Interactive enhancer hubs (iHUBs) mediate transcriptional reprogramming and adaptive resistance in pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) displays a remarkable propensity towards therapy resistance. However, molecular epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms enabling this are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to identify novel mechanistic approaches to overcome or prevent resistance in PDAC.

DESIGN

We used in vitro and in vivo models of resistant PDAC and integrated epigenomic, transcriptomic, nascent RNA and chromatin topology data. We identified a JunD-driven subgroup of enhancers, called interactive hubs (iHUBs), which mediate transcriptional reprogramming and chemoresistance in PDAC.

RESULTS

iHUBs display characteristics typical for active enhancers (H3K27ac enrichment) in both therapy sensitive and resistant states but exhibit increased interactions and production of enhancer RNA (eRNA) in the resistant state. Notably, deletion of individual iHUBs was sufficient to decrease transcription of target genes and sensitise resistant cells to chemotherapy. Overlapping motif analysis and transcriptional profiling identified the activator protein 1 (AP1) transcription factor JunD as a master transcription factor of these enhancers. JunD depletion decreased iHUB interaction frequency and transcription of target genes. Moreover, targeting either eRNA production or signaling pathways upstream of iHUB activation using clinically tested small molecule inhibitors decreased eRNA production and interaction frequency, and restored chemotherapy responsiveness in vitro and in vivo. Representative iHUB target genes were found to be more expressed in patients with poor response to chemotherapy compared with responsive patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings identify an important role for a subgroup of highly connected enhancers (iHUBs) in regulating chemotherapy response and demonstrate targetability in sensitisation to chemotherapy.

Clinical presentation, operative management, and long-term outcomes of rupture after previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presentation trends, intervention, and survival of patients who had been treated for late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (LAR) after open repair (OR) or endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data from a single-center, retrospective database for patients treated for LAR from 2000 to 2020. The end points were the 30-day mortality, major postoperative complication, and survival. The outcomes between LAR managed with EVAR (group I) vs OR were compared (group II).

RESULTS

Of 390 patients with infrarenal aortic rupture, 40 (10%) had experienced aortic rupture after prior aortic repair and comprised the LAR cohort (34 men; age 78 ± 8 years). LAR had occurred before EVAR in 30 and before OR in 10 patients. LAR was more common in the second half of the study with 32 patients after 2010. LAR after prior OR was secondary to ruptured para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. After initial EVAR, LAR had occurred despite reintervention in 17 patients (42%). The time to LAR was shorter after prior EVAR than after OR (6 ± 4 vs 12 ± 4 years, respectively; P = .003). Treatment for LAR was EVAR for 25 patients (63%; group I) and OR for 15 (37%, group II). LAR after initial OR was managed with endovascular salvage for 8 of 10 patients. Endovascular management was more frequent in the latter half of the study period. In group I, fenestrated repair had been used for seven patients (28%). Salvage for the remaining cases was feasible with EVAR, aortic cuffs, or limb extensions. The incidence of free rupture, time to treatment, 30-day mortality (8% vs 13%; P = .3), complications (32% vs 60%; P = .1), and disposition were similar between the two groups. Those in group I had had less blood loss (660 vs 3000 mL; P < .001) and less need for dialysis (0% vs 33%; P < .001) than those in group II. The median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range, 6-45 months). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 76%, 52%, and 41%, respectively, and was similar between groups (28 vs 22 months; P = .48). Late mortality was not related to the aorta.

CONCLUSIONS

LAR after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has been encountered more frequently in clinical practice, likely driven by the frequency of EVAR. However, most LARs, including those after previous OR, can now be salvaged with endovascular techniques with lower morbidity and mortality.

Response Rates of Invasive Lobular Cancer in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Endocrine or Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

A gap remains in the role of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with ILC.

METHOD

Single-institution retrospective review of patients with ILC who received neoadjuvant therapy between 2008 and 2019.

RESULTS

141 patients met inclusion criteria: 71 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and 70 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). 7/71 (9.9%) patients had a pCR following NACT compared to 1/70 (1.4%) with NET (P = .063). pCR was observed in 5/18 (27.8%) patients with Her2Neu-positive disease following NACT, compared to 2/53 (3.8%) with Her2Neu-negative disease (P = .01).For luminal B tumors, median Ki-67 decrease was similar following NACT and NET (18.3 vs 16.3, P = .26).T category decreased in 59 (42.1%) patients following neoadjuvant therapy, increased in 9 (6.4%), and was unchanged in 72 (51.4%). More patients had an increase (28.6%) than decrease (12.1%) in their N category, including 13/60 (21.7%) who were clinically node-negative at diagnosis and identified to have node-positive disease following neoadjuvant therapy, at definitive surgery.

CONCLUSION

In Her2Neu-negative ILC, the potential of a pCR with NACT or NET is low. Most patients' nodal status and tumor size remain unchanged. There is a potential for pathologic stage to be higher at surgery compared to the clinical stage prior to neoadjuvant therapy.

Preclinical evaluation of LCK as a novel therapeutic target in YAP-activated and FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma

463

Background: Molecularly targeted therapy is gaining traction in cholangiocarcinoma with the first FDA approval of a targeted agent in 2020, the FGFR inhibitor pemigatinib. Yet response rates and efficacy are modest, and most cholangiocarcinoma patients still lack targeted therapy options. The hippo pathway effector, YAP, is an oncogene that is activated in the majority of cholangiocarcinoma, yet attempts to develop YAP inhibitors have not yet been clinically successful. Recently, we described a novel mechanism of YAP regulation, via tyrosine phosphorylation by the Src-family kinase LCK. Therefore we hypothesized that LCK inhibition by may be therapeutic in cholangiocarcinoma through suppression of YAP activity. Methods: NTRC 0652-0 is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor with specificity for LCK. In vitro pharmacodynamics were defined. In cholangiocarcinoma cells, specificity for LCK inhibition was determined by mass spectrometry-based unbiased analysis of the tyrosine phosphoproteome following treatment with NTRC 0652-0 or genetic deletion of LCK. YAP phosphorylation and cotranscriptional activity, cell viability, and apoptosis were assessed. A panel of eight cholangiocarcinoma patient derived organoids (PDO) were characterized and tested for sensitivity to NTRC 0652-0. Two patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models bearing FGFR2-rearrangements were utilized for in vivo assessment of pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and efficacy. Results: NTRC 0652-0 demonstrated selectivity for LCK inhibition in vitro and in cholangiocarcinoma cells. NTRC 0652-0 treatment led to YAP inhibition and apoptotic cell death in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines, associated with inhibition of MCL1 expression. PDOs demonstrated variable sensitivity to NTRC 0652-0, correlated with basal YAP tyrosine phosphorylation and drug-induced suppression of YAP co-transcriptional activity. FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma was also identified as a subset with enrichment of YAP target genes. Cells from an FGFR2-altered PDX were sensitive to NTRC 0652-0 despite being primarily resistant to pemigatinib. In two PDX models of FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma, daily oral treatment with NTRC 0652-0 inhibited YAP tyrosine phosphorylation, and resulted in stable plasma and tumor drug levels, acceptable toxicity, and significantly decreased tumor growth. Conclusions: A novel LCK inhibitor, NTRC 0652-0, reduced YAP signaling and demonstrated preclinical efficacy in multiple patient-derived models of cholangiocarcinoma. LCK is a novel therapeutic target in cholangiocarcinoma, and YAP activation or FGFR2-alteration are potential biomarkers for response.

Synergistic combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are uncommon, but highly lethal, gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine/cisplatin is a standard-of-care systemic therapy, but has a modest impact on survival and harbors toxicities, including myelosuppression, nephropathy, neuropathy, and ototoxicity. Whereas BTCs are characterized by aberrations activating the cyclinD1/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6/CDK inhibitor 2a/retinoblastoma pathway, clinical use of CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy is limited by lack of validated biomarkers, diffident preclinical efficacy, and development of acquired drug resistance. Emerging studies have explored therapeutic strategies to enhance the antitumor efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by the combination with chemotherapy regimens, but their mechanism of action remains elusive.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Here, we report in vitro and in vivo synergy in BTC models, showing enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, and better survival with a combination comprising gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrated that abemaciclib monotherapy had only modest efficacy attributable to autophagy-induced resistance. Notably, triplet therapy was able to potentiate efficacy through elimination of the autophagic flux. Correspondingly, abemaciclib potentiated ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 reduction, resulting in sensitization to gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

As such, these data provide robust preclinical mechanistic evidence of synergy between gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors and delineate a path forward for translation of these findings to preliminary clinical studies in advanced BTC patients.

Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Stage 4 Breast Cancer: Is It Worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

The role of reconstruction after primary tumor surgery for metastatic breast cancer remains controversial. This report describes the outcomes for patients undergoing mastectomy with and without reconstruction in the setting of de novo stage 4 breast cancer.

METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained institutional breast surgery database, this study identified all patients who presented with de novo stage 4 breast cancer from January 2008 to December 2018. Patients were included if they had undergone mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Patient, surgical characteristics, and survival outcomes were abstracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

The study identified 29 patients: 8 patients (28%) who underwent reconstruction (R) and 21 patients (72%) who did not (NR). Complete clinical response to induction systemic therapy was more frequent among patients in the R group than among those in the NR group for the primary disease (50% in R, 5% in NR), and to a lesser degree for distant disease (63% in R, 39% in NR). No difference in complication rates between the two groups was identified [n = 1 (13%) in R; n = 2 (10%) in NR; p = 1.0]. Overall survival from surgery was longer in the R group (100% at 2 and 5 years) than in the NR group [85%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 68-100% at 2 years vs 50%; 95% CI 27-91% at 5 years] (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy may be reasonable to consider for appropriately selected patients with de novo stage 4 breast cancer who have excellent responses to systemic therapy and anticipated durable survival.

Variation in training requirements within general surgery: comparison of 23 countries

Background

Many differences exist in postgraduate surgical training programmes worldwide. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the training requirements in general surgery across 23 different countries.

Methods

A collaborator affiliated with each country collected data from the country's official training body website, where possible. The information collected included: management, teaching, academic and operative competencies, mandatory courses, years of postgraduate training (inclusive of intern years), working‐hours regulations, selection process into training and formal examination.

Results

Countries included were Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, India, Ireland, Italy, Kuwait, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, USA and Zambia. Frameworks for defining the outcomes of surgical training have been defined nationally in some countries, with some similarities to those in the UK and Ireland. However, some training programmes remain heterogeneous with regional variation, including those in many European countries. Some countries outline minimum operative case requirement (range 60–1600), mandatory courses, or operative, academic or management competencies. The length of postgraduate training ranges from 4 to 10 years. The maximum hours worked per week ranges from 38 to 88 h, but with no limit in some countries.

Conclusion

Countries have specific and often differing requirements of their medical profession. Equivalence in training is granted on political agreements, not healthcare need or competencies acquired during training.