Data-driven optimization of version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for anal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system undergoes periodic revisions to maintain contemporary survival outcomes related to stage. Recently, the AJCC has developed a novel, systematic approach incorporating survival data to refine stage groupings. The objective of this study was to demonstrate data-driven optimization of the version 9 AJCC staging system for anal cancer assessed through a defined validation approach.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with anal cancer in 2012 through 2017. Kaplan-Meier methods analyzed 5-year survival by individual clinical T category, N category, M category, and overall stage. Cox proportional hazards models validated overall survival of the revised TNM stage groupings.

RESULTS

Overall, 24,328 cases of anal cancer were included. Evaluation of the 8th edition AJCC stage groups demonstrated a lack of hierarchical prognostic order. Survival at 5 years for stage I was 84.4%, 77.4% for stage IIA, and 63.7% for stage IIB; however, stage IIIA disease demonstrated a 73.0% survival, followed by 58.4% for stage IIIB, 59.9% for stage IIIC, and 22.5% for stage IV (p <.001). Thus, stage IIB was redefined as T1-2N1M0, whereas Stage IIIA was redefined as T3N0-1M0. Reevaluation of 5-year survival based on data-informed stage groupings now demonstrates hierarchical prognostic order and validated via Cox proportional hazards models.

CONCLUSION

The 8th edition AJCC survival data demonstrated a lack of hierarchical prognostic order and informed revised stage groupings in the version 9 AJCC staging system for anal cancer. Thus, a validated data-driven optimization approach can be implemented for staging revisions across all disease sites moving forward.

Aspirin vs Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: The Alliance A011502 Randomized Trial

Importance

Observational studies of survivors of breast cancer and prospective trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease suggest improved breast cancer survival among aspirin users, but prospective studies of aspirin to prevent breast cancer recurrence are lacking.

Objective

To determine whether aspirin decreases the risk of invasive cancer events among survivors of breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A011502, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted in the United States and Canada with 3020 participants who had high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, enrolled participants from 534 sites from January 6, 2017, through December 4, 2020, with follow-up to March 4, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized (stratified for hormone receptor status [positive vs negative], body mass index [≤30 vs >30], stage II vs III, and time since diagnosis [<18 vs ≥18 months]) to receive 300 mg of aspirin (n = 1510) or placebo once daily (n = 1510) for 5 years.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival. Overall survival was a key secondary outcome.

Results

A total of 3020 participants were randomized when the data and safety monitoring committee recommended suspending the study at the first interim analysis because the hazard ratio had crossed the prespecified futility bound. By median follow-up of 33.8 months (range, 0.1-72.6 months), 253 invasive disease-free survival events were observed (141 in the aspirin group and 112 in the placebo group), yielding a hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% CI, 0.99-1.63; P = .06). All invasive disease-free survival events, including death, invasive progression (both distant and locoregional), and new primary events, were numerically higher in the aspirin group, although the differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.82-1.72). Rates of grades 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both groups.

Conclusion and Relevance

Among participants with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, daily aspirin therapy did not improve risk of breast cancer recurrence or survival in early follow-up. Despite its promise and wide availability, aspirin should not be recommended as an adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02927249.

A Single Arm Phase 2 Trial of Trametinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma

PURPOSE

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular cancer with pathogenic TAZ-CAMTA1 operating as an oncogenic driver through activation of MAPK pathway. Trametinib is an inhibitor of MEK, a critical kinase in the MAPK pathway. We sought to evaluate the effect of trametinib in patients with EHE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A phase 2 trial of trametinib was conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EHE. Eligibility requirements included evidence of tumor progression or presence of EHE-related pain requiring opiates for management prior to enrollment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1 in cases with TAZ-CAMTA1 confirmed by fusion-FISH. Secondary objectives were to estimate ORR for all patients, median PFS, 2-year OS rate, patient safety, and change in patient-reported global health and pain scores per PROMIS questionnaires.

RESULTS

44 patients enrolled and 42 started trametinib. TAZ-CAMTA1 was detected in 27 tumor samples. The ORR was 3.7% (95% CI: 0.094, 19.0), median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI: 7.1, NA), and 2-year OS rate was 33.3% (95% CI: 19.1, 58.2) in the target population. Median pain intensity and interference scores improved significantly after 4 weeks of trametinib in patients using opiates. Common AEs related to trametinib were rash, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea/constipation, alopecia and edema; one Grade 5 ARDS/pneumonitis was related to trametinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Trametinib was associated with reduction in EHE-related pain and median PFS of more than 6 months providing palliative benefit in patients with advanced EHE, but the trial did not meet the ORR goal.

Hyper-Dependence on NHEJ Enables Synergy between DNA-PK Inhibitors and Low-Dose Doxorubicin in Leiomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive sarcoma for which standard chemotherapies achieve response rates under 30%. There are no effective targeted therapies against LMS. Most LMS are characterized by chromosomal instability (CIN), resulting in part from TP53 and RB1 co-inactivation and DNA damage repair defects. We sought to identify therapeutic targets that could exacerbate intrinsic CIN and DNA damage in LMS, inducing lethal genotoxicity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed clinical targeted sequencing in 287 LMS and genome-wide loss-of-function screens in 3 patient-derived LMS cell lines, to identify LMS-specific dependencies. We validated candidate targets by biochemical and cell-response assays in vitro and in seven mouse models.

RESULTS

Clinical targeted sequencing revealed a high burden of somatic copy-number alterations (median fraction of the genome altered =0.62) and demonstrated homologous recombination deficiency signatures in 35% of LMS. Genome-wide short hairpin RNA screens demonstrated PRKDC (DNA-PKcs) and RPA2 essentiality, consistent with compensatory nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) hyper-dependence. DNA-PK inhibitor combinations with unconventionally low-dose doxorubicin had synergistic activity in LMS in vitro models. Combination therapy with peposertib and low-dose doxorubicin (standard or liposomal formulations) inhibited growth of 5 of 7 LMS mouse models without toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of DNA-PK inhibitors with unconventionally low, sensitizing, doxorubicin dosing showed synergistic effects in LMS in vitro and in vivo models, without discernable toxicity. These findings underscore the relevance of DNA damage repair alterations in LMS pathogenesis and identify dependence on NHEJ as a clinically actionable vulnerability in LMS.

Immunological and clinicopathological features predict HER2-positive breast cancer prognosis in the neoadjuvant NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601 randomized trials

The identification of prognostic markers in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for treatment optimization in HER2-positive breast cancer, with the immune microenvironment being a key factor. Here, we investigate the complexity of B and T cell receptor (BCR and TCR) repertoires in the context of two phase III trials, NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601, evaluating neoadjuvant paclitaxel with trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. BCR features, particularly the number of reads and clones, evenness and Gini index, are heterogeneous according to hormone receptor status and PAM50 subtypes. Moreover, BCR measures describing clonal expansion, namely evenness and Gini index, are independent prognostic factors. We present a model developed in NeoALTTO and validated in CALGB 40601 that can predict event-free survival (EFS) by integrating hormone receptor and clinical nodal status, breast pathological complete response (pCR), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (%) and BCR repertoire evenness. A prognostic score derived from the model and including those variables, HER2-EveNT, allows the identification of patients with 5-year EFS > 90%, and, in those not achieving pCR, of a subgroup of immune-enriched tumors with an excellent outcome despite residual disease.

Age, Body Mass Index, Tumor Subtype, and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival

Importance

Black women in the United States have higher breast cancer (BC) mortality rates than White women. The combined role of multiple factors, including body mass index (BMI), age, and tumor subtype, remains unclear.

Objective

To assess the association of race and ethnicity with survival among clinical trial participants with early-stage BC (eBC) according to tumor subtype, age, and BMI.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study analyzed survival data, as of November 12, 2021, from participants enrolled between 1997 and 2010 in 4 randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trials: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9741, 49907, and 40101 as well as North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831, legacy groups of the Alliance of Clinical Trials in Oncology. Median follow-up was 9.8 years.

Exposures

Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants were compared with non-Hispanic White participants within subgroups of subtype (hormone receptor positive [HR+]/ERBB2 [formerly HER2] negative [ERBB2-], ERBB2+, and HR-/ERBB2-), age (<50, 50 to <65, and ≥65 years), and BMI (<18.5, 18.5 to <25.0, 25.0 to <30.0, and ≥30.0).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 9479 participants, 436 (4.4%) were Hispanic, 871 (8.8%) non-Hispanic Black, and 7889 (79.5%) non-Hispanic White. The median (range) age was 52 (19.0-89.7) years. Among participants with HR+/ERBB2- tumors, non-Hispanic Black individuals had worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.04-2.12; 5-year RFS, 88.5% vs 93.2%) than non-Hispanic White individuals, although the global test for association of race and ethnicity with RFS was not significant within any tumor subtype. There were no OS differences by race and ethnicity in any subtype. Race and ethnicity were associated with OS in young participants (age <50 years; global P = .008); young non-Hispanic Black participants (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.71; 5-year OS, 86.6% vs 92.0%) and Hispanic participants (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.16-2.29; 5-year OS, 86.2% vs 92.0%) had worse OS than young non-Hispanic White participants. Race and ethnicity were associated with RFS in participants with BMIs of 25 to less than 30, with non-Hispanic Black participants having worse RFS (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.23-2.68; 5-year RFS, 83.2% vs 87.3%) than non-Hispanic White participants.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, racial and ethnic survival disparities were identified in patients with eBC receiving standardized initial care, and potentially at-risk subgroups, for whom focused interventions may improve outcomes, were found.

Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients With Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Results From ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance)

PURPOSE

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is the preferred treatment for unifocal breast cancer (BC). The oncologic safety of BCT for multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) has not been demonstrated in a prospective study. ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance) is a phase II, single-arm, prospective trial designed to evaluate oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing BCT for MIBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women age 40 years and older with two to three foci of biopsy-proven cN0-1 BC were eligible. Patients underwent lumpectomies with negative margins followed by whole breast radiation with boost to all lumpectomy beds. The primary end point was cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) at 5 years with an a priori rate of clinical acceptability of <8%.

RESULTS

Among 270 women enrolled between November 2012 and August 2016, there were 204 eligible patients who underwent protocol-directed BCT. The median age was 61 years (range, 40-87 years). At a median follow-up of 66.4 months (range, 1.3-90.6 months), six patients developed LR for an estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of LR of 3.1% (95% CI, 1.3 to 6.4). Patient age, number of sites of preoperative biopsy-proven BC, estrogen receptor status and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, and pathologic T and N categories were not associated with LR risk. Exploratory analysis showed that the 5-year LR rate in patients without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 15) was 22.6% compared with 1.7% in patients with a preoperative MRI (n = 189; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

The Z11102 clinical trial demonstrates that breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation that includes lumpectomy site boosts yields an acceptably low 5-year LR rate for MIBC. This evidence supports BCT as a reasonable surgical option for women with two to three ipsilateral foci, particularly among patients with disease evaluated with preoperative breast MRI.

Association of circulating markers with cognitive decline after radiation therapy for brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

A recent phase III trial (NCT01372774) comparing use of stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] versus whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT] after surgical resection of a single brain metastasis revealed that declines in cognitive function were more common with WBRT than with SRS. A secondary endpoint in that trial, and the primary objective in this secondary analysis, was to identify baseline biomarkers associated with cognitive impairment after either form of radiotherapy for brain metastasis. Here we report our findings on APOE genotype and serum levels of associated proteins and their association with radiation-induced neurocognitive decline.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected samples from a completed randomized clinical trial, patients provided blood samples every 3 months that were tested by genotyping and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and results were analyzed in association with cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

The APOE genotype was not associated with neurocognitive impairment at 3 months. However, low serum levels of ApoJ, ApoE, or ApoA protein (all P < .01) and higher amyloid beta (Aβ 1-42) levels (P = .048) at baseline indicated a greater likelihood of neurocognitive decline at 3 months after SRS, whereas lower ApoJ levels were associated with decline after WBRT (P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with these pretreatment serum markers should be counseled about radiation-related neurocognitive decline.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Immune-Related Gene Expression Signatures vs Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Early-Stage ERBB2/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the CALGB 40601 and PAMELA Trials

Importance

Both tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) assessment and immune-related gene expression signatures by RNA profiling predict higher pathologic complete response (pCR) and improved event-free survival (EFS) in patients with early-stage ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer. However, whether these 2 measures of immune activation provide similar or additive prognostic value is not known.

Objective

To examine the prognostic ability of TILs and immune-related gene expression signatures, alone and in combination, to predict pCR and EFS in patients with early-stage ERBB2/HER2-positive breast cancer treated in 2 clinical trials.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this prognostic study, a correlative analysis was performed on the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 40601 trial and the PAMELA trial. In the CALGB 40601 trial, 305 patients were randomly assigned to weekly paclitaxel with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both for 16 weeks. The primary end point was pCR, with a secondary end point of EFS. In the PAMELA trial, 151 patients received neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib for 18 weeks. The primary end point was the ability of the HER2-enriched subtype to predict pCR. The studies were conducted from October 2013 to November 2015 (PAMELA) and from December 2008 to February 2012 (CALGB 40601). Data analyses were performed from June 1, 2020, to January 1, 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Immune-related gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing and TILs were assessed on 230 CALGB 40601 trial pretreatment tumors and 138 PAMELA trial pretreatment tumors. The association of these biomarkers with pCR (CALGB 40601 and PAMELA) and EFS (CALGB 40601) was studied by logistic regression and Cox analyses.

Results

The median age of the patients was 50 years (IQR, 42-50 years), and 305 (100%) were women. Of 202 immune signatures tested, 166 (82.2%) were significantly correlated with TILs. In both trials combined, TILs were significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; P = .02). In addition to TILs, 36 immune signatures were significantly associated with higher pCR rates. Seven of these signatures outperformed TILs for predicting pCR, 6 of which were B-cell related. In a multivariable Cox model adjusted for clinicopathologic factors, including PAM50 intrinsic tumor subtype, the immunoglobulin G signature, but not TILs, was independently associated with EFS (immunoglobulin G signature-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.93; P = .02; TIL-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.02; P = .99).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study suggest that multiple B-cell-related signatures were more strongly associated with pCR and EFS than TILs, which largely represent T cells. When both TILs and gene expression are available, the prognostic value of immune-related signatures appears to be superior.

Effect of Sepsis on Death as Modified by Solid Organ Transplantation

Background

Patients with solid organ transplants (SOT) have an increased risk for sepsis compared to the general population. Paradoxically, studies suggest that SOT patients with sepsis may experience better outcomes compared to those without a SOT. However, these analyses used previous definitions of sepsis. It remains unknown whether the more recent definitions of sepsis and modern analytic approaches demonstrate a similar relationship.

Methods

Using the Weill Cornell-Critical Care Database for Advanced Research (WC-CEDAR) we analyzed granular physiologic, microbiologic, comorbidity, and therapeutic data in patients with and without SOT admitted to intensive care units (ICU’s). We used a survival analysis with a targeted minimum loss-based estimation, adjusting for within group (SOT and non-SOT) potential confounders to ascertain whether the effect of sepsis, defined by sepsis-3, on 28-day mortality was modified by SOT status. We performed additional analyses on restricted populations.

Results

We analyzed 28,431 patients: 439 with SOT and sepsis, 281 with SOT without sepsis, 6793 with sepsis and without SOT, and 20918 with neither. The most common SOT types were kidney (475) and liver (163). Despite a higher severity of illness in both sepsis groups, the adjusted sepsis-attributable effect on 28-day mortality for non-SOT patients was 4.1% (3.8, 4.5) and -14.4% (-16.8, -12) for SOT patients. The adjusted SOT effect modification was -18.5% (-21.2, -15.9). The adjusted sepsis-attributable effect for immunocompromised controls was -3.5% (-4.5, -2.6).

Conclusions

Across a large database of patients admitted to ICU’s, the sepsis associated 28-day mortality effect was significantly lower in SOT patients compared to controls.

Bolus versus Continuous Intravenous Delivery of Doxorubicin in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Trial (SARC021/TH CR-406)

PURPOSE

Continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) of doxorubicin (DOX) versus bolus (BOL) may minimize dose-dependent DOX cardiomyopathy, but it is unclear whether this advantage is evident as employed in typical soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment. The impact of administration mode on adverse events (AE) and efficacy were compared using data from a randomized trial of DOX-based therapy (SARC021/TH CR-406).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this post hoc analysis, CIV versus BOL was at discretion of the treating physician. Likelihood of AEs, and objective responses were assessed by adjusted logistic regression. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and adjusted Cox regression.

RESULTS

DOX was administered by BOL to 556 and by CIV to 84 patients. Proportions experiencing hematologic, non-hematologic, or cardiac AEs did not differ by administration mode. Hematologic AEs were associated with age, performance status, and cumulative DOX. Non-hematologic AEs were associated with age, performance status, and cumulative evofosfamide. Cardiac AEs were only associated with cumulative DOX; there was no interaction between DOX dose and delivery mode. PFS and OS were similar (median PFS 6.14 months BOL vs. 6.11 months CIV, P = 0.47; median OS 18.4 months BOL vs. 21.4 months CIV, P = 0.62). PFS, OS, and objective responses were not associated with delivery mode.

CONCLUSIONS

CIV was not associated with superior outcomes over BOL within DOX dosing limits of SARC021. Cardiac AEs were associated with increasing cumulative DOX dose. While not randomized with respect to DOX delivery mode, the results indicate that continued investigation of AE mitigation strategies is warranted.

Randomized, double-blinded phase II study of ketoconazole (keto), hydrocortisone (HC), and anti-PSMA antibody J591 labeled with 177Lu or 111In in patients (pts) with high-risk non-metastatic (met) castration-resistant prostate cancer (M0 CRPC)

LBA21

Background: Up to 1/3 of pts develop biochemical relapse following primary therapy. Many are not cured with salvage local therapy, likely because of undetectable distant disease. PSMA is expressed on most PC and can be targeted by radiolabeled J591. 177Lu is a predominantly β-emitting radionuclide and also has γ emission which allows imaging. 111In is predominantly a γ emitter, also with some auger emission for therapy. Hormonal therapy is effective and may increase PSMA expression and radiosensitize. In this DOD-funded study initiated in the pre-PSMA PET and AR signaling inhibitor era, we hypothesized that 177Lu prolongs 18-month (mo) met-free survival (MFS) more than 111In in pts with high risk, M0 CRPC when targeting PSMA via J591 in combo with keto and HC. Methods: Pts with high-risk M0 CRPC defined by PSA DT < 8 mo and/or absolute PSA > 20 ng/mL and serum testosterone < 50 ng/mL with no evidence of metastatic disease on CT/MRI and bone scan were eligible. Treatment included a minimum 4 week lead-in with keto 400 mg TID and HC 20 mg AM, 10 mg PM (both of which could be continued until unacceptable toxicity or development of mets) and a single infusion of J591 with 2:1 randomization to 177Lu (70 mCi/m2) or 111In (5 mCi) in double-blinded fashion. The final version of the protocol was designed to randomize 55 pts for 80% power to detect a difference in 18-mo MFS with one-sided alpha of 10%. Secondary endpoints include median MFS, PSA response, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: 55 pts with median age 68 (range 52 - 88), 75% prostatectomy, 23% primary radiation, 2% primary ADT; 19% local salvage therapy. Median PSA doubling time 3 mo (range 0.87 – 7.85), median baseline PSA 8.0 (range 1-78). In intent to treat analysis (5 without imaging and 4 lost to follow up by 18 mo), 50% developed mets by 18 mo with 177Lu vs 76% with 111In (p=0.066). Median MFS was 23.8 mo vs 20.8 mo, and biochemical PFS was 18.67 vs 8.87 mo, favoring 177Lu in analyses censoring start of new treatment. Confirmed >50% PSA decline occurred in 82% with 177Lu and 71% with 111In. Grade >3 heme AEs were more common with 177Lu vs 111In, including neutropenia (57% vs 11%, with 1 febrile neutropenia) and thrombocytopenia (77% vs 11%, with 25% vs 6% platelet transfusions), whereas Gr >3 non-heme AEs were less common with 177Lu vs 111In, including abdominal pain (0 vs 11%), ALT increase (3.3% vs 22%), and diarrhea (0 vs 22%). Conclusions: Anti-PSMA mAb J591 with keto/HC when radiolabeled with 177Lu leads to improved 18-month met-free survival vs 111In. Most pts had significant PSA decline with either version of radiolabeled J591 with keto/HC. Hematologic toxicity is more common with 177Lu. This supports the development of anti-PSMA radioimmunotherapy for low volume advanced PC, though the optimal radionuclide and targeting agent is unknown. Clinical trial information: NCT00859781 .

Alliance A032002 (ART): Phase II randomized trial of atezolizumab versus atezolizumab and radiation therapy for platinum-ineligible/refractory metastatic urothelial cancer

TPS589

Background: In patients (pts) with metastatic unresectable urothelial cancer, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care for first-line treatment followed by switch maintenance avelumab if disease control is achieved with chemotherapy. Outside of this setting, single agent immunotherapy is often used in pts that have recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy or are platinum ineligible. Atezolizumab is a PD-L1 inhibitor currently approved for pts that have urothelial cancers expressing positive PD-L1 or pts ineligible for receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Tumor-targeted radiotherapy can generate immune-stimulating effects without immune suppression as was previously thought. Moreover, it has become clear that radiotherapy can induce profound effects on tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment that can enhance or trigger an anticancer immune response. While numerous trials have investigated the abscopal effect, this trial will have specific parameters regarding drug type, radiation dose and administration. Methods: A032002 is a phase 2 trial addressing pts that are platinum ineligible or refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy. 144 pts will be randomized to receive either atezolizumab or atezolizumab and single site radiation therapy. The atezolizumab regimen is 1200 mg every 3 weeks. Administration of radiotherapy will occur to one non-target site (8 Gy x 3) for pts randomized to the atezolizumab + radiotherapy arm. All pts will undergo centralized PD-L1 testing (SP142 monoclonal primary antibody), which can be performed on archival tissue; a new biopsy is only required if no archival tissue is available. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, histologically confirmed metastatic urothelial cancer, having at least one measurable site per RECIST 1.1 to monitor for abscopal response, one site targetable for radiation, and tissue available for PD-L1 testing. The primary endpoint is tumor response within 6 months of randomization. Tumor response is defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the treating physician using RECIST 1.1 criteria. For a one-sided log rank test with a type 1 error rateof 0.10, the study has 90% power to detect a 20% increase in response rate. Key secondary endpoints include tumor response using iRECIST, progression-free survival and overall survival. Quality of life assessments include EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BLM30 and PROMIS-Fatigue. Tissue, urine and blood samples will be collected and biobanked for future correlative science. Enrollment to ART began in December 2021. The study is available for participation at all US NCTN sites with a projected enrollment of 3 years. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. Clinical trial information: NCT04936230 .

A phase I/II dose-escalation study of fractionated 225Ac-J591 for progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients with prior treatment with 177Lu-PSMA

TPS288

Background: As prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted radiotherapy (PSMA-TRT) is now an active standard-of-care treatment in mCRPC, ongoing studies with alternative approaches to targeting PSMA will increasingly need to consider the consequences of sequential PSMA-TRT exposure. Our past and ongoing investigations into antibody-based targeting (e.g., J591) and potent alpha emitting payloads (e.g., 225Ac) impact drug kinetics, biodistribution, and resultant clinical toxicities. In a first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study of 225Ac-J591, patients with mCRPC were treated with a single dose of 225Ac-J591 on seven dose levels, up to 93.3 KBq/kg without achievement of maximal tolerated dose (MTD). One patient treated at 80 KBq/kg developed dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Gr 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia, but 0 of 6 at 93.3 KBq/Kg had Gr > 3 heme toxicity or Gr > 2 non-heme toxicity. Although not intentionally preselected for prior exposure, 55% (12/22) of patients had 177Lu-PSMA previously. With approval of 177Lu vipivotide tetraxetan, we amended an ongoing phase I dose-escalation study to include a post-177-Lu-PSMA cohort. Methods: Entry criteria include progressive mCRPC by PCWG3 criteria, ECOG PS 0-2, intact organ function, and prior receipt of AR pathway inhibitor and chemotherapy (or refused/ineligible). There is no limit to prior lines of therapy except alpha-emitting therapies (i.e., PSMA-TRT, 223Ra) and in this amended dose-escalation cohort, all patients must have had prior treatment with 177Lu-PSMA. Treatment will be given in a single fractionated cycle of 225Ac-J591 administered on D1 and D15. The phase I component is a 3+3 dose-escalation study design with up to 18 patients, with the goal of identifying MTD. The phase II component will include up to 16-19 patients in a Simon 2-stage design with 90% power to exclude the null hypothesis (35% or fewer patients with PSA50). Eligible men with negative PSMA PET scans will be offered treatment with informed consent in an exploratory subgroup but will not be counted towards phase II efficacy. Secondary outcomes include radiographic response by PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1 criteria and PSMA PET, biochemical and radiographic progression-free survival, circulating tumor cell counts, and overall survival. Patient reported outcomes, genomic, and immune analyses are exploratory. Enrollment to the post-177Lu-PSMA cohort began in August 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04506567 .

Radiation therapy and irreversible electroporation for intermediate risk prostate cancer (RTIRE)

TPS403

Background: The objective of the RTIRE clinical trial (NCT05345444) is to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and early oncologic efficacy of combining MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with irreversible electroporation (IRE) for men with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. Methods: Inclusion criteria: 1) Men aged ≥18, 2) ECOG 0 –1, 3) Histologically confirmed intermediate risk prostate cancer per NCCN guidelines, 4) Focal grade group 2 (GG2) or 3 (GG3) cancer in multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) target, 5) Gland size < 80cc, 6) Ability to undergo IRE, 7) Ability to receive MRI-guided SBRT, 8) Ability to complete the HRQOL assessment surveys, 9) Willingness to undergo 12 month follow up biopsy. Exclusion criteria: 1) Prior TURP, 2) Prior history of focal therapy, 3) Prior history of receiving pelvic radiotherapy, 4) Patient with history of inflammatory bowel disease, 5) History of bladder neck or urethral stricture. Study Design/Endpoints: This is a feasibility and safety study assessing the ability to perform IRE followed by real-time MRgSBRT. Subjects will undergo focal IRE followed by MRgSBRT (>6 weeks after IRE) to the prostate +/- seminal vesicles prescribed to 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The primary endpoint of the first portion of the trial is feasibility, defined as at least 80% of subjects (8 of 10 subjects) undergoing assessment at 12-weeks post-IRE and at 6-weeks post-MRgSBRT within 1 year from enrollment of the first subject. The expansion phase will include an additional 40 subjects to assess side effect profile and early oncologic efficacy (n=50) at 12 months post RTIRE. RTIRE has enrolled 8 subjects in 3 months and will proceed to the expansion phase. Secondary endpoints include: 1) short-term safety as measured by treatment-related adverse events, 2) oncologic efficacy as measured by number of subjects with presence of ≥GG2 cancer at 12 months post-RTIRE therapy, 3) health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) 4) post-RTIRE prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics including time to PSA nadir and post-nadir PSA stability, 5) assessment of pre and post-RTIRE mpMRI changes to evaluate the area of necrosis and presence of residual tissue, 6) rates of biochemical and clinical progression and the need for secondary or adjuvant treatment following RTIRE. Clinical trial information: NCT05345444 .

Outcome of Patients With Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Enrolled on Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration (SARC) Phase II Trials

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of prior phase II trials for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) may help develop more suitable trial endpoints in future studies.

METHODS

We analyzed outcomes of patients with recurrent or unresectable/metastatic MPNST enrolled on prior Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC) phase II trials and estimated the progression-free survival (PFS). PFS from SARC006 (NCT00304083), the phase II trial of upfront chemotherapy in chemotherapy naïve patients, was analyzed separately. Impact of baseline enrollment characteristics on PFS was evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (29 male, 35 female, median age 39 years (range 15-81)) with MPNST were enrolled on 1 of 5 trials of single agent or combination therapy that were determined to be inactive. Patients had received a median of 1 (range 0-5) prior systemic therapy, and most had undergone prior surgery (77%) and radiation (61%). Seventy-three percent had metastatic disease at enrollment. Median PFS was 1.77 months (95% CI, 1.61-3.45), and the PFS rate at 4 months was 15%. Greater number of prior systemic therapies and worse performance status were associated with inferior PFS. There was no significant difference in PFS based on age at enrollment, treatment trial, response criteria, presence of metastatic disease, disease site at enrollment, and prior surgery or radiation. In comparison, on the SARC006 trial the PFS rate at 4 months was 94% in 40 patients.

CONCLUSION

These data provide a historical baseline PFS that may be used as a comparator in future clinical trials for patients with MPNST.

A FOXO1-dependent transcription network is a targetable vulnerability of mantle cell lymphomas

Targeting lineage-defined transcriptional dependencies has emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy in cancer treatment. Through screening for molecular vulnerabilities of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), we identified a set of transcription factors (TFs) including FOXO1, EBF1, PAX5, and IRF4 that are essential for MCL propagation. Integrated chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing (ChIP-Seq) with transcriptional network reconstruction analysis revealed FOXO1 as a master regulator that acts upstream in the regulatory TF hierarchy. FOXO1 is both necessary and sufficient to drive MCL lineage commitment through supporting the lineage-specific transcription programs. We further show that FOXO1, but not its close paralog FOXO3, can reprogram myeloid leukemia cells and induce B-lineage gene expression. Finally, we demonstrate that cpd10, a small molecule identified from an enriched FOXO1 inhibitor library, induces a robust cytotoxic response in MCL cells in vitro and suppresses MCL progression in vivo. Our findings establish FOXO1 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy targeting lineage-driven transcriptional addiction in MCL.

Association of Long-term Outcomes With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Resected Brain Metastasis: A Secondary Analysis of The N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group) Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Long-term outcomes of radiotherapy are important in understanding the risks and benefits of therapies for patients with brain metastases.

Objective

To determine how the use of postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with quality of life (QOL), cognitive function, and intracranial tumor control in long-term survivors with 1 to 4 brain metastases.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial included 48 institutions in the US and Canada. Adult patients with 1 resected brain metastases but limited to those with 1 to 4 brain metastasis were eligible. Unresected metastases were treated with SRS. Long-term survivors were defined as evaluable patients who lived longer than 1 year from randomization. Patients were recruited between July 2011 and December 2015, and data were first analyzed in February 2017. For the present study, intracranial tumor control, cognitive deterioration, QOL, and cognitive outcomes were measured in evaluable patients who were alive at 12 months from randomization and reanalyzed in June 2017.

Interventions

Stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Intracranial tumor control, toxic effects, cognitive deterioration, and QOL.

Results

Fifty-four patients (27 SRS arm, 27 WBRT arm; female to male ratio, 65% vs 35%) were included for analysis with a median follow-up of 23.8 months. Cognitive deterioration was less frequent with SRS (37%-60%) compared with WBRT (75%-91%) at all time points. More patients declined by 2 or more standard deviations (SDs) in 1 or more cognitive tests for WBRT compared with SRS at 3, 6, and 9 months (70% vs 22%, 46% vs 19%, and 50% vs 20%, respectively). A 2 SD decline in at least 2 cognitive tests was associated with worse 12-month QOL in emotional well-being, functional well-being, general, additional concerns, and total scores. Overall QOL and functional independence favored SRS alone for categorical change at all time points. Total intracranial control for SRS alone vs WBRT at 12 months was 40.7% vs 81.5% (difference, -40.7; 95% CI, -68.1% to -13.4%), respectively. Data were first analyzed in February 2017.

Conclusions and Relevance

The use of SRS alone compared with WBRT resulted in less cognitive deterioration among long-term survivors. The association of late cognitive deterioration with WBRT was clinically meaningful. A significant decline in cognition (2 SD) was associated with overall QOL. However, intracranial tumor control was improved with WBRT. This study provides detailed insight into cognitive function over time in this patient population.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01372774; ALLIANCE/CCTG: N107C/CEC.3 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology/Canadian Cancer Trials Group).

SPIN-02 LEVERAGING AN MRI-GUIDED LINEAR ACCELERATOR PLATFORM FOR POST-OPERATIVE STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY (SBRT) OF SPINAL METASTASES

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Post-operative spine SBRT presents unique clinical challenges. Spinal hardware produces CT and high-field strength MRI artifacts that obscure visualization of the spinal cord and unresected disease. Existing workflows incorporate additional invasive procedures with CT myelogram and quality control for these procedures can introduce uncertainty into SBRT planning. Reducing metallic imaging artifact with a low-field strength (0.35 T) MRI integrated into a MR-Linac (MRL) may facilitate superior visualization of the spinal cord, improved target delineation and treatment localization. The primary objective is to determine the feasibility of MRL-based simulation workflow to facilitate MR-guided post-operative spine SBRT without the need for CT myelogram or CT-based target delineation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A single-institution, single-arm interventional feasibility study is planned. A total of 10 patients who underwent surgical resection of solid tumor spinal metastases with an indication for post-operative SBRT will be enrolled and undergo radiation planning and treatment on a MRL platform that combines a 6MV Linac and 0.35 T on-board MRI system. Enrolled subjects will undergo CT and MR simulation followed by standard-of-care post-operative spine SBRT and follow-up spine imaging every 3 months.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint is feasibility of MR-guided post-operative spine SBRT without CT myelogram. Feasibility is defined as > 70% of participants with clinically acceptable visualization/delineation as determined by blinded dual neuroradiologist review for clinically acceptable visualization/delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) and target volume(s). Exploratory endpoints involve radiation dosimetry analysis of OARs and target volumes as well as documenting the use of adaptive planning. Radiation site progression-free survival will be recorded at 6-months after SBRT.

CONCLUSION

If feasible, an MRL-based workflow for post-operative spine SBRT represents a patient-centric approach to improve efficiency, minimize treatment delays, and avoid invasive procedures that may improve clinical management of solid tumor spinal metastases.

Abstract 3407: Circulating tumor DNA is associated with response and survival in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma

Previous studies have suggested liquid biopsy may be a useful prognostic biomarker for patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS) but this has never been tested prospectively in a patient cohort receiving uniform therapy. We sought to determine whether the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in samples of patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is associated with objective response or survival. Our cohort consisted of 98 patients treated on the SARC021 trial, an open-label, randomized, phase 3, multicenter trial testing the efficacy of adding evofosfamide to doxorubicin compared to treatment with doxorubicin alone for patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas. Using ultra-low passage whole genome sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA we tested whether detection of ctDNA evaluated prior to the start of therapy and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy were associated with treatment response and outcome. Associations between detection of ctDNA and pathological measures of disease burden were evaluated. Kaplan Meier curves were used to estimate survival in patients with or without detectable ctDNA and the log-rank test was used to estimate the significance of the difference between these two groups. We also tested for an association between disease response, stage and number of metastatic sites with the presence or absence of ctDNA with Fisher’s exact test and with ctDNA levels by Student t test. We found that ctDNA was detectable by ULP-WGS in 49% of patients prior to treatment and in 24.6% patients after two cycles of chemotherapy. Detection of pre-treatment ctDNA was associated with a lower overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.03 - 2.31; p=0.03) and a lower likelihood of objective response (odds ratio [OR] = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.06 - 0.59; p=0.005). After two cycles of chemotherapy, patients who continued to have detectable levels of ctDNA experienced a significantly worse overall survival (HR=1.77; 95% CI: 1 - 3.14; p=0.05) and were unlikely to experience an objective response (OR=0.05; 95% CI: 0 - 0.39; p=0.001). We found that detectable levels of ctDNA prior to the start of treatment was significantly associated with patients who had primary tumors measuring greater than 10 cm (75% versus 28%, respectively; p &lt; 0.001), and had more than 5 sites of metastatic disease (73.9% versus 26.1%, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). Detection of ctDNA is associated with outcome and objective response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced LMS. These results suggest that liquid biopsy assays could be used to inform treatment decisions by recognizing patients who are likely and unlikely to benefit from chemotherapy.Ongoing work focuses on identification of ctDNA features, such as copy-number alterations or changes in ctDNA levels over time, that may also be associated with disease progression or response to therapy.

Citation Format: Laura Madanat-Harjuoja, Kelly Klega, Yao Lu, David S. Shulman, Aaron R. Thorner, Anwesha Nag, William Tap, Denise K. Reinke, Lisa Diller, Karla V. Ballman, Suzanne George, Brian D. Crompton. Circulating tumor DNA is associated with response and survival in patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3407.

Abstract 494: Role of age, BMI, and tumor subtype in racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer survival: A pooled analysis of four Alliance adjuvant clinical trials

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated poorer survival of Black women with breast cancer. We assessed whether race/ethnicity was associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among women with breast cancer enrolled in clinical trials for early-stage breast cancer according to tumor subtype, age, and body mass index (BMI).

Methods: 10,011 women enrolled in one of four adjuvant chemotherapy trials: CALGB 9741, CALGB 49907, CALGB 40101, or NCCTG N9831. 9918 participants had available DFS and/or OS data and were included in the analysis. Cox models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between race/ethnicity and DFS and OS. We compared Non-Hispanic (NH) Black (n=871), Hispanic (n=436), and other race participants (n=283) to NH Whites (n=7889). We assessed associations within strata of age group (&lt;50, 50-&lt;65, or ≥65), tumor subtype (hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-, HR-/HER2+, or HR-/HER2-), and BMI (&lt;25, 25-&lt;30, or ≥30).

Results: In multivariable-adjusted models, NH Black patients under 50 years of age had worse DFS compared to NH White patients (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.62) and worse OS (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07). The differences in DFS and OS persisted in patients ages 50 to &lt;65, though there were no significant differences in DFS or OS between NH Black and NH White patients ages ≥65. Among Hispanic and NH White participants, younger age at diagnosis was associated with greater DFS compared with older age overall while this was not true for NH Black patients. Among patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, NH Black patients when compared to NH White patients had worse DFS (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.70) but there was not a significant difference in OS (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.00-1.83). DFS and OS for other tumor subtypes did not significantly differ by race. Among patients with BMI &lt;25, NH Black patients had significantly worse DFS (HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.25-2.30) and OS (HR:1.76, 95% CI:1.20-2.58) compared to NH White patients. There was no difference in survival between different race/ethnicity groups among individuals with BMI ≥25.

Conclusions: Our results identified subgroups that may contribute to the observed disparities in survival between NH Black and NH White women with early-stage breast cancer. The greatest disparities are among individuals &lt;50 years of age, those with HR+/HER2-, and those with BMI &lt;25. These differences exist even within clinical trial populations with similar initial therapy, suggesting that disparities may be influenced by inequities in survivorship care and long-term treatment, such as endocrine therapy adherence and persistence, and/or differences in tumor or host biology.

Support: U10CA180821 and U10CA180882; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00003088, NCT00005970, NCT00024102, NCT00041119; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org

Citation Format: Marla Lipsyc-Sharf, Karla V. Ballman, Jordan D. Campbell, Hyman B. Muss, Edith A. Perez, Lawrence N. Shulman, Lisa A. Carey, Ann H. Partridge, Erica T. Warner. Role of age, BMI, and tumor subtype in racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer survival: A pooled analysis of four Alliance adjuvant clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 494.

Circulating Tumor DNA Is Associated with Response and Survival in Patients with Advanced Leiomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

We sought to determine whether the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in samples of patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is associated with objective response or survival.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Using ultra-low-passage whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) of plasma cell-free DNA from patients treated on a prospective clinical trial, we tested whether detection of ctDNA evaluated prior to the start of therapy and after two cycles of chemotherapy was associated with treatment response and outcome. Associations between detection of ctDNA and pathologic measures of disease burden were evaluated.

RESULTS

We found that ctDNA was detectable by ULP-WGS in 49% patients prior to treatment and in 24.6% patients after two cycles of chemotherapy. Detection of pretreatment ctDNA was significantly associated with a lower overall survival [HR, 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-2.31; P = 0.03] and a significantly lower likelihood of objective response [odds ratio (OR), 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59; P = 0.005]. After two cycles of chemotherapy, patients who continued to have detectable levels of ctDNA experienced a significantly worse overall survival (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1-3.14; P = 0.05) and were unlikely to experience an objective response (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0-0.39; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that detection of ctDNA is associated with outcome and objective response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced LMS. These results suggest that liquid biopsy assays could be used to inform treatment decisions by recognizing patients who are likely and unlikely to benefit from chemotherapy. See related commentary by Kasper and Wilky, p. 2480.

Randomized phase II/III trial of veliparib or placebo in combination with adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation (Alliance A071102)

2001

Background: PolyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) is an important modulator of DNA repair following temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. Pre-clinical testing demonstrated significant survival benefit for the combination of TMZ and PARP inhibitor veliparib in a subset of GBM pt-derived xenografts with MGMT promoter hypermethylation. Methods: After central pathology review and MGMT testing, patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, MGMT promoter hypermethylated GBM who had completed concurrent radiation and TMZ were randomized to adjuvant therapy with TMZ (Days 1-5 q28 days) combined with either placebo or veliparib (Days 1-7 q28 days). Veliparib/placebo+TMZ treatment was continued for up to 6 cycles. Pts accrued on the phase II and III portions of the trial were included in the primary endpoint analysis of overall survival (OS), with 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.71 using a one-sided log-rank test with type I error rate of 0.05. The planned phase III sample size was 400 pts with data maturity after 302 deaths. Results: The phase II and III portions of the trial were open to accrual from 12/15/2014 to 2/6/2017 and 11/8/2017 to 10/15/2018, respectively; 447 pts were accrued to the trial and used in this intention to treat analysis. The two treatment groups were well balanced for prognostic factors, 421 pts initiated treatment, median follow-up was 57.8 months (mos), 380 pts had disease progression and 335 pts have died. There was no difference in OS (p = 0.15; HR 0.89 (0.71-1.11), median OS 28.1 vs. 24.8 mo. for TMZ+veliparib vs. TMZ+placebo, respectively) and no difference in secondary endpoint progression free survival (PFS, p = 0.31; HR 1.05 (0.86-1.30), median 13.2 vs. 12.1 mo, respectively). There was a notable trend for extended OS with TMZ+veliparib treatment at intermediate time-points between 24 and 42 mos (3-year OS 36.6% vs. 28.9% with TMZ+placebo, p = 0.09). In an unplanned exploratory analysis, treatment with TMZ at the time of first recurrence was associated with extended post-recurrence OS (p = 0.03) for pts treated on the experimental arm; median post-recurrence OS with TMZ salvage was 17.0 mo in the TMZ+veliparib arm and 12.6 mo in the TMZ+placebo arm, as compared to 9.6 mo in either arm if TMZ salvage was not used. These data are consistent with a possible effect of veliparib limiting the emergence of TMZ resistance in a subset of GBM pts. Conclusions: Veliparib combined with adjuvant TMZ therapy was not associated with significant extension in OS or PFS in newly diagnosed, MGMT hypermethylated GBM pts. However, a subset of pts treated with TMZ+veliparib may have an extended survival following re-treatment with TMZ at first recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT02152982.

MAIN-CAV: Phase III randomized trial of maintenance cabozantinib and avelumab versus avelumab after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) (Alliance A032001)

TPS4607

Background: First-line platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance avelumab (Av) is the current preferred standard of care in patients (pts) with mUC who do not progress after platinum-based chemotherapy. There is an unmet need to further improve outcomes by combining Av with an effective, non-cross resistant therapy with non-overlapping toxicity. Cabozantinib (CABO) is an oral inhibitor of MET, VEGFR and TAM family receptors involved in tumor growth, angiogenesis and immune cell regulation and has shown efficacy in UC in combination with PD-1/PD-1L1 inhibitors. We hypothesize that CABO-Av combination will be synergistic in pts with mUC with an acceptable safety profile and will improve upon the benefit seen with Av maintenance in mUC. Methods: MAIN-CAV is a phase III randomized, multicenter, international trial for locally advanced/mUC pts (including N3 only disease) who do not progress after 4-6 cycles of any platinum-based chemotherapy (gem-cis, gem-carbo, MVAC or ddMVAC). 654 adult pts will be randomized 1:1 within 3-10 weeks (wk) after last dose of chemotherapy to receive Av 800 mg IV every 2 wk or combination of Av and CABO 40 mg orally daily for up to 2 yrs. Key eligibility criteria include ECOG PS 0-1, no prior use of immunotherapy (exception of BCG), no central nervous system metastases, no major surgery within 4 wk, no uncontrolled hypertension or cardiovascular disorders. Pts will be stratified based on 1) best response to 1L therapy: complete response vs partial response vs stable disease and 2) presence or absence of visceral metastases. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) with assumptions of one-sided alpha of 0.025, power of 80%, median OS of 21 months (mo) on Av arm and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, thus hypothesizing a median OS of 28 mo on CABO-Av combination arm. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, tolerability, and activity of CABO-Av compared to Av alone based on RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST criteria and PD-L1 status of pts’ tumors. Quality of life (QOL) will be assessed using EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-Fatigue 4a, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BLM30 between pts on CABO-avelumab vs avelumab alone. Biomarkers of response and resistance to Av will be assessed using baseline archival tissues, baseline and serial blood, ctDNA, stool and urine. Imaging studies will test correlation of established and new radiomic signatures with OS, adverse events and QOL and incorporate both radiologic and biologic features to predict outcomes. This trial would be the first to systematically address whether adding a multitargeted TKI, CABO to Av leads to improved clinical outcomes compared to Av alone. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171,U10CA180863 (CCTG); Clinical trial information: NCT05092958.

Association of DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations (mts) and clinical outcomes in CALGB 90601 (Alliance)

4521

Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard 1st-line therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). C90601 was a randomized phase III trial testing gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with bevacizumab (B) or placebo (P) in patients (pts) with untreated mUC. Median overall survival (OS) for GCB vs GCP was 14.5 months (mo) vs 14.3 mo (p=0.14) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 vs 6.7 mo, respectively. DDR mts have been implicated in response and survival in mUC and were investigated in this negative trial. Methods: C90601 enrolled 506 pts randomized 1:1 to GCB or GCP from 7/15/09-12/2/14, with stratification for prior chemotherapy and visceral metastases. Consenting pts submitted archival FFPE tumor specimens and blood for matched germline (g)DNA. Tumor and gDNA were sequenced by MSK-IMPACT, a 468-gene exon capture assay, to detect mts in select DDR genes. The proportional hazards model was used to correlate mts in the DNA helicase ERCC2 (pre-specified hypothesis) and additional DDR gene panels being explored in prospective trials in muscle-invasive disease with OS and PFS, adjusting for tumor mt burden and stratification factors. Mts were categorized as deleterious (del) or non-del using pre-defined published criteria. Results: 208 pts underwent DNA sequencing. Clinical features and PFS/OS were comparable to the 506-pt cohort. Median sequencing coverage was 497X. Median mutation count was 13.2 and 8.8 for DDR mt and wild-type tumors, respectively. A non-significant improvement in OS and PFS was seen in pts with ERCC2 mts (HR 0.70), but the 5.3% frequency of ERCC2 mts was lower than in historical series. Neither del mts (table) nor any mts in DDR genes were associated with PFS/OS. Conclusions: DDR mts were not associated with improved outcomes in C90601. The reliance on archival specimens, lower-than-expected ERCC2 mt frequency, small sample sizes, and tumor genomic heterogeneity may have influenced the predictive capacity of DDR mts in this cohort. Similar analyses are underway in pts who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to cystectomy from completed prospective trials. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, Genentech.[Table: see text]

Association between molecular subtype membership or hypoxia-associated gene expression signatures and clinical outcomes in the CALGB 90601 (Alliance) phase 3 clinical trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) plus bevacizumab (B) or placebo (P)

4562

Background: Our previous work showed that basal tumors were associated with the best clinical outcomes in a Phase 2 clinical trial of neoadjuvant dose-dense MVAC plus B, and in other work we showed that basal tumors were enriched with hypoxia-associated gene expression signatures. Here we attempted to validate these findings in the C90601 Phase 3 clinical trial of GC plus B versus GC plus P. Methods: Whole transcriptome RNAseq was performed on all available tumors using Ion Torrent’s Ampliseq platform (n = 189). Tumors were assigned to molecular subtypes using 3 different classifiers - BASE47 (k=2), MDA oneNN (k=3), and the Consensus classifier (k=6). Tumor hypoxia signature enrichment was determined using 2 different gene expression signatures and gene set variation analysis (GSVA). The proportional hazards model was used to correlate molecular subtype calls and hypoxia signature enrichment with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) adjusting for stratification factors and treatment arm (for PFS). Results: The median OS & PFS by different signatures and the hazard ratios (HR) are presented in the Table. Conclusions: Predefined signatures associated with clinical benefit in the Phase-2 neoadjuvant clinical trial were not associated with benefit in C90601. Possible explanations include the lack of strong therapeutic effects of the treatments, potential heterogeneity (“subtype plasticity”) between the profiled tissue samples and the metastatic lesions under treatment pressure, and differences in biology associated with the disease states (muscle-invasive vs advanced/metastatic disease). Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, Department of Defense (CA160312), Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00942331. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of KN046 in patients with thymic carcinoma who failed immune checkpoint inhibitors

TPS8607

Background: Thymic carcinomas are the most aggressive form of thymic epithelial tumors. They are often not operable and are more resistant to chemotherapy than thymomas. Thymic carcinoma is sensitive to pembrolizumab. However, most patients who respond to pembrolizumab eventually recur. Recently, molecules that combine PD(L)1 and CTLA-4 have been developed for solid tumor patients, with the hope that targeted therapy will be more effective than standard of care. KN046 is a bi-specific antibody against PD-L1 and CTLA-4 with a much higher affinity of the anti-PD-L1 portion and a weaker affinity for anti-CTLA-4, potentially leading to less autoimmune disorders and toxicities. We developed a Phase II study to test the hypothesis that dual PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibition with KN046 may represent a safe and tolerable option for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who have progressed on prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include thymic carcinoma with progression after treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor with no limit to prior lines of therapy, adequate organ function and performance status. History of prior or current autoimmune disorders are not allowed and history of baseline positive anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibody are not allowed. KN046 will be administered intravenously at 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or excessive toxicity for up to 2 years. A cycle is defined as 2 treatments (28 days). The primary objective is to evaluate the antitumor activity of KN046 in patients with thymic carcinoma as measured by overall response rate defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. The secondary objectives are to assess the safety and tolerability of KN046 including safety as measured by the number of adverse events (CTCAE 5.0), duration of response (RECIST 1.1) from first documented response to the date of first documented disease progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory objectives include the association of biomarkers (PD-L1 expression, tumor immune microenvironment determined by multiplex IHC, tumor mutational burden, T-cell inflamed gene expression profile) and clinical efficacy parameters. We will also characterize the safety laboratory results (AChR autoantibodies and creatinine kinase) and the occurrence of adverse events of interest. Simon’s two-stage design will be used. The null hypothesis that the true response rate is 5% will be tested against a one-sided alternative of target response rate ≥20%. In the first stage, 10 patients will be accrued. If there are no responses in the first stage, then the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 19 additional patients will be accrued for a total of 29 patients. The null hypothesis will be rejected if ≥4 responses are observed in 29 patients, with a type 1 error rate of 0.05 and power of 80%. The study was activated at Weill Cornell Medicine in December 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04925947.

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with bladder preservation for those patients whose tumors harbor deleterious DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations (Alliance A031701)

TPS4615

Background: While a standard approach to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) management involves neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC), up to 50% of pts recur with metastatic disease. Moreover, removal of the bladder has a significant impact on pts’ quality of life. Pathologic downstaging to non-muscle-invasive disease (<pT2) or complete response (pT0) at RC is associated with long-term survival benefit. Somatic DDR gene alterations were shown to be enriched in pts who were pT0 at RC following NAC in multiple retrospective analyses. We hypothesize that MIBC pts with somatic loss-of-function alterations within specific DDR genes and clinical responses to NAC can be uniquely managed with a bladder-sparing approach consisting of close cystoscopic and radiographic surveillance, avoiding the toxicities of definitive local therapy. Methods: A031701 is a multicenter phase II trial that will enroll 271 pts with T2-T4aN0/xM0 MIBC diagnosed within 60 days prior to enrollment. Multifocal MIBC, tumors >5 cm by cystoscopic assessment, and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-refractory disease (beyond standard induction and maintenance) are not allowed. Intravesical chemotherapy is allowed. Pts must be eligible for cisplatin chemotherapy. Eligible pts will receive either standard dose or dose dense gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (investigator’s choice) with simultaneous genetic sequencing of pre-treatment transurethral resection specimens. Pts whose tumors contain deleterious alterations in any 1 of 9 pre-selected DDR genes ( ERCC2, ERCC5, BRCA1, BRCA2, RECQL4, RAD51C, ATM, ATR, and FANCC) and who exhibit <T1 response on clinical restaging are eligible for organ-sparing management. Pts without deleterious DDR gene alterations or with >T1 disease after NAC will undergo RC or chemoradiation therapy (investigator/patient choice). The primary endpoint is 3-year event-free survival in DDR-altered pts who undergo bladder sparing, defined as the proportion of pts without BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive recurrences, any >T2 recurrences, or any metastatic recurrences. Secondary endpoints include clinical response rate (<cT1) in patients with deleterious DDR gene alterations following NAC, bladder-intact survival, overall survival, pT0 rate in DDR-altered pts who elect to undergo RC, pT0 rate in pts without DDR gene alterations, 3-year RC rate in pts with DDR gene alterations, and proportion of pts undergoing intravesical management for in-bladder recurrences. The study opened for enrollment in September 2018. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. Clinical trial information: NCT03609216.

Measurement of endocrine activity (SET2,3) related to prognosis and prediction of benefit from dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) cancer: CALGB 9741 (Alliance)

505

Background: We investigated the clinical utility of SET2,3, a novel biomarker designed to measure to endocrine sensitivity. SET2,3 measures nonproliferative hormone receptor-related transcription (SETER/PR) adjusted for a baseline prognosis index derived from tumor size, nodes involved and a 4-gene molecular subtype (RNA4). CALGB 9471 is a seminal phase III study that showed improved DFS and OS from 2-weekly dose-dense (DD) vs 3-weekly chemotherapy in ER-negative cancers. Risk of recurrence (ROR-PT) score (intrinsic subtype, proliferation score and tumor size) measured by Nanostring assay was reported to be prognostic in CALGB 9741, but did not predict benefit from DD chemotherapy. Methods: SET2,3 was performed using an aliquot of 200-300 ng RNA (residual from prior ROR-PT testing) from 682 ER+ tumor samples and tested using the QuantiGene Plex bead-based hybridization assay (ThermoFisher, Luminex). We report results for the primary and two secondary objectives of the NCI/CTEP-approved correlative science proposal CSC0154) to evaluate SET2,3 in CALGB 9741 for prognosis (primary endpoint: 95%CI for 5-year (yr) DFS > 75% for High SET2,3 using the predefined prognostic cutpoint 2.10), SET2,3 prognostic independence from ROR-PT, and prediction of outcome according to chemotherapy regimen. We used Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for prognosis and comparison with ROR-PT results (using c-indices) and for prediction according to chemotherapy schedule using an interaction term (prespecified significance level for interaction: p < 0.10). Results: The study met its primary endpoint with a 5-yr DFS of 85.6% (95%CI 81.3-90.2) in the High-SET subset (244/613, 40%). High-SET vs Low-SET was significantly associated with favorable outcomes at 5 yr (DFS 85.6% vs 69%, p <.0001; OS 95.3% vs 84.6%, p <.0001) and 10 yr (DFS 77.7% vs 58.2%, p <.0001; OS 86.9% vs 65.9%, p <.0001). PAM50 ROR-PT and SET classification were available for 596 tumors. In multivariate models for DFS and OS, SET2,3 remained an independent prognostic variable for DFS (SET high vs low HR = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.34 – 0.63, p < 0.0001; PAM50 ROR-PT high vs low HR = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.91 – 1.64, p = 0.18) and for OS (SET high vs low HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.25 – 0.53, p < 0.0001; PAM50 ROR-PT high vs low HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.91 – 1.75, p = 0.16). Similar observations were seen in models including SET and PAM50 ROR-PT as continuous variables. Lower SET2,3 values predicted improved outcomes from DD vs 3-weekly chemotherapy (interaction p=0.0998 for DFS, 0.042 for RFS and 0.027 for OS). This was unrelated to menopausal status and lower SET2,3 values favored DD concurrent treatments. Conclusions: SET2,3 index was strongly prognostic, independent of ROR-PT, and predicted survival benefit from DD chemotherapy in pre- and postmenopausal women with ER+ cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00003088.

Evolving Role of Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Kidney and Urothelial Cancers

The role of adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma is rapidly evolving. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved sunitinib and pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting for renal cell carcinoma and nivolumab for urothelial carcinoma based on disease-free survival benefit. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration held a joint workshop with the National Cancer Institute and the Society of Urologic Oncology in 2017 to harmonize design elements, including eligibility and radiologic assessments across adjuvant trials in renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Considerations from the discussion at these workshops led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to draft guidances to help inform subsequent adjuvant trial design for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Patient-centered decision-making is crucial when determining therapeutic choices in the adjuvant setting; utility functions can be used to help quantify each patient's goals, values, and risk/benefit trade-offs to ensure that the decision regarding adjuvant therapy is informed by their preferences and the evolving outcomes data.

Characterizing COPD Symptom Variability in the Stable State Utilizing the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD Instrument

RATIONALE

It has been suggested that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience considerable daily respiratory symptom fluctuation. A standardized measure is needed to quantify and understand the implications of day-to-day symptom variability.

OBJECTIVES

To compare standard deviation with other statistical measures of symptom variability and identify characteristics of individuals with higher symptom variability.

METHODS

Individuals in the SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcome Measures In COPD Study (SPIROMICS) Exacerbations sub-study completed an Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) daily questionnaire. We calculated within-subject standard deviation (WS-SD) for each patient at week 0 and correlated this with measurements obtained 4 weeks later using Pearson's r and Bland Altman plots. Median WS-SD value dichotomized participants into higher versus lower variability groups. Association between WS-SD and exacerbation risk during 4 follow-up weeks was explored.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Diary completion rates were sufficient in 140 (68%) of 205 sub-study participants. Reproducibility (r) of the WS-SD metric from baseline to week 4 was 0.32. Higher variability participants had higher St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (47.3 ± 20.3 versus 39.6 ± 21.5, p=.04) than lower variability participants. Exploratory analyses found no relationship between symptom variability and health care resource utilization-defined exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

WS-SD of the E-RS can be used as a measure of symptom variability in studies of patients with COPD. Patients with higher variability have worse health-related quality of life. WS-SD should be further validated as a measure to understand the implications of symptom variability.

A randomized phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (A011502): The Aspirin after Breast Cancer (ABC) Trial

360922

Background: In-vitro and in-vivo evidence suggests that aspirin may have an anti-tumor effect. Multiple epidemiologic studies have reported improved breast cancer survival among regular aspirin users compared to non-users. Pooled data from randomized trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease have also reported a decreased risk of metastatic cancer among aspirin users. Thus, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the true benefits and risks of adjuvant aspirin therapy for breast cancer survivors. Methods: The primary objective was to compare the effect of 300 mg aspirin daily versus placebo upon invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients with high-risk, HER2-negative breast cancer. Secondary objectives included effects on overall survival, cardiovascular disease, toxicity, and adherence. Eligible participants included patients aged 18-70 diagnosed with a primary invasive HER2-negative breast cancer. If hormone receptor (HR)–positive, tumors needed to be node positive and diagnosed within the past 10 years. If HR negative, tumors could be node positive or T2-4N0 and diagnosed within the past 18 months. Participants were randomly selected (1:1) to aspirin 300 mg versus placebo daily for 5 years in a double-blinded fashion. Stratification factors include HR status (positive vs. negative), body mass index (< or ≥ 30 kg/m2), and stage (II vs. III). Based upon an accrual goal of 2,936 patients to reach 381 iDFS events, the study was estimated to have 80% power to detect HR 0.75. Results: From January 2017 to December 2020, 3,021 participants were enrolled. Treatment arms were well balanced in terms of key characteristics. In November 2021, the Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended that the trial be unblinded because the stratified hazard ratio had crossed a pre-specified futility boundary. After 191 iDFS events (aspirin: 107, placebo: 84) and median follow-up of 20 months, the stratified hazard ratio comparing aspirin to placebo was 1.27 (z-score: -1.64), which is greater than the pre-specified hazard ratio of futility 1.03 (z-score < -0.192). There was no difference in the frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events by study arm. Compliance was high and similar across arms. Non-protocol use of aspirin/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was similar across arms and less than 14%, consistent with prior randomized aspirin trials. Updated results on iDFS events will be provided at presentation. Conclusions: In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, there was no benefit in breast cancer invasive disease-free survival with the addition of 300 mg aspirin daily. Although inflammation may still play a role in cancer progression, aspirin is not recommended for prevention of breast cancer recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT02927249.

Phase I/II trial of pembrolizumab and AR signaling inhibitor +/- 225Ac-J591 for chemo-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

TPS216

Background: The role of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in prostate cancer remains undefined outside of the subset with mismatch repair. Several studies have suggested that ICI combined with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) or kinase inhibitors may result in improved and/or more durable response in a proportion of men with mCRPC. While not yet proven, addition of external beam radiation to ICI may improve outcomes (for instance Kwon et al Lancet Oncol 2014, Fizazi K et al, Eur Urol 2020). PSMA targeted therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 improves survival in men with CRPC, has been combined with ICI in early phase studies, and we have previously demonstrated the benefit of PSMA targeted therapy using radiolabeled mAb J591. PSMA-targeted alpha-emitters have a very high potency and the potential to generate immune response. Based upon i) ARSI may increase PSMA expression, ii) ARSI may radiosensitize tumors, iii) ARSI resistance may lead to increased PD-L1 expression, and iv) alpha emitters may generate an immune response, we hypothesize that the addition of an alpha-emitting radionuclide (225Ac) targeting prostate cancer (i.e PSMA+ tumors targeted with J591) will lead to double-stranded DNA breaks, cell death, and subsequent release of neoantigens, and thus will increase the response proportion to pembrolizumab plus ARSI resulting in more durable response. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include progressive mCRPC by PCWG3 on at least 1 prior AR pathway inhibitor and no prior chemotherapy for mCRPC. A phase I dose-finding study will first test safety of the triplet combination of pembrolizumab, an ARSI of physician choice, and 2 different doses of 225Ac-J591 (one with minimal and one with moderate single-agent toxicity). Following determination of the optimal dose, a randomized phase II trial will treat subjects with a fixed dose of pembrolizumab 400 mg every 6 weeks (for up to 2 years) plus a standard ARSI (until progression or intolerance) with or without 225Ac-J591. The primary endpoint of the study will test the hypothesis that the addition of a PSMA-targeted alpha emitter increases the composite of RECIST measurable disease, PSA, and CTC count response to immuno-hormonal therapy with 90% power. Key secondary clinical endpoints include 1-year progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival. Exploratory objectives include assessment of immunogenic cell death, immune serologic and host microbiome changes, plasma ctDNA, serial PSMA PET, and patient reported outcomes (FACT-P, BPI, EQ-5D-5L). The phase I portion of this DOD-funded study was activated in summer 2021 with the randomized phase II portion expected to open at PCCTC sites in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04946370.

Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an adaptive, single-centre, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the most common complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with extended in-hospital stay and increased adverse outcomes, including death and stroke. Pericardial effusion is common after cardiac surgery and can trigger atrial fibrillation. We tested the hypothesis that posterior left pericardiotomy, a surgical manoeuvre that drains the pericardial space into the left pleural cavity, might reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

In this adaptive, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing elective interventions on the coronary arteries, aortic valve, or ascending aorta, or a combination of these, performed by members of the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery from Weill Cornell Medicine at the New York Presbyterian Hospital in New York, NY, USA. Patients were eligible if they had no history of atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias or contraindications to the experimental intervention. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and using a mixed-block randomisation approach (block sizes of 4, 6, and 8), to posterior left pericardiotomy or no intervention. Patients and assessors were blinded to treatment assignment. Patients were followed up until 30 days after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the incidence of atrial fibrillation during postoperative in-hospital stay, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02875405, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 18, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 3601 patients were screened and 420 were included and randomly assigned to the posterior left pericardiotomy group (n=212) or the no intervention group (n=208; ITT population). The median age was 61·0 years (IQR 53·0-70·0), 102 (24%) patients were female, and 318 (76%) were male, with a median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2·0 (IQR 1·0-3·0). The two groups were balanced with respect to clinical and surgical characteristics. No patients were lost to follow-up and data completeness was 100%. Three patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group did not receive the intervention. In the ITT population, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the posterior left pericardiotomy group than in the no intervention group (37 [17%] of 212 vs 66 [32%] of 208 [p=0·0007]; odds ratio adjusted for the stratification variable 0·44 [95% CI 0·27-0·70; p=0·0005]). Two (1%) of 209 patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group and one (<1%) of 211 in the no intervention group died within 30 days after hospital discharge. The incidence of postoperative pericardial effusion was lower in the posterior left pericardiotomy group than in the no intervention group (26 [12%] of 209 vs 45 [21%] of 211; relative risk 0·58 [95% CI 0·37-0·91]). Postoperative major adverse events occurred in six (3%) patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group and in four (2%) in the no intervention group. No posterior left pericardiotomy related complications were seen.

INTERPRETATION

Posterior left pericardiotomy is highly effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after surgery on the coronary arteries, aortic valve, or ascending aorta, or a combination of these without additional risk of postoperative complications.

FUNDING

None.

Alliance A011801 (compassHER2 RD): postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer

This report describes the rationale, purpose and design of A011801 (CompassHER2 RD), an ongoing prospective, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial. Eligible patients in the United States (US) and Canada with high-risk (defined as ER-negative and/or node-positive) HER2-positive (HER2+) residual disease (RD) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 and placebo, versus T-DM1 and tucatinib. Patients have also received adjuvant radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy, if indicated per standard of care guidelines. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1 plus tucatinib is superior to iDFS with T-DM1 plus placebo; other outcomes of interest include overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Correlative biomarker, quality of life (QoL) and pharmacokinetic (PK) end points are also evaluated.

The Feasibility of Radiation Therapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: An Initial Report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance) Trial

Purpose:

Historically, multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) has been a contraindication to breast-conserving therapy. We report the feasibility of radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving therapy in MIBC from the Alliance Z11102 trial.

Methods and Materials:

Delineation of targets and organs at risk was performed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group contouring consensus definitions. RT was delivered to the whole breast to 45 to 50 Gy in standard daily fractions of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy. A boost of 10 to 16 Gy in 2.0-Gy daily fractions to each tumor bed was mandatory.

Results:

A total of 236 eligible patients were enrolled in the study between July 23, 2012 and August 19, 2016. Of those, 195 (83%) completed RT. No patient underwent mastectomy for failure to meet the RT dose constraints. Higher absolute boost volume was associated with increased incidence of grade 2 or higher dermatitis (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.041.41; P = .014). Higher relative boost volume as a percentage of the overall breast volume was not associated with increased dermatitis. Neither absolute nor relative boost volume appeared to significantly influence overall cosmesis.

Conclusions:

Breast conservation followed by whole breast RT plus boost to each tumor bed was feasible in the majority of patients with MIBC. Increasing radiation boost volume was associated with increased incidence of acute dermatitis, but was not associated with worse overall cosmesis.

A011801 (CompassHER2 RD): Postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer

TPS595

Background: Patients (pts) with HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) and invasive residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have a higher risk of relapse than pts with a pathologic complete response (pCR). Post neoadjuvant T-DM1 has improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), but pts with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or nodal RD have suboptimal outcomes and recurrences in the central nervous system are a problem. More effective treatment strategies are needed. The CompassHER2 trials, EA1181 and A011801, leverage pCR to tailor post neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ EBC. EA1181 is a NAT de-escalation trial of a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) in clinical stage II-III HER2+ EBC; pts with a pCR complete HP +/- adjuvant radiation (RT) +/- endocrine therapy (ET). A011801 is an escalation trial for pts with high risk HER2+ RD after NAT, examining addition of the HER2 selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) tucatinib to adjuvant T-DM1. Methods: Eligibility and Intervention: Pts. with high-risk HER2+ RD (e.g. ER-,node-positive, or both) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1+ placebo (pb), vs. T-DM1 and tucatinib with adjuvant RT +/- ET. Eligibility criteria include completion of ≥ 6 cycles of NAT, including ≥ 9 weeks of T and H +/- P. All chemotherapy (CT) must be completed preoperatively unless participating in EA1181 (̃15-30% enrollees); these pts must receive postoperative CT to complete ≥ 6 cycles prior to enrollment on A011801. Pts who received prior HER2-targeted TKIs or antibody-drug conjugates are ineligible. Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if iDFS is higher with addition of T-DM1 to tucatinib in pts with HER2+ EBC with RD after NAT; secondary endpoints include overall survival, breast cancer free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, brain metastases-free survival and disease-free survival. Correlative objectives include the association of i) tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) levels in the primary tumor and RD with iDFS, ii) TILs with tucatinib benefit, iii) iDFS and circulating tumor cells (CTC) at serial timepoints and iv) the magnitude of benefit of tucatinib (iDFS) in pts with/without detectable pretreatment CTCs. Quality of life and pharmacokinetic endpoints will also be evaluated. Statistics: A011801 is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase III superiority trial; stratified by i) receipt of postoperative CT (Y/N), ii) hormone receptor-status (+/-),and iii) pathologic lymph node status (+/-). The study targets an absolute difference of 5% in iDFS (control vs. experimental arm 82% & 87%, HR = 0.7), with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. The sample size is 981; target accrual = 1031 pts; activation and completion dates are 01/6/21 and ̃ 01/2028. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Seagen Inc; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04457596 Clinical trial information: NCT04457596.

P10015/SARC033: A phase 2 trial of trametinib in patients with advanced epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE)

11503

Background: EHE is a rare vascular cancer arising in liver, lung, soft tissue and bone. The natural history of metastatic disease varies considerably from indolent growth over years to rapid growth with fatal outcome in months. Treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic EHE with antiangiogenic therapy induces tumor response in a minority of pts, and median PFS is 6-12 months. TAZ-CAMTA1 translocation results in activation of MAPK pathway and is an oncogenic driver in EHE. We sought to evaluate the effect of MEK inhibition using trametinib in pts with unresectable EHE. Methods: A phase 2 trial of trametinib 2 mg daily was conducted in pts with EHE though the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network supported by NCI in collaboration with SARC. Additional support was provided by the EHE Rare Cancer Charity and the EHE Foundation. Pts had to have evidence of objective tumor progression or EHE-related pain requiring narcotics for relief prior to enrollment. Presence of TAZ-CAMTA1 translocation was analyzed by fusion-FISH after enrollment. Primary trial endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1 with at least 1 objective response required in the 1st 13 pts to expand enrollment to 27. The trial was amended after stage 1 to continue enrollment to 27 pts with TAZ-CAMTA1 detected by FISH with goal of >4 objective responses in this group. Secondary objectives were PFS and OS rates, safety and change in pt-reported global health and pain scores per PROMIS questionnaires. Results: 43 pts were enrolled between 6/2017 – 9/2020 across 10 sites and 41 started therapy. TAZ-CAMTA1 fusion was detected in 26, not detected in 7, test failed in 5 and was not performed due to insufficient tumor in 5. Median pt age was 54 (range 22-81 yrs) and 11 were >65 yrs; 25 were female; ECOG was 0 in 23, 1 in 16 and 2 in 3 pts. Most pts experienced reduction in tumor size. ORR per RECIST was 7% (3/41); in pts with TAZ-CAMTA1 detected, the ORR was 0% (0/26). Mean pain intensity and interference scores had a statistically significant improvement and global quality of life scores did not statistically change after 4 weeks of therapy. 17 pts remained on treatment > 6 months and 7 > 12 months. 25 pts stopped trametinib due to EHE progression, 6 died during treatment, 6 withdrew from treatment, 3 stopped drug due to adverse event and 1 is on treatment. The most common AEs related to trametinib were rash, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, alopecia and edema; Grade >3 AEs included anemia, dyspnea, hypoxia, hypotension, syncope and dermatitis. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective clinical study focused on pts with EHE. Although the trial did not meet the ORR goal, stable disease > 6 months was seen in 40% of pts, and EHE-related pain improved on treatment. Trametinib was associated with expected cutaneous and GI adverse effects. Additional pt-reported outcomes and biomarkers of inflammation are undergoing analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT03148275.

Open label phase II trial of cabozantinib (cabo) in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and known amplifications or activating mutations in gene targets who have received prior anti-androgen therapy

TPS5095

Background: Despite a variety of therapy classes extending survival in mCRPC – and excepting select population eligible for PARP inhibitors – no molecularly selected drugs are FDA approved in mCRPC. Previously, cabo, an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases ( e.g. MET, VEGFRs 1-3, RET, KIT, TRKB, FLT-3, AXL, TIE-2), was evaluated in phase III trials (COMET-1, COMET-2) in mCRPC. Despite initial promising results, particularly in bone scan responses and rPFS benefit, further application of cabo in mCRPC was halted after improvement in OS was not observed. It is unclear why prolonged rPFS in COMET-1 (vs. prednisone) did not translate into improved OS. Previous failures may reflect inclusion of relatively cabo-insensitive tumors due to an unselected population with regard to presumed cabo activity. Given that mCRPC specimens from our precision medicine cohort have increased expression of target genes MET and KIT, and qualifying genomic alterations (amplifications, activating mutations) are reported in ̃15% of a publicly-available mCRPC cohort, we developed this rationally-designed study. We predict a molecularly-defined mCRPC cohort will identify the population that most benefits from cabo therapy, as reflected by prolonged rPFS and OS, and more frequent PSA declines and CTC conversions. Methods: We have activated a phase II non-randomized, open label trial designed to evaluate treatment response and survival of patients with mCRPC who harbor evidence of increased signaling of the targets of cabo. Study population will have progressed on an ARSI; prior taxane therapy in castration-sensitive PC or CRPC (beyond 12 mos) will be eligible. Molecular eligibility: DNA (tumor or cfDNA) evidence of amplification or activating mutation in selected targets of cabo. Alternatively, IHC confirming high expression (2 or 3+) via CLIA-approved assay is allowed. Overexpression via RNAseq, validated by CLIA-approved IHC, is permitted. All patients will receive 40 mg/d of cabo, with dose-reductions allowed (to 20 mg/d, then 20 mg EOD). Repeat biopsy after 3 weeks on treatment is mandated. Primary endpoint is rPFS. Using median of 5.6 mos (COMET-1) to guide our H0 (50% rPFS rate at 6 mo), the H1 is ≥75% rPFS at 6 mo. Sample size (30) provides 90% power with one-sided alpha of 0.05 via chi-square test. Secondary endpoints include PSA decline by PCWG3, objective radiographic response proportion, OS, and CTC response rate. Exploratory studies will include serial evaluation of cfDNA (via PCF-SELECT); immune tumor microenvironment response via on-treatment biopsy and collection of plasma for circulating immune markers; and exploration of baseline and on-treatment tumor genomic alterations. This trial is multicentered via the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC c20-254). Clinical trial information: NCT04631744.

Neoadjuvant durvalumab with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-centre, randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Previous phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer have reported major pathological response rates in the range of 15-45%. Evidence suggests that stereotactic body radiotherapy might be a potent immunomodulator in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this trial, we aimed to evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC as an immunomodulator to enhance the anti-tumour immune response associated with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab.

METHODS

We did a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial, comparing neoadjuvant durvalumab alone with neoadjuvant durvalumab plus stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, at NewYork-Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medical Center (New York, NY, USA). We enrolled patients with potentially resectable early-stage NSCLC (clinical stages I-IIIA as per the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer) who were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either neoadjuvant durvalumab monotherapy or neoadjuvant durvalumab plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (8 Gy × 3 fractions), using permuted blocks with varied sizes and no stratification for clinical or molecular variables. Patients, treating physicians, and all study personnel were unmasked to treatment assignment after all patients were randomly assigned. All patients received two cycles of durvalumab 3 weeks apart at a dose of 1·12 g by intravenous infusion over 60 min. Those in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group also received three consecutive daily fractions of 8 Gy stereotactic body radiotherapy delivered to the primary tumour immediately before the first cycle of durvalumab. Patients without systemic disease progression proceeded to surgical resection. The primary endpoint was major pathological response in the primary tumour. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02904954, and is ongoing but closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 25, 2017, and Sept 15, 2020, 96 patients were screened and 60 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the durvalumab monotherapy group (n=30) or the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group (n=30). 26 (87%) of 30 patients in each group had their tumours surgically resected. Major pathological response was observed in two (6·7% [95% CI 0·8-22·1]) of 30 patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group and 16 (53·3% [34·3-71·7]) of 30 patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group. The difference in the major pathological response rates between both groups was significant (crude odds ratio 16·0 [95% CI 3·2-79·6]; p<0·0001). In the 16 patients in the dual therapy group with a major pathological response, eight (50%) had a complete pathological response. The second cycle of durvalumab was withheld in three (10%) of 30 patients in the dual therapy group due to immune-related adverse events (grade 3 hepatitis, grade 2 pancreatitis, and grade 3 fatigue and thrombocytopaenia). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in five (17%) of 30 patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group and six (20%) of 30 patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group. The most frequent grade 3-4 events were hyponatraemia (three [10%] patients in the durvalumab monotherapy group) and hyperlipasaemia (three [10%] patients in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group). Two patients in each group had serious adverse events (pulmonary embolism [n=1] and stroke [n=1] in the durvalumab monotherapy group, and pancreatitis [n=1] and fatigue [n=1] in the durvalumab plus radiotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths or deaths within 30 days of surgery were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Neoadjuvant durvalumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy is well tolerated, safe, and associated with a high major pathological response rate. This neoadjuvant strategy should be validated in a larger trial.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Final report from Intergroup NCCTG 86-72-51 (Alliance): a phase III randomized clinical trial of high-dose versus low-dose radiation for adult low-grade glioma

BACKGROUND

The optimal radiation dose for adult supratentorial low-grade glioma is unknown. The aim of this study was to provide a final update on oncologic and cognitive outcomes of high-dose versus low-dose radiation for low-grade glioma.

METHODS

Between 1986 and 1994, 203 patients with supratentorial low-grade glioma were randomized (1:1) to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions versus 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions after any degree of resection.

RESULTS

For all patients, median overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.2-10.8). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 years (95% CI: 4.3-6.6). Median follow-up is 17.2 years for the 33 patients still alive. High-dose radiation did not improve 15-year OS (22.4%) versus low-dose radiation (24.9%, log-rank P = 0.978) or 15-year PFS (high dose, 15.2% vs low dose, 9.5%; P = 0.7142). OS was significantly better for patients with preoperative tumor diameter <5 cm and baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) >27 and who underwent gross total resection. PFS was improved for patients with oligodendroglioma versus astrocytoma, preoperative tumor diameter <5 cm, patients who had gross total resection, and patients with baseline MMSE >27. For patients who had normal MMSE at baseline, at 7 years only 1 patient (5%) had a clinically significant decrease in MMSE from the previous time point, with the remainder (95%) stable. None had decrease in MMSE at 10, 12, or 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up indicates no benefit to high-dose over low-dose radiation for low-grade gliomas. Cognitive function appeared to be stable after radiation as measured by MMSE.

CODEL: phase III study of RT, RT + TMZ, or TMZ for newly diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma. Analysis from the initial study design

BACKGROUND

We report the analysis involving patients treated on the initial CODEL design.

METHODS

Adults (>18) with newly diagnosed 1p/19q World Health Organization (WHO) grade III oligodendroglioma were randomized to radiotherapy (RT; 5940 centigray ) alone (arm A); RT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) (arm B); or TMZ alone (arm C). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), arm A versus B. Secondary comparisons were performed for OS and progression-free survival (PFS), comparing pooled RT arms versus TMZ-alone arm.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were randomized equally. At median follow-up of 7.5 years, 83.3% (10/12) TMZ-alone patients progressed, versus 37.5% (9/24) on the RT arms. PFS was significantly shorter in TMZ-alone patients compared with RT patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.26, 7.69; P = 0.014). Death from disease progression occurred in 3/12 (25%) of TMZ-alone patients and 4/24 (16.7%) on the RT arms. OS did not statistically differ between arms (comparison underpowered). After adjustment for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status (mutated/wildtype) in a Cox regression model utilizing IDH and RT treatment status as covariables (arm C vs pooled arms A + B), PFS remained shorter for patients not receiving RT (HR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.31, 8.45; P = 0.011), but not OS ((HR = 2.78; 95% CI: 0.58, 13.22, P = 0.20). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 25%, 42%, and 33% of patients (arms A, B, and C). There were no differences between arms in neurocognitive decline comparing baseline to 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

TMZ-alone patients experienced significantly shorter PFS than patients treated on the RT arms. The ongoing CODEL trial has been redesigned to compare RT + PCV versus RT + TMZ.

Association of plasma mitochondrial DNA with COPD severity and progression in the SPIROMICS cohort

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of mechanism-driven, clinically relevant biomarkers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Mitochondrial dysfunction, a proposed disease mechanism in COPD, is associated with the release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), but plasma cell-free mtDNA has not been previously examined prospectively for associations with clinical COPD measures.

METHODS

P-mtDNA, defined as copy number of mitochondrially-encoded NADH dehydrogenase-1 (MT-ND1) gene, was measured by real-time quantitative PCR in 700 plasma samples from participants enrolled in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) cohort. Associations between p-mtDNA and clinical disease parameters were examined, adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, and for informative loss to follow-up.

RESULTS

P-mtDNA levels were higher in participants with mild or moderate COPD, compared to smokers without airflow obstruction, and to participants with severe COPD. Baseline increased p-mtDNA levels were associated with better CAT scores in female smokers without airflow obstruction and female participants with mild or moderate COPD on 1-year follow-up, but worse 6MWD in females with severe COPD. Higher p-mtDNA levels were associated with better 6MWD in male participants with severe COPD. These associations were no longer significant after adjusting for informative loss to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this study, p-mtDNA levels associated with baseline COPD status but not future changes in clinical COPD measures after accounting for informative loss to follow-up. To better characterize mitochondrial dysfunction as a potential COPD endotype, these results should be confirmed and validated in future studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01969344 (SPIROMICS).

Periodontal dysbiosis associates with reduced CSF Aβ42 in cognitively normal elderly

INTRODUCTION

Periodontal disease is a chronic, inflammatory bacterial dysbiosis that is associated with both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down syndrome.

METHODS

A total of 48 elderly cognitively normal subjects were evaluated for differences in subgingival periodontal bacteria (assayed by 16S rRNA sequencing) between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker groups of amyloid and neurofibrillary pathology. A dysbiotic index (DI) was defined at the genus level as the abundance ratio of known periodontal bacteria to healthy bacteria. Analysis of variance/analysis of covariance (ANOVA/ANCOVA), linear discriminant effect-size analyses (LEfSe) were used to determine the bacterial genera and species differences between the CSF biomarker groups.

RESULTS

At genera and species levels, higher subgingival periodontal dysbiosis was associated with reduced CSF amyloid beta (Aβ)42 (P = 0.02 and 0.01) but not with P-tau.

DISCUSSION

We show a selective relationship between periodontal disease bacterial dysbiosis and CSF biomarkers of amyloidosis, but not for tau. Further modeling is needed to establish the direct link between oral bacteria and Aβ.

Factors Associated with Nodal Pathologic Complete Response Among Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results of CALGB 40601 (HER2+) and 40603 (Triple-Negative) (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

De-escalation of axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) requires careful patient selection. We seek to determine predictors of nodal pathologic complete response (ypN0) among patients treated on CALGB 40601 or 40603, which tested NAC regimens in HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), respectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 760 patients with stage II-III HER2+ or TNBC were analyzed. Those who had axillary surgery before NAC (N = 122), or who had missing pretreatment clinical nodal status (cN) (N = 58) or ypN status (N = 41) were excluded. The proportion of patients with ypN0 disease was estimated for those with and without breast pathologic complete response (pCR) according to pretreatment nodal status.

RESULTS

In 539 patients, the overall ypN0 rate was 76.3% (411/539) to 93.2% (245/263) in patients with breast pCR and 60.1% (166/276) with residual breast disease (RD) (P < 0.0001). For patients who were cN0 pretreatment, the ypN0 rate was 88.8% (214/241), 96.3% (104/108) with breast pCR, and 82.7% (110/133) with RD. For patients who were cN1, 66.2% (157/237) converted to ypN0, 91.7% (111/121) with breast pCR and 39.7% (46/116) with RD. For patients who were cN2/3, 65.6% (40/61) converted to ypN0, 88.2% (30/34) with breast pCR and 37.0% (10/27) with RD. On multivariable analysis, only pretreatment clinical nodal status and breast pCR/RD were associated with ypN0 status (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast pCR and pretreatment nodal status are predictive of ypN0 axillary nodal involvement, with < 5% residual nodal disease among cN0 patients who experience breast pCR. These findings support the incorporation of axillary surgery de-escalation strategies into NAC trials.

PDIGREE: An adaptive phase III trial of PD-inhibitor nivolumab and ipilimumab (IPI-NIVO) with VEGF TKI cabozantinib (CABO) in metastatic untreated renal cell cancer (Alliance A031704)

TPS366

Background: First-line treatment of mRCC has rapidly changed to include IPI-NIVO or CABO, with clinical benefit of each based on the Checkmate 214 and CABOSUN (A031203) trials. Combination immunotherapy with VEGF therapies has shown benefit over sunitinib in the JAVELIN 101 and KEYNOTE 426 trials. It is yet unclear which patients (pts) benefit most from combination immunotherapy-VEGF inhibitors, and the optimal sequence of drugs. Methods: In an adaptive, randomized, multicenter phase III trial (Alliance A031704, PDIGREE), pts start treatment with induction IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks. Key inclusion criteria include clear cell mRCC, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate or poor risk, Karnofsky performance status >70, and no prior treatments for mRCC. Based on 3-month radiographic assessment (after completing IPI-NIVO combination), pts with complete responses (CR) undergo maintenance NIVO 480 mg IV every 4 weeks; pts with progression of disease (PD) switch to CABO 60 mg oral daily; pts with non-CR/non-PD are randomized to NIVO 480 mg IV every 4 weeks versus NIVO 480 mg IV every 4 weeks with CABO 40 mg oral daily. Randomization is stratified by IMDC risk criteria and presence of bone metastases. The primary endpoint of the study is overall survival (OS). We hypothesize that 3-year OS will improve to 70% for NIVO-CABO compared to 60% for NIVO alone; to achieve 85% power with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and exponential distribution, 696 patients will be randomized. Accounting for 30% patients with either CR or PD, and 5% dropout from toxicity, up to 1046 pts will be enrolled. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, 12-month CR rate, overall response rate based on RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST criteria, and toxicity profiles. Quality of life will be assessed based on the FKSI-19, PROMIS-fatigue, and EQ5D-5L questionnaires. Biomarkers associated with CR, tissue-based and plasma-based biomarkers will be assessed. Updated enrollment through January 2021 will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03793166 .