimetinib in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence suggests that MEK inhibition promotes accumulation and survival of intratumoral tumor-specific T cells and can synergize with immune checkpoint inhibition. We investigated the safety and clinical activity of combining a MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib, and a programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, atezolizumab, in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I/Ib study treated PD-L1/PD-1-naive patients with solid tumors in a dose-escalation stage and then in multiple, indication-specific dose-expansion cohorts. In most patients, cobimetinib was dosed once daily orally for 21 days on, 7 days off. Atezolizumab was dosed at 800 mg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Secondary end points included objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between 27 December 2013 and 9 May 2016, 152 patients were enrolled. As of 4 September 2017, 150 patients received ≥1 dose of atezolizumab, including 14 in the dose-escalation cohorts and 136 in the dose-expansion cohorts. Patients had metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; n = 84), melanoma (n = 22), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n = 28), and other solid tumors (n = 16). The most common all-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (67%), rash (48%), and fatigue (40%), similar to those with single-agent cobimetinib and atezolizumab. One (<1%) treatment-related grade 5 AE occurred (sepsis). Forty-five (30%) and 23 patients (15%) had AEs that led to discontinuation of cobimetinib and atezolizumab, respectively. Confirmed responses were observed in 7 of 84 patients (8%) with mCRC (6 responders were microsatellite low/stable, 1 was microsatellite instable), 9 of 22 patients (41%) with melanoma, and 5 of 28 patients (18%) with NSCLC. Clinical activity was independent of KRAS/BRAF status across diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Atezolizumab plus cobimetinib had manageable safety and clinical activity irrespective of KRAS/BRAF status. Although potential synergistic activity was seen in mCRC, this was not confirmed in a subsequent phase III study.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01988896 (the investigators in the NCT01988896 study are listed in the supplementary Appendix, available at Annals of Oncology online).

Abstract PD1-06: A phase 1b dose-escalation and expansion study of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax combined with tamoxifen in ER and BCL-2–positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Background: Venetoclax, a potent and selective inhibitor of the survival protein BCL-2 (recently approved in CLL and in development in other hematopoietic malignancies), has yet to be evaluated in pts with solid tumors. BCL-2 is overexpressed in ˜85% of ER+ breast cancer. Pre-clinical findings using patient-derived xenograft breast tumor models suggest that venetoclax synergizes with endocrine therapy by increasing apoptosis. Here we report mBEP, an investigator-initiated phase 1b study of venetoclax with tamoxifen in 33 pts with ER+ (&gt;1%), BCL-2+ (&gt;10%, 2-3+ intensity) and HER2– MBC.

Methods: We conducted a 3+3 dose escalation study comprising cohorts receiving venetoclax 200, 400, 600 or 800 mg/d with tamoxifen 20 mg/d (continued until progression). The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), define dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In a dose expansion phase (at the RP2D), secondary endpoints including safety and tolerability, response at 24 wks (RECIST v1.1), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were studied.

Results: In the escalation phase (n=15 pts), treatment was well tolerated with no DLTs or high-grade (Gd 3/4) adverse events observed, apart from asymptomatic on-target lymphopenia (Gd 3, 2/15 pts). MTD was not reached. The 800 mg/d dose was selected as the RP2D and the cohort expanded to include 24 pts with ≥24 wks follow up (range 24-105 wks). Fifteen pts had received prior regimens for MBC (median 3, range 1-9) that included tamoxifen in 5/15.

For the RP2D cohort (n=24), overall responses (OR) included 1 CR (4%) and 12 PR (50%), with 5 SD (21%), corresponding to a CBR of 75%. The 9 pts treated in the first line setting experienced a 78% OR (7/9 pts) and 11% SD (1/9 pts), equating to an 89% CBR. The data are immature for determining median PFS for the RP2D cohort (currently 40+ wks).

Treatment responses were pre-empted by metabolic responses (FDG-PET) at 4 wks (seen in 13/16 (81%) pts studied), and correlated with serial changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Intriguingly, responses and clinical benefit were observed in pts with plasma-detected ESR1 mutations (4/10 and 7/10, respectively).

The most common treatment-related AEs (CTCAE v4.0) for all pts were lymphopenia in 29/33 (88%; 57% Gd 1-2, 30% Gd 3-4), neutropenia in 24/33 (73%; 67% Gd 1-2, 6% Gd 3), nausea in 22/33 (67%; all ≤Gd 2), anemia in 13/33 (39%; 33% Gd 1-2, 6% G3), thrombocytopenia in 11/33 (33%; all ≤Gd 2), vomiting in 11/33 (33%, all ≤Gd 2), diarrhea in 10/33 (30%; 24% Gd 1-2, 6% Gd 3), infection in 9/33 (27%; 18% Gd 2, 9% Gd 3) and fatigue in 7/33 (21%; all ≤Gd 2). There was one possible treatment-related SAE (infection).

Conclusions: In the first clinical study to evaluate venetoclax in a solid tumor, we demonstrate that combining venetoclax with endocrine therapy has a tolerable safety profile and elicits remarkable activity in ER+ and BCL-2+ MBC. These findings support further investigation of combination therapy for patients with BCL-2-positive breast cancer.

Sponsor: The Royal Melbourne Hospital (ACTRN12615000702516)

Citation Format: Lindeman GJ, Lok SW, Whittle JR, Siow ZR, Bergin AR, Dawson S-J, Desai J, Gray DH, Liew D, Mann GB, Murugasu A, Roberts AW, Rosenthal MA, Shackleton K, Sherman P, Silva MJ, Teh C, Travers A, Vaillant F, Visvader JE. A phase 1b dose-escalation and expansion study of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax combined with tamoxifen in ER and BCL-2–positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-06.

Gender differences in doxorubicin pharmacology for subjects with chemosensitive cancers of young adulthood

PURPOSE

For many cancers, adolescents and young adults (AYA) have worse outcomes than for children and adults. Many factors may contribute to the AYA survival gap, including differences in biology, therapeutic intent, and adherence to therapy. It has been observed that male AYAs have poorer outcomes than females. The purpose of this work was to test the proposition that gender-related pharmacologic factors may account for a component of the AYA survival gap.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, multi-institutional pharmacologic study of 79 patients in total with chemosensitive cancers (Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma and Hodgkin lymphoma) was conducted, with conventional doxorubicin treatment. Pharmacokinetic data of 13 children, 40 AYAs and 13 adults were valid for analysis. Population pharmacokinetics models were developed for doxorubicin and its metabolite doxorubicinol based on the data created in this study. Consequently, model-based analysis was conducted to investigate the relevant topics.

RESULTS

The clearance of doxorubicinol (normalized to body surface area), the main active metabolite of doxorubicin, appears faster in male AYAs than female (p = 0.04, 95% CI 0.1-3.9 L/h). The exposure of doxorubicinol (normalized to dose) is lower in male AYA than female (p = 0.03, 95% CI - 0.005 to - 0.0002 h/L). These might be correlated to the observed difference on nadir neutrophil count between male AYA and female (p = 0.027, 95% CI 0.09-1.4).

CONCLUSION

Gender-related differences in doxorubicin pharmacology may account for worse outcomes for male AYAs with chemosensitive cancers compared to females. These findings may reduce the AYA survival gap compared to other age groups.

Release of syngnathia by anticlockwise rotation and mandibular advancement using bilateral alloplastic temporomandibular joint prostheses: a new approach

We describe a new approach to the planning of treatment and subsequent operation on a patient with syngnathia and severe mandibular retrognathism. To facilitate a large mandibular advancement we applied alloplastic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prostheses to the coronoid processes after anticlockwise rotation of the mandible. To the best of our knowledge this is the first documented case of its kind.

Bacterial Cell Growth Inhibitors Targeting Undecaprenyl Diphosphate Synthase and Undecaprenyl Diphosphate Phosphatase

We synthesized a series of benzoic acids and phenylphosphonic acids and investigated their effects on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. One of the most active compounds, 5-fluoro-2-(3-(octyloxy)benzamido)benzoic acid (7, ED50 ∼0.15 μg mL-1 ) acted synergistically with seven antibiotics known to target bacterial cell-wall biosynthesis (a fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) of ∼0.35, on average) but had indifferent effects in combinations with six non-cell-wall biosynthesis inhibitors (average FICI∼1.45). The most active compounds were found to inhibit two enzymes involved in isoprenoid/bacterial cell-wall biosynthesis: undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase (UPPS) and undecaprenyl diphosphate phosphatase (UPPP), but not farnesyl diphosphate synthase, and there were good correlations between bacterial cell growth inhibition, UPPS inhibition, and UPPP inhibition.

Isoprenoid Biosynthesis Inhibitors Targeting Bacterial Cell Growth

We synthesized potential inhibitors of farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS), undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase (UPPS), or undecaprenyl diphosphate phosphatase (UPPP), and tested them in bacterial cell growth and enzyme inhibition assays. The most active compounds were found to be bisphosphonates with electron-withdrawing aryl-alkyl side chains which inhibited the growth of Gram-negative bacteria (Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) at ∼1-4 μg mL-1 levels. They were found to be potent inhibitors of FPPS; cell growth was partially "rescued" by the addition of farnesol or overexpression of FPPS, and there was synergistic activity with known isoprenoid biosynthesis pathway inhibitors. Lipophilic hydroxyalkyl phosphonic acids inhibited UPPS and UPPP at micromolar levels; they were active (∼2-6 μg mL-1 ) against Gram-positive but not Gram-negative organisms, and again exhibited synergistic activity with cell wall biosynthesis inhibitors, but only indifferent effects with other inhibitors. The results are of interest because they describe novel inhibitors of FPPS, UPPS, and UPPP with cell growth inhibitory activities as low as ∼1-2 μg mL-1 .