[Multicentric Hungarian results of cabozantinib therapy in patients with metastatic kidney cancer based on real-world data]

The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cabozantinib therapy initiated between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2022 was evaluated based on a retrospective review of data from 14 renal centers in Hungary. The starting dose was 60 or 40 mg. Physical examinations and laboratory tests were performed every 4 weeks and imaging studies 3-monthly. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity according to NCI CTCAE 4.0. A total of 230 patient records were evaluated, 201 (87.4%) of them had clear cell RCC. Cabozantinib was administered as third, second and first-line treatment in 48.7%, 38.3% and <5% of cases, respectively. Dose reductions occurred in 62.6% and treatment interruption in 6.5%. Duration of therapy was 10.03 months, which was independent of dose reduction. Overall tumor response rate was 39.2% and clinical benefit was 82.8%. The duration of first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment was 11.47, 8.03, 11.57 and 10.13 months, respectively. Overall survival from the start of therapy was 22.0 months. Cabozantinib therapy in daily practice was more beneficial than according to registry study results. Dose reduction did not affect efficacy.

[Multicentric Hungarian results of cabozantinib therapy in patients with metastatic kidney cancer based on real-world data]

The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cabozantinib therapy initiated between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2022 was evaluated based on a retrospective review of data from 14 renal centers in Hungary. The starting dose was 60 or 40 mg. Physical examinations and laboratory tests were performed every 4 weeks and imaging studies 3-monthly. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity according to NCI CTCAE 4.0. A total of 230 patient records were evaluated, 201 (87.4%) of them had clear cell RCC. Cabozantinib was administered as third, second and first-line treatment in 48.7%, 38.3% and <5% of cases, respectively. Dose reductions occurred in 62.6% and treatment interruption in 6.5%. Duration of therapy was 10.03 months, which was independent of dose reduction. Overall tumor response rate was 39.2% and clinical benefit was 82.8%. The duration of first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment was 11.47, 8.03, 11.57 and 10.13 months, respectively. Overall survival from the start of therapy was 22.0 months. Cabozantinib therapy in daily practice was more beneficial than according to registry study results. Dose reduction did not affect efficacy.

Corrigendum: Systemic treatment of breast cancer. 1st Central-Eastern European professional Consensus Statement on breast cancer

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610383.].

Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer. 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer

This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified based on the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The professional guideline primarily reflects the resolutions and recommendations of the current ESMO, NCCN and ABC5, as well as that of the St. Gallen Consensus Conference statements. The recommendations cover classical prognostic factors and certain multigene tests, which play an important role in therapeutic decision-making. From a didactic point of view, the text first addresses early and then locally advanced breast cancer, followed by locoregionally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Within these, we discuss each group according to the available therapeutic options. At the end of the recommendations, we summarize the criteria for treatment in certain rare clinical situations.

[Not Available]

The primary aim of AVACONT was to collect data in the course of routine oncological care from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab supplemented fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy doublet in an open, multicentre, observational study in Hungary. Primary endpoint of the study was to determine progression-free survival (PFS). The Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised 280 patients. Median PFS calculated from enrolment was 270 days in the FAS population. The metastatic involvement of the liver or more than one organ significantly decreased (250 and 245 days), while a clinical response achieved significantly increased (partial response: 404, complete response: 623 days) the mPFS calculated from enrolment. PFS calculated from the start of the first-line treatment was significantly decreased by the presence of mutant RAS gene (481 vs. 395 days). The results confirm the efficacy, known prognostic factors and safety profile of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy dosed during standard oncology care in Hungarian centres.

Pathologic Complete Response Rates After Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with Chemotherapy in Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer - Increasing Rates of Breast Conserving Surgery: A Real-World Experience

Purpose: The neoadjuvant use of pertuzumab and trastuzumab with chemotherapy improves the pathologic complete response (pCR) in early HER2+ breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the pCR rate obtained with dual HER2 blockade in routine clinical practice. The secondary and tertiary objective was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) on performing breast-conserving surgery and survival data.

Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective, observational study in patients with stage II and III HER2+ early breast cancer who received pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based NST. Data were collected from patients’ medical records.

Results: Eighty-two patients were included in the study treated in 8 cancer centers in Hungary between March 2015 and January 2020. The study included women with a median age of 50.3 years. The majority of the patients (95%) received a sequence of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by docetaxel. pCR was achieved in 54% of the cases. As a result of NST a significant increase of conservative breast surgeries (33% vs. 3.6% planned, p = 0.0001) was observed. Ki67 expression and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) significantly predicted pCR. None of the variables were independent predictors of DFS.

Conclusion: The pCR rate achieved in our study demonstrates the reproducibility of trial data in a real-world population. The rate of breast-conserving surgery was significantly increased.

[Linac-based stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer with intrafractional triggered imaging]

Our aim was to present different treatment strategies (non-gated [NG], respiratory-gated [RG] and deep inspiration breath-hold [DIBH] technique) of linac-based stereotaxic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for pancreatic cancer in terms of use of marker, abdominal compression, image quality, and time efficiency. From October 2016 to October 2020 14 patients were treated with VMAT-based SABR (NG: 6/14, 8/14 RG RT including 3/8 DIBH SABR). Treatment verification consisted of 3D/4D CBCTs. For intrafractional tumor visualization (11/14) different type of fiducials were used. The average treatment time was the shortest with NG RT, followed by DIBH and RG RT. However, the best image quality was achieved with DIBH technique. The Krippendorff's agreement test among three independent RTTs showed that DIBH CBCT (Cone Beam CT) can produce sufficient image quality for OARs and can be used to reliably determine OARs position related to safety zone (PRV). Overall, marker-based DIBH SABR with intrafractional tumor visualization appears to be the best technique on linac at present.

[Systemic treatment of breast cancer: professional guideline]

Since the III. Breast Cancer Consensus Conference, a number of new evidence based on clinical trial results have been published which justified updating the 2016 recommendation. In addition to classical prognostic factors, some multigenic tests, which we have incorporated into the recommendation, will play an important role in therapeutic decision-making. The professional guide primarily reflects the resolutions and recommendations of the current ESMO, NCCN, ABC4, as well as the St. Gallen Consensus Conference. From a didactic point of view, the text follows first the line of early and then locally advanced breast cancer, locoregionally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Within these, we discuss each group according to therapeutic options.

Fulvestrant Plus Vistusertib vs Fulvestrant Plus Everolimus vs Fulvestrant Alone for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: The MANTA Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does the addition of vistusertib increase progression-free survival and other measures of antitumor activity of fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed after prior therapy with aromatase inhibitors?

Findings

This randomized clinical trial in 333 patients failed to demonstrate a benefit of vistusertib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone. In addition, the outcomes in both vistusertib groups were inferior to those in the group treated with fulvestrant plus everolimus.

Meaning

The results suggest that dual mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition with vistusertib at the maximal tolerated doses is inferior to mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 inhibition with the rapamycin analogue everolimus.

Importance

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a substantial benefit of adding everolimus to endocrine therapy. Everolimus inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) complex but not mTORC2, which can set off an activating feedback loop via mTORC2. Vistusertib, a dual inhibitor of mTORC1 and mTORC2, has demonstrated broad activity in preclinical breast cancer models, showing superior activity to everolimus.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vistusertib in combination with fulvestrant compared with fulvestrant alone or fulvestrant plus everolimus in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The MANTA trial is an open-label, phase 2 randomized clinical trial in which 333 patients with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer progressing after prior aromatase inhibitor treatment underwent randomization (2:3:3:2) between April 1, 2014, and October 24, 2016, at 88 sites in 9 countries: 67 patients were assigned to receive fulvestrant, 103 fulvestrant plus vistusertib daily, 98 fulvestrant plus vistusertib intermittently, and 65 fulvestrant plus everolimus. Treatment was continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Interventions

Fulvestrant alone or in combination with vistusertib (continuous or intermittent dosing schedules) or everolimus.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Among the 333 women in the study (median age, 63 years [range, 56-70 years]), median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.5-9.2 months) with fulvestrant, 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.4 months) with fulvestrant plus daily vistusertib, 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.6-9.9 months) with fulvestrant plus intermittent vistusertib, and 12.3 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.7 months) with fulvestrant plus everolimus. There was no significant difference in PFS between those receiving fulvestrant plus daily or intermittent vistusertib and fulvestrant alone (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.63-1.24]; P = .46; and hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.55-1.12]; P = .16).

Conclusions and Relevance

The combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared with fulvestrant plus vistusertib or fulvestrant alone. The trial failed to demonstrate a benefit of adding the dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitor vistusertib to fulvestrant.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02216786 and EudraCT number: 2013-002403-34

Capecitabine in Combination with Docetaxel in First Line in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: an Observational Study

Due to the limited experience with capecitabine plus docetaxel (XT) combination in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Hungary, the main objective of the study was to analyze the effectiveness and tolerability of XT therapy. A prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, multicenter, observational study was designed. All female patients were eligible whose metastatic breast cancer could be treated with the XT protocol according to the summary of product characteristics of the drugs. The median progression free survival was 9.9 ± 3.0 months. Time to treatment failure was 4.6 ± 5.1 months on average. The overall response rate was 28.9 %, the clinical benefit rate was 73.3 %. The treatment was discontinued in 35.6 % of patients due to disease progression and in 20.0 % due to adverse events (AE). 33 patients with a total of 73 AEs have been reported, and 13 of them had serious adverse events (SAE). The efficacy and the safety profile of XT chemotherapy proven in the study are consistent with the results demonstrated in randomized trials. First-line XT chemotherapy effectively improves the PFS in metastatic breast cancer.

[Epstein-Barr virus genome positive lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the stomach]

EBV is associated with a high number of tumours and non-tumourous conditions. The rare lymphoepithelioma like carcinoma of the stomach,--just as similar tumours of foregut origin (thymus, lung, salivary gland)--are frequently EBV genom positive with the expression of only a few genes (EBV nuclear antigen 1, EBV encoded ribonucleoproteins/EBER/, latency I). On the basis of the clinicopathological analysis of two cases and literature data the authors point out the male predominance and the relatively favourable prognosis of the patients, furthermore the frequent cardial-subcardial localization of these tumours. Since the frequent non-lymphoepithelioma like stomach tumours,--adenocarcinomas,--show EBV genom positivity in about 1% of the cases, it is concluded that the characteristic lymphoepithelioma like histological pattern is not a sine qua non condition of EBV genom positivity. It may also be assumed, that the CD8 and TIA 1 cytotoxic lymphocytes are not virus but tumour cell specific, however not efficient, perhaps not activated. The low level of apoptotic tumour cells supports this assumption. In one of the cases a double tumour, a genom positive lymphoepithelioma like carcinoma and a genom negative adenocarcinoma, adjacent to each other was seen which speaks in favour of common carcinogenetic factors and shows that microscopic neighbourhood is not a necessary condition in viral association. The origin of the possible oncogenic effect of EBV in the absence of the transforming gene products latent membrane protein 1 and EBNA 2 in genom positive stomach carcinomas is uncertain. The significance of the presence in both cases of CD 5+ tumour cells is not clear, the study of further cases is indicated.