1
|
Weinstein S, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Birkholz JH, Cash BD, Cilenti E, Dane B, Horvat N, Kambadakone AR, Korngold EK, Liu PS, Lo BM, McCrary M, Mellnick V, Pietryga JA, Santillan CS, Zukotynski K, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Left Lower Quadrant Pain: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S471-S480. [PMID: 38040465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
The differential diagnosis for left lower quadrant pain is wide and conditions range from the benign and self-limited to life-threatening surgical emergencies. Along with patient history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, imaging is often critical to limit the differential diagnosis and identify life-threatening abnormalities. This document will discuss the guidelines for the appropriate use of imaging in the initial workup for patients who present with left lower quadrant pain, patients with suspected diverticulitis, and patients with suspected complications from diverticulitis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - James H Birkholz
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Elizabeth Cilenti
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, Primary care physician
| | - Bari Dane
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Natally Horvat
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Bruce M Lo
- Sentara Norfolk General Hospital/Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Marion McCrary
- Duke Signature Care, Durham, North Carolina; American College of Physicians
| | - Vincent Mellnick
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Saint Louis, Missouri; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Katherine Zukotynski
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kambadakone AR, Santillan CS, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Birkholz JH, Camacho MA, Cash BD, Dane B, Felker RA, Grossman EJ, Korngold EK, Liu PS, Marin D, McCrary M, Pietryga JA, Weinstein S, Zukotynski K, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S445-S461. [PMID: 36436969 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
This document focuses on imaging in the adult and pregnant populations with right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain, including patients with fever and leukocytosis. Appendicitis remains the most common surgical pathology responsible for RLQ abdominal pain in the United States. Other causes of RLQ pain include right colonic diverticulitis, ureteral stone, and infectious enterocolitis. Appropriate imaging in the diagnosis of appendicitis has resulted in decreased negative appendectomy rate from as high as 25% to approximately 1% to 3%. Contrast-enhanced CT remains the primary and most appropriate imaging modality to evaluate this patient population. MRI is approaching CT in sensitivity and specificity as this technology becomes more widely available and utilization increases. Unenhanced MRI and ultrasound remain the diagnostic procedures of choice in the pregnant patient. MRI and ultrasound continue to perform best in the hands of the experts. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avinash R Kambadakone
- Division Chief, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Medical Director, Martha's Vineyard Hospital Imaging.
| | - Cynthia S Santillan
- Vice Chair of Clinical Operations, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair; Vice Chair of Education, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California. ACR LI-RADS; Division Chief, SAR Portfolio Director; RSNA Radiology Senior DE
| | - James H Birkholz
- Divisional Director, Quality and Safety (Abdominal Imaging), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Radiology Representative to the Interdisciplinary Dysmotility (GIMIG) Conference
| | - Marc A Camacho
- The University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | - Brooks D Cash
- Chief of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Division, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Bari Dane
- Director of Body CT, Abdominal Imaging; Director of Quality and Safety Outpatient Imaging, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Robin A Felker
- Associate Clerkship Director for Internal Medicine, Georgetown University; Primary care physician, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Eric J Grossman
- Medical Director, Multi-Specialty Clinic, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara, California; American College of Surgeons
| | - Elena K Korngold
- Section Chief, Body Imaging, Chair, Department of Radiology Promotion and Tenure Committee, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Peter S Liu
- Section Head, Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Marion McCrary
- Associate Director of Duke GME Coaching, Duke Signature Care, Durham, North Carolina; American College of Physicians; Governor-Elect, American College of Physicians North Carolina Chapter
| | | | | | - Katherine Zukotynski
- Co-Associate Chair for Research, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair; Section Chief Abdominal Imaging, Director of MRI and CT, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garcia EM, Pietryga JA, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Chang KJ, Kambadakone AR, Korngold EK, Liu PS, Marin D, Moreno CC, Panait L, Santillan CS, Weinstein S, Wright CL, Zreloff J, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hernia. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S329-S340. [PMID: 36436960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Abdominopelvic hernias are common clinical entities composed of a wide variety of congenital, traumatic, and iatrogenic etiologies. Any weakness in the body wall may result in hernia of cavity contents with concomitant risks of morbidity and mortality. Presentations may be specific, palpable body wall mass/bulge, or vague, nonspecific pain through bowel obstruction. This document focuses on initial imaging of the adult population with signs of symptoms prompting suspicion of abdominopelvic hernia. Imaging of the abdomen and pelvis to evaluate defects is essential for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Often CT and ultrasound are the first-line modalities to quickly evaluate the abdomen and pelvis, providing for accurate diagnoses and management of patients. MRI protocols may be useful as first-line imaging studies, especially in patients with orthopedic instrumentation. Although often performed, abdominal radiographs and fluorographic procedures may provide indirect evidence of hernias but are usually not indicated for initial diagnosis of hernia. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia; Board Member, Taubman Museum of Art.
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- Division Chief, Emergency Radiology at UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill North Carolina; and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin; and Vice-Chair of Education, University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; Chair ACR LI-RADS; Division Chief, SAR Portfolio Director, RSNA Radiology Senior Deputy Editor
| | - Kevin J Chang
- Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Section Chief of Abdominal Imaging, Director of MRI, Chair of Committee on C-RADS
| | - Avinash R Kambadakone
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Division Chief, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Medical Director, Martha's Vineyard Hospital Imaging
| | - Elena K Korngold
- Section Chief, Body Imaging/Chair, Department of Radiology Promotion and Tenure Committee; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Peter S Liu
- Section Head, Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Lucian Panait
- President, Minnesota Hernia Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota; American College of Surgeons; American Hernia Society (member of the Technology and Value Assessment Committee); Practice Advisory Committee Member, American Hernia Society
| | - Cynthia S Santillan
- Vice-Chair of Clinical Operations, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | | | - Jennifer Zreloff
- Georgia, Primary Care Physician, Emory University, Atlanta, Georiga; Medical Director, Seavey General Medicine Clinic; Assistant Director of Innovation Seavey Comprehensive Internal Medicine Clinic, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia; Section Chief Abdominal Imaging, Director of MRI and CT
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Korngold EK, Moreno C, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Cash BD, Chang KJ, Gage KL, Gajjar AH, Garcia EM, Kambadakone AR, Liu PS, Macomber M, Marin D, Pietryga JA, Santillan CS, Weinstein S, Zreloff J, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging of Colorectal Cancer: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S208-S222. [PMID: 35550803 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative imaging of rectal carcinoma involves accurate assessment of the primary tumor as well as distant metastatic disease. Preoperative imaging of nonrectal colon cancer is most beneficial in identifying distant metastases, regardless of primary T or N stage. Surgical treatment remains the definitive treatment for colon cancer, while organ-sparing approach may be considered in some rectal cancer patients based on imaging obtained before and after neoadjuvant treatment. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena K Korngold
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Section Chief, Body Imaging; Chair, P&T Committee; Modality Chief, CT.
| | - Courtney Moreno
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Chair America College of Radiology CT Colonography Registry Committee
| | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin; Vice Chair of Education (University of Wisconsin Dept of Radiology)
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; ACR LI-RADS Working Group Chair
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; American Gastroenterological Association; Chief of GI, UTHealth
| | - Kevin J Chang
- Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Director of MRI, Associate Chief of Abdominal Imaging; ACR Chair of Committee on C-RADS
| | - Kenneth L Gage
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Aakash H Gajjar
- PRiSMA Proctology Surgical Medicine & Associates, Houston, Texas; American College of Surgeons
| | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Avinash R Kambadakone
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Division Chief, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital; Medical Director, Martha's Vineyard Hospital Imaging
| | - Peter S Liu
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Section Head, Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH
| | | | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Cynthia S Santillan
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; Vice Chair of Clinical Operations for Department of Radiology
| | - Stefanie Weinstein
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Associate Chief of Radiology, San Francisco VA Health Systems
| | | | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia; Director MR and CT at VCUHS; Section Chief Abdominal Imaging VCUHS
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Levy AD, Liu PS, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Bharucha AE, Chang KJ, Cilenti E, Gage KL, Garcia EM, Kambadakone AR, Korngold EK, Marin D, Moreno C, Pietryga JA, Santillan CS, Weinstein S, Wexner SD, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Anorectal Disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:S268-S282. [PMID: 34794588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
This review summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of the initial imaging in 4 clinical scenarios in patients with suspected inflammatory disease or postoperative complication of the anorectum. These clinical scenarios include suspected perianal fistula or abscess; rectovesicular or rectovaginal fistula; proctitis or pouchitis; and suspected complication following proctectomy, coloproctectomy, or colectomy with a pouch or other anastomosis. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios of anorectal disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela D Levy
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
| | - Peter S Liu
- Section Head, Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; and Founder, Advisory Board Quantix Bio
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Chair of the Neurogastroenterology Section, Chair of Research Compliance Subcommittee, and Medical Director, Office of Clinical Trials, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota; and American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Kevin J Chang
- Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Cilenti
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, Primary care physician
| | - Kenneth L Gage
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; SECJNMMI Member-at-Large
| | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Avinash R Kambadakone
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Taubman Museum of Art Board Member; and Past-President VA Rad Society
| | - Elena K Korngold
- Section Chief, Abdominal Imaging, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Courtney Moreno
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Chair ACR CTC Registry Committee; and Executive Council American Roentgen Ray Society
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Associate Editor Hollow Organ GI
| | - Cynthia S Santillan
- Chief, Body Imaging Division and Vice-Chair, Clinical Operations for Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Steven D Wexner
- Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida; Editor-in-Chief, Surgery Journal; American College of Surgeons PAC Board; and Managing Member, Unique Surgical Innovations
| | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia; Director of CT and MRI at VCU, Section Chief, Abdominal Imaging at VCU
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karuppasamy K, Kapoor BS, Fidelman N, Abujudeh H, Bartel TB, Caplin DM, Cash BD, Citron SJ, Farsad K, Gajjar AH, Guimaraes MS, Gupta A, Higgins M, Marin D, Patel PJ, Pietryga JA, Rochon PJ, Stadtlander KS, Suranyi PS, Lorenz JM. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:S139-S152. [PMID: 33958109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Diverticulosis remains the commonest cause for acute lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding (GIB). Conservative management is initially sufficient for most patients, followed by elective diagnostic tests. However, if acute lower GIB persists, it can be investigated with colonoscopy, CT angiography (CTA), or red blood cell (RBC) scan. Colonoscopy can identify the site and cause of bleeding and provide effective treatment. CTA is a noninvasive diagnostic tool that is better tolerated by patients, can identify actively bleeding site or a potential bleeding lesion in vast majority of patients. RBC scan can identify intermittent bleeding, and with single-photon emission computed tomography, can more accurately localize it to a small segment of bowel. If patients are hemodynamically unstable, CTA and transcatheter arteriography/embolization can be performed. Colonoscopy can also be considered in these patients if rapid bowel preparation is feasible. Transcatheter arteriography has a low rate of major complications; however, targeted transcatheter embolization is only feasible if extravasation is seen, which is more likely in hemodynamically unstable patients. If bleeding site has been previously localized but the intervention by colonoscopy and transcatheter embolization have failed to achieve hemostasis, surgery may be required. Among patients with obscure (nonlocalized) recurrent bleeding, capsule endoscopy and CT enterography can be considered to identify culprit mucosal lesion(s). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nicholas Fidelman
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Hani Abujudeh
- Detroit Medical Center, Tenet Healthcare and Envision Radiology Physician Services, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Drew M Caplin
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Hempstead, New York, Chair, Committee on Practice Parameters Interventional Radiology, American College of Radiology, Program Director, Interventional Radiology Residency, Zucker School of Medicine NSLIJ
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - Khashayar Farsad
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, Vice Chair, Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Aakash H Gajjar
- PRiSMA Proctology Surgical Medicine & Associates, Houston, Texas, American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Amit Gupta
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | | | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Parag J Patel
- Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Paul J Rochon
- University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Pal S Suranyi
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Galgano SJ, McNamara MM, Peterson CM, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Camacho MA, Cash BD, Chang KJ, Feig BW, Gage KL, Garcia EM, Kambadakone AR, Levy AD, Liu PS, Marin D, Moreno C, Pietryga JA, Smith MP, Weinstein S, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Left Lower Quadrant Pain-Suspected Diverticulitis. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 16:S141-S149. [PMID: 31054740 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
This review summarizes the relevant literature regarding imaging of suspected diverticulitis as an etiology for left lower quadrant pain, and imaging of complications of acute diverticulitis. The most common cause of left lower quadrant pain in adults is acute sigmoid or descending colonic diverticulitis. Appropriate imaging triage for patients with suspected diverticulitis should address the differential diagnostic possibilities and what information is necessary to make a definitive management decision. Patients with diverticulitis may require surgery or interventional radiology procedures because of associated complications, including abscesses, fistulas, obstruction, or perforation. As a result, there has been a trend toward greater use of imaging to confirm the diagnosis of diverticulitis, evaluate the extent of disease, and detect complications before deciding on appropriate treatment. Additionally, in the era of bundled payments and minimizing health care costs, patients with acute diverticulitis are being managed on an outpatient basis and rapid diagnostic imaging at the time of initial symptoms helps to streamline and triage patients to the appropriate treatment pathway. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samuel J Galgano
- Research Author, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | | | | | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Marc A Camacho
- The University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - Barry W Feig
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; American College of Surgeons
| | - Kenneth L Gage
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | | | - Angela D Levy
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Jason A Pietryga
- The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Martin P Smith
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang KJ, Marin D, Kim DH, Fowler KJ, Camacho MA, Cash BD, Garcia EM, Hatten BW, Kambadakone AR, Levy AD, Liu PS, Moreno C, Peterson CM, Pietryga JA, Siegel A, Weinstein S, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Small-Bowel Obstruction. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:S305-S314. [PMID: 32370974 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Small-bowel obstruction is a common cause of abdominal pain and accounts for a significant proportion of hospital admissions. Radiologic imaging plays the key role in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel obstruction as neither patient presentation, the clinical examination, nor laboratory testing are sufficiently sensitive or specific enough to diagnose or guide management. This document focuses on the imaging evaluation of the two most commonly encountered clinical scenarios related to small-bowel obstruction: the acute presentation and the more indolent, low-grade, or intermittent presentation. This document hopes to clarify the appropriate utilization of the many imaging procedures that are available and commonly employed in these clinical settings. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Chang
- Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Marc A Camacho
- The University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Benjamin W Hatten
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | | | - Angela D Levy
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | | | | | | - Alan Siegel
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim DH, Chang KJ, Fowler KJ, Cash BD, Garcia EM, Kambadakone AR, Levy AD, Liu PS, Mace SE, Marin D, Moreno C, Peterson CM, Pietryga JA, Solnes LB, Weinstein S, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Crohn Disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:S81-S99. [PMID: 32370980 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Three common clinical scenarios involving use of imaging in Crohn disease are covered. These include the initial evaluation of Crohn disease when the diagnosis has not been previously established, the evaluation for anticipated exacerbation of known disease, and the evaluation of disease activity during therapy monitoring. The appropriateness of a given imaging modality for each scenario is rated as one of three categories (usually appropriate, may be appropriate, usually not appropriate) to help guide evaluation. Pediatric presentation of Crohn disease and the appropriateness of imaging are not covered in this document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Kim
- Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin.
| | | | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Brooks D Cash
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas; American Gastroenterological Association
| | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | | | - Angela D Levy
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Sharon E Mace
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bass R, McNamara MM, Little MD, Pietryga JA, Sanyal R, Zarzour JG. Contrast Enema Examination: Technique and Essential Findings. Radiographics 2018. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170111.pres] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
11
|
Bass R, McNamara MM, Little MD, Pietryga JA, Sanyal R, Zarzour JG. Contrast Enema Examination: Technique and Essential Findings: RadioGraphics Fundamentals | Online Presentation. Radiographics 2018; 38:90-91. [PMID: 29320315 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Bass
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JTN 357, Birmingham, AL 35294
| | - Michelle M McNamara
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JTN 357, Birmingham, AL 35294
| | - Mark D Little
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JTN 357, Birmingham, AL 35294
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JTN 357, Birmingham, AL 35294
| | - Rupan Sanyal
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JTN 357, Birmingham, AL 35294
| | - Jessica G Zarzour
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JTN 357, Birmingham, AL 35294
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baalmann CG, Galgano SJ, Pietryga JA, Novak L, Robbin ML. A Case of a Chorionic Bump: New Sonographic-Histopathologic Findings With Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36:1968-1970. [PMID: 28503780 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Lea Novak
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Michelle L Robbin
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rais-Bahrami S, Nix JW, Turkbey B, Pietryga JA, Sanyal R, Thomas JV, Gordetsky JB. Clinical and multiparametric MRI signatures of granulomatous prostatitis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:1956-1962. [PMID: 28238033 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1080-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study is to differentiate granulomatous prostatitis (GP) from high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) based on clinical findings and imaging characteristics on multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI). METHODS Pathology from patients undergoing MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsies between 2014 and 2015 was reviewed. Five patients with biopsy proven GP were identified as well as 15 patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score ≥4 + 3 = 7 PCa. Patients were matched for age, serum PSA level, and prebiopsy-assigned MP-MRI cancer suspicion scores. MP-MRI studies were reviewed to identify findings that would differentiate GP from PCa in patients who had equally high suspicion scores based upon imaging characteristics. RESULTS All five patients with GP on MR/US fusion-targeted biopsies were assigned a PIRADS 4 or 5 suspicion score. There were equally high suspicion scores on MP-MRI for both groups (p = 0.57). Re-evaluation of the MRI characteristics of the 5 GP patients and 15 matched controls who had pathologically proven Gleason score ≥4 + 3 = 7 PCa on targeted biopsy demonstrated statistically lower mean ADC values within the index targeted lesion for PCa vs. GP (p = 0.002) Qualitatively, no patients with GP on biopsy had imaging evidence of higher-staged disease, while 33% of patients in the high-risk PCa cohort demonstrated at least one high-stage feature (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Patients with GP routinely have MRIs with moderate to high levels of suspicion for harboring PCa. Re-evaluation of these patients' imaging demonstrated characteristics including significantly higher ADC values and absence of high-stage features, which may help differentiate areas of GP from PCa in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 3529, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Jeffrey W Nix
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 3529, USA
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rupan Sanyal
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - John V Thomas
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 3529, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are the vascular accesses of choice for long-term hemodialysis. Strategies to establish and maintain functioning AVFs and AVGs are essential. In addition to clinical evaluation, ultrasound plays a critical role in the evaluation and maintenance of AVFs and AVGs. AVFs have a high rate of failure to mature which can be reliably diagnosed with ultrasound. Treatable etiologies of the failure to mature can often be diagnosed with ultrasound. Causes of secondary AVG failure can also be diagnosed with ultrasound and treated. AVGs have a relatively short functional life expectancy due to a high rate of AVG thrombosis. Ultrasound is a safe, noninvasive way to diagnose vascular stenosis in both AVFs and AVGs prior to thrombosis, potentially saving the access. Routine surveillance ultrasound of asymptomatic AVFs and AVGs is controversial with conflicting studies on its benefit. Routine surveillance ultrasound of AVFs and AVGs is not common practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Pietryga
- The Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mark D Little
- The Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Michelle L Robbin
- The Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Pietryga JA, Rais-Bahrami S. Role of systematic biopsy in the era of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion guidance. BJU Int 2016; 118:181-3. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A. Pietryga
- Department of Radiology; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Radiology; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham
- Department of Urology; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham AL USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rais-Bahrami S, Pietryga JA, Nix JW. Contemporary role of advanced imaging for bladder cancer staging. Urol Oncol 2015; 34:124-33. [PMID: 26427696 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Revised: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Optimized pretreatment staging of bladder urothelial carcinoma is essential in guiding appropriate treatment. This staging process relies heavily on tissue pathology from transurethral resection of bladder tumor as well as imaging for diagnosis of local, regional, nodal, or distant visceral spread. Accurate preoperative staging is critical for appropriate treatment decision making and patient counseling as these are based on the extent of disease involvement, largely classifying the cancer as having local, regional, or distant spread. Currently, the gold standard of transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by computed tomography imaging with intravenous contrast provides excellent staging specificity in cases of more advanced bladder cancers with suspicion of spread; however, this often under stages patients that can lead to adverse oncologic outcomes in these patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Incorporation of novel imaging modalities including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography imaging have shown promise in improving accuracy of staging for both local and distant disease in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
| | - Jason A Pietryga
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jeffrey W Nix
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pietryga JA, Burke LMB, Marin D, Jaffe TA, Bashir MR. Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium: examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition. Radiology 2014; 271:426-34. [PMID: 24475864 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether the use of a multiple arterial phase imaging technique provides adequate image quality in patients experiencing transient severe motion (TSM) in the arterial phase on abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained with gadoxetate disodium. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Five hundred forty-nine consecutive MR examinations were evaluated, 345 performed with gadoxetate disodium and 204 performed with gadobenate dimeglumine. All examinations included single-breath-hold triple arterial phase acquisition. Five radiologists blinded to the contrast material rated motion on a scale of 1 (no motion) to 5 (nondiagnostic images) for the precontrast phase, the three arterial phases, the portal venous phase, and the late dynamic phase. Adequacy of late hepatic arterial timing was also rated for the each of the three arterial phases. Mean motion scores were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The number of patients with TSM, as well as the number of those with "adequate" arterial phases, was compared with the χ(2) or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS Mean motion scores in all three arterial phases in the gadoxetate disodium cohort were significantly worse than those in the gadobenate dimeglumine cohort (P < .005). TSM occurred at a higher rate with gadoxetate disodium than with gadobenate dimeglumine (10.7% [37 of 345 examinations] vs 0.5% [one of 204 examinations], P < .001). However, 30 of 37 examinations affected by TSM had at least one well-timed arterial phase with a mean motion score of 3 or less and were thus considered adequate. CONCLUSION Use of single-breath-hold multiple arterial phase acquisition in abdominal MR imaging with gadoxetate disodium recovers most arterial phases that would otherwise have been compromised by transient motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Pietryga
- From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3808, Durham, NC 27710
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pietryga JA, Fonder MA, Rogg JM, North DL, Bercovitch LG. Invisible metallic microfiber in clothing presents unrecognized MRI risk for cutaneous burn. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34:E47-50. [PMID: 22173750 PMCID: PMC7964672 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2011] [Accepted: 06/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY We report a case of a thermal burn that occurred during MR imaging likely caused by invisible silver-embedded microfibers in the fabric of an undershirt. As the prevalence of fabric containing nondetectable metallic microfiber increases in athletic and "tech" clothing, the importance of having patients change into safe facility-provided garments before MR imaging is emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Pietryga
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pietryga JA, Beland MD, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Placement of Marker Coils at Biopsy: Usefulness in the Localization of Poorly Visualized Renal Neoplasms for Subsequent CT-guided Radiofrequency Ablation. Radiology 2012; 263:555-61. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|