Proteomic Associations of Adverse Outcomes in Human Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Identifying novel molecular drivers of disease progression in heart failure (HF) is a high-priority goal that may provide new therapeutic targets to improve patient outcomes. The authors investigated the relationship between plasma proteins and adverse outcomes in HF and their putative causal role using Mendelian randomization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The authors measured 4776 plasma proteins among 1964 participants with HF with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in PHFS (Penn Heart Failure Study). Assessed were the observational relationship between plasma proteins and (1) all-cause death or (2) death or HF-related hospital admission (DHFA). The authors replicated nominally significant associations in the Washington University HF registry (N=1080). Proteins significantly associated with outcomes were the subject of 2-sample Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses. After correction for multiple testing, 243 and 126 proteins were found to be significantly associated with death and DHFA, respectively. These included small ubiquitin-like modifier 2 (standardized hazard ratio [sHR], 1.56; P<0.0001), growth differentiation factor-15 (sHR, 1.68; P<0.0001) for death, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-like protein (sHR, 1.40; P<0.0001), and pulmonary-associated surfactant protein C (sHR, 1.24; P<0.0001) for DHFA. In pathway analyses, top canonical pathways associated with death and DHFA included fibrotic, inflammatory, and coagulation pathways. Genomic analyses provided evidence of nominally significant associations between levels of 6 genetically predicted proteins with DHFA and 11 genetically predicted proteins with death.

CONCLUSIONS

This study implicates multiple novel proteins in HF and provides preliminary evidence of associations between genetically predicted plasma levels of 17 candidate proteins and the risk for adverse outcomes in human HF.

Proteomic Associations of NT-proBNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels are variably elevated in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), even in the presence of increased left ventricular filling pressures. NT-proBNP levels are prognostic in HFpEF and have been used as an inclusion criterion for several recent randomized clinical trials. However, the underlying biologic differences between HFpEF participants with high and low NT-proBNP levels remain to be fully understood.

METHODS

We measured 4928 proteins using an aptamer-based proteomic assay (SOMAScan) in available plasma samples from 2 cohorts: (1) Participants with HFpEF enrolled in the PHFS (Penn Heart Failure Study; n=253); (2) TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial) participants in the Americas (n=218). We assessed the relationship between SOMAScan-derived plasma NT-proBNP and levels of other proteins available in the SOMAScan assay version 4 using robust linear regression, with correction for multiple comparisons, followed by pathway analysis.

RESULTS

NT-proBNP levels exhibited prominent proteome-wide associations in PHFS and TOPCAT cohorts. Proteins most strongly associated with NT-proBNP in both cohorts included SVEP1 (sushi, von Willebrand factor type-A, epidermal growth factor, and pentraxin domain containing 1; βTOPCAT=0.539; P<0.0001; βPHFS=0.516; P<0.0001) and ANGPT2 (angiopoietin 2; βTOPCAT=0.571; P<0.0001; βPHFS=0.459; P<0.0001). Canonical pathway analysis demonstrated consistent associations with multiple pathways related to fibrosis and inflammation. These included hepatic fibrosis and inhibition of matrix metalloproteases. Analyses using cut points corresponding to estimated quantitative concentrations of 360 pg/mL (and 480 pg/mL in atrial fibrillation) revealed similar proteomic associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating NT-proBNP levels exhibit prominent proteomic associations in HFpEF. Our findings suggest that higher NT-proBNP levels in HFpEF are a marker of fibrosis and inflammation. These findings will aid the interpretation of NT-proBNP levels in HFpEF and may guide the selection of participants in future HFpEF clinical trials.

Proteomic Correlates of the Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Proteinuria is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its biologic correlates are poorly understood. We assessed the relation between 49 plasma proteins and the urinary protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) in 365 participants in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial. Linear regression and network analysis were used to represent relations between protein biomarkers and UPCR. Higher UPCR was associated with older age, a greater proportion of female gender, smaller prevalence of previous myocardial infarction, and greater prevalence of diabetes, insulin use, smoking, and statin use, in addition to a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, hematocrit, and diastolic blood pressure. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15; β = 0.15, p <0.0001), followed by N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proANP; β = 0.774, p <0.0001), adiponectin (β = 0.0005, p <0.0001), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23, β = 0.177; p <0.0001), and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors I (β = 0.002, p <0.0001) and II (β = 0.093, p <0.0001) revealed the strongest associations with UPCR. Network analysis showed that UPCR is linked to various proteins primarily through FGF-23, which, along with GDF-15, indicated node characteristics with strong connectivity, whereas UPCR did not. In a model that included FGF-23 and UPCR, the former was predictive of the risk of death or heart-failure hospital admission (standardized hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 2.26, p <0.0001) and/or all-cause death (standardized hazard ratio 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.07, p = 0.0005), whereas UPCR was not prognostic. Proteinuria in HFpEF exhibits distinct proteomic correlates, primarily through its association with FGF-23, a well-known prognostic marker in HFpEF. However, in contrast to FGF-23, UPCR does not hold independent prognostic value.