AB0039 AGRIN REPAIRS BONE AND CARTILAGE IN VIVO

Background:

Cartilage defects in the joints are reported in 61% of all arthroscopies1&2. The size of the cartilage repair market is estimated to be $2.195 million by 20253. Cartilage defects can evolve into osteoarthritis, in which abnormal load results in cartilage breakdown, joint pain and reduced mobility. Osteoarthritis is the leading cause of permanent disability and absenteeism and affects up to 1/3 of the people over 60yrs. In western countries osteoarthritis costs 1.5-2% of the GDP4. Joint replacement with a prosthesis restores some degree of independence but in up to 20% of patients it does not meet expectations 5 and has a limited life span. There is no pharmacological intervention that arrests or reverts the course of osteoarthritis, despite the desperate need.

We previously published that agrin plays an important role in cartilage homeostasis6. The addition of agrin to chondrocytes in vivo resulted in enhanced cartilage formation, suggesting a potential role for agrin in cartilage repair.

Objectives:

Investigate the potential of agrin for use in cartilage repair.

Methods:

Critical size osteochondral defects were generated in mice and sheep and injected intraarticularly with type I collagen gel containing agrin or vehicle. Animals were monitored for 8 weeks or 6 months respectively. MicroCT, histological analysis, qPCR, linage tracking, reporter assays, chondrogenesis assay, immunohistochemistry were performed.

Results:

A single intraarticular administration of agrin induced regeneration of critical-size osteochondral defects in mice, restoring the tissue architecture and bone-cartilage interface. Agrin stem cells to the site of injury and, through simultaneous activation of CREB and suppression of canonical WNT signalling, induced GDF5 expression and differentiation into stable articular chondrocytes, forming stable articular cartilage. In sheep, agrin treatment resulted in regeneration of bone and cartilage, which promoted increased ambulatory activity.

Conclusion:

Agrin orchestrates repair morphogenesis at the joint surface by modulating multiple signalling pathways, supporting the therapeutic use of agrin for joint surface regeneration.

References:

[1]Curl, W. W. et al. Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. Off. Publ. Arthrosc. Assoc. N. Am. Int. Arthrosc. Assoc. 13, 456–460 (1997).

[2]Hjelle, K., Solheim, E., Strand, T., Muri, R. & Brittberg, M. Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. Off. Publ. Arthrosc. Assoc. N. Am. Int. Arthrosc. Assoc. 18, 730–734 (2002).

[3]Cartilage Repair Market Size, Share, Industry Analysis 2018-2025 | AMR. Allied Market Research https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/cartilage-repair-market.

[4]Hiligsmann, M. et al. Health economics in the field of osteoarthritis: an expert’s consensus paper from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 43, 303–313 (2013).

[5]Dieppe, P., Lim, K. & Lohmander, S. Who should have knee joint replacement surgery for osteoarthritis? Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 14, 175–180 (2011).

[6]Eldridge, S., et al. Agrin mediates chondrocyte homeostasis and requires both LRP4 and α-dystroglycan to enhance cartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 75 (6), 1228-1235 (2016).

Acknowledgements:

We thank the technical staff in the ARM Lab and Staff at the University of Aberdeen’s Animal Facility and Microscopy and Histology Facility for support. Funding: We gratefully acknowledge funding support of this work by the MRC (MR/L022893/1, MR/N010973/1,and MR/P026362/1), Versus Arthritis (19667, 21515, 20886, and 21621), Rosetrees Trust (A1205), the Medical College of St Bartholomew’s Hospital Trust, and the William Harvey Research Foundation.

Disclosure of Interests:

Suzanne Eldridge: None declared, Aida Barawi: None declared, Hui Wang: None declared, Anke Roelofs: None declared, Magdalena Kaneva: None declared, Zeyu Guan: None declared, Helen Lydon: None declared, Bethan Thomas: None declared, Anne-Sophie Thorup: None declared, Beatriz F Fernandez: None declared, Sara Caxaria: None declared, Danielle Strachan: None declared, Ahmed Ali: None declared, Kanatheepan Shanmuganathan: None declared, Costantino Pitzalis: None declared, James Whiteford: None declared, Fran Henson: None declared, Andrew McCaskie: None declared, Cosimo De Bari: None declared, Francesco Dell’Accio Consultant of: F.D. has received consultancy fees from Samumed and UCB.

OP0200 BLOCKING ROR2 IMPROVES CARTILAGE INTEGRITY AND PROVIDES PAIN RELIEF IN OSTEOARTHRITIS

Background:

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of chronic disability worldwide, affecting 12% of the population, and yet we still do not have a disease-modifying treatment. Cartilage breakdown is the hallmark of OA, and patients suffer from pain and loss of joint function/independence, severely affecting quality of life. Therefore, there is a huge unmet clinical need.

Receptor tyrosine kinase–like orphan receptor 2 (ROR2) is a non-canonical WNT receptor that regulates the planar cell polarity pathway, controlling limb outgrowth during development. During skeletal development, chondrocytes require ROR2 to undergo hypertrophy throughout the process of endochondral bone formation1. Loss of function mutations in humans causes Recessive Robinow Syndrome, leading to limb shortening and brachydactyly2,3.

Although absent from healthy adult articular cartilage, our initial studies identified high expression levels of ROR2 in chondrocytes from patients with OA, suggesting a role in the disease process

Objectives:

To test the potential of ROR2 blockade as a disease-modifying treatment for OA.

Methods:

Human cartilage organoid model in nude mice, menisco-ligament injury (MLI) model of OA in mice, behavioural studies, in vitro studies in cells.

Results:

ROR2/WNT5A signaling was increased in osteoarthritic cartilage. Blocking ROR2 was sufficient to induce articular chondrogenesis and suppress expression of aggrecanases in a mesenchymal stem cell line, and to support cartilage formation in a human cartilage organoid model in nude mice using primary chondrocytes from patients with OA.

In the MLI model of OA, blocking ROR2 in therapeutic regime using atelocollagen-conjugated siRNA resulted in reduced cartilage destruction and in rapid and sustained pain relief. Due to the limited expression pattern of ROR2 in adulthood, no systemic or local toxicity were expected, nor were any observed4.

With the current technology, ROR2 blockade requires intra-articular (IA) injections of siRNA conjugated to atelocollagen every 5 days. Preliminary efficacy data of potentially longer-acting ROR2 blockers are promising.

The mechanism of action of ROR2 blockade was independent of modulation of canonical WNT signaling.

ROR2/WNT5A promoted nuclear localization of YAP, which required both Rho and G-proteins. YAP signaling downstream of ROR2 also required Rho, but not G-proteins. YAP and TEAD inhibition was required, but not sufficient, for the chondrogenic effect of blocking ROR2. Therefore, additional, yet unknown mechanisms must be involved downstream of ROR2.

Conclusion:

ROR2 blockade has potential as a disease-modifying treatment for OA, resulting in cartilage protection and rapid and sustained pain relief in a murine model. This will be crucial for clinical success of any treatment for OA and promote patient compliance.

Our current siRNA-atelocollagen based technology requires IA injections too frequently to be acceptable for patients. We are developing ROR2 blockade which can be administered systemically or IA not more often than every 3 months - work funded by FOREUM.

References:

[1]DeChiara, T. M. et al. Ror2, encoding a receptor-like tyrosine kinase, is required for cartilage and growth plate development. Nat. Genet.24, 271–4 (2000).

[2]Bokhoven, H. Van, Celli, J. & Kayserili, H. Mutation of the gene encoding the ROR2 tyrosine kinase causes autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome. Nature25, 423–426 (2000).

[3]Afzal, A., Rajab, A., Fenske, C. & Oldridge, M. Recessive Robinow syndrome, allelic to dominant brachydactyly type B, is caused by mutation of ROR2. Nature25, 419–422 (2000).

[4]Thorup, A.-S. et al. ROR2 blockade as a therapy for osteoarthritis. Sci. Transl. Med.12, eaax3063 (2020).

Acknowledgements:

We gratefully acknowledge funding support of this work by the Medical College of St Bartholomew’s Hospital Trust, the William Harvey Research Foundation, FOREUM foundation for research in rheumatology (1016807), the MRC (MR/L022893/1, MR/N010973/1, MR/P026362/1, MR/K013076/1), Versus Arthritis (21515, 20886, 21621, 20859), and the DFG Emmy-Noether program (BE4328/5-1).

Disclosure of Interests:

Anne-Sophie Thorup: None declared, Danielle Strachan: None declared, Sara Caxaria: None declared, Blandine Poulet: None declared, Bethan Thomas: None declared, Suzanne Eldridge: None declared, Giovanna Nalesso: None declared, James Whiteford: None declared, Costantino Pitzalis: None declared, Thomas Aigner: None declared, Roger Corder: None declared, Jessica Bertrand: None declared, Francesco Dell’Accio Consultant of: Samumed and UCB

Effects of a 1-year randomized controlled trial of resistance training on lower limb bone and muscle structure and function in older men

SUMMARY

A 1-year randomized controlled trial of resistance training compared with a control group was undertaken in 143 men aged 55-80 years. Although hip bone mineral density, lean body mass, and function increased in both groups, lean body mass and function but not bone density increased more in the resistance group.

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of resistance training on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women, but the effect in men is unclear. The aim was to examine the effect of a 1-year resistance training program on bone and lean body mass in 143 men aged 55-80 years, randomized to either resistance training or active control.

METHODS

Resistance exercises were selected to provide loading at the hips. Measurements were taken at 0, 6, and 12 months for BMD (whole body, hip, and spine), lean body mass, strength, and functional fitness.

RESULTS

The intervention showed a significant increase in total hip BMD for both groups at 12 months (active control, 1,014-1,050 mg/cm(2); resistance, 1,045-1,054 mg/cm(2), p < 0.05) with no increased effect of resistance training compared to active control. However, compared to the active control group, the resistance group increased their lean body mass (active control, 0.1 +/- 2.1%; resistance, 1.5 +/- 2.7%, p < 0.05), fitness (active control, 4.6 +/- 11.1%; resistance, 13.0 +/- 13.4%, p < 0.05), and lower limb muscle strength (active control, 14.3 +/- 16.8%; resistance, 39.4 +/- 30.87%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to previous findings in older women, in older men, a resistance training program does not increase hip bone mass more than walking 30 min three times a week.

Watercress supplementation in diet reduces lymphocyte DNA damage and alters blood antioxidant status in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Cruciferous vegetable (CV) consumption is associated with a reduced risk of several cancers in epidemiologic studies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of watercress (a CV) supplementation on biomarkers related to cancer risk in healthy adults.

DESIGN

A single-blind, randomized, crossover study was conducted in 30 men and 30 women (30 smokers and 30 nonsmokers) with a mean age of 33 y (range: 19-55 y). The subjects were fed 85 g raw watercress daily for 8 wk in addition to their habitual diet. The effect of supplementation was measured on a range of endpoints, including DNA damage in lymphocytes (with the comet assay), activity of detoxifying enzymes (glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase) in erythrocytes, plasma antioxidants (retinol, ascorbic acid, alpha-tocopherol, lutein, and beta-carotene), plasma total antioxidant status with the use of the ferric reducing ability of plasma assay, and plasma lipid profile.

RESULTS

Watercress supplementation (active compared with control phase) was associated with reductions in basal DNA damage (by 17%; P = 0.03), in basal plus oxidative purine DNA damage (by 23.9%; P = 0.002), and in basal DNA damage in response to ex vivo hydrogen peroxide challenge (by 9.4%; P = 0.07). Beneficial changes seen after watercress intervention were greater and more significant in smokers than in nonsmokers. Plasma lutein and beta-carotene increased significantly by 100% and 33% (P < 0.001), respectively, after watercress supplementation.

CONCLUSION

The results support the theory that consumption of watercress can be linked to a reduced risk of cancer via decreased damage to DNA and possible modulation of antioxidant status by increasing carotenoid concentrations.

Cinematographic studies of the interior of the actively contracting heart

Images