1
|
Marcon P, Clarke A, Pace K, McDonald C, Saibil F, Lochnan HA, Punthakee Z, Mahmud F. A191 PERSISTENT BENEFIT OF DIETITIAN-LED GLUTEN-FREE DIET EDUCATION AT CD DIAGNOSIS ON DIETARY ADHERENCE IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES AND CELIAC DISEASE. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2022. [PMCID: PMC8859248 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab049.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Celiac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune comorbidity of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with a gluten-free diet (GFD) being the current gold standard treatment for this condition. Adherence to a GFD can be impacted by several factors including dietetic counselling, yet little is known about the impact of clinic-based interventions on long-term GFD adherence in this population.
Aims
To prospectively evaluate the impact of a dietitian-led GFD education intervention on adherence to a GFD in children and adults with T1D and CD over a 3-year period.
Methods
A cohort of N=62 pediatric and adult subjects who screened seropositive for CD as part of the CD-DIET clinical trial were followed over a 3-year period post-CD diagnosis and assessed on the basis of the GFD education regimen they received at initial CD diagnosis. This included 3 groups: 1) intensive dietitian training (IDT = 5 dietitian visits over 1 year while following GFD), 2) single dietitian training (SDT = 1 GFD training session after 1 year of following GCD) and 3) no dietitian training (NDT) at CD diagnosis. Annual visits included serologic testing of TTG-IgA titres, anthropometric assessments and the completion of questionnaires evaluating diet and adherence to a GFD. Data was analysed longitudinally using linear mixed effects and generalized estimating equations (GEE) regression modeling adjusting for the fixed effects of age, sex, duration of diabetes and time.
Results
At baseline, participants who received IDT (n=15), SDT (n=16) and NDT (n=31) represented 24.2%, 25.8%, and 50.0% of the cohort, respectively. Over the 3-year study period, participants in the IDT group had the greatest odds of self-reporting being a GFD, with odds 4.3 (95%CI: 1.1 to 16.4; P=0.033) and 9.5 (95%CI: 2.7 to 33.7; P<0.001) greater than the SDT and NDT groups, respectively. The assessment of daily gluten intakes less than 10mg, as recommended for a GFD, revealed a lack of differences between the IDT and SDT groups. In contrast, the NDT group had significantly lower odds of meeting this threshold relative to those who received IDT (OR=0.2; 95%CI: 0.04 to 0.56; P=0.004). No longitudinal differences in TTG-IgA levels were seen between groups over the 3-year period.
Conclusions
In diabetes patients greater contact with a dietitian at CD diagnosis was associated with higher levels of GFD adherence over time, which was not reflected in follow-up Serologic evaluation. These findings highlight the importance of nutritional support in patients with both diabetes and celiac disease at the time of CD diagnosis. In addition, following TTG-IgA alone does not fully inform dietary compliance to a GFD.
Diet teaching stratification
Diet assignment
Funding Agencies
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation / PSI
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Marcon
- GI, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Clarke
- GI, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - K Pace
- GI, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C McDonald
- Western University Faculty of Science, London, ON, Canada
| | - F Saibil
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Z Punthakee
- McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - F Mahmud
- Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dave S, Farhat W, Pace K, Navarro O, Hebert D, Khoury AE. Effect of donor pneumoperitoneum on early allograft perfusion following renal transplantation in pediatric patients: an intraoperative Doppler ultrasound study. Pediatr Transplant 2008; 12:522-6. [PMID: 18672483 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00796.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Decreased perfusion and trauma during laparoscopic harvesting are proposed causative factors for DGF and rejection in children following renal transplantation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) allograft. We performed a retrospective review of 11 children who underwent LDN transplant and 11 preceding patients who underwent ODN transplant. Intraoperative DUS findings, creatinine values and clearance, time to nadir creatinine and AR episodes were compared. There were no significant differences in the BMI, vascular anatomy, side of nephrectomy, or warm ischemia time in the two groups. Mean follow-up duration was 11.4 and 30.4 months in LDN and ODN groups. DUS showed initial turbulent flow in five of the LDN and four of the ODN group with an average RI of 0.59 and 0.66 in the ODN and LDN groups, respectively (NS). Three patients in the ODN group had an abnormal RI compared to none in the LDN group (p = 0.034). The creatinine values, creatinine clearances (at 24 h, one, four wk and last follow-up) and AR episodes were similar in both groups. Pneumoperitoneum during LDN does not appear to have an adverse impact on early graft reperfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dave
- Division of Pediatric Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Asano TK, McLeod RS, Blitz M, Butts C, Kneteman N, Bigam D, Oosthuizen JFM, Phang PT, Gouthro D, Ravid A, Liu M, O'Connor BI, MacRae HM, Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Al-Obeed O, Penning J, Stern HS, Colquhoun P, Nogueras J, Dipasquale B, Petras J, Wexner S, Woodhouse S, Raval MJ, Heine JA, May GR, Bass S, Brown CJ, MacLean AR, Asano T, Cohen Z, MacRae HM, O'Connor BI, McLeod RS, Asano TK, Toma D, Stern HS, McLeod RS, Irshad K, Ghitulescu GA, Gordon PH, MacLean AR, Lilly L, Cohen Z, O'Connor B, McLeod RS, Ravid A, O'Connor BI, Liu M, MacRae HM, Cohen Z, McLeod RS, St Germaine RL, de Gara CJ, Fox R, Kenwell Z, Blitz S, Wong JT, Mc-Mulkin HM, Porter GA, Jayaraman S, Gray D, Burpee SE, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Pace K, Poulin EC, Freeman J, Tranqui P, Trottier D, Bodurtha A, Sarma A, Bheerappa N, Sastry RA, de Gara CJ, Hanson J, Hamilton S, Taylor MC, Haase E, Stevens J, Rigo V, Richards J, Bigam DL, Cheung PY, Burpee SE, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Pace K, Poulin EC, Grace DM, Gupta S, Sarma A, Bheerappa N, Radhakrishna P, Sastry RA, Malik S, Duffy P, Schulte P, Cameron R, Pace KT, Dyer S, Phan V, Poulin E, Schlachta C, Mamazza J, Stewart R, Honey RJ, Kanthan R, Kanthan SC, Jayaraman S, Aarts MA, Solomon MJ, McLeod RS, Ong S, Pitt D, Stephen W, Latulippe J, Girotti M, Bloom S, Pace K, Dyer S, Stewart R, Honey RJ, Poulin E, Schlachta C, Mamazza J, Furlan JC, Rosen IB, Asano TK, Haigh PI, McLeod RS, Al Saleh N, Taylor B, Karimuddin AA, Marschall J, McFadden A, Pollett WG, Dicks E, Tranqui P, Trottier D, Freeman J, Bodurtha A, Urbach DR, Bell CM, Austin PC, Cleary SP, Gyfe R, Greig P, Smith L, Mackenzie R, Strasberg S, Hanna S, Taylor B, Langer B, Gallinger S, Marschall J, Nechala P, Chibbar R, Colquhoun P, Zhou J, Lee TDG, Meneghetti AT, McKenna GJ, Owen D, Scudamore CH, McMaster RM, Chung SW, Aarts MA, Granton J, Cook DJ, Bohnen JMA, Marshall JC, Colquhoun P, Weiss E, Efron J, Nogueras J, Vernava A, Wexner S, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Burpee SE, Pace KT, Mamazza J, Rosen IB, Furlan JC, Charghi R, Schricker T, Backman S, Rouah F, Christou NV, Obayan A, Keith R, Juurlink BHJ, Skaro AI, Liwski RS, Zhou J, Lee TDG, Hirsch GM, Powers KA, Khadaroo RG, Papia G, Kapus A, Rotstein OD, Furlan JC, Rosen IB, Stratford AFC, George RL, VanManen L, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Mayrand S, Mercier L, Stanbridge D, Fried GM, Nanji SA, Hancock WW, Anderson C, Shapiro AMJ, Butter A, Martins L, Taylor B, Ott MC, Rycroft K, Wall WJ, Burpee SE, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Pace K, Poulin EC, Taylor MC, Christou NV, Jarand J, Sylvestre JL, McLean APH, Behzadi A, Tan L, Unruh H, Brandt MG, Darling GE, Miller L, Seely AJE, Maziak DE, Gunning D, Do MT, Bukhari M, Shamji FM, Abdurahman A, Darling G, Ginsberg R, Johnston M, Waddell T, Keshavjee S, Cuccarolo G, Charyk-Stewart T, Inaba K, Malthaner R, Gray D, Girotti M, Grondin SC, Tutton SM, Sichlau MJ, Pozdol C, McDonough TJ, Masters GA, Ray DW, Liptay MJ. Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Canadian Association of General Surgeons Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons: Canadian Surgery Forum, London, Ont., Sept. 19 to 22, 2002. Can J Surg 2002; 45:3-26. [PMID: 37381180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - D Pitt
- Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Joo HS, Perks WJ, Kataoka MT, Errett L, Pace K, Honey RJ. A comparison of patient-controlled sedation using either remifentanil or remifentanil-propofol for shock wave lithotripsy. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:1227-32. [PMID: 11682403 DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) has been used for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) because it allows for rapid individualized titration of anesthetics. Because of its sedating effects, the addition of propofol to remifentanil may improve patient tolerance of SWL with PCS. One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil 10 microg or remifentanil 10 microg plus propofol 5 mg for PCS with zero-lockout interval. Nine patients in the Remifentanil group and three patients in the Remifentanil-Propofol group required additional sedatives to complete their SWL (P = 0.128). Compared with the Remifentanil group, the Remifentanil-Propofol group required less remifentanil, had a decreased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and had a better overall satisfaction level. However, they had an increased incidence of transient apnea and oxygen desaturation. The incidence of apnea was 15% in the Remifentanil group and 52% in the Remifentanil-Propofol group (P < 0.001). All patients were able to move themselves to the stretcher at the end of SWL, and median time to home discharge was <70 min in both groups. Both remifentanil and remifentanil-propofol were useful for PCS during SWL. IMPLICATIONS The addition of propofol to remifentanil improves patient satisfaction and decreases postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, it causes more respiratory depression than remifentanil alone. When remifentanil-propofol is used with patient-controlled sedation, appropriate monitoring and a minimum 1-2 min lockout interval is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Joo
- Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wordinger RJ, Orr EL, Pace K, Oakford L, Morrill A. An assessment of mast-cell deficient mice (W/Wv) as a model system to study the role of histamine in implantation and deciduoma formation. J Reprod Fertil 1985; 73:451-6. [PMID: 3989796 DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0730451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The ovaries from mast cell-normal (+/+) and mast cell-deficient (W/Wv) mice were examined with light and electron microscopy. In addition the effect of ovariectomy and subsequent steroid treatment on total uterine histamine content, total mast cell numbers and surface and glandular epithelial cell heights was measured. The ovaries of +/+ mice were normal, displaying various stages of follicular growth and atresia and numerous corpora lutea; the ovaries of W/Wv mice lacked follicles and corpora lutea but contained numerous hyperplastic interstitial cells which contained numerous lipid droplets, vesiculated mitochondria and abundant endoplasmic reticulum suggestive of steroid synthesis. Steroid treatment of ovariectomized +/+ and W/Wv mice caused a significant increase in uterine wet weight and endometrial surface and glandular epithelial cell heights. In +/+ mice, steroid treatment caused a concomitant increase in total mast cells per uterine horn while mast cells were totally absent in W/Wv mice. The increase in uterine histamine in +/+ mice is consistent with the increase in mast cell numbers. Measurable amounts of uterine histamine, which increases slightly after steroid treatment, were demonstrated in W/Wv mice. Since the uteri of +/+ and W/Wv mice respond to steroids in a similar manner with the sole exception being histamine content and mast cell numbers, our results demonstrate the potential of using these animals to investigate the role(s) of uterine mast cells and non-mast cell uterine histamine in the process of implantation and the formation of a decidual cell response.
Collapse
|