Long-term outcome in traumatic brain injury patients with midline shift: a secondary analysis of the Phase 3 COBRIT clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Following traumatic brain injury (TBI), midline shift of the brain at the level of the septum pellucidum is often caused by unilateral space-occupying lesions and is associated with increased intracranial pressure and worsened morbidity and mortality. While outcome has been studied in this population, the recovery trajectory has not been reported in a large cohort of patients with TBI. The authors sought to utilize the Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment (COBRIT) trial to analyze patient recovery over time depending on degree of midline shift at presentation.

METHODS

Patient data from the COBRIT trial were stratified into 4 groups of midline shift, and outcome measures were analyzed at 30, 90, and 180 days postinjury. A recovery trajectory analysis was performed identifying patients with outcome measures at all 3 time points to analyze the degree of recovery based on midline shift at presentation.

RESULTS

There were 892, 1169, and 895 patients with adequate outcome data at 30, 90, and 180 days, respectively. Rates of favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOS-E] scores 4-8) at 6 months postinjury were 87% for patients with no midline shift, 79% for patients with 1-5 mm of shift, 64% for patients with 6-10 mm of shift, and 47% for patients with > 10 mm of shift. The mean improvement from unfavorable outcome (GOS-E scores 2 and 3) to favorable outcome (GOS-E scores 4-8) from 1 month to 6 months in all groups was 20% (range 4%-29%). The mean GOS-E score for patients in the 6- to 10-mm group crossed from unfavorable outcome (GOS-E scores 2 and 3) into favorable outcome (GOS-E scores 4-8) at 90 days, and the mean GOS-E of patients in the > 10-mm group nearly reached the threshold of favorable outcome by 180 days postinjury.

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis of the Phase 3 COBRIT trial, TBI patients with less than 10 mm of midline shift on admission head CT had significantly improved functional outcomes through 180 days after injury compared with those with greater than 10 mm of midline shift. Of note, nearly 50% of patients with > 10 mm of midline shift achieved a favorable outcome (GOS-E score 4-8) by 6 months postinjury.

Impact of Multi-Disciplinary Care and Clinical Coach Coordinators on Participant Satisfaction and Retention in TBI Clinical Trials: A TEAM-TBI Study

BACKGROUND

Targeted Evaluation Action and Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury (TEAM-TBI) is a monitored, multiple interventional research identifying clinical profiles and assigns individualized, evidence-based treatment program. The objective of the current study was to assess overall participant satisfaction of the multi-disciplinary care team and approach.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, 90 participants completed the 4-day TEAM-TBI clinical intake evaluation resulting in individualized treatment recommendations followed by a six-month intervention phase follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age 18-60, history of chronic TBI (>6 months post-injury) with refractory clinical sequelae at screening (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS] score >30).

RESULTS

A total of 85/90 (94%) participants completed the survey at baseline focusing on intake evaluation and approach; 90% of eligible participants also completed the follow-up time-point. Hundred percent of participants had a mean score of >4 across all questions at the initial time point."

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-disciplinary care approach and individualized treatment plans of the TEAM-TBI study yielded high participant retention and satisfaction scores. The Clinical Coach component of the trial was one of the highest rated aspects of the program and was associated with participant motivation and high retention rates.

Recovery Trajectories and Long-Term Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase 3 Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Prospects for recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are often underestimated, potentially leading to withdrawal of care in the comatose TBI patient who may ultimately have a favorable outcome with aggressive care. Outcomes and trajectories of recovery in a large series of patients with TBI were evaluated at 30, 90, and 180 days postinjury.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of the phase 3 Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment (COBRIT) trial was performed analyzing recovery trajectories and long-term outcomes at 30, 90, and 180 days postinjury. A Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) score of 5 or higher was considered favorable. Pearson χ² analysis was used, and a P value of 0.05 was considered significant. A locally weighted, polynomial regression model was used to model recovery trajectories in a nonlinear fashion.

RESULTS

Subjects with TBI in the COBRIT trial had high rates of favorable outcome (57% of severe TBI, 86% of moderate TBI, and 93% of complicated mild TBI) at 6-month follow-up. These favorable outcomes often converted from high rates of unfavorable outcome at initial 1-month follow-up (85% of severe TBI, 57% of moderate TBI, and 21% of complicated mild TBI). Recovery trajectories had not plateaued at 6 months, suggesting that further improvement occurs beyond 6 months postinjury.

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis of the COBRIT trial, most patients had favorable outcomes by the GOS-E at 6 months postinjury in all complicated mild and moderate TBI groups, with over half of patients with severe TBI achieving a favorable outcome as well. Of subjects in a vegetative state (GOS-E score 2) at 1 month postinjury, 18% improved to a favorable outcome by 6 months postinjury. There was substantial improvement in all groups from 1 to 6 months, and this improvement may continue beyond 6 months. Clinical trials in TBI should consider recovery curves with repeated measures to assess outcomes because arbitrary single-moment outcome determination likely underestimates treatment effect in TBI care.

Clinical Outcomes of Transplanted Modified Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Stroke: A Phase 1/2a Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preclinical data suggest that cell-based therapies have the potential to improve stroke outcomes.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with stable, chronic stroke were enrolled in a 2-year, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of surgical transplantation of modified bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (SB623).

RESULTS

All patients in the safety population (N=18) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Six patients experienced 6 serious treatment-emergent adverse events; 2 were probably or definitely related to surgical procedure; none were related to cell treatment. All serious treatment-emergent adverse events resolved without sequelae. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or deaths. Sixteen patients completed 12 months of follow-up at the time of this analysis. Significant improvement from baseline (mean) was reported for: (1) European Stroke Scale: mean increase 6.88 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-10.3; P<0.001), (2) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: mean decrease 2.00 (95% confidence interval, -2.7 to -1.3; P<0.001), (3) Fugl-Meyer total score: mean increase 19.20 (95% confidence interval, 11.4-27.0; P<0.001), and (4) Fugl-Meyer motor function total score: mean increase 11.40 (95% confidence interval, 4.6-18.2; P<0.001). No changes were observed in modified Rankin Scale. The area of magnetic resonance T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal change in the ipsilateral cortex 1 week after implantation significantly correlated with clinical improvement at 12 months (P<0.001 for European Stroke Scale).

CONCLUSIONS

In this interim report, SB623 cells were safe and associated with improvement in clinical outcome end points at 12 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01287936.

Abstract 149: A Novel Phase 1/2A Study of Intraparenchymal Transplantation of Human Modified Bone Marrow Derived Cells in Patients with Stable Ischemic Stroke

Introduction: No treatment exists to restore lost brain function after stroke. Animal studies demonstrate that brain transplantation of SB623, a human bone marrow derived stromal cell with transient transfection of Notch-1 gene, after experimental stroke can improve neurologic outcome. This clinical study is the first North American trial of intraparenchymal transplantation of bone marrow derived cell therapy for chronic stroke patients.

METHODS: This is a two center (Stanford University and the University of Pittsburgh) open label safety and dose escalation feasibility study. Stereotactic transplantation is targeted to the subcortical peri-infarct area. Inclusion criteria include 18-75 yo, 6-60 mos post subcortical MCA ischemic stroke, mRS 3-4 and NIHSS > 7. Safety endpoints include WHO toxicity scale, MRIs and clinical follow-up to 2 years. The primary efficacy endpoint is European Stroke Scale (ESS) at 6 mos; secondary efficacy measures are ESS, NIHSS, Fugl-Meyer, mRS, cognitive scores up to 2 years, and FDG-PET at 6 months.

RESULTS: Seventeen patients have been treated (6 with 2.5M cells, 6 with 5M and 5 with 10M). Follow-up is currently 6 mos in 12 pts, 9 mos in 9 pts and 12 mos in 6 pts. There were 3 serious adverse events related to the surgery, but not to the cells (seizure, subdural hematoma, pneumonia). Cytokine levels, HLA antibody levels, and PBMC function did not change from baseline. Three measures of efficacy (NIHSS, ESS, Fugl-Meyer) all show a trend toward improvement. Since the sample size is small, no statistical analysis has been done. Two patients showed remarkable improvement in their motor (2) and language function (1) within 24 h of surgery, effects which have been sustained during follow-up (12 and 3 mos). These were the only 2 patients with new FLAIR lesions (DWI neg) in the motor cortex that resolved at 2 mos.

CONCLUSIONS: Intraparenchymal transplantation of human modified bone marrow derived stromal cells in chronic stroke patients is safe, feasible, and shows a trend toward neurologic improvement. Larger studies will be initiated to further assess clinical efficacy.