Incorporating health equity in the neurology curriculum: Our experience

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDoH) are responsible for 80-90% of modifiable contributors to health, yet this material may not be covered in preclinical medical school neuroscience courses.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how topics related to SDoH and inclusion, diversity, equity, anti-racism, and social justice (IDEAS) were incorporated into a preclinical neuroscience course.

METHODS

IDEAS concepts and guided discussions were added to our existing case-based curriculum, and guest speakers were invited to discuss how these concepts are relevant in the field of neurology.

RESULTS

Most students felt that content and discussions were integrated thoughtfully. Students also found it helpful to learn and observe how faculty address these topics in real-world cases.

CONCLUSION

The additional content related to SDoH and IDEAS is feasible. Faculty with or without expertise in IDEAS concepts were able to utilize these cases and generate discussion without detracting from the neuroscience course material.

DISP-14. DEFINING INTERVENTIONS AND METRICS TO IMPROVE DIVERSITY IN CNS CLINICAL TRIAL PARTICIPATION: A SNO AND RANO EFFORT

Despite major strides in cancer research, care, and therapy, these advances have not been equitable across race and ethnicity. Groups underrepresented in medicine (URM) are more likely to have inadequate preventive screening, increased delays in diagnosis, and poor representation in clinical trials. Notably, Black and Latino Americans represent 29% of the population but only reflect 8% of oncology clinical trial participants. Recent studies have shown that this disparity is also present in neuro-oncology as women, Black, and Latino Americans remain under-accrued in clinical trials. Brain tumor patients already face unique barriers to clinical trial enrollment and completion due to disease-specific conditions–such as impaired motor function, cognition, language deficits, and caregiver dependency–which pose additional difficulties in clinical trial consent, enrollment, and adherence. As part of this collaborative initiative, we evaluated the impact of how a lack of diversity in cancer research is detrimental to scientific discovery and propose interventions focused on improving URM engagement with clinical research. Recommendations include the creation of inclusive trial design at the onset, decreasing barriers to care, expanding trial eligibility, and equitable access to tumor profiling for personalized medical trials. Additionally, setting reasonable metrics and goals for accrual and engagement with patient and community stakeholders will ultimately help to diversify trial participants. Lastly, diversification and inclusion practices within the neuro-oncology workforce, including all personnel involved in clinical research, will help to minimize bias, promote concordant care, and assist with developing sustainable solutions. The diversification of participation in neuro-oncology clinical trials is imperative. The lack of diversity in clinical trials can contribute to improper generalizability of treatment efficacy, resulting in potentially harmful practices. Equitable access and inclusion of URM brain tumor patients will not only enhance research discoveries but will also result in improved patient care for all cancer patients.

Clinical Problem Solving: A 56-Year-Old Woman With Right Facial Weakness, Numbness, and Diplopia

We discuss a case of a middle-aged woman with a history of urothelial carcinoma, who presented with subacute progression of double vision, right facial numbness, and back pain. Her MRI brain and spine demonstrated multifocal enhancing lesions at the skull base and throughout the spine. Since her initial serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies were unrevealing, she underwent a biopsy of her skull base lesion, which was initially concerning for infection. However, her symptoms worsened despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, necessitating a spinal root biopsy that was consistent with leptomeningeal urothelial carcinoma. Her case illustrates the challenge of accurately diagnosing isolated leptomeningeal metastatic disease, which can be difficult to diagnose from CSF analysis and often requires multiple lumbar punctures to improve sensitivity. While genitourinary cancers rarely metastasize to the CNS, clinicians should retain high suspicion for neoplastic etiologies of leptomeningeal disease in patients with a history of cancer and new neurologic deficits.

INNV-40. REAL WORLD INTEGRATION OF THE NEUROLOGIC ASSESSMENT IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY (NANO) SCALE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE IN PATIENTS WITH IDH-WT GBM

BACKGROUND

The neurologic assessment in neuro-oncology (NANO) scale was developed as a standardized metric to objectively measure neurologic function in patients with brain tumors and complement radiographic assessment in defining overall outcome. The scale has been incorporated in clinical trials. Early data is suggestive of feasibility and that NANO contributes to overall outcome assessment. However, real-world use of the NANO scale to drive clinical-decision making and the predictive value of the NANO scale to determine overall survival remains unclear in IDH-wt GBM.

METHODS

We report on an ongoing study using the NANO scale to evaluate neurologic function in patients with IDH-wt GBM, seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Patient demographics, tumor histology and molecular status, treatment history and progression dates are being captured. NANO score, as collected by a built-in scale in our institutional electronic medical record (EMR), functional status (Karnofsky performance status) and corticosteroid dose are collected at prespecified time points (prior to start of therapy, and during each subsequent MRI visit). Changes in the NANO score will be correlated to overall survival. Statistical analyses including descriptive data analysis and generalized linear models will be performed using R (version 3.4.3).

RESULTS

Since June 2020, 50 patients have been enrolled in this study, including 42 (84%) with ≥2 follow up visits. Study accrual was initially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but adaptation to a virtual platform for NANO allowed for improved recruitment and follow up of patients. Study results will be available for discussion at the 2021 SNO conference.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of neurologic function by NANO is feasible in a virtual framework in a prospective study in patients with GBM, aided by integration of the scale in our institutional EMR. NANO is able to objectively track neurologic function throughout disease course in IDH-wt GBM.