Anisakis simplex only provokes allergic symptoms when the worm parasitises the gastrointestinal tract

We analysed patients with allergic or digestive symptoms after seafood ingestion in order to assess a correct diet in Anisakis simplex sensitised individuals. A total of 120 patients who suffered allergic and/or digestive symptoms after marine food ingestion were studied. We performed skin prick tests for A. simplex and seafood, total serum and specific serum immunoglobulin E to A. simplex in the acute stage and 1 month later. A gastroscopy was carried out to find larvae in those patients with persistent abdominal pain. A challenge with non-infective larvae was performed to assess a correct diet. Some 96 patients were sensitised to A. simplex. Gastroscopy was performed in 47 and we detected larvae in 24. We compared symptoms, skin tests, total and specific IgE and the latency of appearance of symptoms in patients positive for Anisakis larvae, patients without larvae at gastroscopy and patients without digestive symptoms. There was no difference among the groups. We challenged 22 patients with frozen A. simplex larvae. After allowing deep-frozen seafood in the diet for more than 2 years, no patient suffered a reaction. At this time, we allowed all our patients well-frozen seafood without any allergic reaction occurring. Allergic symptoms are the most frequent manifestation of A. simplex parasitism. We could not find any patient allergic to the thermostable proteins of parasite.

Gastroallergic anisakiasis: borderline between food allergy and parasitic disease-clinical and allergologic evaluation of 20 patients with confirmed acute parasitism by Anisakis simplex

BACKGROUND

Human subjects can be parasitized by Anisakis simplex by eating raw or undercooked fish. Gastric anisakiasis is probably the most frequent clinical entity presenting with severe epigastric pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. In gastroallergic anisakiasis hypersensitivity symptoms predominate.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe clinical features, laboratory data, and gastroscopic findings in gastroallergic anisakiasis.

METHODS

We selected 40 patients presenting to the emergency department with an acute allergic reaction, and if we suspected acute parasitism by A simplex, a fiberoptic gastroscopy was performed. In 20 patients we could detect one or more nematodes; these patients are referred to as group A. Those in whom no worm could be found are referred to as group B (n = 20). A detailed history, clinical features, gastroscopic findings, laboratory data, and skin prick test responses were compared.

RESULTS

Long-time intervals of up to 26 hours between fish intake and onset of hypersensitivity symptoms were found (group A, 5.4 +/- 6.3 hours; group B, 5.3 +/- 2.6 hours). Patients in groups A and B did not differ with respect to allergic symptoms (urticaria, angioedema, erythema, bronchospasm, and anaphylaxis) or the mainly light abdominal symptoms (upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea). No significant differences were found with respect to age, time interval between fish intake and onset of symptoms, white cell and eosinophil counts, specific IgE levels against A simplex, or total IgE levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The peculiar sometimes long-time interval between fish intake and onset of allergic symptoms render the diagnosis difficult. An early gastroscopy can confirm the diagnosis and prevent complications. We suggest that gastroallergic anisakiasis be considered a distinct clinical entity in which the predominant symptoms are hypersensitivity symptoms and in which the correct diagnosis is not only important in the management of the acute reaction but also in the prevention of further allergic episodes.