Comparison of suspected and confirmed internal EVD-related infections: a prospective multi-centre U.K. observational study

Background

Diagnosis of internal external ventricular drain (EVD)-related infections (iERI) is an area of diagnostic difficulty. Empiric treatment is often initiated on clinical suspicion. There is limited guidance around antimicrobial management of confirmed versus suspected iERI.

Methods

Data on patients requiring EVD insertion were collected from 21 neurosurgical units in the United Kingdom from 2014 to 2015. Confirmed iERI was defined as clinical suspicion of infection with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture and/or Gram stain. Cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and clinical parameters and antimicrobial management were compared between the 2 groups. Mortality and Modified Rankin Scores were compared at 30 days post-EVD insertion.

Results

Internal EVD-related infection was suspected after 46 of 495 EVD insertions (9.3%), more common after an emergency insertion. Twenty-six of 46 were confirmed iERIs, mostly due to Staphylococci (16 of 26). When confirmed and suspected infections were compared, there were no differences in CSF white cell counts or glucose concentrations, nor peripheral blood white cell counts or C-reactive protein concentrations. The incidence of fever, meningism, and seizures was also similar, although altered consciousness was more common in people with confirmed iERI. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial usage was prevalent in both groups with no difference in median duration of therapy (10 days [interquartile range {IQR}, 7–24.5] for confirmed cases and 9.5 days [IQR, 5.75–14] for suspected, P = 0.3). Despite comparable baseline characteristics, suspected iERI was associated with lower mortality and better neurological outcomes.

Conclusions

Suspected iERI could represent sterile inflammation or lower bacterial load leading to false-negative cultures. There is a need for improved microbiology diagnostics and biomarkers of bacterial infection to permit accurate discrimination and improve antimicrobial stewardship.

OS07.2.A Evaluation of Intraoperative Surgical Adjuncts and Resection of Glioblastoma (ELISAR GB): A UK and Ireland multicentre, prospective observational cohort study

Background

Despite operative and adjuvant therapies, glioblastoma remains incurable, with the extent of resection being one of few treatments that can improve survival. To improve resection, operative adjuncts are used, with neuronavigation and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) recommended as a standard of care in those aimed for maximal safe resection. Despite the standards, meta-analysis concluded that the impact of 5-ALA on the extent of surgical resection is of low quality due to bias in reporting tumour location and additional image guidance used, factors impacting on extent of resection as well as short-term neurological outcomes being uncertain. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the availability and use of 5-ALA and other adjuncts and compare surgical outcomes of 5-ALA-guided versus non-5-ALA-guided resections.

Material and Methods

A multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted across 27 out of 31 available centres in the UK and Ireland from 6 January until 19 March 2020. Inclusion criteria included adults with first diagnosis, supratentorial glioblastoma undergoing resection. Primary outcomes included: i) the availability and use of surgical adjuncts and ii) complete resection of enhancing tissue (CRET). Secondary outcomes included adverse events, new onset of postoperative neurological deficit and post-operative neurological function. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis with a p-value <0.05 deemed significant.

Results

232 consecutive cases were identified. 142/232 cases were aimed for maximal safe resection subsequently divided into 5-ALA-guided (n=92) versus non-5-ALA-guided (n=50) resections. 5-ALA and neuronavigation were available across all centres. Neuronavigation and 5-ALA were used in 91% (n=129/142) and 65% (n=92/142) of cases aimed for maximal safe resection whereas 83% (n=75/90) and 49% (n=44/90) for debulk surgery. 35 unique combinations of surgical adjuncts were used in 232 operations. 5-ALA-guided resection yielded a higher percentage of CRET than without (55% versus 28%, p < 0.01). The two groups showed no difference in adverse events (p=0.98), new onset of neurological deficit (p=0.88) nor neurological function (p=0.7). A logistic regression analysis showed that 5-ALA was an important predictor of CRET regardless of additional adjuncts used (OR 2.4, CI 0.96-5.97, P = 0.05), tumour location and molecular characterisation (OR 3.48, CI 1.61-7.51, P <0.01).

Conclusion

Firstly, we showed that 5-ALA is not always used for glioblastoma aimed for CRET. Secondly, we report a great heterogeneity of adjuncts used for resection, possibly explained by a lack of high-quality evidence and surgeon training. Thirdly we demonstrate that 5-ALA-guided resection leads to higher percentage of CRET regardless of other adjuncts used, tumour location and molecular characterisation.

Relating professionalism and conscientiousness to develop an objective, scalar, proxy measure of professionalism in anaesthetic trainees

BACKGROUND

The concept of professionalism is complex and subjective and relies on expert judgements. Currently, there are no existing objective measures of professionalism in anaesthesia. However, it is possible that at least some elements of professionalism may be indicated by objective measures. A number of studies have suggested that conscientiousness as a trait is a significant contributor to professionalism.

METHODS

A 'Conscientiousness Index' (CI) was developed by collation of routinely collected data from tasks expected to be carried out by anaesthetic trainees such as punctual submission of holiday and 'not-on-call' requests, attendance at audit meetings, timely submission of completed appraisal documentation and sickness/absence notifications. The CI consists of a sum of points deducted from a baseline of 50 for non-completion of these objective and measurable behaviours related to conscientiousness. This was correlated with consultants' formal and informal subjective measures of professionalism in those trainees. Informal, subjective measures of professionalism consisted of a 'Professionalism Index' (PI). The PI consisted of a score developed from consultants' expert, subjective views of professionalism for those trainees. Formal, subjective measures of professionalism consisted of a score derived from comments made by consultants in College Tutor feedback forms on their views on the professionalism of those trainees (College Tutor feedback; CT). The PI and CT scores were correlated against the CI using a Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

There was a negative, but not statistically significant, relationship between the CI and formal, subjective measures of professionalism; CT scores (r = -0.341, p = 0.06), but no correlation between CI and consultants informal views of trainees' professionalism; the PI scores (r _s  = -0.059, p = 0.759).

CONCLUSIONS

This may be due the 'failure to fail' phenomenon due to the high stakes nature of raising concerns of professionalism in postgraduate healthcare professionals or may be that the precision of the tool may be insufficient to distinguish between trainees who generally show highly professional behaviour. Future development of the tool may need to include more of the sub-facets of conscientiousness. Independently of a relationship with the construct of professionalism, a measure of conscientiousness might be of interest to future employers.