Characterization and quality of care indicators in patients with acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation

Introduction

The definition of the quality of care in healthcare services is paramount to implement the resources necessary to grant the best quality of care according to the current guidelines. Recently, the European Society of Cardiology's guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) were published, and defined the quality indicators to be evaluated in such patients.

Purpose

To characterize the level of care given to the population of patients with NSTEMI included in the a national registry since 2011, according to the new guidelines directives.

Population and methods

We evaluated 12193 patients with NSTEMI. For each year the following variables were analyzed: age, gender, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities, clinical presentation (rhythm, blood pressure, Killip-Kimball Class), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), treatment during admission and discharge, and time to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Besides this, a comparing between years was made to analyze differences according to the quality indicators established in the guidelines.

Results

In 2019, 83.9% of patient with LVEF <40% were treated with IECA/ARA II and 80.6% were prescribed a betablocker at discharge. No statistically significant differences were found across the year with respect to IECA/ARA II at discharge (p=0.495), and beta-blocker at discharge (p=0.812). In terms of P2Y12 inhibitors during the hospital admission, there was a statistically significant increase in its use when comparing 2019 to 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 (p=0.019 for 2014 and p<0,001 the following years), with prescription in 90.4% of the patients in 2019. At discharge 88.3% of the patients were prescribed a P2Y12 inhibitor in 2019 and there was also a statistically significant increase in its prescription when compared to the previous years (from 2011 to 2017 with a p<0.001). When it comes to the prescription of statins at discharge there was a statistically significant difference between groups, driven mostly by an increase compared to the year 2012 (95.6% vs 90.8%, p=0.005). Only 16% of patients were subjected to ICA within 24h of admission during the year 2019. No statistically significant difference was found between other years (p>0.100 when comparing between years).

Discussion

The most striking feature that can be improved is the amount of patients subject to ICA within the first 24h after diagnosis. When it comes to the P2Y12 inhibitors it is also clear that there has been an increase in its prescription during the admission and at discharge. To sum up, it is clear that there is still some margin to improve care, of at least 10–20% in most parameters. This data portrays a picture of the measures and steps to take in order to provide the adequate care according to the latest guidelines.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

P603Cardiac Magnetic Resonance evaluation and risk stratification of patients with unexplained or suspected arrhythmias

Introduction

The etiological diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias is often difficult. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is the gold standard exam for anatomical and functional cardiac evaluation and it may be indicated in patients with ventricular arrhythmias when echocardiography does not provide an accurate assessment of left and right ventricles (LV, RV).

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of CMR in the diagnosis and stratification of arrhythmic risk in patients with confirmed or suspected arrhythmias, as well as to describe the changes observed.

Methods

We performed a prospective registry over a 5-year period of all the patients with arrhythmias who underwent CMR for diagnostic and risk stratification purposes. We followed a protocol to evaluate both anatomically and functionally the ventricles and to look for the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

Results

A total of 78 patients were included, of which 65% were male and a mean age of 46±17 years-old was observed. The indications for CMR evaluation of patients with confirmed or suspected arrhythmias were as follows: 33% (n=26) of the patients had very frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVC), 23% (n=18) had sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), 17% (n=13) suspected structural heart disease with high arrhythmic potential, 12% (n=9) unexplained recurrent syncope, 6% (n=5) supraventricular tachycardia, 5% (n=4) non-sustained VT and 4% (n=3) aborted sudden cardiac death. Depressed ventricular ejection fraction (<50%) was present in 9% (n=7) for the LV and in 14% (n=11)for the RV. Dilation of the LV was found in 24% of the patients (n=19, mean LV volume: 115±4ml/m2) and RV dilation was present in only 1 patient who had right ventricle arrhythmogenic dysplasia (RVAD) (RV volume: 152ml/m2). Cardiac synchronization artifacts due to the presence of very frequent PVC compromised the calculation of v volumes in only 4% (n=3) of the patients. In total, 6% (n=5) had interventricular septum hypertrophy (mean 15±6g/m2), 10% (n=8) had a slight prolapse of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and 19% (n=15) had a dilated left auricle. LGE was present in 13% (n=10) and slight pericardium effusion was detected in 12% (n=9). CMR was considered normal in 65% (n=51), in 15% (n=12) we found nonspecific changes deserving follow-up and in 20% (n=15) it was possible to establish a diagnosis which was previously unknown: 5% (n=4) had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 4% (n=3) LV non-compaction, 4% (n=3) a myocarditis sequelae, 3% (n=2) RVAD, 3% (n=2) a myocardial infarction scar and 1 had non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Conclusions

CMR is a technique with high spatial resolution, feasible and safe, which allowed an increase in diagnosis in 20% of the patients, thus contributing to the risk stratification of our study population with suspected high arrhythmic potential when the first-line complementary exams were inconclusive.