Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of primary breast cancer in patients not undergoing surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose was to explore the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in providing local control (LC) for primary breast cancer in patients unable to undergo surgery.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Between 2015 and 2019, 13 non-surgical candidates with 14 lesions were treated with SBRT for primary breast cancer. In 4 cases, SBRT was used after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT; 40-50 Gy/20-25 fractions). SBRT dose was 30-40 ​Gy in 5 fractions for patients treated with SBRT alone and 25-32 ​Gy in 4-5 fractions for those treated with SBRT ​+ ​WBRT. LC and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Response was also assessed using RECIST guidelines.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 32 (range: 3.4-70.4) months. Imaging at median 2.2 (0.6-8.1) months post-SBRT showed median 43.2 ​% (range: 2-100 ​%) decrease in the largest diameter and median 68.7 ​% (range: 27.9-100 ​%) SUV reduction. There were 3 cases of local progression at 8.7-10.6 months. Estimated LC was 100 ​% at 6 months and 71.6 ​% at 12, 24 and 36 months. Estimated median OS was 100 ​% at 6 months, 76.9 ​% at 12 months, and 61.5 ​% at 24 and 36 months. Acute toxicity (n ​= ​13; 92.9 ​%) included grade (G)1 (n ​= ​8), G2 (n ​= ​4), and G4 (necrosis; n ​= ​1). Late toxicity included G2 edema (n ​= ​1) and G4 necrosis (n ​= ​2, including 1 consequential late effect). Only patients treated with SBRT ​+ ​WBRT experienced acute/late G4 toxicity, managed with resection or steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT to primary breast cancer resulted in good LC in non-surgical/metastatic patients. Although necrosis (n ​= ​2) occurred in the SBRT ​+ ​WBRT group, it was successfully salvaged.

Utility of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Establishing Local Control for Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer Not Undergoing Definitive Surgery

PURPOSE

Surgery is the backbone of breast cancer (BC) treatment. For patients who cannot undergo surgery, improving local control (LC) of the primary tumor is paramount. To that end, this study explored the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2015 and 2022, 21 nonsurgical candidates (10 metastatic, 11 stage IA-IIIC) received 23 SBRT courses to primary BC. Seven were analyzed retrospectively; 15 are currently enrolled in a prospective study. SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) was delivered every other day. Follow-up imaging was reviewed. Acute (≤3 months) and late toxicities were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. LC and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Median age was 78.4 years (45.9-97.3). Median follow-up was 14.7 months (3.3-70.3). Median pre-SBRT index lesion size was 3.1 cm (0.5-14.5) and planning treatment volume was 32.4 cc (11.5-522.4). Initial posttreatment imaging performed at a median 4.0 months (0.6-11.9) post-SBRT demonstrated median decrease in index lesion size of 20.8% (0%-100%); SUV reduction of 65.2% (20.8%-100%). Second follow-up scans at a median 7.8 months post-SBRT showed 62% (0%-100%) and 88% (33.3%-100%) median reduction in tumor size and SUV, respectively, compared with pre-SBRT values. The estimated LC rate was 100% at 6 months and 93.3% at 12, 24, and 36 months. Local progression occurred in 1 case 9.5 months after SBRT, after an initial response. Regional progression occurred in 4 cases (17.4%) at a median 18.6 months (5.2-22.7) post-SBRT. Six patients (35.3%) developed distant progression at a median 2.7 months (0.9-16.2). The estimated OS was 85.7% at 6 months, 69.6% at 12 months, and 63.8% at 24 and 36 months. The rates of acute toxicity were G1: 47.8%, G2: 4.3%, G3: 8.7%, and G4: 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive SBRT for primary BC resulted in good LC in nonsurgical patients and was well-tolerated. Considering the pattern of progression, additional approaches to improve regional/distant control should be investigated.

Predictive Value of Pre-Treatment MRI Radiomics for Distant Brain Metastases Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Local intracranial therapy for brain metastases (BM) has taken on particular importance as survival among metastatic patients improves. However, the development of distant BMs (DBMs) outside the treated area remains a stubborn problem for which canonical clinical features (age, histology, ECOG PS) have limited predictive capability. In this study, we hypothesized that MRI-based "radiomic" features (sub-visual cues extracted from diagnostic images) can accurately predict the time-to-DBM development (TTDD) on a retrospectively curated dataset of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

We queried our treatment planning system for patients treated with brain SRS/SRT between 2014 and 2021, and curated the incidence/timing of DBMs manually. Pre-RT MRI sequences (T1 pre, T1 post, T2, and FLAIR) and planning data were obtained for each patient. MRI and CT simulations were co-registered using affine transformations, and regions of interest (ROIs) were identified based on contoured structures (GTV) and discrete isodose ranges (0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75%+). Radiomic features were extracted from these ROIs, and clinical features (ECOG PS, tumor volume, age) were recorded for baseline comparison. Features were selected using Wald test scores from univariate Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models. Multivariate CPH models were then trained to predict TTDD using combinations of selected features. Predictive capability was evaluated using concordance index (c-index) values. A radiomic risk score (RRS) was created to discriminate patients with low and high-risk for DBMs, and evaluated using a log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were selected with a median follow up of 356 days. 53 patients developed DBMs (median time 118 days). Radiomic CPH models achieved a c-index of 0.63 compared to clinical baseline of 0.49. The combination of radiomic and clinical features achieved the highest c-index of 0.69. Overall, radiomic features with and without clinical features were able to stratify patients into low and high-risk groups with statistically significant differences in TTDD development (see Table 1). Clinical features alone were not significant. The most predictive radiomic features were identified within the T1 pre-contrast MRI from the 50-75% isodose regions, followed by T2 FLAIR/GTV and T2/GTV combinations.

CONCLUSION

Radiomic features from routine MR scans were more predictive of TTDD than baseline clinical features. The contribution from the 50-75% isodose region suggests importance within the peritumoral environment in addition to the tumor itself.