|
1
|
Schmidt CC, Rodriguez-Alejandro OE, Cooke SP, Dworkin JD, Cook AJ, Buce JG, Stefko JM, Cline NS, Smolinski PJ, Miller MC. Relative contributions of the supraspinatus cord and strap tendons to shoulder abduction and translation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:172-180. [PMID: 37543280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The supraspinatus (SS) is formed by a larger anterior bipennate muscle with a cord-like tendon and a posterior unipennate muscle with a strap-like tendon. There is a tendinous connection between the 2 SS subunits. Yet, the relative mechanical contribution of the SS cord and SS strap musculotendinous units to load transmission and subsequent shoulder abduction force is unknown. We hypothesized that a simulated SS cord vs. an SS strap tear would generate less shoulder abduction force and, further, an intact SS cord would offset the expected abduction loss from an SS strap tear, but the inverse would not be true. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were tested in a shoulder simulator with physiological load vectors applied to the upper and lower subscapularis, SS cord, SS strap, infraspinatus, and teres minor. The roles of the SS cord and SS strap muscles were delineated by varying their loads, while keeping constant loads on other muscles. The randomized testing trials included a native condition and 4 test cases that simulated tears by dropping the load and force transfer via the SS cord-to-SS strap connection by adding the load. Testing was completed at both 0° and 30° of abduction. During each test, shoulder abduction force, rotator cuff strains, and humeral translation were measured. RESULTS Simulated isolated SS cord and SS strap tears led to a significantly lower shoulder abduction force (P < .001). A simulated cord tear at 0° and 30° reduced the abduction force by 53% and 38%, respectively. A simulated strap tear at 0° and 30° dropped the abduction force by 27% and 23%, respectively. The decline in the abduction force was larger for the SS cord tear vs. SS strap tear (P ≤ .001). An SS cord tear with full-load transfer to the strap was able to recover to native values at both 0° and 30° (P ≥ .288). Likewise, an SS strap tear with full-load transfer to the SS cord showed a similar recovery to native values at both 0° and 30° (P ≥ .155). During full-load transfer, the tendon strain followed the loading pattern. An SS cord tear or SS strap tear did not cause a change in humeral translation (P ≥ .303). DISCUSSION The mechanical findings support the efficacy of nonoperative treatment of small (<10 mm) SS tears,11 because an intact SS strap tendon can effectively offset the abduction loss of a torn SS cord tear and vice versa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Schmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Omar E Rodriguez-Alejandro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sean P Cooke
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D Dworkin
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sky Lakes Medical Center, Klamath Falls, OR, USA
| | - Austin J Cook
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin G Buce
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph M Stefko
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Noah S Cline
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark C Miller
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|