Analgesic Use and Pain in Robust, Pre-Frail and Frail Older Outpatients with Cancer

Background

Pain management can be challenging in frail older people with cancer due to drug–drug interactions and heightened susceptibility to adverse drug events.

Objective

To investigate the relationship between analgesic use and pain by frailty status in older outpatients with cancer.

Methods

A total of 385 consecutive patients aged 70 years and over who presented to an outpatient oncology clinic between January 2009 and July 2010 completed structured assessments of analgesic use (opioids, paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), pain (10-point visual analogue scale) and clinical factors. Frailty was derived using modified Fried’s frailty phenotype. Logistic regression was used to compute adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between analgesic use and pain for each frailty group (robust, pre-frail or frail).

Results

For robust outpatients (n = 101), there was weak evidence for a 30 % relative increase in the adjusted odds of analgesic use between outpatients who differed by one unit of pain score (95 % CI 0.995−1.71, p = 0.0532). For pre-frail outpatients (n = 190), there was evidence for a negative quadratic relationship (adjusted OR for the quadratic coefficient: 0.952, 95 % CI 0.910−0.993, p = 0.0244). For frail outpatients (n = 94), there was an 8 % relative increase in the adjusted odds of analgesic use between outpatients who differed by one unit of pain score, but no statistical evidence for association (95 % CI 0.934−1.26; p = 0.298).

Conclusions

These findings can be considered for the ongoing development of safe, effective strategies for analgesic use in older outpatients with cancer.

Statin use and pain in older people with cancer: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate statin use and pain in people with cancer aged 70 to 79 and 80 and older.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Medical oncology outpatient clinic at the Royal Adelaide Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged 70 and older who presented consecutively between January 2009 and June 2010 (n = 385), of whom 106 were aged 80 and older.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants completed a structured data collection instrument, documenting medication use, comorbidities and a general pain assessment (10-point visual analogue scale (VAS)). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with statin use.

RESULTS

The prevalence of statin use was 35% (n = 97) in people aged 70 to 79 and 39% (n = 41) in those aged 80 and older. After adjusting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and analgesic use, statin use was associated with self-reported pain (VAS ≥ 5) (OR = 4.09, 95% CI = 1.32-12.68) in people aged 80 and older but not in those aged 70 to 79. Half of participants using statins (51% n = 70) had a palliative treatment approach. Of the 41 statin users aged 80 and older, 20 (49%) were using statins for primary prevention.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of statin use was similar in people aged 70 to 79 years and those aged 80 and older, with statin use associated with self-reported pain in people aged 80 and older. This highlights a potential benefit of "deprescribing" statins in older people with cancer, especially those aged 80 and older.

Potentially inappropriate medication use in older people with cancer: prevalence and correlates

OBJECTIVES

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use has been associated with an increase in adverse drug events, hospitalization and mortality. This study investigated the prevalence and factors associated with PIM use in patients presenting to a medical oncology outpatient clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (n=385) aged ≥ 70 years referred to a medical oncology outpatient clinic between January 2009 and July 2010 completed a structured data collection instrument. The instrument assessed medication use, diagnoses, self-reported falls in the previous six months, pain (10-point visual analog scale [VAS]) and distress (10-point VAS). Frailty was defined using exhaustion, weight loss, Karnofsky Performance Scale, instrumental activities of daily living and physical function. PIM use was defined by the Beers Criteria. Logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with PIM use.

RESULTS

In total, 26.5% (n=102) of the sample used ≥1 PIM. The five most prevalent classes of PIMs were benzodiazepines (n=34, 8.8%), tricyclic antidepressants (n=16, 4.2%), alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists (prazosin) (n=15, 3.9%), propulsives (metoclopramide) (n=15, 3.9%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n=14, 3.6%). In multivariate analyses, PIM use was associated with age 75-79 years (OR 1.83; 95%CI 1.02-3.26) compared to age 70-74 years, using ≥ 5 medications (OR 4.10; 95%CI 2.26-7.44) compared to <5 medications and being frail (OR 3.05; 95%CI 1.18-7.87) compared to being robust.

CONCLUSION

More than one quarter of older people with cancer used one or more PIMs, and this was associated with being frail compared to being robust.

Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in older people with cancer

PURPOSE

Polypharmacy has been associated with drug-drug interactions, adverse drug events, hospitalisation and increased mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in older people with cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged≥70 years (n=385) presenting to the medical oncology outpatient clinic at Royal Adelaide Hospital between January 2009 and July 2010 completed a structured data collection instrument. The instrument included domains related to medications, diagnoses, instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), physical function (SF-36), pain (ten-point visual analogue scale, VAS), weight loss (patient self-reported over previous 6 months), exhaustion (CES-D) and distress (ten-point VAS). Frailty was computed using Fried's frailty phenotype. Logistic regression was used to compute unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between polypharmacy (defined as five or more self-reported daily medications) and clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Polypharmacy was present in 57% (n=221) of patients. When adjusting for age, gender and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), polypharmacy was associated with being pre-frail (OR=2.35, 95%CI=1.43-3.86) and frail (OR=4.48, 95%CI=1.90-10.54) compared to being robust. When adjusting for age, gender, exhaustion, KPS, IADLs, pain and distress, polypharmacy was associated with higher CCI scores (OR=1.58, 95%CI=1.29-1.94) and poorer physical function (OR=1.13, 95%CI=1.06-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in older people with cancer and associated with impaired physical function and being pre-frail and frail compared to being robust. Research is needed to identify strategies to minimize patients' medication regimens.