Dual-mobility cups could yield lesser infections than conventional cups: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

INTRODUCTION

Dual-mobility cups (DMC) are gaining popularity mainly for their reduced rate of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently, indication for DMC use extends beyond patients with high risk of dislocation or revision THA cases. Many authors reported DMC outcomes in primary THA for all aetiologies. However, some reports claimed that the use of DMC is accompanied with higher rates of infection compared with conventional cups (CC) in both primary and revision THA.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the use of DMC generate higher rates of infection when compared with conventional cups?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this meta-analysis was to look for significant difference in the rate of post-operative infection between DMC cups and conventional cups.

METHODOLOGY

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched since inception. Only studies with comparative design reporting the outcome infection rate were included.

RESULTS

Seventeen retrospective comparative studies were located comprising 248,541 patients: 16,020 in the DMC group and 232,521 in the CC group. The mean follow-up period was 37.5 ± 42 and 50.2 ± 48.7 months for the DMC and CC groups, respectively. The meta-analytical results indicated the following: (a) significantly lesser infections following DMC compared with CC in revision THA (odds ratio (OR) = 0.75 (95% CI = 0.653 to 0.874, P = 0.0002, I² = 25%); (b) for primary THA and for large-sampled registries, significance was found using only the fixed-effects model estimate; and (c) no significant difference was found for the subgroup of cohort studies.

CONCLUSION

Our results clearly refute the claim that DMC would yield higher rates of infection. On the contrary, the findings demonstrated that the use of DMC reduces the risk of post-operative infection in revision THA and a similar lower infection trend for primary THA when compared with the standard cups.

Revision of a Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Cup Using a Dual Mobility Component: Is It a Reasonable Option?

Revision of large-diameter, monoblock acetabular components for both hip resurfacing arthroplasty and metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is correlated to a high amount of complications. For this reason, performing a limited revision by conversion to a dual mobility (DM) without acetabular component exchange has been proposed in order to limit these complications. Although DM bearing offers an easy solution avoiding the intraoperative and time-associated complications, concern about polyethylene wear and stability remains due to the difference regarding the design, the coverage angle and the clearance of the two implants. In order to evaluate the performance of this new solution with the new material to prevent the possibility of failure it is essential to conduct a review of the literature A qualitative systematic review of the literature has been conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Scopus for English and French articles between January 2000 and October 2019 was performed, with the primary objective of finding articles about dual mobility bearing coupling with large metal-on-metal cup in the case of hip revision procedure. Various combinations of the key words were used in the search strategy. Thirteen articles with DM bearing mated with MoM cup were analyzed. Of the 130 hip revisions selected, with a follow-up from 6 to 53 months, there were a total of 14 with complications (10.77%): four true dislocations (3.08%); six intra-prosthetic dislocations (IPD, 4.6%), two of which presented plastic deformation and polyethylene wear; four other complications (3.08%), included a cup osteolysis, a clicking noise, a superficial infection and a periprosthetic fracture. All the mentioned true dislocations occurred during the first month while IPDs appeared during the first two years from the index revision. In conclusion, according to the literature analyzed, we can stress that the concerns and doubts about mating a DM bearing with large MoM cup cannot be dissolved. It has been pointed out that a DM bearing is not designed for a MoM cup; it is not mechanically tested on MoM cups, which presents different clearance and coverage angles. Predictable complications may occur, such as IPD, polyethylene wear and true dislocation. These complications have been reported at an even higher rate than they were in the eighties, when the first generation of DM implants were of a lower quality of polyethylene and the characteristic of the design was less optimal than modern ones.

Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Versus Hemiarthroplasty in Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: Comparative Study and Results at Minimum 3-Year Follow-up

Background:

Hip fractures are serious injuries associated with relatively high mortality rates and disabilities, commonly seen in elderly persons. There is an ongoing debate regarding the advantages of various hip arthroplasty devices. This study aimed to analyze the long-term advantages of 2 different surgical procedures and assess if the dislocation rate, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and functional independence measure (FIM) are more favorable in dual mobility (DM) than those in hemiarthroplasty (HA).

Hypothesis:

Dual mobility procedures provide better postoperative outcomes than HA in terms of HHS, FIM, and dislocation rate.

Materials and Methods:

The survey was a prospective, comparative interventional single-blinded study performed at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo, a tertiary health-care institution. A total of 94 patients underwent DM or conventional bipolar HA for repair of displaced femoral neck fractures within 2 weeks of injury. Primary outcomes were postoperative dislocation rate, FIM, and HHS. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, estimated intraoperative blood loss, time to first postoperative full weight-bearing, time to walking ability with and without crutches, mortality rate, and postoperative infection rate.

Results:

There were no significant differences for most parameters between the groups. We found a significant difference in the dislocation rate between the 2 groups, wherein there were no dislocations in the DM group and 3 dislocations in the HHS group (0% vs 6.4%). In terms of postoperative HHS at 12 months and 3 years, DM provided better outcomes (<0.034 and <0.014, respectively).

Discussion:

Dual mobility compares favorably to HA in terms of dislocation rate and HHS, while no difference was found for FIM. In order to have a more complete overview, we recommend more intense long-term studies including several heterogeneous parameters to compare the clinical outcomes between DM and HA.

Level of evidence (with study design):

Level II.

Extended trochanteric osteotomy: comparison of 3 modes of fixation: metallic wires, cables, plate, about a series of 157 cases

Introduction: The trans femoral osteotomy was initially described by Wagner in 1987 and the extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) was described by Younger et al. in 1995 and is considered to be the gold standard technique for removal of well-fixed femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this report is:

to compare the different types of fixation metallic wires, cables, metallic reinforcement plate (MRP) we have used in revision THA where an ETO was performed;

analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of these devices at 1 year;

analyse the complication.

Materialand method: It is a retrospective continuous monocentric series of 157 patients where an ETO was performed. It was fixed by an MRP in 17 patients, cables in 43, metallic wires in 97. The main outcome was the consolidation of the osteotomized femoral flap (OFF). Secondary outcomes were Postel Merle d’Aubigne score and complications occurred at 1 year follow up. Qualitative variable was presented as percentage, quantitative variables as mean or median, standard deviation and range.

Result: 157 patients (73−46, 5% females) were included. Mean age at surgery was 66.7 year (sd = 10.63). Mean interval between index surgery and revision was 11.07 year (sd = 5.67). Causes for revision and bone defects were comparable. At 1 year OFF is healed without displacement in 82% with metallic wires, 70% with cables, 88% with MRP. Not significant.

Discussion: Fixation of the femoral flap is a technical issue in ETO. Metallic wires and cables are the most commonly used to secure the fixation. Fixation with a metallic plate is reported in a few number of articles and may be helpful specially when a fracture of the OFF occurred during surgery.

How is patella height modified after total knee arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Since the first measurement method of patella height in 1929 (Janssen), more than 16 methods have been described. Most of these measures are not suitable to measure patella height after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One of us (JC) modified the original Caton Deschamps (oCD), index with a new relative index called modified Caton Deschamps (mCD) index, by using new landmarks. The purpose of this study was to determine how patella height is modified after TKA.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Sixty primary TKAs were consecutively prospectively enrolled. One type of implant was used (cementless postero-stabilized TKA, rotating plateau, cemented patella resurfacing). Patient's characteristics, functional and radiological outcomes were recorded pre-operatively and at one year follow-up. Pre-operative and post-operative outcomes were compared by paired t-test. Post-operative outcomes were compared between groups by one-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Average difference between pre and post-operative mCD was 0.19 in this series. In 81.7% of cases, patella was lowered. Patients were classified in three groups according to patella height lowering. Between these three groups, no significant statistical differences (IKS score knee and function, range of motion) could be identified.

DISCUSSION

In TKA, patella assessment in sagittal plane is as important as frontal or horizontal planes. True patella infera (TPI) is mostly due to patella tendon shortening measured by oCD. Pseudo patella infera (PPI) measured by mCD is mostly due to joint line elevation (over femoral cut with an over thickness of the tibial component). In this study a moderate patella lowering (minor than 15%) does not have a significant impact on the functional results (IKS, ROM) nevertheless in 80% patella is lowered. The next step will be to analyze precisely what factors are influencing this lowering and what prevention could be suggested in primary and revision TKA.

Low friction arthroplasty and dual mobility cup: a new gold standard

INTRODUCTION

Low friction arthroplasty (LFA) introduced by Sir John Charnley was the gold standard for many years. Dislocation and infection are the first causes for early revision. Late failures are polyethylene (PE) wear and loosening. Due to dislocation risk we slowly switched to the use of LFA with dual mobility cups (DMC). The purposes of this study are (1) to assess whether our changes have improved outcomes and (2) what is the new gold standard?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We selected from an observational registry of 1,091 cases of hybrid Charnley total hip arthroplasty (THA). The acetabular component was either DMC in 455 cases or fixed cup (FC) in 636 cases.

RESULTS

Three dislocations (0.6%) occurred in the DMC group (none revised). In the FC group 54 dislocated (8.49%) and 20 were recurrent and underwent revision (revision rate 3.14%). In the DMC group, five acetabular and three femoral revisions were performed (revision rate for loosening 1.7%). In the FC group 19 cases underwent acetabular revision, and five cases had femoral component revised (revision rate for loosening 3.7%).

DISCUSSION

Charnley's LFA has proven over 50 years of excellent survivorship. To decrease dislocation risk, one suggested increasing femoral head diameter. Gilles Bousquet proposed another way, namely, the DMC concept. Dislocation is no longer a critical issue with DMC as demonstrated in our series and main series. DMC in primary THA is still a subject of debate. Mid-term results do not demonstrate a higher rate of wear than LFA. What is the current gold standard? LFA was and is our current gold standard in association with a DMC.

Equivalent wear performance of dual mobility bearing compared with standard bearing in total hip arthroplasty: in vitro study

PURPOSE

Osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on polyethylene wear and dictates the survival of the prosthesis. Dual mobility in THAs, which is claimed to reduce dislocation risk, has very good long-term clinical results. However, little is known about how the liner wears in this design, compared to the standard single mobility model.

METHODS

A comparative study looking at wear of a conventional ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liner, using gravimetric measurement, between dual mobility implants and standard implants, was performed on a simulator in accordance with a normed protocol based on the same dimensions, environmental conditions and stresses. A linear regression test was employed.

RESULTS

Under the same conditions (loading, cycles, sterilization, material and surface roughness), the gravimetric wear (for conventional polyethylene) is comparable between a standard and a dual mobility cup. This correlates to ten year follow-up results of dual mobility cup.

DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION

This in vitro equivalent wear serves to confirm the very good long-term clinical results observed with dual mobility bearing, whose use should not be restricted by concerns about increased polyethylene wear.

Patellar height assessment in total knee arthroplasty: a new method

INTRODUCTION

We described in 1981 a method to evaluate patellar height in normal and symptomatic knees on sagittal X-ray view. This index is a frequently used method, yet it is not suitable after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The original method measures the distance between the distal margin of the articular surface of the patella (point A) and the anterosuperior angle of the tibial plateau (point T), then the length of the patellar articular surface (AP). The index is AT/AP ratio (normal values range from 0.8 to 1.2). After TKA, the T landmark is no longer available, so we must define a new T' landmark. This point is situated at the intersection between the line perpendicular to the tibial posterior cortex elevated at the tip of the fibular head and the tibial anterior cortex. This remarkable landmark can be identified before and after TKA, with a new relative index AT'/AP ratio. This modified method allows the comparison of patella height before and after TKA.

RESULTS

We have used this modified index with the collaboration of several authors during the testing of different models of TKA, with an accurate reproducibility. Repeatability (usually called intra-observer reliability) was good, with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 0.58 and 0.75 among the observers. Reproducibility (usually called inter-observer reliability) was also considered as good, with ICC ranging from 0.64 to 0.72.

DISCUSSION

Patella height measurement has to be assessed with the original method (AT/AP) to detect patella infera that could influence the surgical approach. The correlation between original and modified indexes has to be assessed. The modification of patella height after TKA could be evaluated through the modified index and compared with functional results.

A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk

PURPOSE

Mid- and long-term follow-up of Charnley total hip arthroplasty (THA) demonstrated good functional results with 85 % survivorship at 25-year follow-up. However, dislocation still remains an unsolved problem. Dislocation may occur throughout the patient's and implant's life. The aim of this study is to answer the question: does a dual mobility cup (DMC) decrease the dislocation risk?

METHODS

We report comparative results at ten years of follow-up of two groups of primary cemented Charnley-type THA, one with a standard polyethylene cup (group 1, n = 215) and the other one with a DMC (group 2, n = 105).

RESULTS

In group 1, 26 dislocations (12.9 %) occurred. In group 2 only one dislocation (0.9 %) occurred. This dislocation was successfully reduced by closed reduction, without any recurrence. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0018). In group 1, the reason for revision was recurrent dislocation in 21 cases. Five patients were revised for other reasons. The global revision rate was 12.9 %. In group 2, two patients needed revision surgery for aseptic loosening. The global revision rate was 2.1 %. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.054). The goal was reached for the patients of group 2 who had more risks factors for dislocation (age, aetiology, American Society of Anesthesiologists and Devane scores) than those of group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

When using a DMC, we observed a low rate of dislocation in primary THA (0.9 %). This surgical choice seems to be a safe and effective technique in Charnley-type THA, especially in a high-risk population.

Over 25 years survival after Charnley's total hip arthroplasty

Background

Since 1962, the low friction arthroplasty (LFA) developed by Sir John Charnley has spread widely throughout the world. Many series have reported long-term results. Polyethylene (PE) wear is well known. The average wear ratio is about 0.1 mm a year. Many factors may influence that wear process.

Purpose

The authors describe two different series of patients operated upon with Charnley’s total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the original cemented stem and a non modular 22.2-mm head, with a cemented full polyethylene acetabular socket. Outcomes confirm excellent patient function after 25 years. They emphasise the fact that PE is the weak point of total hip arthroplasty. Function may be excellent even though PE wear is significant. In several cases, no wear at the maximum follow-up was detectable.

Results

This study confirms different publications relating long-term follow-up with LFA. During a Charnley meeting in Lyon, we published a survival curve of 85% after 25 years. Berry et al. published a 86.5% survival curve (J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:171–177, 2002). In 1995, Luc and Marcel Kerboul published a 77% survival rate after 20 years in young patients under 40 years old at the time of the surgery. In 2009, Callaghan et al. published a series of 35 years follow-up with a ratio of 78% survivorship (J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:2617–2621).

Conclusion

Could the long-term results be improved? Through recent decades, many solutions have been introduced to improve the survivorship of THA including bearing surfaces such as alumina-on-alumina and metal-on-metal. Different problems have occurred with these solutions. LFA might be improved by working on the nature and the quality of the head. Improvements might also be obtained by working on the quality and the hardness of the acetabular socket.